ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

变量之间的影响关系和多重影响因素的共同作用类型

温忠粦, 王一帆, 马鹏, 孟进   

  • 收稿日期:2024-02-19 修回日期:2024-06-12 接受日期:2024-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 温忠粦
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32171091); 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD190006)

The Influence Relationship among Variables and Types of Multiple Influence Factors Working Together

Wang YiFan   

  • Received:2024-02-19 Revised:2024-06-12 Accepted:2024-06-13

摘要: 探讨研究变量之间的关系是心理学和其他社科领域实证研究的主要工作。基于问卷调查的实证文章多数涉及变量之间的影响关系,但这个概念未有明确界定,经常被人理解为相关关系或者因果关系,无论哪种情况都会带来问题,尤其在中介效应研究中更为突出。本文将影响关系定义为有方向性的相关关系,从外延和内涵上揭示了相关、影响和因果三者之间的关系;提供了多种途径为影响关系建模找到理据;讨论了一个结果变量的多重影响因素的共同作用类型。本文将为问卷研究中的变量之间关系研究提供理论支撑。

关键词: 影响关系, 相关关系, 因果关系, 影响因素, 中介变量, 调节变量

Abstract: Exploring the relationships among variables is the main focus of empirical research in psychology and other social science disciplines. Most Empirical studies based on questionnaire surveys involve the influence relationship between variables. However, neither research methodologies nor common online encyclopedia entries provide a strict definition for this concept, leading to a lack of clarity in the understanding of the influence relationship. Some equate it with the causal relationship, while others consider it synonymous with the correlation relationship. Both cases can pose problems, particularly in the study of mediating effects. This article defines the influence relationship as a direction correlation relationship, elucidating relations between correlation, influence, and causation from the perspectives of denotation and connotation. It discusses the connection between influencing factors and risk factors, where risk factors are considered a subset of influencing factors. While theoretically defining risk factors as equivalent to influencing factors is feasible, equating risk factors with influencing factors may sometimes be challenging to explain. Usually, factors that may lead to adverse outcomes are considered risk factors. We provide several ways to find evidence for modeling the influence relationship: (1) Determining direction based on the chronological order of variable occurrences; (2)Following the rule that object variables influence on subject variables; (3) Supporting from theory or empirical literature; (4) According to attributes of variables: essential attributes influencing state attributes, long-term attributes influencing temporary attributes, and stable attributes influencing unstable attributes; (5) Reversing the order of two variables to see which one is easier to explain; (6) Reasoning through analogies; (7) Summarizing from life experience and common sense; (8) Using the principles of cross-lag analysis to identify dominant factors. We also discuss types of multiple influencing factors working together. These include independent effects, overlapping effects, two types of proxy effects, two types of mediating variables, and two types of moderating variables. Some influence relationships are closer to the causal relationship, while others are closer to the correlation relationship. The degree to which different studies obtain influence relationships that are close to the causal relationship may differ, affecting the quality of the research. The closer an influence relationship is to causation, the more information it can provide and the more likely it is to be valued.

Key words: influence relationship, correlation relationship, causal relationship, influence factor, mediating variable, moderating variable