霍式中国职业兴趣量表构想效度的验证性因素分析（Ⅱ）：多特质多方法矩阵的LISREL模型比较检验

心理学报 ›› 1996, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 120-125.

霍式中国职业兴趣量表构想效度的验证性因素分析（Ⅱ）：多特质多方法矩阵的LISREL模型比较检验

白利刚;凌文辁;方俐洛

中科院心理所

发布日期:1996-06-25 出版日期:1996-06-25
通讯作者: 白利刚

CONFIRMITORY FACTOR ANALYSIS TO THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE VOCATIONAL INTEREST INVENTORY OF HOLLAND TYPE(Ⅱ):THE CONTRAST OF THE MTMM-LISREL,MODELS'

Bai Ligang;Lin Wenquan;Fang Liluo(Institute of Psychology Academia Sinica,Beijing,100012)

Online:1996-06-25 Published:1996-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 霍式中国职业兴趣量表通过验证性因素分析的交叉证实检验，显示出具备良好的会聚效度和区分效度，但同时也显示出一定的来自方法偏误的影响。在本研究中，研究者采用多特质多方法的Ｌｉｓｒｅｌ模型各成分间的比较检验法，对模型中特质因素、方法因素及方法偏误因素等各成分的作用做了进一步的区分，以考察二者各自影响作用的大小。结果表明，霍式中国职业兴趣量表构想效度良好，来自方法偏误的影响作用不大。

关键词: LISREL模型, 构想效度, 方法偏误

Abstract: The Chinese Vocational interest Inventory of Holland Type was cross-validated by applying confirmitory factor analysis.The results showed that the convergent and discriminant validity was good,but also some effects of method-bias.In this study we tested the effects of traits,methods and method-bias respectively by applying the contrast of the MTMM-LISREL Models.The results suggested substantial support that the inventory's RIASEC construct validity is good,the effects of method-bias is limited.

Key words: Lisrel model, construct validity, method-bias

白利刚,凌文辁,方俐洛. (1996). 霍式中国职业兴趣量表构想效度的验证性因素分析（Ⅱ）：多特质多方法矩阵的LISREL模型比较检验. 心理学报, 28(2), 120-125.

Bai Ligang,Lin Wenquan,Fang Liluo(Institute of Psychology Academia Sinica,Beijing,100012). (1996). CONFIRMITORY FACTOR ANALYSIS TO THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE VOCATIONAL INTEREST INVENTORY OF HOLLAND TYPE(Ⅱ):THE CONTRAST OF THE MTMM-LISREL,MODELS'. , 28(2), 120-125.

[1]	吴志明,张厚粲. 评价中心的构想效度和结构模型[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(4): 85-91.
[2]	白利刚,凌文辁,方俐洛. 霍式中国职业兴趣量表构想效度的验证性因素分析（Ⅰ）：量表会聚效度和区分效度的验证性因素分析[J]. 心理学报, 1996, 28(1): 64-69.