Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (2) : 228-241     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00228
Regular Articles |
Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables
LIU Yanli1; LU Guizhi1; LIU Yong2
(1 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China)
(2 Mental Health Education and Counseling Center, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 150047, China)
Download: PDF(458 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Personal need for structure is referred to be an individual’ s prefer or need to the simple structure, clarity things and environments, which naturally is a kind of motive and desire, and could be manifested by simplifying complex information or in an order and well-structured cognitive processing way. There are individual differences in the personal need for structure. Individuals with higher personal need for structure scores are especially likely to simplify complex information and environments, understand and structure their worlds in unambiguous, simple representations or descriptions, thus to reduce cognitive resources’ expenditure and consumption, improve the efficiency of cognitive manipulation and maintain internal stability of cognitive and behavioral tendency. This article is to synthesize the current theoretical foundation and conceptual development on the personal need for structure, and introduce two main measurements (PNS-12 scale, PNS-11 scale) and related researches, which are presented according to antecedent variables, consequent variables of the personal need for structure. The future research is proposed to make a thorough inquiry on the concept and structure, improve the research methods, develop more effective measuring tools, explore the mechanisms and conduct the indigenization researches of the personal need for structure.

Keywords personal need for structure      factor structure      theory of lay-epistemology      antecedents      consequences     
Corresponding Authors: LU Guizhi, E-mail: luzi0451@sina.com   
Issue Date: 15 February 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Yanli
LU Guizhi
LIU Yong
Cite this article:   
LIU Yanli,LU Guizhi,LIU Yong. Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 228-241.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00228     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I2/228
[1] LI Haidong; DUAN Jinyun; ZENG Kai. The concept, antecedents and consequences of loyalty to supervisor[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 133-144.
[2] SUN Jianmin; ZHANG Yejun. Presenteeism in the Workplace: A New Topic in Organization and Management Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 654-668.
[3] HU Shaonan; WANG Yong. Concept, Measurements, Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1975-1984.
[4] ZHANG Tian;DING Xuechen;WENG Jing;FU Hong;XUE Yan. Does Forgiveness Increase or Reduce the Possibility of Further Offenses: The Discussion about the Consequences of Forgiveness Based on the Perspective of Offender[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 104-111.
[5] CHEN Juan;ZHENG Yong. Structures and Functions of Time-Personality[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 896-904.
[6] YUAN Qing-Hong,;CHEN Wen-Chun. Concept, Measurement and Related Constructs of Job Embeddedness[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 941-946.
[7] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. Research on Perceived Supervisor Support: Review and Prospect[J]. , 2008, 16(02): 340-347.
[8] Wei Jun;Cheng ZhongYuan;Zhang Mian. Principal Theories, Measurement and Relevant Variables of Organizational Identification[J]. , 2007, 15(06): 948-955.
[9] Ling Li;LuChangqin. A Review of the Research on Psychological Empowerment[J]. , 2007, 15(04): 652-658.
[10] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. A Review of the Research on Work/Job Engagement[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 366-372.
[11] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. A Review of the Research on Collective Efficacy in I/O Psychology[J]. , 2006, 14(06): 924-931.
[12] Zhou Mingjian,Bao Gongmin. A Review of Supervisory Commitment Theory[J]. , 2005, 13(03): 356-365.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech