变量之间的影响关系和多重影响因素的共同作用类型

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.01462

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探讨研究变量之间的关系是心理学和其他社科领域实证研究的主要工作。基于问卷调查的实证文章多数涉及变量之间的“影响关系”, 但这个概念未有明确界定, 经常被人理解为相关关系或者因果关系, 无论哪种情况都会带来问题, 尤其在中介效应研究中更为突出。本文将影响关系定义为有方向性的相关关系, 从外延和内涵上揭示了相关、影响和因果三者之间的关系; 提供了多种途径为影响关系建模找到理据; 讨论了一个结果变量的多重影响因素的共同作用类型。本文将为问卷研究中的变量之间关系研究提供理论支撑。

Abstract:

The investigation of relationships among variables is the main focus of empirical research in psychology and other social science disciplines. Many empirical studies based on questionnaire surveys involve the influence relationship between variables. However, the lack of a universally accepted definition for this concept has led to ambiguity, and it is often conflated with causal or correlational relationships, which may cause problems, especially for studies on mediating effects.

This article defines the influence relationship as a directional correlation, elucidating relations between correlation, influence, and causation in terms of denotation and connotation. Risk factors and protective factors are both influence factors of a negative outcome, and the impact increases with the level of a risk factor and decreases with that of a protective factor.

We summarize several ways to find evidence for modeling the influence relationship: (1) establishing directionality based on the temporal sequencing of variable occurrences; (2) testing the explanatory power by reversing the order of variables; (3) following the rule that object variables tend to influence subject variables; (4) considering attributes of variables (e.g., essential vs. state attributes, long-term vs. temporary attributes; stable vs. unstable attributes) to predict their influence; (5) gaining evidence from theoretical or empirical literature; (6) obtaining support from life experience and common sense; (7) reasoning through analogies; (8) applying principles of cross-lag analysis to identifying dominant factors.

Furthermore, we categorize multiple influence factors working together. These include independent effects, overlapping effects, two types of proxy effects, two types of mediating variables, and three types of moderating variables. These distinctions clarify how different influence factors work together to shape outcomes.

Some influence relationships exhibit characteristics akin to causal relationships, while others resemble correlation patterns. The degree to which different studies capture influence relationships close to causation may differ, affecting the quality of the research. Closer proximity to causal relationships enhances the informational value and significance of findings.

Key words: influence relationship, correlation relationship, causal relationship, influence factor, mediator, moderator

中图分类号:

B841

温忠麟, 王一帆, 马鹏, 孟进. (2024). 变量之间的影响关系和多重影响因素的共同作用类型. 心理学报, 56(10), 1462-1470.

WEN Zhonglin, WANG Yifan, MA Peng, MENG Jin. (2024). The influence relationship among variables and types of multiple influence factors working together. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(10), 1462-1470.

图/表 4

参考文献 31

[1]	Affuso G., Zannone A., Esposito C., Pannone M., Miranda M. C., De Angelis G., ... Bacchini D. (2023). The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 1-23.
[2]	Baron R. M., & Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 pmid: 3806354
[3]	Cheng C., & Huang X. (2021). The influence of individually- oriented courage on middle school students’ academic achievement: The mediating roles of problem-solving and help-seeking coping styles. Psychological Development and Education, 37(1), 60-67.
	[程翠萍, 黄希庭. (2021). 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响: 问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(1), 60-67.]
[4]	Cook T. D., Campbell D. T., & Day A. (1979). Quasi- experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (Vol. 351). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[5]	Davis J. (1985). The logic of causal order. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
[6]	Fisher R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
[7]	Hau K. T., Wen Z., & Cheng Z. (2004). Structural equation model and its applications. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
	[侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.]
[8]	He Y. (2020). The influence of parental control on adolescents’ adaptation and intervention (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Beijing Normal University.
	[何妍. (2020). 父母控制对青少年适应的影响及干预研究 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.]
[9]	Hu Q., Huang L., & Li J. (2023). How tradition and new life coexist: A study on the relationship between tourists’ authenticity experience and loyalty. Human Geography, 38(5), 180-190.
	[胡其波, 黄丽满, 李军. (2023). 传统与新生何以融合并存——基于代际差异的旅游者真实性体验与忠诚度的影响关系研究. 人文地理, 38(5), 180-190.]
[10]	Jacobs Jr D. R., Woo J. G., Sinaiko A. R., Daniels S. R., Ikonen J., Juonala M., ... Dwyer T. (2022). Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and adult cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine, 386(20), 1877-1888.
[11]	James L. R., & Brett J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307-321.
[12]	Jin C., Zou H., & Li X. (2011). Protective and risk factors and their cumulative effect of adolescents’ social adjustment. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (1), 12-20.
	[金灿灿, 邹泓, 李晓巍. (2011). 青少年的社会适应: 保护性和危险性因素及其累积效应. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 12-20.]
[13]	Ke J., Sun M., & Li Y. (2009). Psychological capital: Chinese indigenous scale’s development and its validity comparison with the western scale. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(9), 875-888.
	[柯江林, 孙健敏, 李永瑞. (2009). 心理资本: 本土量表的开发及中西比较. 心理学报, 41(9), 875-888.]
[14]	Kraemer H. C., Stice E., Kazdin A., Offord D., & Kupfer D. (2001). How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(6), 848-856. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848 pmid: 11384888
[15]	Liekefett L., Christ O., & Becker J. C. (2023). Can conspiracy beliefs be beneficial? Longitudinal linkages between conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and existential threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(2), 167-179.
[16]	Liu S., Wu X., Wang X., & Ying J. (2023). The association between parenting stress and parental involvement: Do partner’s coparenting behaviors matter? Journal of Psychological Science, 46(4), 857-864.
	[刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸, 应洁峰. (2023). 父母教养压力对教养投入的影响: 配偶协同教养行为的调节效应. 心理科学, 46(4), 857-864.]
[17]	Lyu M., Xiong Y., Yang L., Chen J., Wang Q., & Ren P. (2023). Effects of victimization on proactive and reactive aggression among early adolescents: The mediating roles of anger rumination and sadness rumination. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 21(6), 799-806. doi: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.011
	[吕沐华, 熊昱可, 杨柳, 陈嘉慧, 王泉泉, 任萍. (2023). 受欺负对青少年主动性攻击及反应性攻击的影响: 愤怒反刍和悲伤反刍的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 21(6), 799-806.] doi: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.011
[18]	Mega C., Ronconi L., & De Beni R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 106(1), 121-131.
[19]	Mo L., Wen Z., & Chen C. (2007). Psychological research methods. Guang zhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press.
	[莫雷, 温忠麟, 陈彩琦. (2007). 心理学研究方法. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社.]
[20]	Niedenthal P. M., Hampton R. S., & Marji M. (2023). Ancestral diversity: A socioecological account of emotion culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(2), 167-175. doi: 10.1177/09637214221151154 pmid: 37397941
[21]	Ruisch B. C., Anderson R. A., Inbar Y., & Pizarro D. A. (2021). A matter of taste: Gustatory sensitivity predicts political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 394-409.
[22]	Shu H., & Zhang Y. (2008). Research methods in psychology: Experimental design and data analysis. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
	[舒华, 张亚旭. (2008). 心理学研究方法: 实验设计和数据分析. 北京: 人民教育出版社.]
[23]	Wang H., Wang M., Wen Z., Wang Y., & Fang J. (2022). Which comes first? Modeling the longitudinal association between mindfulness and neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111226.
[24]	Wang T. (2006). Causal analysis in social research. Sociological Studies, (4), 132-156.
	[王天夫. (2006). 社会研究中的因果分析. 社会学研究, (4), 132-156.]
[25]	Wen Z. (2017). Causal inference and analysis in empirical studies. Journal of Psychological Science, 40(1), 200-208.
	[温忠麟. (2017). 实证研究中的因果推理与分析. 心理科学, 40(1), 200-208.]
[26]	Wen Z., Hau K. T., & Chang L. (2005). A comparison of moderator and mediator and their applications. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(2), 268-274.
	[温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274.]
[27]	Wen Z., Liu F., Zheng Y., Liao X., & Huang Y. (2024). Why are there so many empirical articles on moderating or mediating effects? Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 30(4), 291-297.
	[温忠麟, 刘方, 郑渊丹, 廖心怡, 黄亦南. (2024). 为何调节效应或中介效应的实证文章那么多? 应用心理学, 30(4), 291-297.]
[28]	Wen Z., & Ye B. (2014). Analyses of Mediating Effects: The Development of Methods and Models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 731-745. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731
	[温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731
[29]	Xie J., Wen Z., Shen J., Tan Y., Liu X., Yang Y., & Zheng X. (2023). Longitudinal relationship between prosocial behavior and meaning in life of junior high school students: A three-wave cross-lagged study. Journal of Adolescence, 95(5), 1017-1032. doi: 10.1002/jad.12172 pmid: 37016571
[30]	Ye B., & Fang X. (2017). The effects of cultural intelligence on minority preparatory undergraduates’ subjective well- being: The chain mediating effect of bicultural identity integration and acculturative stress. Journal of Psychological Science, 40(4), 892-897.
	[叶宝娟, 方小婷. (2017). 文化智力对少数民族预科生主观幸福感的影响: 双文化认同整合和文化适应压力的链式中介作用. 心理科学, 40(4), 892-897.]
[31]	You J., Liu H., Liu X., Zhai D., & Yang L. (2022). Influencing factors of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among college students—Based on the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(4), 944-948.
	[尤静, 刘海玲, 刘新春, 翟得康, 杨丽. (2022). 大学生自杀意念和自杀尝试影响因素分析——基于自杀行为的整合动机意志模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(4), 944-948.]