ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 2082-2102.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.2082 cstr: 32110.14.2026.2082

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

医患最优化决策特征组合对患者参与共享决策的影响

朱冬青1, 秦璐瑶1, 李纯鑫1, 梁竹苑2,3   

  1. 1北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室, 首都师范大学心理学院, 北京 100048;
    2中国科学院心理研究所, 认知科学与心理健康全国重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    3中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-30 发布日期:2026-08-04 出版日期:2026-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 朱冬青, E-mail: zdq@cnu.edu.cn; 梁竹苑, E-mail: liangzy@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71502117)、北京市教育委员会人文社会科学研究计划一般项目(SM202010028011)支持

The effect of doctor-patient maximization combinations on patient engagement in shared decision-making

ZHU Dongqing1, QIN Luyao1, LI Chunxin1, LIANG Zhuyuan2,3   

  1. 1Beijing key lab of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
    2State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    3Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-09-30 Online:2026-08-04 Published:2026-10-25

摘要: 共享决策本质上是权力从医生向患者动态转移的过程, 其实现程度取决于医患特征组合对转移过程的具体影响。本研究基于权力转移视角和自我决定理论, 采用内容分析、追踪调查与即时模拟三种方法, 通过3项系列研究探讨了医患最优化决策特征组合对患者共享决策参与意愿的影响及可能的心理路径。研究发现, 医患最优化决策特征组合通过患者心理需求总体满足显著影响其共享决策参与意愿。具体而言, 面对满意型医生时, 最优化患者比满意型患者心理需求总体满足更高, 因而表现出更强的共享决策参与意愿; 面对最优化医生时, 两类患者的心理需求总体满足水平及共享决策参与意愿均显著降低。研究结果不仅从医患权力转移的角度增进了对共享决策的理解, 也为临床实践中推进共享决策的实施提供了改进策略。

关键词: 医患共享决策, 最优化决策特征组合, 权力转移, 自我决定理论

Abstract: Shared decision-making (SDM) is inherently a dynamic process of power transitioning from doctors to patients, and the degree to which this process is realized depends on how the combined characteristics of doctors and patients shape the transition. Nevertheless, few studies have systematically examined how doctor-patient characteristic combinations influence patients' willingness to engage in SDM from a power transition perspective. To address this gap, this study integrates the power transition perspective, maximization research, and self-determination theory to systematically investigate the effect of doctor-patient maximization combinations on patients' willingness to engage in SDM and the mediating role of overall satisfaction of patients' psychological needs in this process.
Employing content analysis of audio-recorded consultations, Study 1 explored whether doctor-patient maximization combinations influence patients' willingness to engage in SDM, combining patients' self-reported willingness with coded SDM behavioral data. With the support of the department head, one maximizing and one satisficing doctor were identified as target doctors. First-visit patients were randomly recruited from their clinics. After each consultation, patients completed a questionnaire assessing their maximizing tendencies, willingness to engage in SDM, and control variables. All consultations were audio-recorded, and the recordings were independently coded by trained research assistants on five behavioral indicators. Results confirm a significant interaction effect between doctor and patient maximizing tendencies on patients' willingness to engage in SDM. Specifically, when interacting with a satisficing doctor, maximizing patients exhibit stronger willingness to engage in SDM than satisficing patients. In contrast, a maximizing doctor significantly reduces engagement willingness among both maximizing and satisficing patients (supporting H1).
Using a multi-wave design with real-world, randomly matched doctor-patient dyads, Study 2 examined whether the overall satisfaction of patients' psychological needs mediates the relationship between doctor-patient maximization combinations and patients' willingness to engage in SDM. To reduce common method bias, data were collected from dyads at four separate time points. Before the consultation (T1), waiting patients reported their maximizing tendencies (independent variable) and demographic information. After the consultation (T2), these patients assessed their overall satisfaction of psychological needs (mediating variable) and immediate willingness to engage in SDM (dependent variable), along with control measures. Following the clinic session on the same day (T3), the attending doctors reported their own maximizing tendency and control variables. Two weeks after the consultation (T4), patients' delayed willingness to engage in SDM was measured through the hospital's routine telephone follow-up system. Replicating prior findings, this study further reveals that the overall satisfaction of patients' psychological needs mediates the relationship between doctor-patient maximization combinations and patients' willingness to engage in SDM —both immediately and two weeks later (supporting H2 and H3).
Using a hidden profile task in a SDM context, Study 3 used a 2 (doctor maximization: maximizing vs. satisficing) × 2 (patient maximization: maximizing vs. satisficing) between-subjects design to establish causal inferences for our theoretical model. Doctors and patients were first randomly assigned to either a maximizing or satisficing condition and subsequently paired to form four dyad types. Each dyad then completed a hidden profile task in a SDM context, after which we recorded behavioral data (final decisions and total preset messages exchanged). Finally, patients reported their willingness to engage in SDM, the overall satisfaction of psychological needs, and demographics. The results further validate the research hypotheses (supporting H1, H2 and H3), lending support to its causal inferences. By incorporating a hidden profile task into the SDM context, this research partially simulated the doctor-patient information exchange and SDM process, and objectively assessed SDM effectiveness based on both parties' decision outcomes.
Collectively, this study reveals that doctor-patient maximization combinations significantly influence patients' willingness to engage in SDM through the overall satisfaction of patients' psychological needs, thus providing valuable theoretical insights. First, it extends the theoretical perspective on SDM by systematically investigating the effect of doctor-patient maximization combinations. Second, by integrating maximizing theory with SDM research, it establishes an interdisciplinary bridge between behavioral decision science and clinical communication. Finally, it not only extends self-determination theory beyond its conventional boundaries but also develops a need-satisfaction-based theoretical model of SDM.

Key words: doctor-patient shared decision-making, maximization combinations, power transition, self-determination theory

中图分类号: