ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办：中国心理学会
　　　中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (03): 411-418.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

评估职业兴趣的结构

刘长江,James Rounds   

  1. 北京师范大学心理学院，北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2002-05-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2003-05-30 发布日期:2003-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘长江

EVALUATING THE STRUCTURE OF VOCATIONAL INTEREST IN CHINA

Liu Changjiang,James-Rounds   

  1. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China 100875
  • Received:2002-05-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2003-05-30 Online:2003-05-30
  • Contact: Liu Changjiang

PDF (PC)

1521

摘要： Holland的职业兴趣理论对当今兴趣研究产生了广泛、深远的影响。但是目前，还没有研究考察Holland理论假设在中国的适用性。研究共检验了5个与Holland的6种兴趣类型（RIASEC）有关的假设，其中两个是由本文研究者提出。研究搜集了在中国进行的、与Holland理论有关的研究，并最终选择了9个RIASEC相关矩阵。假定顺序的随机化检验以及方差分析的结果表明，Holland的圆形假设与数据的拟合程度在5个模型中最差；多维标度法结果表明，RIASEC的空间结构图并没有很好地符合Holland的圆形假设

关键词: 职业兴趣, 圆形假设, 多维标度法, 假定顺序的随机化检验

Abstract: Holland’s RIASEC typology of vocational interest has a major influence on vocational researches worldwide. However, so far, no research in China examined the hypothesis of RIASEC types. The study tested 5 hypotheses of RIASEC types, two of which were proposed by the authors. The study searched for the researches which were related to Holland’s theory and conducted in China, and selected 9 matrices of RIASEC. The results indicated that Holland’s circular model did not fit the matrices, and space configuration of RIASEC did not represent Holland’s model. Implications on the structure of and types of vocational interest were discussed

Key words: vocational interest, the circular hypothesis, multidimensional scaling, randomization test of hypothesized order relations

中图分类号: