Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (9) : 1677-1685     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01677
Regular Articles |
Risk Perception Based on Climate Change
ZHANG Hui; XU Fuming; LI Bin; LUO Hanbing; ZHENG Qiuqiang
(Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education (CCNU); School of Psychology, Central China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China)
Download: PDF(150 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Risk perception based on climate change refers to an objective understanding and subjective feelings of climate change in life, which has been a hot topic in researches of risk perception. The purposes of present paper are to review previous research findings, and then provide directions for future researches in this field. Specifically, psychological mechanisms handling risk perception based on climate change include the psychometric paradigm and two system theory. Evidences show risk perception based on climate change could be mediated by gender, age, knowledge, experience, emotion, world view and so on. Further researches are expected to focus on deepening our understanding of its psychological theories and determinants, as well as expanding its application values to group.
Keywords risk perception      climate change      the psychometric paradigm      two systems theory     
Corresponding Authors: XU Fuming   
Issue Date: 15 September 2013
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
XU Fuming
LI Bin
LUO Hanbing
ZHENG Qiuqiang
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Hui,XU Fuming,LI Bin, et al. Risk Perception Based on Climate Change[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1677-1685.
URL:     OR
[1] Xiaokang LYU, Hongzhi LIU, Chunye FU. Risk perception of medical information[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1307-1324.
[2] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[3] XIANG Peng; GENG Liuna; ZHOU Kexin; CHENG Xiao. Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 691-700.
[4] LI Kai; GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong. Public risk perception of terror attacks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 358-369.
[5] LI Aimei; TAN Lei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; Pan Jiyang. The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 804-814.
[6] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[7] LU Ya;YIN Keli;QIAN Limei;SHEN Nan. The Psychological Impacts of Climate Change and Coping Strategy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 1016-1024.
[8] Chen Yi-Wen;Ma Ji-Wei. E-commerce Consumers Purchase Decision and Its Influencing Factors[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 27-34.
[9] Zhang Shuoyang,Chen Yiwen,Wang Erping. RISK PERCEPTION IN CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY[J]. , 2004, 12(02): 256-263.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech