Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 652-664.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00652
• ·Regular Articles· • Previous Articles Next Articles
DING Linjie1, LI Xu1(), YIN Shufei2
Received:
2020-05-09
Online:
2021-04-15
Published:
2021-02-22
CLC Number:
DING Linjie, LI Xu, YIN Shufei. Positivity effects in working memory: The effects of emotional valence and task relevance[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 652-664.
研究者(年份) | 平均年龄(或年龄范围) | 样本量 | 研究设计 | 研究结果(因变量:正确率) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YA vs. OA | YA vs. OA | 范式 | 刺激材料 | 效价 | 组内分析结果 | 组间差异结果 | |
Bermudez & Souza, | 26.17 vs. 70.96 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 图片 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:积极、中性>消极; 积极=中性 | - |
Hartley et al. Study1 | 19.45 vs. 72.93 | 31 vs. 31 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/悲伤/愤怒/恐惧/惊讶/厌恶 | - | 高兴/悲伤/愤怒/恐惧/ 惊讶/厌恶:OA=YA |
Hartley et al. Study3 | 20.38 vs. 75.41 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪/非情绪 | - | 情绪、非情绪:OA=YA |
Majerus & D'Argembeau, Study2 | 24~30 vs. 60~84 | 15 vs. 15 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | OA、YA:积极>消极、中性; 消极=中性 | 积极/中性/消极:OA<YA |
Majerus & D'Argembeau, Study3 | 24~30 vs. 60~84 | 15 vs. 15 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:积极>中性; 消极>中性 OA:积极>中性; 消极=中性 | - |
Mammarella et al. | 24.97 vs. 64.70 | 35 vs. 37 | 操作广度任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:消极>积极、中性; 积极=中性 OA:消极>积极、中性; 积极>中性 | 积极:OA=YA; 消极:OA=YA; 中性:OA<YA; |
Mikels et al. | 22.35 vs. 72.50 | 20 vs. 20 | 情感保持任务 | 图片 | 积极/消极 | YA:消极>积极 OA:积极>消极 | 积极:OA>YA 消极:- |
Mok et al. | 23.42 vs. 69.25 | 54 vs. 51 | 短时记忆任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/恐惧 | OA、YA:高兴>恐惧 | 高兴、恐惧:OA<YA |
Sava et al. Study1 | 19.84 vs. 74.33 vs. 78.82 (AD) | 25 vs. 21 vs. 17 (AD) | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/悲伤 | YA:高兴=中性=悲伤 OA:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=悲伤 AD:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=悲伤 | 高兴:OA、YA>AD; OA=YA 中性、悲伤:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD |
Sava et al. Study2 | 22.4 vs. 80.81 vs. 84.22 (AD) | 21 vs. 21 vs.18 (AD) | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/愤怒 | YA:高兴=中性=愤怒 OA:高兴、中性>愤怒; 高兴=中性 AD:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=愤怒 | 高兴:AD<YA; OA=YA; OA=AD 中性:OA、AD<YA; OA>AD 愤怒:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD |
Sv?rdet al. | 25.20 vs. 70.50 | 40 vs. 35 | 短时记忆任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/愤怒 | OA、YA:高兴>愤怒 | 高兴、愤怒:OA<YA |
研究者(年份) | 平均年龄(或年龄范围) | 样本量 | 研究设计 | 研究结果(因变量:正确率) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YA vs. OA | YA vs. OA | 范式 | 刺激材料 | 效价 | 组内分析结果 | 组间差异结果 | |
Bermudez & Souza, | 26.17 vs. 70.96 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 图片 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:积极、中性>消极; 积极=中性 | - |
Hartley et al. Study1 | 19.45 vs. 72.93 | 31 vs. 31 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/悲伤/愤怒/恐惧/惊讶/厌恶 | - | 高兴/悲伤/愤怒/恐惧/ 惊讶/厌恶:OA=YA |
Hartley et al. Study3 | 20.38 vs. 75.41 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪/非情绪 | - | 情绪、非情绪:OA=YA |
Majerus & D'Argembeau, Study2 | 24~30 vs. 60~84 | 15 vs. 15 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | OA、YA:积极>消极、中性; 消极=中性 | 积极/中性/消极:OA<YA |
Majerus & D'Argembeau, Study3 | 24~30 vs. 60~84 | 15 vs. 15 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:积极>中性; 消极>中性 OA:积极>中性; 消极=中性 | - |
Mammarella et al. | 24.97 vs. 64.70 | 35 vs. 37 | 操作广度任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | YA:消极>积极、中性; 积极=中性 OA:消极>积极、中性; 积极>中性 | 积极:OA=YA; 消极:OA=YA; 中性:OA<YA; |
Mikels et al. | 22.35 vs. 72.50 | 20 vs. 20 | 情感保持任务 | 图片 | 积极/消极 | YA:消极>积极 OA:积极>消极 | 积极:OA>YA 消极:- |
Mok et al. | 23.42 vs. 69.25 | 54 vs. 51 | 短时记忆任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/恐惧 | OA、YA:高兴>恐惧 | 高兴、恐惧:OA<YA |
Sava et al. Study1 | 19.84 vs. 74.33 vs. 78.82 (AD) | 25 vs. 21 vs. 17 (AD) | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/悲伤 | YA:高兴=中性=悲伤 OA:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=悲伤 AD:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=悲伤 | 高兴:OA、YA>AD; OA=YA 中性、悲伤:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD |
Sava et al. Study2 | 22.4 vs. 80.81 vs. 84.22 (AD) | 21 vs. 21 vs.18 (AD) | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/愤怒 | YA:高兴=中性=愤怒 OA:高兴、中性>愤怒; 高兴=中性 AD:高兴>中性、悲伤; 中性=愤怒 | 高兴:AD<YA; OA=YA; OA=AD 中性:OA、AD<YA; OA>AD 愤怒:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD |
Sv?rdet al. | 25.20 vs. 70.50 | 40 vs. 35 | 短时记忆任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/愤怒 | OA、YA:高兴>愤怒 | 高兴、愤怒:OA<YA |
研究者 (年份) | 平均年龄 (或年龄范围) | 样本量 | 研究设计 | 研究结果(因变量:正确率) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YA vs. OA | YA vs. OA | 范式 | 刺激材料 | 效价 | 任务描述 | 组内分析结果 | 组间差异结果 | |
Belham et al. Study1 | 21.38 vs. 71.10 | 56 vs. 39 | 延迟再认任务 | 图片 | 积极/中性/消极 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:积极=中性=消极 | 积极/中性/消极:OA<YA |
Belham et al. Study2 | 21.31 vs. 69.92 | 26 vs. 25 | 延迟再认任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/愤怒 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:愤怒>高兴; 高兴=中性; 愤怒=中性 OA:愤怒>高兴; 高兴=中性; 愤怒=中性 | 高兴/中性/愤怒:OA<YA |
Berger et al. | 25.03 vs. 68.60 | 31 vs. 31 | 2-back | 面孔 | 中性/愤怒 | 比较当前与两个试次前的刺激的情绪效价是否一致; 忽略n-1与n-3试次的刺激 | YA:愤怒=中性; OA:愤怒=中性; | 愤怒、中性:OA<YA |
Borg et al. | 27.07 vs. 78.35 vs. 80.92 (AD) | 14 vs. 14 vs.14 (AD) | 短时记忆任务 | 图片 | 中性/消极 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:消极=中性; OA:消极<中性; AD:消极=中性 | 消极:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD 中性:OA、AD<YA; OA>AD |
Hartley et al. Study2 | 20.04 vs. 74.43 | 32 vs. 30 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪 | 记忆面孔身份; 忽略面孔的情绪效价 | - | 情绪:OA<YA |
Hartley et al. Study3 | 20.38 vs. 75.41 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪/非情绪 | 记忆面孔身份; 忽略面孔的情绪效价 | - | 情绪/非情绪:OA<YA |
Truong & Yang, | 19.69 vs.73.25 | 36 vs. 36 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | 记忆任务指定的情绪目标刺激; 忽略任务指定的情绪分心刺激 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:消极<积极、中性; 积极=中性 | 积极、中性:OA=YA 消极:OA<YA |
研究者 (年份) | 平均年龄 (或年龄范围) | 样本量 | 研究设计 | 研究结果(因变量:正确率) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YA vs. OA | YA vs. OA | 范式 | 刺激材料 | 效价 | 任务描述 | 组内分析结果 | 组间差异结果 | |
Belham et al. Study1 | 21.38 vs. 71.10 | 56 vs. 39 | 延迟再认任务 | 图片 | 积极/中性/消极 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:积极=中性=消极 | 积极/中性/消极:OA<YA |
Belham et al. Study2 | 21.31 vs. 69.92 | 26 vs. 25 | 延迟再认任务 | 面孔 | 高兴/中性/愤怒 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:愤怒>高兴; 高兴=中性; 愤怒=中性 OA:愤怒>高兴; 高兴=中性; 愤怒=中性 | 高兴/中性/愤怒:OA<YA |
Berger et al. | 25.03 vs. 68.60 | 31 vs. 31 | 2-back | 面孔 | 中性/愤怒 | 比较当前与两个试次前的刺激的情绪效价是否一致; 忽略n-1与n-3试次的刺激 | YA:愤怒=中性; OA:愤怒=中性; | 愤怒、中性:OA<YA |
Borg et al. | 27.07 vs. 78.35 vs. 80.92 (AD) | 14 vs. 14 vs.14 (AD) | 短时记忆任务 | 图片 | 中性/消极 | 记忆刺激的空间位置; 忽略刺激的情绪效价 | YA:消极=中性; OA:消极<中性; AD:消极=中性 | 消极:OA、AD<YA; OA=AD 中性:OA、AD<YA; OA>AD |
Hartley et al. Study2 | 20.04 vs. 74.43 | 32 vs. 30 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪 | 记忆面孔身份; 忽略面孔的情绪效价 | - | 情绪:OA<YA |
Hartley et al. Study3 | 20.38 vs. 75.41 | 24 vs. 24 | 延迟匹配任务 | 面孔 | 情绪/非情绪 | 记忆面孔身份; 忽略面孔的情绪效价 | - | 情绪/非情绪:OA<YA |
Truong & Yang, | 19.69 vs.73.25 | 36 vs. 36 | 延迟匹配任务 | 词汇 | 积极/中性/消极 | 记忆任务指定的情绪目标刺激; 忽略任务指定的情绪分心刺激 | YA:积极=中性=消极 OA:消极<积极、中性; 积极=中性 | 积极、中性:OA=YA 消极:OA<YA |
[1] | 毕丹丹, 韩布新. (2014). 积极效应研究的几个方法学问题. 心理科学进展, 22(7),1103-1111. |
[2] | 龚先旻, 王大华. (2012). 老年人情绪记忆中的积极效应及其产生机制. 心理科学进展, 20(9),1411-1418. |
[3] | 霍丽娟, 郑志伟, 李瑾, 李娟. (2018). 老年人的脑可塑性:来自认知训练的证据. 心理科学进展, 26(5),846-858. |
[4] | 刘海宁, 刘晓倩, 刘海虹, 李峰, 韩布新. (2019). 老年人情绪注意积极效应的发生机制. 心理科学进展, 27(12),2064-2076. |
[5] | 喻婧, 马振玲, 牛亚南, 张宝山, Broster, L. S, 李娟. (2015). 年龄相关的情绪偏向效应的时间进程 (英文). 生物化学与生物物理进展, 42(2),365-374. |
[6] | 张禹, 李红, 赵守盈, 罗禹. (2016). 任务无关情绪刺激对工作记忆信息更新的影响: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 39(1),2-7. |
[7] |
Addis, D. R., Leclerc, C. M., Muscatell, K. A., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). There are age-related changes in neural connectivity during the encoding of positive, but not negative, information. Cortex, 46(4),425-433.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.011 URL pmid: 19555933 |
[8] |
Barch, D. M., Braver, T. S., Sabb, F. W., & Noll, D. C. (2000). Anterior cingulate and the monitoring of response conflict: Evidence from an fMRI study of overt verb generation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2),298-309.
URL pmid: 10771413 |
[9] |
Belham, F. S., Tavares, M.C. H., Satler, C., Garcia, A., Rodrigues, R. C., Canabarro, S.L. S., & Tomaz, C. (2017). Negative facial expressions - but not visual scenes - enhance human working memory in younger and older Participants. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8,668.
URL pmid: 29018342 |
[10] |
Berger, N., Richards, A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2018). Differential effects of angry faces on working memory updating in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 33(4),667-673.
URL pmid: 29902058 |
[11] |
Bermudez, T., & Souza, A. S. (2017). Can emotional content reduce the age gap in visual working memory? Evidence from two tasks. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8),1676-1683.
URL pmid: 27702390 |
[12] |
Borg, C., Leroy, N., Favre, E., Laurent, B., & Thomas- Anterion, C. (2011). How emotional pictures influence visuospatial binding in short-term memory in ageing and Alzheimer's disease? Brain and Cognition, 76(1),20-25.
URL pmid: 21481999 |
[13] |
Brockmole, J. R., & Logie, R. H. (2013). Age-related change in visual working memory: A study of 55, 753 participants aged 8-75. Frontiers in Psychology, 4,12.
URL pmid: 23372556 |
[14] |
Carstensen, L. L., & DeLiema, M. (2018). The positivity effect: A negativity bias in youth fades with age. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19,7-12.
URL pmid: 30327789 |
[15] | Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3),165-181. |
[16] | Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the Positivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3),117-121. |
[17] |
Clapp, W. C., & Gazzaley, A. (2012). Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 33(1),134-148.
URL pmid: 20144492 |
[18] |
Coxon, J. P., Goble, D. J., Leunissen, I., van Impe, A., Wenderoth, N., & Swinnen, S. P. (2016). Functional brain activation associated with inhibitory control deficits in older adults. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1),12-22.
URL pmid: 25085883 |
[19] | Dolcos, F., Kragel, P., Wang, L., & McCarthy, G. (2006). Role of the inferior frontal cortex in coping with distracting emotions. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 17(15),1591-1594. |
[20] |
Dolcos, F., & McCarthy, G. (2006). Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(7),2072-2079.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006 URL pmid: 16481440 |
[21] |
English, T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2015). Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(2),348-355.
URL pmid: 25894484 |
[22] | Feredoes, E., Heinen, K., Weiskopf, N., Ruff, C., & Driver, J. (2011). Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(42),17510-17515. |
[23] |
Ford, J. H., DiBiase, H. D., Ryu, E., & Kensinger, E. A. (2018). It gets better with time: Enhancement of age-related positivity effect in the six months following a highly negative public event. Psychology and Aging, 33(3),419-424.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000250 URL pmid: 29756799 |
[24] | Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10),1298-1300. |
[25] |
Giasson, H. L., Liao, H. -W., & Carstensen, L. L. (2019). Counting down while time flies: Implications of age-related time acceleration for goal pursuit across adulthood. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26,85-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.001 URL pmid: 30048830 |
[26] |
Gronchi, G., Righi, S., Pierguidi, L., Giovannelli, F., Murasecco, I., & Viggiano, M. P. (2018). Automatic and controlled attentional orienting in the elderly: A dual- process view of the positivity effect. Acta Psychologica, 185,229-234.
URL pmid: 29550693 |
[27] |
Guye, S., & von Bastian, C. C. (2017). Working memory training in older adults: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer. Psychology and Aging, 32(8),732-746.
URL pmid: 29239658 |
[28] | Hartley, A. A., Ravich, Z., Stringer, S., & Wiley, K. (2015). An age-related dissociation of short-term memory for facial identity and facial emotional expression. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 70(5),718-728. |
[29] | Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. (2015). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. Towse (Eds.). Variation in working memory (pp.227-249). New York: Oxford University Press. |
[30] | Iacoviello, B. M., Wu, G., Alvarez, E., Huryk, K., Collins, K. A. Murrough, J. W., ... Charney, D.S (2014). Cognitive- emotional training as an intervention for major depressive disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 31(8),699-706. |
[31] |
Iordan, A. D., & Dolcos, F. (2017). Brain activity and network interactions linked to valence-related differences in the impact of emotional distraction. Cerebral Cortex, 27(1),731-749.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv242 URL pmid: 26543041 |
[32] |
Iordan, A. D., Dolcos, S., & Dolcos, F. (2013). Neural signatures of the response to emotional distraction: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7,200.
URL pmid: 23761741 |
[33] |
Kalenzaga, S., Lamidey, V., Ergis, A.-M., Clarys, D., & Piolino, P. (2016). The positivity bias in aging: Motivation or degradation? Emotion, 16(5),602-610.
URL pmid: 26950366 |
[34] |
Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Emotion triggers executive attention: anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task. Human Brain Mapping, 32(2),198-208.
URL pmid: 20715084 |
[35] | Labouvie-Vief, G., Grühn, D., & Studer, J. (2010). Dynamic integration of emotion and cognition: Equilibrium regulation in development and aging. In R. M. Lerner, M. E. Lamb and A. M. Freund (Eds.), The Handbook of Life-Span Development (Vol. 2, pp.79-115). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[36] |
Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11),3388-3399.
URL pmid: 21452946 |
[37] | Lugtmeijer, S., de Haan, E. H. F., & Kessels, R. P. C. (2019). A comparison of visual working memory and episodic memory performance in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition,26(3),387-406. |
[38] | Majerus, S., & D'Argembeau, A. (2011). Verbal short-term memory reflects the organization of long-term memory: Further evidence from short-term memory for emotional words. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2),181-197. |
[39] |
Mammarella, N., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Leonardi, G., & Fairfield, B. (2013). Examining an emotion enhancement effect in working memory: Evidence from age-related differences. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(3),416-428.
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.775065 URL pmid: 23452136 |
[40] |
Mammarella, N., di Domenico, A., & Fairfield, B. (2016). Aging and the genetic road towards the positivity effect in memory. Experimental Gerontology, 82,120-124.
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.06.011 URL pmid: 27350108 |
[41] | Mather, M. (2016). The affective neuroscience of aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1),213-238. |
[42] |
Mather, M., & Knight, M. R. (2006). Angry faces get noticed quickly: Threat detection is not impaired among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1),54-57.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx048 URL pmid: 28475695 |
[43] |
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11(1),103-107.
URL pmid: 18066057 |
[44] | McNab, F., Zeidman, P., Rutledge, R. B., Smittenaar, P., Brown, H. R., Adams, R. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2015). Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(20),6515-6518. |
[45] | Meng, X., Yang, J., Cai, A. Y., Ding, X. S., Liu, W., Li, H., & Yuan, J. J. (2015). The neural mechanisms underlying the aging-related enhancement of positive affects: Electrophysiological evidences. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7,143. |
[46] |
Mikels, J. A., Larkin, G. R., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: Changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age. Psychology and Aging, 20(4),542-553.
doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.542 URL pmid: 16420130 |
[47] |
Mok, R. M., van der Meulen, J. E. H., Holmes, E. A., & Nobre, A. C. (2019). Changing interpretations of emotional expressions in working memory with aging. Emotion, 19(6),1060-1069.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000481 URL pmid: 30321038 |
[48] | Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(2),241-268. |
[49] | Oberauer, K. (2019). Working memory and attention - a conceptual analysis and review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1),36. |
[50] |
Oberauer, K., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). What limits working memory capacity? Psychological Bulletin, 142(7),758-799.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000046 URL pmid: 26950009 |
[51] |
Oren, N., Ash, E. L., Tarrasch, R., Hendler, T., Giladi, N., & Shapira-Lichter, I. (2017). Neural patterns underlying the effect of negative distractors on working memory in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 53,93-102.
URL pmid: 28242539 |
[52] |
Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., ... Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1),48-76.
URL pmid: 29083201 |
[53] |
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2),148-158.
doi: 10.1038/nrn2317 URL pmid: 18209732 |
[54] |
Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4),160-166.
URL pmid: 19285913 |
[55] | Pessoa, L. (2017). Cognitive control and emotional processing. In T. Egner (Ed.). The Wiley handbook of cognitive control,(pp.392-407). Chichster, United Kingdom: Wiley, Ltd. |
[56] | Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3,339. |
[57] |
Rhodes, R. E., & Katz, B. (2017). Working memory plasticity and aging. Psychology and Aging, 32(1),51-59.
URL pmid: 28182497 |
[58] |
Samrani, G., Bäckman, L., & Persson, J. (2017). Age- differences in the temporal properties of proactive interference in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 32(8),722-731.
URL pmid: 29239657 |
[59] | Sava, A. -A., Krolak-Salmon, P., Delphin-Combe, F., Cloarec, M., & Chainay, H. (2017). Memory for faces with emotional expressions in Alzheimer's disease and healthy older participants: Positivity effect is not only due to familiarity. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(1),1-28. |
[60] |
Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69(3),538-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.11.005 URL pmid: 19097677 |
[61] | Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(2),135-144. |
[62] |
Schweizer, S., Grahn, J., Hampshire, A., Mobbs, D., & Dalgleish, T. (2013). Training the emotional brain: Improving affective control through emotional working memory training. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(12),5301-5311.
URL pmid: 23516294 |
[63] | Schweizer, S., Hampshire, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2011). Extending brain-training to the affective domain: Increasing cognitive and affective executive control through emotional working memory training. PLOS ONE, 6(9),e24372. |
[64] | Sims, T., Hogan, C. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (2015). Selectivity as an emotion regulation strategy: Lessons from older adults. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3,80-84. |
[65] |
Svärd, J., Fischer, H., & Lundqvist, D. (2014). Adult age-differences in subjective impression of emotional faces are reflected in emotion-related attention and memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,423.
URL pmid: 24860535 |
[66] | Swanson, H. L., & Fung, W. (2016). Working memory components and problem-solving accuracy: Are there multiple pathways? Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8),1153-1177. |
[67] |
Swick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, A. U. (2008). Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC Neuroscience, 9,102.
URL pmid: 18939997 |
[68] |
Teixeira-Santos, A. C., Moreira, C. S., Magalhaes, R., Magalhaes, C., Pereira, D. R., Leite, J., ... Sampaio, A. (2019). Reviewing working memory training gains in healthy older adults: A meta-analytic review of transfer for cognitive outcomes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 103,163-177.
URL pmid: 31100297 |
[69] |
Truong, L., & Yang, L. (2014). Friend or foe? Decoding the facilitative and disruptive effects of emotion on working memory in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,94.
URL pmid: 24624097 |
[70] |
Tsvetanov, K. A., Ye, Z., Hughes, L., Samu, D., Treder, M. S., Wolpe, N., ... Rowe, J. B. (2018). Activity and connectivity differences underlying inhibitory control across the adult life span. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(36),7887-7900.
URL pmid: 30049889 |
[71] |
Vermeij, A., Kessels, R.P. C., Heskamp, L., Simons, E.M. F., Dautzenberg, P.L. J., & Claassen, J. (2017). Prefrontal activation may predict working-memory training gain in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(1),141-154.
URL pmid: 26843001 |
[72] | Walla, P., & Panksepp, J. (2013). Neuroimaging helps to clarify brain affective processing without necessarily clarifying emotions. In K. N. Fountas (Ed.), Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging (pp.93-118). Rijeka, Croatia: In Tech. |
[73] |
Yuan, J. J., Tian, Y., Huang, X. T., Fan, H. Y., & Wei, X. M. (2019). Emotional bias varies with stimulus type, arousal and task setting: Meta-analytic evidences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107,461-472.
URL pmid: 31557549 |
[74] |
Ziaei, M., Salami, A., & Persson, J. (2017). Age-related alterations in functional connectivity patterns during working memory encoding of emotional items. Neuropsychologia, 94,1-12.
URL pmid: 27865969 |
[75] | Ziaei, M., Samrani, G., & Persson, J. (2018). Age differences in the neural response to emotional distraction during working memory encoding. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5),869-883. |
[76] |
Zinke, K., Zeintl, M., Eschen, A., Herzog, C., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Potentials and limits of plasticity induced by working memory training in old-old age. Gerontology, 58(1),79-87.
doi: 10.1159/000324240 URL pmid: 21430358 |
[1] | YE Shuqi, YIN Junting, LI Zhaoxian, LUO Junlong. The influence mechanism of emotion on intuitive and analytical processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 736-746. |
[2] | WANG Xinlin, QIU Xiaoyue, WENG Xuchu, YANG Ping. Modulating working memory related-oscillation via entrainment of neural oscillation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 802-816. |
[3] | CHEN Xingming, FU Tong, LIU Chang, ZHANG Bin, FU Yunfa, LI Enze, ZHANG Jian, CHEN Shengqiang, DANG Caiping. Neuroplasticity induced by working memory training: A spatio-temporal model of decreased distribution in brain regions based on fMRI experiments [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 255-274. |
[4] | CHEN Yutian, CHEN Rui, LI Peng. The development of concept and theoretical models of “chunking” in working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2708-2717. |
[5] | WANG Chundi, WANG Da-hui. Capacity and maintenance mechanism of vibrotactile working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1141-1148. |
[6] | ZHANG Zhao, ZHANG Liwei, GONG Ran. The filtering efficiency in visual working memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 635-651. |
[7] | GUAN Xuxu, WANG Hongbo. Neural mechanisms of suppression-induced forgetting [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 665-676. |
[8] | HUANG Zhijing, LI Xu. Processing of emotional information in working memory in major depressive disorder [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 252-267. |
[9] | XIE Tingting, WANG Lijuan, WANG Tianze. How is limb movement information stored in working memory? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(1): 93-101. |
[10] | LI Wanru, KU Yixuan. The influence of acute stress on working memory: Physiological and psychological mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(9): 1508-1524. |
[11] | RAN Guangming, LI Rui, ZHANG Qi. Neural mechanism underlying recognition of dynamic emotional faces in social anxiety [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 1979-1988. |
[12] | Ya-xuan Ang, Fang-fang Wang, Yong-na Li. The Positivity Effect in Facial Trustworthiness Judgment in Older Adults: Age Difference and the Effects of Cognitive Declines [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 11-11. |
[13] | Ya-xuan Ang, Xin-yue Liu, Shi-wei Yang, Yong-na Li. The Positivity Effect of Facial Trustworthiness in Older Adults: The Influence of Facial Expressions and Face Age [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 12-12. |
[14] | Mengjiao Xu, Yingtao Fu, Jiahan Yu, Ping Zhu, Mowei Shen, Hui Chen. Source information is inherently linked to working memory representation for auditory but not for visual stimuli [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 24-24. |
[15] | Haoyue Ji, Li Wang, Yi Jiang. Gaze Cues Stored in Working Memory Trigger Automatic Attentional Orienting [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 29-29. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||