ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (06): 830-834.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

网络旗帜广告的记忆效果

王詠,马谋超,雷莉,丁夏齐   

  1. 中国科学院心理研究所,北京  100101
  • 收稿日期:2003-01-05 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2003-11-30 出版日期:2003-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 王詠

MEMORY EFFECT OF BANNER WEB-AD

Wang-Yong,--Ma-Mouchao,--Lei-Li,--Ding-Xiaqi   

  1. Institute of Psychology, Academia Sinica, Beijing, 100101, China
  • Received:2003-01-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2003-11-30 Published:2003-11-30
  • Contact: Wang Yong

摘要: 由于人们对网络旗帜广告效果的质疑,在网络广告的计费方式上也出现了两种计价模式,分别为按照浏览率和点击率来计量广告效果。其本质问题在于单纯浏览是否能够产生广告效果,以及浏览和点击各自所能带来的广告效果差异有多大。本研究利用模糊测量及相应统计方法,就上网者对网络旗帜广告的记忆效果进行测量。结果显示,在单纯浏览的情况下,上网者对网络旗帜广告已经留有印象,但这种记忆效果并不随着浏览次数的增加而显著改善;点击所能带来的广告记忆效果约为单纯浏览对应效果的1.4~1.5倍

关键词: 网络旗帜广告, 浏览率, 点击率, 广告记忆效果, 模糊测量

Abstract: The limited size of banner web-ad and the netusers’ inclination of neglecting the banners make people doubt about the banner web-ad’s effect. Because of this, there exists two kinds of charge model which counts on pageview-rate or click-through-rate individually. The questions behind are: is there Ad-memory from browsing only? What is the concrete difference between the memory effect derived from browse-only and click-through actions? By using fuzzy measurement and statistical method, the netusers’ memory to the banner web-ads they browsed or clicked were measured. The result showed that there does exist memory under browsing only. And the memory effect cannot be improved by increasing the repeated browsing times to the same banner on different web-pages. The ad-memory of those who clicked the banner is about 1.4~1.5 times as much as those who only browsed the banner

Key words: banner web-ad, pageview rate, click-through rate, ad-memory effect, fuzzy measurement method

中图分类号: