心理学报 ›› 1986, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 86-91. cstr: 32110.14.1986.00086
• • 上一篇 下一篇
罗胜德
发布日期:
出版日期:
Luo Shengde Institute of Psychology, Academia Sinica
Online:
Published:
摘要: (艾宾浩斯)记忆实验心理学研究整整一个世纪了。本文简溯并试评记忆脑机制研究的简史,特别是本世纪内的两场学术辩论及代表假说。
关键词: NULL
Abstract: At the centennial anniversary of research on memory experimentalpsychology which dates back to the book "Memory" by H. Ebbinghausof Germany, the author comments on the mystery of engram whichhas been regarded as the core cf the mystery of the mind, andbriefly reviews the history of research on the brain mechanisms ofmemory. The paper also deals with the two great debates in this centuryand their representative hypotheses, such as I. P. Pavlov's conditionedreflex theory, K. S. Lashley's integration theory, M. R. Rosenzweig'scorrelation hypothesis, G. Ungar's nervous codes hypothesis, K. H.Pribram's hollogram hypothesis (1969), Jose M. R. Delgado's constellat-ions hypothesis (1981), and the hypothesis of electrical codes, chemicalcodes, and structural codes of acquired informations and engrams inthe brain.
Key words: NULL
罗胜德. (1986). 简评记忆脑机制研究中的两场辩论及代表假说. 心理学报, 18(4), 86-91.
Luo Shengde Institute of Psychology, Academia Sinica. (1986). A SHORT COMMENT ON THE TWO GREAT DEBATES ABOUT-BRAIN MECHANISMS OF MEMORY AND THEIR REP RESENTATIVE HYPOTHESES. , 18(4), 86-91.
推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/
https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y1986/V18/I4/86