The automaticity in cognitive processing: From dichotomy to gradual view

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01556

Abstract

Abstract:

Cognitive automaticity is an inevitable road for human learning and progress. The traditional dichotomy view classifies cognitive processes into controlled or automatic processes according to certain features of cognitive processes (e.g., unconsciousness). However, these features are not universal but up to the experimental paradigms used by researchers. New viewpoints based on the attentional resources theory have been developed recently, taking the controlled-automatic process as a continuous dimension and the decreases of attentional resources as the central feature of the development of automaticity. Compared with dichotomy, the gradual view accords better with empirical findings. Further, the gradual view can be appliaed in both cognitive information processing and the stages model of skill acquisition theory, which confirmed the universality of gradual view.

Key words: information processing, skill acquisition, automaticity, implicit, attention, attentional resources theory

CLC Number:

B842

CHEN ShengDong, CHEN YongQiang, GAO Wei, LUO Li, YANG JieMin, YUAN JiaJin. The automaticity in cognitive processing: From dichotomy to gradual view[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.

Figures/Tables 1

References 45

1	傅小兰 . ( 2006). 表征、加工和控制在认知活动中的作用. 心理科学进展, 14( 4), 73-81.
2	高伟, 陈圣栋, 龙泉杉, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦 . ( 2017). 情绪调节研究方法的蜕变: 从有意情绪调节到自动化情绪调节. 科学通报, 63( 4), 415-424.
3	Anderson, J. R . ( 1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89( 4), 369-406.
4	Bargh, J. A . ( 1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought(pp. 3-51).New York: Guilford.
5	Bargh, J. A . ( 1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. The American journal of psychology, 105( 2), 181-199.
6	Bargh, J. A . ( 1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7	Bargh, J. A . ( 2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36( 2), 147-168. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.336
8	Bargh, J. A . ( 2014). The historical origins of priming as the preparation of behavioral responses: Unconscious carryover and contextual influences of real-world importance. Social Cognition, 32, 209-224.
9	Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. ( 2008). The Unconscious Mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3( 1), 73-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00064.x
10	Bargh J. A., & Morsella, E. (2010). Unconscious behavioral guidance systems. In C. Agnew, D. Carlston, W. Graziano, & J. Kelly (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp.89-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
11	Bargh J. A., Schwader K. L., Hailey S. E., Dyer R. L., & Boothby E. J . ( 2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16( 12), 593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002
12	Bargh J. A., & Williams, L. E. (2007). On the Automatic or Nonconscious Regulation of Emotion. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp.1-39). New York: Guilford Press.
13	Braunstein L. M., Gross J. J., & Ochsner K. N . ( 2017). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A multi-level framework. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12( 10), 1545-1557.
14	DeCoster, J., & Claypool,H. M. ( 2004). A Meta-Analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and social psychology review : An official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 8( 1), 2-27.
15	Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory (HA Ruger & CE Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College.(Original work published 1885), 39.
16	Fitts P. M. (1964). Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243-285). New York, NY: Acadamic Press.
17	Fitzsimons G. M. ,& Bargh, J. A. (2004). Automatic self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 151-170). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
18	Gross, J. J . ( 2013). Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13( 3), 359-365. doi: 10.1037/ a0032135
19	Hassin R. R., Bargh J. A., & Zimerman S . ( 2009). Automatic and Flexible: The case of non-conscious goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 27( 1), 20-36.
20	Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18( 3), 193-223.
21	Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A . ( 2014). The Selfish Goal: autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37( 2), 121-135. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X13000290
22	James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23	Kim J. W., Ritter F. E., & Koubek R. J . ( 2013). An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14( 1), 22-37.
24	Logan, G. D . ( 1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 39( 2), 367-386.
25	Logan, G. D . ( 1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18( 5), 883-914.
26	Mattiassi A. D., Mele S., Ticini L. F., & Urgesi C . ( 2014). Conscious and unconscious representations of observed actions in the human motor system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26( 9), 2028-2041. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00619
27	Mauss I. B., Bunge S. A., & Gross J. J . ( 2007). Automatic emotion regulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1( 1), 146-167. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007. 00005.x
28	Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. ( 1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102( 2), 246-268.
29	Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. ( 2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132( 2), 297-326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
30	Newell, A., & Rosenbloom,P. S . ( 1980). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition(pp. 1-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31	Posner M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2004). Attention and cognitive control. In D. A. Balota & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Key readings in cognition. Cognitive psychology: Key readings (pp. 205-223). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32	Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M . ( 2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27( 3), 525-559.
33	Schneider W., Dumais S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention (pp. 1-27). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
34	Shiffrin,R. M., & Schneider, W. ( 1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84( 2), 127-190.
35	Shiffrin,R. M., & Czerwinski, M.P . ( 1988). A model of automatic attention attraction when mapping is partially consistent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14( 3), 562-569.
36	Snyder M. P. R. R.( 1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. R. S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
37	Sutherland C. A. M., Young A. W., & Rhodes G . ( 2017). Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties. British Journal of Psychology, 108( 2), 397-415.
38	Shanks, D. R . ( 2016). Misunderstanding the behavior priming controversy: Comment on payne, brown-iannuzzi, and loersch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146( 8), 1216-1222.
39	Spunt R. P. ,& Lieberman, M. D. (2014). Automaticity, control, and the social brain. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp.279-296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40	Thorndike, E. L . ( 1913). The psychology of learning (Vol. 2): Teachers College, Columbia University.
41	Tylén K., Philipsen J. S., Roepstorff A., & Fusaroli R . ( 2016). Trails of meaning construction: Symbolic artifacts engage the social brain. NeuroImage, 134, 105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.056
42	VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
43	VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. ( 2014). In B.VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction ( pp.vii-261). New York, NY: Routledge.
44	Willingham, D. B . ( 1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105( 3), 558-584.
45	Williams L. E., Bargh J. A., Nocera C. C., & Gray J. R . ( 2009). The unconscious regulation of emotion: Nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. Emotion, 9( 6), 847-854. doi: 10.1037/a0017745

[1]	ZHANG Kaili, ZHENG Hong, WANG Fengyan. “One prelude” and “two movements”: A portrayal of the research process of wisdom psychology in the past 50 years [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 721-735.
[2]	CUI Nan, WANG Jiuju, ZHAO Jing. Effectiveness and underlying mechanism of the intervention for children with comorbidity between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and developmental dyslexia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 622-630.
[3]	ZHANG Hao, XIAO Bangming, HUANG Minxue. The in-feed native advertising avoidance mechanism and re-targeting strategy based on user dynamic information processing mode [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 223-239.
[4]	LIU Wei, SHEN Xiaoling. A dynamic perspective on the relationship between team reflection-in-action and innovation: A moderated mediation model integrating cognition and emotion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1759-1769.
[5]	ZHOU Guomei, ZHENG Ruoying, LIN Jia, LIU Xinge. The holistic representation of facial attractiveness and the attractiveness enhancement mechanism of dynamic faces [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1429-1438.
[6]	LIU Yanxiu, XIE Tong, FU Shimin. The role of object representation strength in the object-based attention of dynamic object [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 591-600.
[7]	YE Liqun, TAN Xin, YAO Kun, DING Yulong. Influence of normal aging on early stages of visual attention: Evidence from ERP studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2746-2763.
[8]	ZHANG Wen, DONG Qiyiru, GONG Lijuan, SHANG Qi, CHENG Chen, DING Xuechen. The theoretical accounts and developmental predictors of operational momentum effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2777-2788.
[9]	YIN Rong. Comparative studies of mind reading: Similarities and differences in theory of mind between non-human primates and humans and corresponding explanations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2540-2557.
[10]	HOU Wenwen, SU Yi (ESTHER). The influence of atypical attention and memory on vocabulary delay in children with autism spectrum disorder [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2558-2569.
[11]	LI Jingting, DONG Zizhao, LIU Ye, WANG Su-Jing, ZHUANG Dongzhe. Micro-expression spotting method based on human attention mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2143-2153.
[12]	WANG Zile, ZHANG Qi. The internal mechanisms of attentional templates in facilitating visual search [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2206-2218.
[13]	WU Xia, WANG Junzhe, WANG Yun, CHEN Ying, YANG Haibo. The processing mechanism of category-specific attentional control settings in attentional capture [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2219-2227.
[14]	ZHAO Na, QIN Xuezhe, LIU Yaqian, SUN Ling. You get what you pay for? The mechanisms and moderators of price-quality effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2372-2380.
[15]	GAN Jiaqun, WANG Enguo. Attentional disengagement in autism spectrum disorders [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(1): 129-140.