心理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (12): 1291-1305.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01291
• 研究报告 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2019-03-27
发布日期:
2019-10-21
出版日期:
2019-12-25
通讯作者:
张积家
E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com
基金资助:
WANG Bin1, LI Zhirui2, WU Limei3, ZHANG Jijia1()
Received:
2019-03-27
Online:
2019-10-21
Published:
2019-12-25
Contact:
ZHANG Jijia
E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com
摘要:
通过3个实验, 考察具身模拟在汉语肢体动作动词理解中的作用。实验1考察在整字启动下具身模拟对运动通道中箭头方向判断的影响, 发现理解肢体动作动词在运动通道中存在着动作-汉字相容效应, 汉字的具身方向与箭头方向一致促进被试对箭头方向的判断。实验2考察在整字启动下具身经验对视觉通道中字母位置判断的影响, 发现理解肢体动作动词在视觉通道中存在着动作-汉字相容效应, 汉字的具身方位与字母方位一致促进对字母方位的识别。实验3采用义符启动范式考察义符与整字的具身模拟, 发现理解汉语肢体动作动词不仅在整字层次上存在着具身模拟, 在部件层次上也存在着具身模拟。义符在汉字加工中期被激活了, 并且持续到加工晚期。整个研究表明, 汉语肢体动作动词理解是一个跨通道的具身模拟过程, 具身模拟在汉语肢体动作动词的理解中起着非常重要的作用。
中图分类号:
王斌, 李智睿, 伍丽梅, 张积家. (2019). 具身模拟在汉语肢体动作动词理解中的作用. 心理学报, 51(12), 1291-1305.
WANG Bin, LI Zhirui, WU Limei, ZHANG Jijia. (2019). Effects of embodied simulation on understanding Chinese body action verbs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(12), 1291-1305.
启动词类 | 材料举例 | 平均笔画数 | 平均频率 | 平均熟悉性 | 平均语义透明度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 举, 抬, 跃 | 12.10 | 1164 | 4.20 | 3.81 |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 俯, 捶, 跌 | 11.95 | 1405 | 4.26 | 3.78 |
表1 实验材料统计信息表
启动词类 | 材料举例 | 平均笔画数 | 平均频率 | 平均熟悉性 | 平均语义透明度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 举, 抬, 跃 | 12.10 | 1164 | 4.20 | 3.81 |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 俯, 捶, 跌 | 11.95 | 1405 | 4.26 | 3.78 |
启动词类型 | 箭头向上 | 箭头向下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 | 错误率 | 反应时 | 错误率 | |
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 484 (75) | 1.48 (3.12) | 484 (79) | 4.91 (6.28) |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 494 (76) | 5.21 (4.92) | 472 (92) | 3.33 (4.08) |
表2 方向不同的汉语肢体动作动词启动下箭头方向判断的平均反应时(ms)和平均错误率(%)
启动词类型 | 箭头向上 | 箭头向下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 | 错误率 | 反应时 | 错误率 | |
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 484 (75) | 1.48 (3.12) | 484 (79) | 4.91 (6.28) |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 494 (76) | 5.21 (4.92) | 472 (92) | 3.33 (4.08) |
启动词类型 | 字母在上 | 字母在下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 | 错误率 | 反应时 | 错误率 | |
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 429 (77) | 2.47(4.69) | 446 (78) | 3.17 (4.98) |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 441 (90) | 2.81 (5.17) | 426 (69) | 3.03 (5.24) |
表3 不同汉语肢体动作动词启动下字母位置判断的平均反应时(ms)和平均错误率(%)
启动词类型 | 字母在上 | 字母在下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 | 错误率 | 反应时 | 错误率 | |
方向向上的肢体动作动词 | 429 (77) | 2.47(4.69) | 446 (78) | 3.17 (4.98) |
方向向下的肢体动作动词 | 441 (90) | 2.81 (5.17) | 426 (69) | 3.03 (5.24) |
肢体动作动词词类 | 材料举例 | 平均笔画数 | 平均频率 | 平均熟悉性 | 平均语义透明度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
具身方向向上 | 扬, 跃 | 11.30 | 978 | 4.27 | 3.89 |
具身方向向下 | 捶, 跌 | 11.45 | 1157 | 4.26 | 3.78 |
表4 实验材料统计信息表
肢体动作动词词类 | 材料举例 | 平均笔画数 | 平均频率 | 平均熟悉性 | 平均语义透明度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
具身方向向上 | 扬, 跃 | 11.30 | 978 | 4.27 | 3.89 |
具身方向向下 | 捶, 跌 | 11.45 | 1157 | 4.26 | 3.78 |
启动类型 | SOA=43 ms | SOA=72 ms | SOA=243 ms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一致 | 不一致 | 一致 | 不一致 | 一致 | 不一致 | |
义符启动 | ||||||
反应时 | 868 (103) | 858 (109) | 823 (95) | 869 (102) | 818 (108) | 863 (113) |
错误率 | 11.70 (8.48) | 15.74 (9.78) | 11.70 (8.48) | 13.72 (9.12) | 9.47 (7.75) | 13.83 (10.23) |
控制启动 | ||||||
反应时 | 875 (119) | 854 (114) | 857 (101) | 851 (125) | 858 (112) | 871 (120) |
错误率 | 11.91 (8.70) | 16.17 (9.68) | 10.21 (7.52) | 15.32 (10.65) | 8.19 (6.87) | 15.32 (11.39) |
表5 不同启动条件下被试判断的平均反应时(ms)和平均错误率(%)
启动类型 | SOA=43 ms | SOA=72 ms | SOA=243 ms | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一致 | 不一致 | 一致 | 不一致 | 一致 | 不一致 | |
义符启动 | ||||||
反应时 | 868 (103) | 858 (109) | 823 (95) | 869 (102) | 818 (108) | 863 (113) |
错误率 | 11.70 (8.48) | 15.74 (9.78) | 11.70 (8.48) | 13.72 (9.12) | 9.47 (7.75) | 13.83 (10.23) |
控制启动 | ||||||
反应时 | 875 (119) | 854 (114) | 857 (101) | 851 (125) | 858 (112) | 871 (120) |
错误率 | 11.91 (8.70) | 16.17 (9.68) | 10.21 (7.52) | 15.32 (10.65) | 8.19 (6.87) | 15.32 (11.39) |
[1] | Aziz-Zadeh L., & Damasio A . (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1-3), 35-39. |
[2] | Barsalou L. W . (1999a). Language comprehension:Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28(1), 61-80. |
[3] | Barsalou L. W . (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660. |
[4] | Barsalou L.W., Simmons W. K., Barbey A. K., & Wilson C. D . (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality- specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84-91. |
[5] | Beauchamp M. S., Lee K. E., Haxby J. V., & Martin A . (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34(1), 149-159. |
[6] | Beauchamp M. S., Lee K. E., Haxby J. V., & Martin A . (2003). FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 991-1001. |
[7] | Bedny M., Caramazza A., Grossman E., Pascual-Leone A., & Saxe R . (2008). Concepts are more than percepts: The case of action verbs. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(44), 11347-11353. |
[8] | Borghi A. M., & Riggio L . (2009a). Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research, 1253, 117-128. |
[9] | Borghi A. M., & Scorolli C . (2009b). Language comprehension and dominant hand motion simulation. Human Movement Science, 28(1), 12-27. |
[10] | Boulenger V., Roy A. C., Paulignan Y., Deprez V., Jeannerod M., & Nazir T. A . (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607-1615. |
[11] | Cardona J. F., Kargieman L., Sinay V., Gershanik O., Gelormini C., Amoruso L., …& Ibáñez A . (2014). How embodied is action language? Neurological evidence from motor diseases. Cognition, 131(2), 311-322. |
[12] | Chen X. K., & Zhang J. J . (2008). Role of familiarity of semantic radicals in the recognition of highly familiar Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(2), 148-159. |
[ 陈新葵, 张积家 . (2008). 义符熟悉性对高频形声字词汇通达的影响. 心理学报, 40(2), 148-159.] | |
[13] | Chen X. K., & Zhang J. J . (2012). Role of familiarity of semantic radicals in the recognition of lowly familiar Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(7), 882-895. |
[ 陈新葵, 张积家 . (2012). 义符熟悉性对低频形声字词汇通达的影响. 心理学报, 44(7), 882-895.] | |
[14] | Cohen J . (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. |
[15] | Ding G. S., Peng D. L., & Taft M . (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese:A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530-539. |
[16] | Dudschig C., Souman J., Lachmair M., Vega I. D. L., & Kaup B . (2013). Reading “sun” and looking up: The influence of language on saccadic eye movements in the vertical dimension. Plos One, 8(2), e56872. |
[17] | Dunn B. M., Kamide Y., & Scheepers C . (2014). Hearing “moon” and looking up: Word-related spatial associations facilitate saccades to congruent locations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36(36), 433-438. |
[18] | Feldman, J., Narayanan S . (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385-392. |
[19] | Feldman L. B., & Siok W. W. T . (1999a). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 559-576. |
[20] | Feldman L. B., & Siok W. W. T . (1999b). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds). Reading Chinese script (pp. 19-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[21] | Fernandino L., Binder J. R., Desai R. H., Pendl S. L., Humphries C. J., Gross W. L., … & Seidenberg M. S . (2016). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction:A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2018-2034. |
[22] | Gallese V., & Sinigaglia C . (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512-519. |
[23] | Gallese V., & Sinigaglia C . (2012). Response to de bruin and Gallagher: Embodied simulation as reuse is a productive explanation of a basic form of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 99-100. |
[24] | Giudice M. D., Manera V., & Keysers C . (2009). Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Developmental Science, 12(2), 350-363. |
[25] | Glenberg A. M . (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1-19. |
[26] | Glenberg A. M., & Kaschak M. P . (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565. |
[27] | Hald L. A., de Nooijer J., van Gog T., & Bekkering H . (2016). Optimizing word learning via links to perceptual and motoric experience. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 495-522. |
[28] | Hauk O., Johnsrude I., & Pulvermüller F . (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301-307. |
[29] | Horoufchin H., Bzdok D., Buccino G., Borghi A. M., & Binkofski F . (2018). Action and object words are differentially anchored in the sensory motor system - A perspective on cognitive embodiment. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-11. |
[30] | Juárez F. P-G., Labrecque D., & Frak V . (2019). Assessing language-induced motor activity through event related potentials and the grip force sensor, an exploratory study. Brain and Cognition, 135, DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010. |
[31] | Keysers D., & Castillo J. G . (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain and Language, 112(1), 54-76. |
[32] | Keysers C., & Perrett D. I . (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(11), 501-507. |
[33] | Klepp A., Weissler H., Niccolai V., Terhalle A., Geisler H., Schnitzler A., & Biermann-Ruben K . (2014). Neuromagnetic hand and foot motor sources recruited during action verb processing. Brain and Language, 128(1), 41-52. |
[34] | Law S. P., Yeung O., Wong W., & Chiu K. M. Y . (2005). Processing of semantic radicals in writing Chinese characters: Data from a Chinese dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 885-903. |
[35] | Li Y., & Kang J. S . (1993). Analysis of phonetics of the ideophonetic characters in modern Chinese. In: Y. Chen (eds.), Information analysis of usage of characters in modern Chinese (pp.84-98). Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press. |
[ 李燕, 康家深 . (1993). 现代汉语用字信息分析. 上海: 上海教育出版社. ] | |
[36] | Lin N., Lu X. M., Fang F., Han Z. Z., & Bi Y. C . (2011). Is the semantic category effect in the lateral temporal cortex due to motion property differences? NeuroImage, 55(4), 1853-1864. |
[37] | Liu C., Tardif T., Mai X. Q., Gehring W. J., Simms N., & Luo Y. J . (2010). What’s in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages. Human Brain Mapping, 31(11), 1786-1801. |
[38] | Lu Z. Y., Gao Z. H., Duan X. L., & Liu X. H . (2007). Views of embodied language comprehension. Advances in Psychological Science, 15(2), 275-281. |
[ 鲁忠义, 高志华, 段晓莉, 刘学华 . (2007). 语言理解的体验观. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 275-281.] | |
[39] | Martin A . (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45. |
[40] | Meteyard L., & Vigliocco G . (2009). Verbs in space: Axis and direction of motion norms for 299 English verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 565-574. |
[41] | Pulvermüller F., Härle M., & Hummel F . (2001). Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78(2), 143-168. |
[42] | Qu F. B., Yin R., Zhong Y., & Ye H. S . (2012). Motor perception in language comprehension: Perspective from embodied cognition. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(6), 834-842. |
[ 曲方炳, 殷融, 钟元, 叶浩生 . (2012). 语言理解中的动作知觉:基于具身认知的视角. 心理科学进展, 20(6), 834-842.] | |
[43] | Richardson D. C., Spivey M. J., Barsalou L. W., & Mcrae K . (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767-780. |
[44] | Richardson D. C., Spivey M. J., Edelman S., Naples A. J . (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In:Proceedings of the 23ed annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 845-850). Erlbaum [poster presentation], Mahwah. |
[45] | Rodriguez A. D., Mccabe M. L., Nocera J. R., & Reilly J . (2012). Concurrent word generation and motor performance: Further evidence for language-motor interaction. Plos One, 7(5):e37094. |
[46] | She X. J., & Zhang B. Y . (1997). The effects of semantic and phonetic clues in puctophonetic character mental lexicon. Journal of Psychology Science, 20(2), 142-145. |
[ 佘贤君, 张必隐 . (1997). 形声字心理词典中义符和音符线索的作用. 心理科学, 20(2), 142-145.] | |
[47] | Stanfield R. A., & Zwaan R. A . (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153-156. |
[48] | Strozyk J. V., Dudschig C., & Kaup B . (2017). Do I need to have my hands free to understand hand-related language? Investigating the functional relevance of experiential simulations. Psychological Research, 83(3), 406-418. |
[49] | Su D. Q., Zhong Y., Zeng H., & Ye H. S . (2013). Embodied semantic processing of Chinese action idioms: Evidence from fMRI study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(11), 1187-1199. |
[ 苏得权, 钟元, 曾红, 叶浩生 . (2013). 汉语动作成语语义理解激活脑区及其具身效应:来自fMRI的证据. 心理学报, 45(11), 1187-1199.] | |
[50] | Tao Y., Wang X. X., Ma X., & Liu Y . (2017). How semantic radical support inductive reasoning—evidence from ERP study. Psychology Exploration, 37(2), 117-124. |
[ 陶云, 王晓曦, 马谐, 刘艳 . (2017). 义符促进类别归纳推理的ERP证据. 心理学探新, 37(2), 117-124.] | |
[51] | Wang J. Y., Ye H. S., & Su D. Q . (2018). The correlativity of action and sematic processing: Perspect of embodied metaphor. Psychological Exploration, 38(1), 15-19. |
[ 王继瑛, 叶浩生, 苏得权 . (2018). 身体动作与语义加工:具身隐喻的视角. 心理学探新, 38(1), 15-19.] | |
[52] | Wang X. S., Pei. M., Wu. Y., & Su Y. J . (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02230. |
[53] | Wang X. X., Ma X., Tao Y., Tao Y. C., & Li H . (2018). How semantic radicals in Chinese characters facilitate hierarchical category-based induction. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-10. |
[54] | Williams C . (2013). Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners. Reading and Writing, 26(2), 293-315. |
[55] | Williams C., & Bever T . (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589-605. |
[56] | Winkielman P., Niedenthal P., Wielgosz J., Eelen J., & Kavanagh L. C . (2015). Embodiment of cognition and emotion. Mario Mikulincer, (4), 151-175. |
[57] | Wu H., Mai X., Tang H., Ge Y., Luo Y. J., & Liu C . (2013). Dissociable somatotopic representations of Chinese action verbs in the motor and premotor cortex. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1-12. |
[58] | Wu H. Y., Tang H. H., Ge Y., Yang S. Y., Mai X. Q., Luo Y. J., & Liu C . (2017). Object words modulate the activity of the mirror neuron system during action imitation. Brain and Behavior, 7(11), 1-13. |
[59] | Wu L. M., Mo L., & Wang R. M . (2007). Dynamic mental simulation during comprehension of motion descriptions. Advances in Psychological Science, 15(4), 605-612. |
[ 伍丽梅, 莫雷, 王瑞明 . (2007). 有关运动的语言理解的知觉模拟. 心理科学进展, 15(4), 605-612.] | |
[60] | Yang J., & Shu H . (2011). Embodied representation of tool-use action verbs and hand action verbs: Evidence from a tone judgment task. Neuroscience Letters, 493(3), 112-115. |
[61] | Yang T. F . (2016). Image schemas in verb-particle constructions: Evidence from a behavioral experiment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(2), 379-393. |
[62] | Ye H. S., & Zeng H . (2013). Mirror neuron, embodied simulation and mind-reading. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),(4), 97-104. |
[ 叶浩生, 曾红 . (2013). 镜像神经元、具身模拟与心智阅读. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (4), 97-104.] | |
[63] | Zhang D. X., & Dong H . (2017). The directional semantic features of Chinese body verbs and their derived sememes. Journal of Liaoning University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 19(5), 63-66. |
[ 张道新, 董宏 . (2017). 汉语肢体动词的方向语义特征及其衍生义位. 辽宁工业大学学报(社会科学版), 19(5), 63-66.] | |
[64] | Zhang J. J., & Chen X. K . (2005). The role of Chinese characters ‘yifu’ in cognition of Chinese action verbs meaning. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(4), 434-441. |
[ 张积家, 陈新葵 . (2005). 汉字义符在汉语动作动词意义认知中的作用. 心理学报, 37(4), 434-441.] | |
[65] | Zhang J. J., Fang Y. H., & Chen X. K . (2006). The role of semantic radicals of Chinese characters in grammatical categorization of Chinese visual words. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(2), 159-169. |
[ 张积家, 方燕红, 陈新葵 . (2006). 义符在中文名词和动词分类中的作用. 心理学报, 38(2), 159-169.] | |
[66] | Zhang J. J., & Peng D. L . (1993). Experimental study on the retrieval of feature meaning of Chinese words. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 25(2), 140-147. |
[ 张积家, 彭聃龄 . (1993). 汉字特征语义提取的实验研究. 心理学报, 25(2), 140-147.] | |
[67] | Zhang J. J., Peng D. L., & Zhang H. C . (1991). The recovery of meaning of Chinese characters in the classifying process (Ⅱ). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 23(2), 139-144. |
[ 张积家, 彭聃龄, 张厚粲 . (1991). 分类过程中汉字的语义提取(Ⅱ). 心理学报, 23(2), 139-144.] | |
[68] | Zhang J. J., Wang J., & Chen X. K . (2014). Semantic radicals’ research in twenty years: Theoretical exploration, experimental evidence and processing model. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(3), 381-399. |
[ 张积家, 王娟, 陈新葵 . (2014). 义符研究20年:理论探讨、实验证据和加工模型. 心理科学进展, 22(3), 381-399.] | |
[69] | Zhang J. J., Wang J., & Yin C . (2014). The role of phonetic radicals and semantic radicals in phonetics and semantics extraction of phonogram characters: An eye movement study on components perception. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(7), 885-900. |
[ 张积家, 王娟, 印丛 . (2014). 声符和义符在形声字语音、语义提取中的作用——来自部件知觉眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(7), 885-900.] | |
[70] | Zhang J. J., Zhang H. C., & Peng D. L . (1990). The recovery of Chinese characters in claasifying process (Ⅰ). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 22(4), 397-405. |
[ 张积家, 张厚粲, 彭聃龄 . (1990). 分类过程中汉字的语义提取(Ⅰ). 心理学报, 22(4), 397-405.] | |
[71] | Zhang J. J., & Zhang Y. Z . (2016). The time course of semantic radical’s semantic and syntax activation under radical priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(9), 1070-1081. |
[ 张积家, 章玉祉 . (2016). 义符启动范式下义符的语义和语法激活的时间进程. 心理学报, 48(9), 1070-1081.] | |
[72] | Zhang Y. Z., & Zhang J. J . (2017). The effects of neighborhood size and category consistency of the semantic radical on semantic radical’s semantic activation under radical priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(8), 1041-1052. |
[ 章玉祉, 张积家 . (2017). 义符启动范式下家族大小和类别一致性对义符语义激活的影响. 心理学报, 49(8), 1041-1052.] | |
[73] | Zhou L., Peng G., Zheng H. Y., Su I. F., & Wang W. S. Y . (2013). Sub-lexical phonological and semantic processing of semantic radicals: A primed naming study. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 967-989. |
[74] | Zhu H. K . (2018). Aspect impact on the action-sentence compatibility effect in Chinese sentence comprehension (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hebei University, Baoding. |
[ 朱鸿凯 . (2018). 时态对汉语句子理解中动作—句子相符效应的影响(硕士学位论文). 河北大学, 保定.] | |
[75] | Zwaan R. A . (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 81-88. |
[76] | Zwaan R. A . (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 44(1), 35-62. |
[77] | Zwaan R. A . (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229-234. |
[78] | Zwaan R. A., & Madden C. J . (2005). Grounding Cognition. The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[79] | Zwaan R. A., & Yaxley R. H . (2004). Lateralization of object-shape information in semantic processing. Cognition, 94(2), B35-B43. |
[1] | 王娟, 马雪梅, 李兵兵, 张积家. 汉字形声字识别中义符和声符的家族效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 857-868. |
[2] | 王丹, 王婷, 秦松, 张积家. 部件启动范式下可成字部件的位置效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 163-176. |
[3] | 章玉祉, 张积家. 任务性质、家族大小和词类一致性对义符语法信息激活的影响 *[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(10): 1091-1101. |
[4] | 章玉祉, 张积家. 义符启动范式下家族大小和类别一致性 对义符语义激活的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1041-1052. |
[5] | 张积家;章玉祉. 义符启动范式下义符的语义和语法激活的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1070-1081. |
[6] | 叶浩生. 镜像神经元的意义[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 444-456. |
[7] | 王娟;张积家. 义符的类别一致性和家族大小影响形声字的语义加工[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1390-1400. |
[8] | 张积家;王娟;印丛. 声符和义符在形声字语音、语义提取中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 885-900. |
[9] | 陈新葵,张积家. 义符熟悉性对低频形声字词汇通达的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 882-895. |
[10] | 崔占玲,张积家. 汉-英双语者言语理解中语码切换的机制 —— 来自亚词汇水平的证据 [J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(02): 173-184. |
[11] | 方燕红,张积家. 汉字词和图片命名与分类的比较[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(02): 114-126. |
[12] | 陈新葵,张积家. 义符熟悉性对高频形声字词汇通达的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(02): 148-159. |
[13] | 毕鸿燕,胡伟,翁旭初. 汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(06): 791-797. |
[14] | 张积家,方燕红,陈新葵. 义符在中文名词和动词分类中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(02): 159-169. |
[15] | 张积家,陈新葵. 汉字义符在汉语动作动词意义认知中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(04): 434-441. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||