Lost radiance: Negative influence of parental gender bias on women’s workplace performance

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01148

ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B

Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1148-1159.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01148

• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles

Lost radiance: Negative influence of parental gender bias on women’s workplace performance

XU Minya¹, LIU Beini²(), XU Zhenyu³

¹Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
²Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
³Shandong Women’s Federation, Shandong Jinan 250001, China

Published:2023-07-25 Online:2023-04-21
Contact: LIU Beini E-mail:liubeini@btbu.edu.cn

Abstract

XU Minya, LIU Beini, XU Zhenyu. (2023). Lost radiance: Negative influence of parental gender bias on women’s workplace performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(7), 1148-1159.

Variables	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Only Child	0.62	0.49
2. Hukou	0.79	0.41	0.35^*
3. Mother’s education level	4.09	1.50	0.32^*	0.41^*
4. Mother’s employment	0.90	0.30	0.16^*	0.11	0.16^*
5. Father’s education level	4.37	1.60	0.33^*	0.34^*	0.73^*	0.13
6. Mother’s gender bias	2.29	1.11	?0.05	?0.01	?0.10	?0.03	?0.04	(0.95)
7. Father’s gender bias	2.54	1.28	?0.05	?0.01	0.00	?0.13	?0.01	0.66^*	(0.94)
8. Self-esteem	4.89	1.07	0.02	?0.01	?0.02	0.04	0.02	?0.20^*	?0.19^*	(0.93)
9. Career compromise	3.21	0.89	?0.02	0.02	?0.02	0.07	?0.07	0.27^*	0.11	?0.37^*	(0.91)
10. Perceived gender discrimination at work	5.24	1.33	?0.01	?0.00	?0.04	?0.09	?0.07	0.12	0.10	?0.22^*	0.26^*	(0.92)
11. In-role performance	5.05	1.03	0.04	0.04	0.01	0.06	0.04	?0.13	?0.10	0.54^*	?0.44^*	?0.35^*	(0.89)
12. Creativity	4.87	1.17	0.07	0.09	0.02	?0.00	0.09	?0.12	?0.11	0.43^*	?0.40^*	?0.29^*	0.48^*	(0.95)

Variables	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Only Child	0.62	0.49
2. Hukou	0.79	0.41	0.35^*
3. Mother’s education level	4.09	1.50	0.32^*	0.41^*
4. Mother’s employment	0.90	0.30	0.16^*	0.11	0.16^*
5. Father’s education level	4.37	1.60	0.33^*	0.34^*	0.73^*	0.13
6. Mother’s gender bias	2.29	1.11	?0.05	?0.01	?0.10	?0.03	?0.04	(0.95)
7. Father’s gender bias	2.54	1.28	?0.05	?0.01	0.00	?0.13	?0.01	0.66^*	(0.94)
8. Self-esteem	4.89	1.07	0.02	?0.01	?0.02	0.04	0.02	?0.20^*	?0.19^*	(0.93)
9. Career compromise	3.21	0.89	?0.02	0.02	?0.02	0.07	?0.07	0.27^*	0.11	?0.37^*	(0.91)
10. Perceived gender discrimination at work	5.24	1.33	?0.01	?0.00	?0.04	?0.09	?0.07	0.12	0.10	?0.22^*	0.26^*	(0.92)
11. In-role performance	5.05	1.03	0.04	0.04	0.01	0.06	0.04	?0.13	?0.10	0.54^*	?0.44^*	?0.35^*	(0.89)
12. Creativity	4.87	1.17	0.07	0.09	0.02	?0.00	0.09	?0.12	?0.11	0.43^*	?0.40^*	?0.29^*	0.48^*	(0.95)

	Self-esteem	Career compromise	.In-role performance	Creativity
Only Child	0.04	0.02	0.01	0.10
	(0.33)	(0.21)	(0.09)	(0.64)
Hukou	0.01	0.03	0.09	0.24
	(0.07)	(0.24)	(0.79)	(1.32)
Mother’s education level	?0.04	0.01	?0.01	?0.07
	(?0.76)	(0.28)	(?0.19)	(?0.87)
Mother’s employment	0.08	0.27	0.09	?0.06
	(0.54)	(1.44)	(0.80)	(?0.31)
.Father’s education level	0.02	?0.05	?0.01	0.05
	(0.54)	(?1.12)	(?0.28)	(0.82)
Parents’ gender bias	?0.16^**	0.11	0.04	0.02
	(?2.89)	(1.77)	(1.02)	(0.29)
Perceived gender discrimination at work			?0.12^**	?0.15^**
			(?2.95)	(?2.86)
Self-esteem		?0.39^***	0.48^***	0.45^**
		(?4.06)	(5.46)	(3.45)
Career compromise			?0.28^**	?0.44^***
			(?3.44)	(?3.69)

	Self-esteem	Career compromise	.In-role performance	Creativity
Only Child	0.04	0.02	0.01	0.10
	(0.33)	(0.21)	(0.09)	(0.64)
Hukou	0.01	0.03	0.09	0.24
	(0.07)	(0.24)	(0.79)	(1.32)
Mother’s education level	?0.04	0.01	?0.01	?0.07
	(?0.76)	(0.28)	(?0.19)	(?0.87)
Mother’s employment	0.08	0.27	0.09	?0.06
	(0.54)	(1.44)	(0.80)	(?0.31)
.Father’s education level	0.02	?0.05	?0.01	0.05
	(0.54)	(?1.12)	(?0.28)	(0.82)
Parents’ gender bias	?0.16^**	0.11	0.04	0.02
	(?2.89)	(1.77)	(1.02)	(0.29)
Perceived gender discrimination at work			?0.12^**	?0.15^**
			(?2.95)	(?2.86)
Self-esteem		?0.39^***	0.48^***	0.45^**
		(?4.06)	(5.46)	(3.45)
Career compromise			?0.28^**	?0.44^***
			(?3.44)	(?3.69)

[1]	ZHANG Jianwei, ZHOU Yufan, LI Linying, LI Haihong, HUA Weijun. How to teach resourcefully? The mechanism of teacher dialectical feedback on team creativity of college students [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(8): 1301-1316.
[2]	DONG Niannian, YIN Kui, XING Lu, SUN Xin, DONG Yanan. The effects of daily supervisor negative feedback on employee creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(5): 831-843.
[3]	LI Xin, LIU Pei, LI Aimei, WANG Xiaotian, ZHANG Junwei. A multipath model of leader after-hours electronic communication expectations and employee job performance [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(8): 964-978.
[4]	CHENG Tong, CHENG Nanhua, WANG Meifang, WANG Zhengyan. Toddlers' anxiety predicts their creativity at the age of five: The chain mediation effects of general cognition and mastery motivation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(7): 799-812.
[5]	ZHANG Hui, LIU Yanjun, SHI Yanwei, ZHANG Nan. The effect of customer-initiated support on employee service performance: The self-verification theory perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(4): 398-410.
[6]	WANG Dan, WANG Dianhui, CHEN Wenfeng. The relationship between adolescents’ resilience and their malevolent creative behaviors [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(2): 154-167.
[7]	CHENG Rui, LU Kelong, HAO Ning. The effect of anger on malevolent creativity and strategies for its emotion regulation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(8): 847-860.
[8]	YANG Baoyan, CHEN Shasha, SU Shaoqing, CHEN Fangli. Outwardly strong but inwardly weak, pretensions to wealth? Exploring the impact of heterogeneous high self-esteem on materialism in a self-threat situation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(6): 667-680.
[9]	GUO Gongxing, CHENG Bao. Effects of customer empowering behaviors on employees’ career growth: Perspective of self-determination theory [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(2): 215-228.
[10]	KE Xiaoxiao, QI Huizi, LIANG Jiahui, JIN Xinyuan, GAO Jie, ZHANG Mingxia, WANG Yamin. Situational assessment method of the Chinese people’s holistic thinking characteristics and their application [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(12): 1299-1309.
[11]	ZHANG Jinghuan, FU Mengmeng, XIN Yuwen, CHEN Peipei, SHA Sha. The development of creativity in senior primary school students: Gender differences and the role of school support [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(9): 1057-1070.
[12]	HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668.
[13]	ZHU Jinqiang, XU Shiyong, ZHOU Jinyi, ZHANG Bainan, XU Fangfang, ZONG Boqiang. The cross-level double-edged-sword effect of boundary-spanning behavior on creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(11): 1340-1351.
[14]	TONG DanDan, LI WenFu, LU Peng, YANG WenJing, YANG Dong, ZHANG QingLin, QIU Jiang. The neural basis of scientific innovation problem finding [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(11): 1253-1265.
[15]	LUAN Mo, WU Shuang, LI Hong. The relationship between anticipated communication and creativity: The moderating role of construal level [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(10): 1178-1188.

Lost radiance: Negative influence of parental gender bias on women’s workplace performance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments