Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (8) : 1480-1488     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01480
Regular Articles |
Embodiment in Moral Judgment
YE Hongyan1; ZHANG Fenghua1,2
(1 School of Psychology, Key Laboratory of Psychology and Cognition Science of Jiangxi, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China) (2 Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou 310015, China)
Download: PDF(246 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Moral judgment is a kind of evaluation and judgment about certain types of behaviors which individuals make to distinguish good from evil and right from wrong. With the rise of embodied cognition theory, the studies of embodiment in moral judgment are subsequently carried out. Researchers on embodiment in moral judgment mainly focus on three aspects, namely physical cleanliness and disgust, physical temperature and body movement. Researchers explain embodied effect in moral judgment from the perspective of Psychological Development proposed by Piaget and Vygotsky respectively, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. Considering the fact that physical variables can influence moral judgment through emotion and cognition, future research should integrate embodied approach of moral judgment with existed theories of moral judgment. And researchers should make clear of the relationship between embodiment in moral judgment and moral intuition. Future research should further explore the timeliness and dynamic, discuss the relevant moderator variables and individual differences, and make cross-cultural comparisons under the perspective of embodied effect.

Keywords moral judgment      embodied cognition      morality      conceptual metaphor      moral intuition     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Fenghua,   
Issue Date: 15 August 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
YE Hongyan
ZHANG Fenghua
Cite this article:   
YE Hongyan,ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHANG Yinhua,LI Hong,WU Yin. The application of computational modelling in the studies of moral cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055.
[2] Wenhua YU,Zhongyi LU. A new perspective on the cognitive function of gestures: The “spatializing” gesture hypothesis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 426-433.
[3] Suhong XIONG,Hongjie SUN,Ji LU,Qi YAO,Quancheng ZHANG. Eating behavior from the perspective of embodied cognition: Based on the mental simulation approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 486-496.
[4] LI Ying,ZHANG Can,WANG Yue. The effect of moral emotions on the metaphorical mapping of morality and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[5] RAO Tingting,YU Feng,ZHOU Aiqin,XU Liying,YANG Shenlong. Does religious priming make people better?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 926-936.
[6] XU Liying,YU Feng,ZHOU Aiqin,YANG Shenlong,DING Xiaojun. Cuteness: Perceptions and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 689-699.
[7] ZHAN Ze,WU Baopei. Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 128-140.
[8] CHEN Lin,TIAN Xiaoming,DUAN Jinyun. The cognitive mechanism of advice taking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[9] Xukai ZHANG,Hang YIN,Peng LI,Hong LI. The effect of oxytocin on social decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1438-1449.
[10] Yu YAN,Tong LI. An analysis of the reverse mechanism how the victim turn into an instigator on workplace incivility[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1307-1318.
[11] LI Heng. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[12] LU Hong, ZHANG Xinyuan, WEI Wenqi, LIU Yi.  The influence of spatial physical order on psychology and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[13] Chuanjun LIU,Jiangqun LIAO. An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2260-2271.
[14] Xiaomeng HU,Feng YU,Kaiping PENG. How does culture affect morality? The perspectives of between-culture variations, within-culture variations, and multiculturalism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2081-2090.
[15] LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech