Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1189-1207.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1189
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao
Received:2025-06-18
Online:2026-07-15
Published:2026-05-11
CLC Number:
HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao. How the internal attention selection advantage emerges in visual working memory: Evidence from the retro-cue paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(7): 1189-1207.
| [1] 付凯. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中内部注意优先化选择的灵活性有限 [硕士学位论文]. 辽宁师范大学. [2] 付凯, 王天昊, 梁腾飞, 付雪莹, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中的内部注意选择: 效果、特性及机制.心理科学, 43(6), 1333-1340. [3] 龙芳芳, 李昱辰, 陈晓宇, 李子媛, 梁腾飞, 刘强. (2019). 视觉工作记忆的巩固加工: 时程、模式及机制.心理科学进展, 27(8), 1404-1416. [4] 潘志虎, 刘茹邑, 郭利静, 叶超雄. (2024). 视觉工作记忆中干扰对回溯线索收益的影响.四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 47(2), 179-187. [5] 王一峰, 唐雨竹, 肖坤辰, 荆秀娟. (2025). 持续性注意低频波动的机制与干预.心理科学进展, 33(7), 1091-1103. [6] 叶超雄, 胡中华, 梁腾飞, 张加峰, 许茜如, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆回溯线索效应的产生机制: 认知阶段分离.心理学报, 52(4), 399-413. [7] Ahmad J., Swan G., Bowman H., Wyble B., Nobre A. C., Shapiro K. L., & McNab F. (2017). Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4785. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-X [8] Barth, A., & Schneider, D. (2018). Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference. Psychophysiology, 55(7), e13062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13062 [9] Bays P. M., Schneegans S., Ma W. J., & Brady T. F. (2024). Representation and computation in visual working memory. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(6), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2 [10] Berryhill M. E., Richmond L. L., Shay C. S.,& Olson, I. R.(2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.593605 [11] Capodieci A., Ruffini C., Frascari A., Rivella C., Bombonato C., Giaccherini S.,… Pecini, C.(2023). Executive functions in children with specific learning disorders: Shedding light on a complex profile through teleassessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 142, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104621 [12] Cepeda-Freyre H. A., Garcia-Aguilar G., Eguibar J. R., & Cortes C. (2020). Brain processing of complex geometric forms in a visual memory task increases P2 amplitude. Brain Sciences, 10(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020114 [13] Chen S., Töllner T., Müller H. J., & Conci M. (2024). ERPs and alpha oscillations track the encoding and maintenance of object-based representations in visual working memory. Psychophysiology, 61(7), e14557. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14557 [14] Chen W., Ye S., Ding X., Shen M., & Gao Z. (2024). Selectively maintaining an object's feature in visual working memory: A comparison between highly discriminable and fine-grained features. Memory & Cognition, 53(3), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01612-w [15] Chen Z., Sun Q., & Li X. (2023). Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory. Psychological Research, 87(6), 1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x [16] Daume J., Kamiński J., Salimpour Y., Schjetnan A. G.P., Anderson, W. S., Valiante, T. A., … Rutishauser, U.(2024). Persistent activity during working memory maintenance predicts long-term memory formation in the human hippocampus. Neuron, 112(23), 3957-3968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.013 [17] Ding Y., Postle B. R., & van Ede F. (2024). Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36(5), 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02123 [18] Dube B., Lumsden A., & Al-Aidroos N. (2019). Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 641-646. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7 [19] Echeverria-Altuna I., Boettcher S. E., van Ede F., & Nobre A. C. (2025). Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory. PLOS Biology, 23(7), e3003273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003273 [20] Ester E. F.,& Nouri, A.(2023). Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors. iScience, 262023.107259 [21] Ester E. F., Nouri A., & Rodriguez L. (2018). Retrospective cues mitigate information loss in human cortex during working memory storage. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(40), 8538-8548. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018 [22] Fan L., Zhang L., Diao L., Xu M., Chen R., & Zhang X. (2021). Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820966264 [23] Fu X., Ye C., Hu Z., Li Z., Liang T.,& Liu, Q.(2022). The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms. Biological Psychology, 170, 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108320 [24] Gao C., Zhang Q., & Zhang X. (2023). Active inhibition of the retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Evidence from event-related potential. i-Perception, 14(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231182290 [25] Gresch D., Behnke L., van Ede F., Nobre A. C., & Boettcher S. E. (2025). Neural dynamics of reselecting visual and motor contents in working memory after external interference. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(18), e2347242025. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2347-24.2025 [26] Gressmann M.,& Janczyk, M.(2016). The (Un)clear effects of invalid retro-cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244 [27] Günseli E., Fahrenfort J. J., van Moorselaar D., Daoultzis K. C., Meeter M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 13499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 [28] Gunseli E., van Moorselaar D., Meeter M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1334-1341. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x [29] Guo L., Nie D., Liu P., Zhang L., & Ye C. (2025). Color first, space next, orientation last: A temporal comparison of retro-cue effects in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01789-8 [30] Hajonides J. E., van Ede F. V., Stokes M. G., & Nobre A. C. (2020). Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 20(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.8.25 [31] Han, S., & Ku, Y. (2022). Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: Harmony but not uniformity. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1274-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01556-9 [32] Han S., Zhou H., Tian Y.,& Ku, Y.(2023). Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: Advantage of peripheral over central cues. Progress in Neurobiology, 230, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521 [33] Hao R., Becker M. W., Ye C., Liu Q., & Liu T. (2018). The bandwidth of VWM consolidation varies with the stimulus feature: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(5), 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000488 [34] Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39(4), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003023 [35] Hou L., Yang J., Xu L., Peng J., Joyce Law C. Y., & Chen T. (2023). Activation of brain regions associated with working memory and inhibitory control in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review. Current Medical Imaging, 19(8), 865-873. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405618666220822101019 [36] Kuo B. C., Lin S. H.,& Yeh, Y. Y.(2018). Functional interplay of top-down attention with affective codes during visual short-term memory maintenance. Cortex, 103, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.003 [37] Kuo B. C., Rotshtein P.,& Yeh, Y. Y.(2011). Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding. Brain and Cognition, 772011.10.001 [38] Kuo B. C., Yeh Y. Y., Chen A. J.W., & D'Esposito, M.(2011). Functional connectivity during top-down modulation of visual short-term memory representations. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1589-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.043 [39] Lepsien J., Thornton I.,& Nobre, A. C.(2011). Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1569-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.011 [40] Li H. H., Sprague T. C., Yoo A. H., Ma W. J., & Curtis C. E. (2025). Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory. Science Advances, 11(15), eadr8015. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr8015 [41] Liljefors J., Almeida R., Rane G., Lundström J. N., Herman P., & Lundqvist M. (2024). Distinct functions for beta and alpha bursts in gating of human working memory. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53257-7 [42] Lin Y. T., Sasin E., & Fougnie D. (2021). Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1600-1612. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02239-0 [43] Liu Q., Yin X., Guo L., & Ye C. (2024). Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01969-2 [44] Liu R., Guo L., Lin X., Nie D., Astikainen P.,& Ye, C.(2024). Dimension-based retro-cue benefit in working memory does not require unfocused dimension removal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1433405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433405 [45] Liu R., Guo L., Sun H. J., Parviainen T., Zhou Z., Cheng Y., .. Ye C. (2023). Sustained attention required for effective dimension-based retro-cue benefit in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 23(5), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.5.13 [46] Luo T., Huang L., & Tian M. (2023). Retro-cue effect: The retro-cue is effective when and only when working memory consolidation is inadequate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(9), 1439-1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001225 [47] Luo X., Guo J., Liu L., Zhao X., Li D., Li H., .. Sun, L.(2019). The neural correlations of spatial attention and working memory deficits in adults with ADHD. NeuroImage: Clinical, 22, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101728 [48] Makovski T.,& Pertzov, Y.(2015). Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 682015.1049623 [49] Matsukura M., Luck S. J., & Vecera S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1422-1434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192957 [50] Mössing, W. A., & Busch, N. A. (2020). Lateralized alpha oscillations are irrelevant for the behavioral retro-cueing benefit in visual working memory. PeerJ, 8, e9398. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9398 [51] Myers N. E., Stokes M. G.,& Nobre, A. C.(2017). Prioritizing information during working memory: Beyond sustained internal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010 [52] Ngiam, W. X. Q. (2024). Mapping visual working memory models to a theoretical framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(2), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02356-5 [53] Niklaus M., Nobre A. C., & van Ede F. (2017). Feature- based attentional weighting and spreading in visual working memory. Scientific Reports, 7, 42384. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42384 [54] Niklaus M., Singmann H.,& Oberauer, K.(2019). Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits. Cognition, 183, 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.015 [55] Pacheco-Estefan D., Fellner M. C., Kunz L., Zhang H., Reinacher P., Roy C., .. Axmacher N. (2024). Maintenance and transformation of representational formats during working memory prioritization. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52541-w [56] Paluch K., Magnuski M., Średniawa W., Ivanovski D., Rysz A., Służewska-Niedźwiedź M., .. Kamiński J. (2025). Unattended working memory items are coded by persistent activity in human medial temporal lobe neurons. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(10), 2099-2113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02235-0 [57] Panichello, M. F., & Buschman, T. J. (2021). Shared mechanisms underlie the control of working memory and attention. Nature, 592(7855), 601-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03390-w [58] Pertzov Y., Bays P. M., Joseph S., & Husain M. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030947 [59] Poch C., Carretie L.,& Campo, P.(2017). A dual mechanism underlying alpha lateralization in attentional orienting to mental representation. Biological Psychology, 128, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.015 [60] Poth, C. H. (2020). Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task. Cognitive Processing, 21(3), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00967-7 [61] Printzlau F. A., Myers N. E., Manohar S. G., & Stokes M. G. (2022). Neural reinstatement tracks spread of attention between object features in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(9), 1681-1701. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01879 [62] Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031172 [63] Rerko L., Souza A. S., & Oberauer K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 712-728. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8 [64] Riddle J., McPherson T., Sheikh A., Shin H., Hadar E., & Frohlich F. (2024). Internal representations are prioritized by frontoparietal theta connectivity and suppressed by alpha oscillation dynamics: Evidence from concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation EEG and invasive EEG. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(15), e1381232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-23.2024 [65] Sahu P. P.,& Tseng, P.(2021). Frontoparietal theta tACS nonselectively enhances encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages in visuospatial working memory. Neuroscience Research, 172, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2021.05.005 [66] Sasin, E., & Fougnie, D. (2020). Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76431-5 [67] Schneider D., Barth A., Getzmann S.,& Wascher, E.(2017). On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG. Biological Psychology, 124, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.006 [68] Schneider D., Barth A.,& Wascher, E.(2017). On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG. NeuroImage, 162, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.057 [69] Schneider D., Mertes C., & Wascher E. (2016). The time course of visuo-spatial working memory updating revealed by a retro-cuing paradigm. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 21442. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21442 [70] Sewell D. K., Lilburn S. D., & Smith P. L. (2016). Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(11), 1673-1693. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040213 [71] Shepherdson P., Oberauer K., & Souza A. S. (2018). Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 286-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000448 [72] Smith P. L., Lilburn S. D., Corbett E. A., Sewell D. K.,& Kyllingsbæk, S.(2016). The attention-weighted sample- size model of visual short-term memory: Attention capture predicts resource allocation and memory load. Cognitive Psychology, 89, 71-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.002 [73] Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1839-1860. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 [74] Souza A. S., Rerko L., & Oberauer K. (2016). Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 890-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000192 [75] Stemmann, H., & Freiwald, W. A. (2019). Evidence for an attentional priority map in inferotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), 23797-23805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821866116 [76] Superbia-Guimarães,L., Bader, M., & Camos, V.(2022). Attentional orienting in working memory in children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 472022.2155164 [77] Tanoue, R. T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2012). The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0305-0 [78] Tomić, I., & Bays, P. M. (2024). A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory. eLife, 13, e91034. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91034 [79] Trapp S.,& Lepsien, J. R.(2012). Attentional orienting to mnemonic representations: Reduction of load-sensitive maintenance-related activity in the intraparietal sulcus. Neuropsychologia, 502012.08.003 [80] Ülkü S., Getzmann S., Wascher E., & Schneider D. (2025). EEG correlates of cognitive dynamics in task resumption after interruptions: The impact of available time and flexibility. European Journal of Neuroscience, 61(4), e70027. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70027 [81] Vandenbroucke A. R. E., Sligte I. G., de Vries J. G., Cohen M. X., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). Neural correlates of visual short-term memory dissociate between fragile and working memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2477-2490. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00870 [82] Van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2024). A neural decision signal during internal sampling from working memory in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(19), e1475232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1475-23.2024 [83] van Moorselaar, D., Gunseli, E., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L.(2015). The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01053 [84] van Moorselaar D., Olivers C. N., Theeuwes J., Lamme V. A., & Sligte I. G. (2015). Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000124 [85] Van Moorselaar D., Theeuwes J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(4), 1450-1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229 [86] Wang Z., Xuan B., & Li S. (2022). Motion or sociality? The cueing effect and temporal course of autistic traits on gaze-triggered attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(4), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02480-9 [87] Ye C., Sun H. -J., Xu Q., Liang T., Zhang Y., & Liu Q. (2019). Working memory capacity affects trade-off between quality and quantity only when stimulus exposure duration is sufficient: Evidence for the two-phase model. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44998-3 [88] Yu Q., Teng C., & Postle B. R. (2020). Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory. PLOS Biology, 18(6), e3000769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000769 [89] Yuk V., Urbain C., Anagnostou E.,& Taylor, M. J.(2020). Frontoparietal network connectivity during an n-back task in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 551808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551808 [90] Zhou Y., Curtis C. E., Sreenivasan K. K., & Fougnie D. (2022). Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(37), 7110- 7120. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022 [91] Zickerick B., Rösner M., Sabo M., & Schneider D. (2021). How to refocus attention on working memory representations following interruptions-Evidence from frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(11), 7820-7838. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15506 |
| [1] | Wanru Li, Jia Yang, Pinglei Bao. The Neural Basis of Visual Working Memory of Real-World Object [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 102-102. |
| [2] | Mengxuan Sun, Qi Zhang. Simultaneous or Switching? Electrophysiological Measures of the Mechanism During Multiple Object Searching in Real-world Scenes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 92-92. |
| [3] | ZHANG Zhao, ZHANG Liwei, GONG Ran. The filtering efficiency in visual working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 635-651. |
| [4] | Keyun Xin, Zhi Li. Visual working memory load does not affect the overall stimulus processing time in visual search [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 33-33. |
| [5] | LONG Fangfang, LI Yuchen, CHEN Xiaoyu, LI Ziyuan, LIANG Tengfei, LIU Qiang. Consolidation processing of visual working memory: Time course, pattern and mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(8): 1404-1416. |
| [6] | Yangzhuo LI, Xucheng YANG, Hong GAO, Xiangping GAO. The role of working memory representation in visual search: The perspective of non-target template [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1608-1616. |
| [7] | LIANG Tengfei, WU Haiyan, ZHANG Yin, LONG Fangfang, CHEN Jiangtao, HU Zhonghua, LIU Qiang. Attentional selection in the perceptual scenes and internal working memory representations: A unitized perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 625-635. |
| [8] | Zhang Haihang; Shen Mowei; Zhou Jifan. High Visual Working Memory Resolution for Cooperation-oriented People [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 42-. |
| [9] | HE Xu;GUO Chunyan. Capacity and Resource Allocation of Visual Working Memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1741-1748. |
| [10] | SUN Hui-Ming;FU Xiao-Lan. Mechanism of Visual Working Memory Consolidation: Vulcanization or Recession? [J]. , 2011, 19(11): 1605-1614. |
| [11] | LIU Fei; WANG En-Guo. The Status and Prospect in Research on Working Memory of Objects [J]. , 2010, 18(2): 200-209. |
| [12] | WEI Liu-Qing;ZHANG Xue-Min;LIU Bing;LU Xue-Ming;LI Ying-Di. The Pattern and Cognitive Mechanism of Visual Multiple Object Tracking [J]. , 2010, 18(12): 1919-1925. |
| [13] | SHAN Xi-Jiao;LI Shou-Xin. The New Development of Mechanism of Visual Working Memory Capacity Based on New Models [J]. , 2010, 18(11): 1684-1691. |
| [14] | Pan Yi;Xu Baihua;Hu Xinkui. The Role of Visual Working Memory in Visual Search [J]. , 2007, 15(5): 754-760. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||