Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (3) : 335-350     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00335
Meta-Analysis |
Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning
WANG Fuxing1; XIE Heping1; LI Hui2
(1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education;
School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
(2 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
Download: PDF(446 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The modality effect in multimedia learning showed that learning outcomes were enhanced if words were presented in an audial format with pictures, rather than a visual format (see Mayer, 2009). However, research on the reverse modality effect indicated a totally opposite result (e.g. Crooks, Cheon, Inan, Ari, & Flores, 2012; Tabbers, Martens, & van Merriënboer, 2004). A meta-analysis based on 91 empirical studies was conducted to investigate the effect of text modality on both retention and transfer tests. After pooling data preliminarily, ninety-four independent effect sizes (8088 participants) were finally included in retention-related meta-analysis while 83 independent effect sizes (6664 participants) in transfer-related meta-analysis. The results suggested that participants who learned from narration outperformed those who learned from visual text both on retention test (dretention = 0.24) and transfer test (dtransfer = 0.25) with different effect sizes from Ginns’s (2005). Further moderator analyses indicated that modality effect on learning outcomes was significantly moderated by the pace of presentation, dynamism of pictures and duration of learning materials. Specifically, the modality effect occurred mainly in conditions of system-paced presentation (dretention = 0.43, dtransfer = 0.44), dynamic pictures (dretention = 0.50, dtransfer = 0.59) and short learning materials (dretention = 0.38, dtransfer = 0.33). All of the results didn’t reveal a reverse modality effect. The replicated strong modality effect suggested that performance on recall and comprehension tasks was better when words and pictures were presented in a dual modality, rather than a single one, which supported Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML). Moreover, the pace of presentation, dynamism of pictures and duration of learning materials should be considered as vital boundary conditions of modality effect.

Keywords modaity effect      reverse modality effect      boundary condition      multimedia learning      meta-analysis     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Fuxing, E-mail: fxwang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 March 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Fuxing
XIE Heping
LI Hui
Cite this article:   
WANG Fuxing,XIE Heping,LI Hui. Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 335-350.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00335     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I3/335
[1] SHI Guochun, ZHANG Lihua, FAN Huiyong.  The relationship between aggression and self-esteem: A Meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1274-1288.
[2] YUAN Bo, DONG Yue, LI Weiqiang.  The trust repair effect of apology: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1103-1113.
[3] CHEN Lijun; JIANG Jie; REN Zhihong; YUAN Hong. A meta-analysis of preference for sexual dimorphism of male’s face[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 553-569.
[4] XIANG Mingqiang; ZHANG Liwei; ZHANG Apei; YANG Hongying. The influence of ego depletion on sporting performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 570-585.
[5] LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
[6] WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; XIE Heping; LIU Huashan. Is pedagogical agent in multimedia learning good for learning? A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 12-28.
[7] GAO Shuang; ZHANG Xiangkui. A meta-analysis on effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1358-1367.
[8] DING Fengqin; LU Zhaohui. Association between empathy and prosocial behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[9] XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; WANG Yuxin; An Jing. Does Harder-to-Read mean Better-to-Learn? Effects of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1077-1090.
[10] SUN Jianmin; WANG Honglei. The potential mechanisms involved in the negative effect of high performance work system[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1091-1106.
[11] LI Yanqing; REN Zhihong; JIANG Guangrong. Meta-analysis on the mental health of the Chinese policemen of public security organization[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 692-706.
[12] REN Zhihong; XIE Fei; YU Xianglian; SU Wenliang; CHEN Lijun; ZHAO Lingbo. A meta-analysis of self-help cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: Efficacy, influential factors and the quality of evidence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 173-195.
[13] DENG Xiaoping; LUO Xiuwen; WU Yuzhen. The mediating effect of parental involvement between family socioeconomic status and academic performance: Meta-analysis structural equation modeling[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1844-1853.
[14] REN Zhihong; LAI Lizu; YU Xianglian; LI Songwei; . Meta-analysis on CBM for anxiety disorder: effect sizes, moderators and mediation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1690-1711.
[15] SHA Jingying; ZHANG Xiangkui. A cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in Chinese college students’ self-esteem: 1993~2013[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1712-1722.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech