Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1189-1207.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1189
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao(
)
Received:2025-06-18
Online:2026-07-15
Published:2026-05-11
Contact:
WANG Tingzhao
E-mail:wangtingzhao@snnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao. How the internal attention selection advantage emerges in visual working memory: Evidence from the retro-cue paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(7): 1189-1207.
| [1] | 付凯. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中内部注意优先化选择的灵活性有限 [硕士学位论文]. 辽宁师范大学. |
| [2] | 付凯, 王天昊, 梁腾飞, 付雪莹, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中的内部注意选择: 效果、特性及机制. 心理科学, 43(6), 1333-1340. |
| [3] |
龙芳芳, 李昱辰, 陈晓宇, 李子媛, 梁腾飞, 刘强. (2019). 视觉工作记忆的巩固加工: 时程、模式及机制. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1404-1416.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01404 |
| [4] | 潘志虎, 刘茹邑, 郭利静, 叶超雄. (2024). 视觉工作记忆中干扰对回溯线索收益的影响. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 47(2), 179-187. |
| [5] |
王一峰, 唐雨竹, 肖坤辰, 荆秀娟. (2025). 持续性注意低频波动的机制与干预. 心理科学进展, 33(7), 1091-1103.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.1091 |
| [6] |
叶超雄, 胡中华, 梁腾飞, 张加峰, 许茜如, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆回溯线索效应的产生机制: 认知阶段分离. 心理学报, 52(4), 399-413.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00399 |
| [7] |
Ahmad, J., Swan, G., Bowman, H., Wyble, B., Nobre, A. C., Shapiro, K. L., & McNab, F. (2017). Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4785. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-X
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x URL |
| [8] |
Barth, A., & Schneider, D. (2018). Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference. Psychophysiology, 55(7), e13062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13062
doi: 10.1111/psyp.2018.55.issue-7 URL |
| [9] |
Bays, P. M., Schneegans, S., Ma, W. J., & Brady, T. F. (2024). Representation and computation in visual working memory. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(6), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2
doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2 URL pmid: 38849647 |
| [10] |
Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.593605
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.604786 URL |
| [11] |
Capodieci, A., Ruffini, C., Frascari, A., Rivella, C., Bombonato, C., Giaccherini, S., … Pecini, C. (2023). Executive functions in children with specific learning disorders: Shedding light on a complex profile through teleassessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 142, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104621
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104621 URL |
| [12] |
Cepeda-Freyre, H. A., Garcia-Aguilar, G., Eguibar, J. R., & Cortes, C. (2020). Brain processing of complex geometric forms in a visual memory task increases P2 amplitude. Brain Sciences, 10(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020114
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020114 URL |
| [13] |
Chen, S., Töllner, T., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2024). ERPs and alpha oscillations track the encoding and maintenance of object-based representations in visual working memory. Psychophysiology, 61(7), e14557. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14557
doi: 10.1111/psyp.v61.7 URL |
| [14] |
Chen, W., Ye, S., Ding, X., Shen, M., & Gao, Z. (2024). Selectively maintaining an object's feature in visual working memory: A comparison between highly discriminable and fine-grained features. Memory & Cognition, 53(3), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01612-w
doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01612-w URL |
| [15] |
Chen, Z., Sun, Q., & Li, X. (2023). Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory. Psychological Research, 87(6), 1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x URL |
| [16] |
Daume, J., Kamiński, J., Salimpour, Y., Schjetnan, A. G. P., Anderson, W. S., Valiante, T. A., … Rutishauser, U. (2024). Persistent activity during working memory maintenance predicts long-term memory formation in the human hippocampus. Neuron, 112(23), 3957-3968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.013
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.013 URL |
| [17] |
Ding, Y., Postle, B. R., & van Ede, F. (2024). Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36(5), 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02123
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02123 URL |
| [18] |
Dube, B., Lumsden, A., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2019). Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 641-646. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7
doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7 URL |
| [19] |
Echeverria-Altuna, I., Boettcher, S. E., van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2025). Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory. PLOS Biology, 23(7), e3003273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003273
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003273 URL |
| [20] |
Ester, E. F., & Nouri, A. (2023). Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors. iScience, 26(7), 107259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107259
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107259 URL |
| [21] |
Ester, E. F., Nouri, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2018). Retrospective cues mitigate information loss in human cortex during working memory storage. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(40), 8538-8548. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018 URL pmid: 30126971 |
| [22] |
Fan, L., Zhang, L., Diao, L., Xu, M., Chen, R., & Zhang, X. (2021). Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820966264
doi: 10.1177/1747021820966264 URL |
| [23] |
Fu, X., Ye, C., Hu, Z., Li, Z., Liang, T., & Liu, Q. (2022). The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms. Biological Psychology, 170, 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108320
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108320 URL |
| [24] | Gao, C., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, X. (2023). Active inhibition of the retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Evidence from event-related potential. i-Perception, 14(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231182290 |
| [25] |
Gresch, D., Behnke, L., van Ede, F., Nobre, A. C., & Boettcher, S. E. (2025). Neural dynamics of reselecting visual and motor contents in working memory after external interference. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(18), e2347242025. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2347-24.2025
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2347-24.2025 URL |
| [26] | Gressmann, M., & Janczyk, M. (2016). The (Un)clear effects of invalid retro-cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244 |
| [27] |
Günseli, E., Fahrenfort, J. J., van Moorselaar, D., Daoultzis, K. C., Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 13499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 URL |
| [28] |
Gunseli, E., van Moorselaar, D., Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1334-1341. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x URL |
| [29] | Guo, L., Nie, D., Liu, P., Zhang, L., & Ye, C. (2025). Color first, space next, orientation last: A temporal comparison of retro-cue effects in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01789-8 |
| [30] | Hajonides, J. E., van Ede, F. V., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2020). Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 20(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.8.25 |
| [31] |
Han, S., & Ku, Y. (2022). Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: Harmony but not uniformity. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1274-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01556-9
doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01556-9 URL |
| [32] |
Han, S., Zhou, H., Tian, Y., & Ku, Y. (2023). Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: Advantage of peripheral over central cues. Progress in Neurobiology, 230, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521 URL |
| [33] |
Hao, R., Becker, M. W., Ye, C., Liu, Q., & Liu, T. (2018). The bandwidth of VWM consolidation varies with the stimulus feature: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(5), 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000488
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000488 URL pmid: 29154628 |
| [34] | Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39(4), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003023 |
| [35] | Hou, L., Yang, J., Xu, L., Peng, J., Joyce Law, C. Y., & Chen, T. (2023). Activation of brain regions associated with working memory and inhibitory control in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review. Current Medical Imaging, 19(8), 865-873. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405618666220822101019 |
| [36] |
Kuo, B. C., Lin, S. H., & Yeh, Y. Y. (2018). Functional interplay of top-down attention with affective codes during visual short-term memory maintenance. Cortex, 103, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.003
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.003 URL |
| [37] |
Kuo, B. C., Rotshtein, P., & Yeh, Y. Y. (2011). Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding. Brain and Cognition, 77(3), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.001 URL |
| [38] |
Kuo, B. C., Yeh, Y. Y., Chen, A. J. W., & D'Esposito, M. (2011). Functional connectivity during top-down modulation of visual short-term memory representations. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1589-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.043
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.043 URL |
| [39] |
Lepsien, J., Thornton, I., & Nobre, A. C. (2011). Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1569-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.011
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.011 URL pmid: 21420421 |
| [40] |
Li, H. H., Sprague, T. C., Yoo, A. H., Ma, W. J., & Curtis, C. E. (2025). Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory. Science Advances, 11(15), eadr8015. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr8015
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr8015 URL |
| [41] |
Liljefors, J., Almeida, R., Rane, G., Lundström, J. N., Herman, P., & Lundqvist, M. (2024). Distinct functions for beta and alpha bursts in gating of human working memory. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53257-7
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53257-7 URL |
| [42] |
Lin, Y. T., Sasin, E., & Fougnie, D. (2021). Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1600-1612. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02239-0
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02239-0 URL |
| [43] |
Liu, Q., Yin, X., Guo, L., & Ye, C. (2024). Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01969-2
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01969-2 URL |
| [44] |
Liu, R., Guo, L., Lin, X., Nie, D., Astikainen, P., & Ye, C. (2024). Dimension-based retro-cue benefit in working memory does not require unfocused dimension removal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1433405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433405
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433405 URL |
| [45] | Liu, R., Guo, L., Sun, H. J., Parviainen, T., Zhou, Z., Cheng, Y.,... Ye, C. (2023). Sustained attention required for effective dimension-based retro-cue benefit in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 23(5), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.5.13 |
| [46] |
Luo, T., Huang, L., & Tian, M. (2023). Retro-cue effect: The retro-cue is effective when and only when working memory consolidation is inadequate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(9), 1439-1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001225
doi: 10.1037/xlm0001225 URL |
| [47] |
Luo, X., Guo, J., Liu, L., Zhao, X., Li, D., Li, H.,... Sun, L. (2019). The neural correlations of spatial attention and working memory deficits in adults with ADHD. NeuroImage: Clinical, 22, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101728
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101728 URL |
| [48] | Makovski, T., & Pertzov, Y. (2015). Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 68(9), 1735-1743. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1049623 |
| [49] |
Matsukura, M., Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1422-1434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192957
doi: 10.3758/BF03192957 URL |
| [50] |
Mössing, W. A., & Busch, N. A. (2020). Lateralized alpha oscillations are irrelevant for the behavioral retro-cueing benefit in visual working memory. PeerJ, 8, e9398. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9398
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9398 URL |
| [51] |
Myers, N. E., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2017). Prioritizing information during working memory: Beyond sustained internal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010
doi: S1364-6613(17)30053-0 URL pmid: 28454719 |
| [52] |
Ngiam, W. X. Q. (2024). Mapping visual working memory models to a theoretical framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(2), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02356-5
doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02356-5 URL |
| [53] |
Niklaus, M., Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2017). Feature- based attentional weighting and spreading in visual working memory. Scientific Reports, 7, 42384. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42384
doi: 10.1038/srep42384 URL |
| [54] |
Niklaus, M., Singmann, H., & Oberauer, K. (2019). Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits. Cognition, 183, 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.015
doi: S0010-0277(18)30310-X URL pmid: 30551034 |
| [55] |
Pacheco-Estefan, D., Fellner, M. C., Kunz, L., Zhang, H., Reinacher, P., Roy, C.,... Axmacher, N. (2024). Maintenance and transformation of representational formats during working memory prioritization. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52541-w
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52541-w URL |
| [56] |
Paluch, K., Magnuski, M., Średniawa, W., Ivanovski, D., Rysz, A., Służewska-Niedźwiedź, M.,... Kamiński, J. (2025). Unattended working memory items are coded by persistent activity in human medial temporal lobe neurons. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(10), 2099-2113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02235-0
doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02235-0 URL pmid: 40634665 |
| [57] |
Panichello, M. F., & Buschman, T. J. (2021). Shared mechanisms underlie the control of working memory and attention. Nature, 592(7855), 601-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03390-w
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03390-w URL |
| [58] |
Pertzov, Y., Bays, P. M., Joseph, S., & Husain, M. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030947
doi: 10.1037/a0030947 URL pmid: 23244045 |
| [59] |
Poch, C., Carretie, L., & Campo, P. (2017). A dual mechanism underlying alpha lateralization in attentional orienting to mental representation. Biological Psychology, 128, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.015
doi: S0301-0511(17)30134-5 URL pmid: 28746832 |
| [60] |
Poth, C. H. (2020). Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task. Cognitive Processing, 21(3), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00967-7
doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00967-7 URL pmid: 32206936 |
| [61] |
Printzlau, F. A., Myers, N. E., Manohar, S. G., & Stokes, M. G. (2022). Neural reinstatement tracks spread of attention between object features in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(9), 1681-1701. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01879
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01879 URL pmid: 35704549 |
| [62] |
Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031172
doi: 10.1037/a0031172 URL |
| [63] |
Rerko, L., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 712-728. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8
doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8 URL |
| [64] |
Riddle, J., McPherson, T., Sheikh, A., Shin, H., Hadar, E., & Frohlich, F. (2024). Internal representations are prioritized by frontoparietal theta connectivity and suppressed by alpha oscillation dynamics: Evidence from concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation EEG and invasive EEG. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(15), e1381232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-23.2024
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-23.2024 URL |
| [65] |
Sahu, P. P., & Tseng, P. (2021). Frontoparietal theta tACS nonselectively enhances encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages in visuospatial working memory. Neuroscience Research, 172, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2021.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.05.005 URL pmid: 33992662 |
| [66] |
Sasin, E., & Fougnie, D. (2020). Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76431-5
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76431-5 URL |
| [67] |
Schneider, D., Barth, A., Getzmann, S., & Wascher, E. (2017). On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG. Biological Psychology, 124, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.006
doi: S0301-0511(17)30006-6 URL pmid: 28115199 |
| [68] |
Schneider, D., Barth, A., & Wascher, E. (2017). On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG. NeuroImage, 162, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.057
doi: S1053-8119(17)30704-8 URL pmid: 28847491 |
| [69] |
Schneider, D., Mertes, C., & Wascher, E. (2016). The time course of visuo-spatial working memory updating revealed by a retro-cuing paradigm. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 21442. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21442
doi: 10.1038/srep21442 URL |
| [70] |
Sewell, D. K., Lilburn, S. D., & Smith, P. L. (2016). Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(11), 1673-1693. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040213
doi: 10.1037/a0040213 URL |
| [71] |
Shepherdson, P., Oberauer, K., & Souza, A. S. (2018). Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 286-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000448
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000448 URL pmid: 28557495 |
| [72] |
Smith, P. L., Lilburn, S. D., Corbett, E. A., Sewell, D. K., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2016). The attention-weighted sample- size model of visual short-term memory: Attention capture predicts resource allocation and memory load. Cognitive Psychology, 89, 71-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.002 URL |
| [73] |
Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1839-1860. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 URL |
| [74] |
Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 890-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000192
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000192 URL pmid: 26752731 |
| [75] |
Stemmann, H., & Freiwald, W. A. (2019). Evidence for an attentional priority map in inferotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), 23797-23805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821866116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821866116 URL |
| [76] |
Superbia-Guimarães, L., Bader, M., & Camos, V. (2022). Attentional orienting in working memory in children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(8), 384-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2022.2155164
doi: 10.1080/87565641.2022.2155164 URL |
| [77] |
Tanoue, R. T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2012). The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0305-0
doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0305-0 URL |
| [78] | Tomić, I., & Bays, P. M. (2024). A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory. eLife, 13, e91034. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91034 |
| [79] |
Trapp, S., & Lepsien, J. R. (2012). Attentional orienting to mnemonic representations: Reduction of load-sensitive maintenance-related activity in the intraparietal sulcus. Neuropsychologia, 50(12), 2805-2811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.003
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.003 URL pmid: 22960415 |
| [80] |
Ülkü, S., Getzmann, S., Wascher, E., & Schneider, D. (2025). EEG correlates of cognitive dynamics in task resumption after interruptions: The impact of available time and flexibility. European Journal of Neuroscience, 61(4), e70027. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70027
doi: 10.1111/ejn.v61.4 URL |
| [81] |
Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Sligte, I. G., de Vries, J. G., Cohen, M. X., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). Neural correlates of visual short-term memory dissociate between fragile and working memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2477-2490. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00870
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00870 URL pmid: 26351862 |
| [82] |
Van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2024). A neural decision signal during internal sampling from working memory in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(19), e1475232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1475-23.2024
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1475-23.2024 URL |
| [83] | van Moorselaar, D., Gunseli, E., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01053 |
| [84] |
van Moorselaar, D., Olivers, C. N., Theeuwes, J., Lamme, V. A., & Sligte, I. G. (2015). Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000124
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000124 URL |
| [85] | Van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(4), 1450-1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229 |
| [86] |
Wang, Z., Xuan, B., & Li, S. (2022). Motion or sociality? The cueing effect and temporal course of autistic traits on gaze-triggered attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(4), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02480-9
doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02480-9 URL |
| [87] |
Ye, C., Sun, H. -J., Xu, Q., Liang, T., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2019). Working memory capacity affects trade-off between quality and quantity only when stimulus exposure duration is sufficient: Evidence for the two-phase model. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44998-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44998-3 URL |
| [88] |
Yu, Q., Teng, C., & Postle, B. R. (2020). Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory. PLOS Biology, 18(6), e3000769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000769
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000769 URL |
| [89] |
Yuk, V., Urbain, C., Anagnostou, E., & Taylor, M. J. (2020). Frontoparietal network connectivity during an n-back task in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 551808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551808
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551808 URL |
| [90] |
Zhou, Y., Curtis, C. E., Sreenivasan, K. K., & Fougnie, D. (2022). Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(37), 7110-7120. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022 URL pmid: 35927036 |
| [91] |
Zickerick, B., Rösner, M., Sabo, M., & Schneider, D. (2021). How to refocus attention on working memory representations following interruptions-Evidence from frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(11), 7820-7838. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15506
doi: 10.1111/ejn.15506 URL pmid: 34687107 |
| [1] | Wanru Li, Jia Yang, Pinglei Bao. The Neural Basis of Visual Working Memory of Real-World Object [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 102-102. |
| [2] | Mengxuan Sun, Qi Zhang. Simultaneous or Switching? Electrophysiological Measures of the Mechanism During Multiple Object Searching in Real-world Scenes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 92-92. |
| [3] | ZHANG Zhao, ZHANG Liwei, GONG Ran. The filtering efficiency in visual working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 635-651. |
| [4] | Keyun Xin, Zhi Li. Visual working memory load does not affect the overall stimulus processing time in visual search [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 33-33. |
| [5] | LONG Fangfang, LI Yuchen, CHEN Xiaoyu, LI Ziyuan, LIANG Tengfei, LIU Qiang. Consolidation processing of visual working memory: Time course, pattern and mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(8): 1404-1416. |
| [6] | Yangzhuo LI, Xucheng YANG, Hong GAO, Xiangping GAO. The role of working memory representation in visual search: The perspective of non-target template [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1608-1616. |
| [7] | LIANG Tengfei, WU Haiyan, ZHANG Yin, LONG Fangfang, CHEN Jiangtao, HU Zhonghua, LIU Qiang. Attentional selection in the perceptual scenes and internal working memory representations: A unitized perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 625-635. |
| [8] | Zhang Haihang; Shen Mowei; Zhou Jifan. High Visual Working Memory Resolution for Cooperation-oriented People [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 42-. |
| [9] | HE Xu;GUO Chunyan. Capacity and Resource Allocation of Visual Working Memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1741-1748. |
| [10] | SUN Hui-Ming;FU Xiao-Lan. Mechanism of Visual Working Memory Consolidation: Vulcanization or Recession? [J]. , 2011, 19(11): 1605-1614. |
| [11] | LIU Fei; WANG En-Guo. The Status and Prospect in Research on Working Memory of Objects [J]. , 2010, 18(2): 200-209. |
| [12] | WEI Liu-Qing;ZHANG Xue-Min;LIU Bing;LU Xue-Ming;LI Ying-Di. The Pattern and Cognitive Mechanism of Visual Multiple Object Tracking [J]. , 2010, 18(12): 1919-1925. |
| [13] | SHAN Xi-Jiao;LI Shou-Xin. The New Development of Mechanism of Visual Working Memory Capacity Based on New Models [J]. , 2010, 18(11): 1684-1691. |
| [14] | Pan Yi;Xu Baihua;Hu Xinkui. The Role of Visual Working Memory in Visual Search [J]. , 2007, 15(5): 754-760. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||