ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办：中国心理学会
　　　中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社
2025年4月4日 星期五

心理学报 ›› 1987, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 94-100. cstr: 32110.14.1987.00094

• • 上一篇    下一篇

经典测验理论和项目反应理论对题目分析的对比研究

李伟明;陈富国   

  1. 上海师范大学教育管理系 ,上海师范大学教育管理系
  • 发布日期:1987-09-25 出版日期:1987-09-25

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ITEM—ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE ITEM RESPONSE THEORY AND THE CLASSICAL TEST THEORY

Li Wei-ming;Cheng Fu-guo Department of Educational Management, Shanghai Normal University   

  • Online:1987-09-25 Published:1987-09-25

摘要： 项目反应理论(Item Resporse Theory IRT)被一些人认为是当代心理测量三大发展方向之一。在某些方面,它比经典测验理论(Classical TestTheory CTT)更为合理。本文利用1986年上海市师范类高等院校招生考试的理科数学试卷中选择题的实际考试资料,先用CTT计算有关题目指数,再用IRT对题目绘制题目特征曲线ICC(Item Charicteriotic Curve)并按Logstic模型对题目参数作出了估计,从而对题目分析结果作了对比研究。最后,本文对IRT与CTT在我国的运用、提出了若干看法。

关键词: NULL

Abstract: The item response theory (IRT) has been considered by some scho-lars as one of the three prime directions of current psychological measu-rement theory. In several respects it is more reasonable than the classi-cal test theory (CTT). This paper, using the 1986 data of the entrance-examinations of Teachers' Colleges in Shanghai, and taking the frame ofCTT, computes the indexes of five multiple-choice items in the mathem-atical papers of science students. Then, basing on IRT, the item charac-teristic curves are plotted and the item parameters are estimated under-logistic models. Thus, a comparative study of the results of item-analysis is made. Some comments are made on the application of IRT and CTT inour practice.

Key words: NULL