ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (07): 830-835.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

变通的题组项目功能差异检验方法在篇章阅读测验中的应用

郑蝉金;郭聪颖;边玉芳   

  1. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-07-30 发布日期:2011-07-30
  • 通讯作者: 边玉芳

Using Testlet DIF Procedures to Detect Testlet DIF in Chinese Passage-based Reading Testing

ZHENG Chan-Jin;GUO Cong-Ying;BIAN Yu-Fang   

  1. (State Key Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
  • Received:2010-09-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-07-30 Online:2011-07-30
  • Contact: BIAN Yu-Fang

摘要: 篇章形式的阅读测验在语文学科考试与语言能力测试中占有越来越重要的地位。篇章阅读测验是一种典型的题组测验, 因此需要采用能够处理题组效应的统计方法进行分析。在进行项目功能差异(DIF)检验时, 也需要采用与之匹配的DIF检验方法。目前能够处理题组效应的DIF检验方法主要包括变通的题组DIF检验方法和基于题组反应模型的DIF检验方法, 基于题组反应模型的DIF检验方法由于实现过程繁琐, 目前只停留在理论探讨阶段。本研究将变通的题组DIF检验方法及其效应值指标引入篇章阅读测验的DIF检验中, 能够解决篇章阅读测验中DIF检验与测量的问题, 效应值指标能够为如何处理有DIF效应的题组项目提供重要依据。本研究首先选用非题组DIF检验方法与变通的题组DIF检验方法对一份试卷进行DIF检验, 两种方法的比较结果体现了进行题组DIF检验的必要性与优越性, 然后选用变通的题组DIF检验方法中有代表性的四种方法对某阅读成就测验进行题组DIF检验。研究结果表明, 在篇章阅读测验中, 能够处理题组效应的DIF检验方法较传统的DIF检验方法具有较大的优越性。

关键词: 篇章, 项目功能差异, 题组DIF, 效应值

Abstract: Structuring items around reading passages (the passage-based format) is enjoying more and more popularity in reading and language testing. The passage-based format is a typical example of testlets, groups of items that exhibit dependencies due to a common prompt, so statistical techniques used to analyze passage-based items, such as DIF detection, must account for the testlet effect. Current methods to deal with the testlet effect fall into two categories: the testlet model-based approach and the alternative/indirect approach. The former is more methodically sound, but is in its infancy and is not ready for practical purposes.
This study pursues the second path and accounts for the testlet effect in DIF detection by introducing alternative hypothesis testing for testlet DIF and indices its effect size. The first part is a comparison study between traditional DIF and the alternative testlet DIF, which demonstrates the necessity and advantages of the new approach.
The second part employs four testlet DIF procedures derived from the alternative approach to conduct hypothesis tests and investigates three indices to measure the DIF effect size. These indices can provide helpful information for DIF decision-making in testlets.
The results indicate that these alternative testlet DIF procedures are more technically sound than the non-testlet DIF procedures for passage-based testing.

Key words: passage-based, DIF, testlet DIF, effect size