Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (11) : 1690-1711     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01690
Meta-Analysis |
Meta-analysis on CBM for anxiety disorder: effect sizes, moderators and mediation
REN Zhihong1,2,3; LAI Lizu1,2; YU Xianglian4; LI Songwei5; RUAN Yijun1,6; ZHAO Lingbo1
(1 School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China) (2 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, TN 38111, USA) (4 International College of Chinese School, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350108, China) (5 The Guidance Center of Students Development, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100101, China) (6 Department of Psychology, BeiJing Normal University, Beijing 100101, China)
Download: PDF(761 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The current update meta-analysis focused on the effect sizes of Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) for anxiety disorder, and explored the potential moderators by subgroup analysis and hierarchical meta-regression. To understand the mechanism of CBM, mediation analysis by two-stage structural equation method (TSSEM) integrating meta-analysis and structural equation method is applied. The results demonstrate that (1) CBM may have small effects on anxiety symptom reduction at the risk of publication bias; however, CBM can modify cognitive bias better with a medium effect size. (2) The type of intervention, training environment, publication year and impact factor moderate the effect size of CBM on post-training anxiety. Training environment and the type of anxiety disorder are moderators of the effect size on cognitive bias. (3) Cognitive bias is the partial mediator by which CBM may have an influence on anxiety symptom.

Keywords Cognitive bias modification      anxiety disorder      Meta-analysis      mediation     
Corresponding Authors: ZHAO Lingbo, E-mail: zlb@fzu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 November 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
REN Zhihong; LAI Lizu; YU Xianglian; LI Songwei; . Meta-analysis on CBM for anxiety disorder: effect sizes, moderators and mediation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science,2016, 24(11): 1690-1711.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01690     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I11/1690
[1] SHI Guochun, ZHANG Lihua, FAN Huiyong.  The relationship between aggression and self-esteem: A Meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1274-1288.
[2] YUAN Bo, DONG Yue, LI Weiqiang.  The trust repair effect of apology: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1103-1113.
[3] XIANG Mingqiang; ZHANG Liwei; ZHANG Apei; YANG Hongying. The influence of ego depletion on sporting performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 570-585.
[4] CHEN Lijun; JIANG Jie; REN Zhihong; YUAN Hong. A meta-analysis of preference for sexual dimorphism of male’s face[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 553-569.
[5] WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; XIE Heping; LIU Huashan. Is pedagogical agent in multimedia learning good for learning? A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 12-28.
[6] GAO Shuang; ZHANG Xiangkui. A meta-analysis on effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1358-1367.
[7] QI Yafei; MO Shuliang. Active mediation of parents in the use of media in children and adolescents[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1290-1299.
[8] DING Fengqin; LU Zhaohui. Association between empathy and prosocial behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[9] LI Yanqing; REN Zhihong; JIANG Guangrong. Meta-analysis on the mental health of the Chinese policemen of public security organization[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 692-706.
[10] WANG Fuxing; XIE Heping; LI Hui. Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 335-350.
[11] REN Zhihong; XIE Fei; YU Xianglian; SU Wenliang; CHEN Lijun; ZHAO Lingbo. A meta-analysis of self-help cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: Efficacy, influential factors and the quality of evidence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 173-195.
[12] DENG Xiaoping; LUO Xiuwen; WU Yuzhen. The mediating effect of parental involvement between family socioeconomic status and academic performance: Meta-analysis structural equation modeling[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1844-1853.
[13] SHA Jingying; ZHANG Xiangkui. A cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in Chinese college students’ self-esteem: 1993~2013[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1712-1722.
[14] DUAN Jin-Yun; ZHANG Chen; XU Yue. A meta-analysis of the relationship between demographic characteristics and employee voice behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1568-1582.
[15] LI Li; ZHOU Xin; GUO Liping. Working memory and mathematics learning: A meta-analysis in early childhood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1556-1567.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech