Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 1248-1257.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01248
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Xuzhe, CHU Xiaowei, LIU Qingqi, ZHOU Zongkui, FAN Cuiying()
Received:
2018-10-08
Online:
2019-07-15
Published:
2019-05-22
Contact:
FAN Cuiying
E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
HUANG Xuzhe, CHU Xiaowei, LIU Qingqi, ZHOU Zongkui, FAN Cuiying. Bystander behavior in cyberbullying[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1248-1257.
[1] | 陈文平, 段锦云, 田晓明 . (2013). 员工为什么不建言:基于中国文化视角的解析. 心理科学进展, 21(5), 905-913. |
[2] | 丁凤琴, 陆朝晖 . (2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174. |
[3] | 林琳 . (2017). 拖延行为的干预:计划行为理论和实施意向的影响. 心理学报, 49(7), 953-965. |
[4] | 刘勤学, 陈武, 周宗奎 . (2015). 大学生网络使用与网络利他行为:网络使用自我效能和性别的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 685-693. |
[5] | 肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和 . (2014). 共情对亲社会行为的影响及神经基础. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 208-215. |
[6] | 王柳生, 蔡淦, 戴家隽, 潘发达, 张海燕 . (2013). 具身情绪: 视觉图片的证据. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 188-190. |
[7] | 魏萍, 康冠兰, 丁锦红, 郭春彦 . (2014). 奖赏预期对面孔情绪加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究. 心理学报, 46(04), 437-449. |
[8] | 吴鹏, 范晶, 刘华山 . (2017). 道德情绪对网络助人行为的影响——道德推理的中介作用. 心理学报, 49(12), 1559-1569. |
[9] | 杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲 . (2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678. |
[10] | 叶浩生 . (2012). 具身认知、镜像神经元与身心关系. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 11(3), 32-36. |
[11] | 原珂, 齐亮 . (2015). “旁观者”现象: 旁观者介入公共冲突的过程分析及破解策略. 社会主义研究, 219(01), 93-100. |
[12] | 张德胜, 金耀基, 陈海文, 陈健民, 杨中芳, 赵志裕, 伊莎白 . (2001). 论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外. 社会学研究, 2, 33-48. |
[13] | 周懿瑾, 魏佳纯 . (2016). “点赞”还是“评论”?社交媒体使用行为对个人社会资本的影响——基于微信朋友圈使用行为的探索性研究. 新闻大学, 135(68), 68-75. |
[14] |
Allison K. R., & Bussey K. , (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses' responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.026 URL |
[15] |
Balakrishnan V. , (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in malaysia: The roles of gender, age and internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 149-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.021 URL |
[16] |
Balakrishnan V. , (2017). Unraveling the underlying factors sculpting cyberbullying behaviours among malaysian young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 194-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.062 URL |
[17] |
Balakrishnan V. , (2018). Actions, emotional reactions and cyberbullying - from the lens of bullies, victims, bully-victims and bystanders among malaysian young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1190-1200.
doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.002 URL |
[18] |
Bandura A. , (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L URL |
[19] | Barlińska J., Szuster A., & Winiewski M . (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37-51. |
[20] | Barrows J., Dunn S., & Lloyd C. A . (2013). Anxiety, self- efficacy, and college exam grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 204-208. |
[21] |
Barry C. M., & Wentzel K. R . (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: the role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153-163.
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153 URL |
[22] | Barsalou L. W . (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. |
[23] |
Bastiaensens S., Vandebosch H., Poels K., Van Cleemput K., DeSmet A., & De Bourdeaudhuij I . (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259-271.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036 URL |
[24] | Bastiaensens S., Vandebosch H., Poels K., Van Cleemput K., DeSmet A., & De Bourdeaudhuij I . (2015). ‘Can I afford to help?’ how affordances of communication modalities guide bystanders’ helping intentions towards harassment on social network sites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(4), 425-435. |
[25] |
Berenguer J . (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 110-134.
doi: 10.1177/0013916508325892 URL |
[26] |
Brewer G., & Kerslake J. , (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073 URL |
[27] | Brody N., & Vangelisti A. , (2015). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 94-119. |
[28] | Bronfenbrenner U . (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Children & Youth Services Review, 2(4), 433-438. |
[29] |
Cao B., & Lin W.-Y. , (2015). How do victims react to cyberbullying on social networking sites? The influence of previous cyberbullying victimization experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 458-465.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.009 URL |
[30] |
Cardoos S. L., & Hinshaw S. P . (2011). Friendship as protection from peer victimization for girls with and without adhd. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(7), 1035-1045.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9517-3 URL |
[31] |
DeSmet A., Bastiaensens S., Van Cleemput C., Poels K., Vandebosch H., Cardon G., & De Bourdeaudhuij L . (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398-415.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051 URL |
[32] | Desmet A., Bastiaensens S., Van Cleemput K., Poels K., Vandebosch H., & De Bourdeaudhuij I . (2012). Mobilizing bystanders of cyberbullying: an exploratory study into behavioural determinants of defending the victim. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 181, 58-63. |
[33] |
DeSmet A., Bastiaensens. S., Van Cleemput K.., Poels K., Vandebosch H., Deboutte G., … De Bourdeaudhuij I .,(2018). The efficacy of the friendly attac serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 336-347.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.011 URL |
[34] | DiFranzo D., Taylor S. H., Kazerooni F., Wherry O. D., & Bazarova N. N . (2018). Upstanding by design: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. CHI Conference(pp.1-12). |
[35] |
Dillon K. P., & Bushman B. J . (2015). Unresponsive or un-noticed?: Cyberbystander intervention in an experimental cyberbullying context. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 144-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.009 URL |
[36] |
Dorit O.-S., Tali H., & Sigal E . (2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 23-48.
doi: 10.1177/0886260515585531 URL |
[37] | Eisenberg N., Fabes R. A., & Spinrad T. L . (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp646-718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
[38] | Erreygers S., Pabian S., Vandebosch H., & Baillien E . (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning & Individual Differences, 48, 61-67. |
[39] |
Estrada P . (1995). Adolescents' self-report of prosocial responses to friends and acquaintances: The role of sympathy-related cognitive, affective, and motivational processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(2), 173-200.
doi: 10.1207/jra.1995.5.issue-2 URL |
[40] |
Ferreira P. C., Simão A. M. V., Ferreira A., Souza S., & Francisco S . (2016). Student bystander behavior and cultural issues in cyberbullying: when actions speak louder than words. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 301-311.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.059 URL |
[41] | Fishbein M., & Ajzen I. , (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. |
[42] |
Freis S. D., & Gurung R. A. R . (2013). A facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 11-19.
doi: 10.1037/a0030239 URL |
[43] |
Gahagan K., Vaterlaus J. M., & Frost L. R . (2016). College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: Conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 1097-1105.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.019 URL |
[44] |
Gallagher H. L., & Frith C. D . (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77-83.
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6 URL |
[45] |
Holfeld B . (2014). Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.012 URL |
[46] |
Hollenbaugh E. E., & Ferris A. L . (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055 URL |
[47] |
Huang Y.-y., & Chou C. , (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1581-1590.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005 URL |
[48] |
Jones L. M., Mitchell K. J., & Turner H. A . (2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2308-2320.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0342-9 URL |
[49] |
Kowalski R. M., Giumetti G. W., Schroeder A. N., & Lattanner M. R . (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137.
doi: 10.1037/a0035618 URL |
[50] | Latan B., & Darley J. M . (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? (pp. 1-67). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. |
[51] | Lenhart A., Madden M., Smith A., Purcell K., & Zickuhr K . (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, 25(12), 86. |
[52] |
Machackova H., Dedkova L., & Mezulanikova K . (2015). Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 96-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010 URL |
[53] | Macháčková H., Dedkova L., Sevcikova A., & Cerna A . (2013). Bystanders' support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 25-36. |
[54] |
McCrae R. R., & Costa Jr P. T . (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 URL |
[55] |
Menesini E., Codecasa E., Benelli B., & Cowie H . (2003). Enhancing children's responsibility to take action against bullying: Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior, 29(1), 1-14.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337 URL |
[56] | Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2018. Bystander. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/bystander |
[57] |
Moeller F. G., Barratt E. S., Dougherty D. M., Schmitz J. M., & Swann A. C . (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(11), 1783-1793.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1783 URL |
[58] | Obermaier M., Fawzi N., & Koch T . (2014). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1491-1507. |
[59] |
Patterson L. J., Allan A., & Cross D . (2016). Adolescent bystanders' perspectives of aggression in the online versus school environments. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 60-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.02.003 URL |
[60] |
Patterson L. J., Allan A., & Cross D . (2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media and Society, 19(3), 366-383.
doi: 10.1177/1461444815606369 URL |
[61] |
Pozzoli T., & Gini G. , (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 815-827.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9 URL |
[62] |
Price D., Green D., Spears B., Scrimgeour M., Barnes A., Geer R., & Johnson B . (2014). A qualitative exploration of cyber-bystanders and moral engagement. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(1), 1-17.
doi: 10.1017/jgc.2013.18 URL |
[63] |
Quirk R., & Campbell M. , (2015). On standby? a comparison of online and offline witnesses to bullying and their bystander behaviour. Educational Psychology, 35(4), 430-448.
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.893556 URL |
[64] | Roskamp T. J . (2009). Cyberbullying in Illinois public schools. Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks. |
[65] |
Schacter H. L., Greenberg S., & Juvonen J . (2016). Who's to blame?: the effects of victim disclosure on bystander reactions to cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 115-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.018 URL |
[66] | Shultz E., Heilman R., & Hart K. J . (2014). Cyber-bullying: An exploration of bystander behavior and motivation. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(4), article 3. |
[67] |
Slonje R., Smith P. K., & Frisén A . (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024 URL |
[68] |
Smith C. A., Organ D. W., & Near J. P . (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653 URL |
[69] |
Song J., & Oh I. , (2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273-282.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008 URL |
[70] |
Stueve A., Dash K., O'Donnell L., Tehranifar P., Wilson-Simmons R., Slaby R. G., & Link B. G . (2006). Rethinking the bystander role in school violence prevention. Health promotion practice, 7(1), 117-124.
doi: 10.1177/1524839905278454 URL |
[71] |
Tangney J. P., Stuewig J., & Mashek D . (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 URL |
[72] |
Thornberg R., Tenenbaum L., Varjas K., Meyers J., Jungert T., & Vanegas G . (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: to intervene or not to intervene? The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247-252.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792 URL |
[73] |
Van Cleemput K., Vandebosch H., & Pabian S . (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383-396.
doi: 10.1002/ab.v40.5 URL |
[74] |
Weber M., Ziegele M., & Schnauber A . (2013). Blaming the victim: the effects of extraversion and information disclosure on guilt attributions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 254-259.
doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0328 URL |
[75] | Wikipedia. (2018). Bystander. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from |
[76] |
Williams L. E., & Bargh J. A . (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606-607.
doi: 10.1126/science.1162548 URL |
[77] |
Wong-Lo M., & Bullock L. M . (2014). Digital metamorphosis: examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 418-422.
doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.007 URL |
[1] | CHENG Jieting, SHI Mengwei. Perceived warmth and competence: The role of physiological cues in social cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 443-454. |
[2] | XIAO Chengli, SUI Yuqing, XIAO Suheng, ZHOU Renlai. A new perspective on spatial interaction research: The effects of multiple social factors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 796-805. |
[3] | WEN Fangfang, KE Wenlin, ZUO Bin, DAI Yuee, NIE Siyuan, YAO Yi, HAN Shi. Implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP): Measuring principle and applications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 1936-1947. |
[4] | WANG Hongyu, CUI Zhisong, ZOU Chunlong, YU Jiali, ZHAO Di. Loyal or rebel? Employee bootleg innovation in Chinese context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 975-989. |
[5] | CUI Jialei, CUI Liying. The confrontational response of women to gender prejudice between two identities [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1085-1092. |
[6] | WANG Xieshun, SU Yanjie. From motor imitation to social cognition: The role of self-other control [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 636-645. |
[7] | LI Wenqi, ZHANG Mengyuan, KOU Yu. Political orientation and its changing mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 549-559. |
[8] | YANG Shenlong, GUO Yongyu, YU Feng, RAO Tingting, ZHAO Liang, XU Liying. Three explanatory perspectives on the root of system justification [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2238-2248. |
[9] | YUE Tong, HUANG Xiting, LIU Guangyuan. Sex-related differences in the effects of Oxytocin on human social cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(12): 2157-2167. |
[10] | Fan Wei; Zhong Yiping; Fu Xiaolan. The influence of self-control on deception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 997-1008. |
[11] | PAN Wei; CHEN Wei; WANG Yin; SHAN Chun-lei. The myth of broken mirror theory of autism: Origins, problems and prospects [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 958-973. |
[12] | JIA Lei; ZHU Shurong; ZHANG Changjie; ZHANG Qinglin. The distributed semantic representation and activation processes of the implicit and explicit stereotypes: An examination based on the perspective of cognitive neuroscience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1519-1533. |
[13] | YANG Ying; KOU Yu. Individuals’ Well-Being in Prosocial Interaction: The Role of Autonomy [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1226-1235. |
[14] | LIU Yan; GU Chuanhua. Interpersonal Sensitivity: From Social Cognition to Psychological Risk Factor [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 489-495. |
[15] | YANG Ziyan; LIU Yunzhi; YU Zhenkun; CAI Huajian. Applications of Implicit Association Test [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 1966-1980. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||