Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (2) : 235-242     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00235
Regular Articles |
The Mechanism of Why Self-control Resources and Cognitive Resources Influence Each Other: An Integrated Model
LI Jianbin
(Department of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Download: PDF(186 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Although self-control resources and cognitive resources are considered as independent, recent research has documented that these two types of resources are mutually influencing each other. Previous study explains this phenomenon in the framework of executive control, but it fails to provide how these resources affect executive control, and leads to some neglect of the neural mechanism and the moderating variables of self-control resources depletion. To have a more systematic understanding why self-control resources and cognitive resources influence each other, the author put forward an integrated model which addresses that: (1) the major reason of why these two resources mutually influence is because they are both coordinated by a same higher psychological function (i.e. executive control) and by a same neural structure (i.e. the prefrontal cortex); (2) decreased blood glucose level, mental fatigue and declined motivation reduce the activation of prefrontal cortex; (3) lower activation of prefrontal cortex undermines the functions of executive control on subsequent self-control and cognitive tasks; (4) by increasing the endurance towards fatigue, supplementing blood glucose and triggering motive can help prefrontal cortex maintain its activation level, facilitating executive control on subsequent tasks, which finally retains subsequent self-control and high-level cognitive performances. Future study should focus on the relations of self-control resources and other information processing, verify a possible mediating model of prefrontal cortex playing between the two sequential tasks with dynamic cognitive neuroscience approaches, and investigate the neural mechanism of the moderating variables of self-control resources.
Keywords self control resources      cognitive resources      executive control      self control      mental fatigue      motivation      prefrontal cortex     
Corresponding Authors: LI Jianbin   
Issue Date: 15 February 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Jianbin
Cite this article:   
LI Jianbin. The Mechanism of Why Self-control Resources and Cognitive Resources Influence Each Other: An Integrated Model[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 235-242.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00235     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I2/235
[1] GAO Fan, WANG Pei.  The relationship among the individual self, the relational self and the collective self: Based on the motivational and cognitive perspectives[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1208-1217.
[2] ZHANG Tengxiao, HAN Buxin.  Red is more sexy: Factors and evolutional process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1069-1076.
[3] YANG Ziyan; LUO Yu; GU Ruolei; LIU Yunzhi; CAI Huajian. Self-esteem and brain: A social neuroscience approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 788-798.
[4] WANG Tong; YANG Qing; HUANG Xiting. The double-edged effect and mechanism of episodic future thinking on goal attainment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 846-856.
[5] PAN Zhe; GUO Yongyu; XU Buxiao; YANG Shenlong. Agency, Communion and their relationship in personality research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 99-110.
[6] GAO Shuang; ZHANG Xiangkui. A meta-analysis on effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1358-1367.
[7] LI Xuejiao; ZOU Zhiling. The application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of substance dependence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1398-1408.
[8] ZHANG Dongmei; LU Haidong; ZU Yatong. Expertise reversal effect from a cognitive load perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 501-509.
[9] LIU Chen-Ling; WANG Yun. Client Motivation: An Integration of Theory and Practice in Counseling and Psychotherapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 261-269.
[10] HUANG Wenqiang; YANG Shasha; YU Ping. Neural mechanisms of risky decision-making based on rodent research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1767-1779.
[11] JING Xiujuan; WANG Yifeng. The Relationships among Attention Networks and Their Psychological and Physiological Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1531-1539.
[12] YANG Ying; KOU Yu. Individuals’ Well-Being in Prosocial Interaction: The Role of Autonomy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1226-1235.
[13] XIA Mu; LI Xueliu; LI Hong;Yang Ke. The Relationship between Left Frontal and Approach Motivation Process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 815-821.
[14] LI Yang; BAI Xinwen. Creating for Others: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Intrinsic Motivation and Prosocial Motivation on Creativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 175-181.
[15] LENG Bingbing; WANG Xiangling; GAO Heming; LI Fuhong. Cognitive and Emotional Activities of Guilt and the Corresponding Brain Network[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2064-2071.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech