Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 623-635.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00623
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yanqing, WANG Fuxing(), XIE Heping, CHEN Jiaxue, LI Wenjing, HU Xiangen()
Received:
2018-06-19
Online:
2019-04-15
Published:
2019-02-22
Contact:
WANG Fuxing,HU Xiangen
E-mail:fxwang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn;xiangenhu@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
WANG Yanqing, WANG Fuxing, XIE Heping, CHEN Jiaxue, LI Wenjing, HU Xiangen. A picture is worth a thousand words: Self-generation drawing for multimedia learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 623-635.
研究 | 样本量 | 实验操纵 | 实验材料 | 内在感知 | 学习效果d值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
383 | 绘图vs释义 | 电池中电化学的概念 | / | U*=0.279 | |
762 | 绘图vs阅读 | 人体组织结构 | / | R*(#) | |
222 | 绘图vs提供图画vs阅读 | 数学单词问题 | / | R*(#) | |
244 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术 | B*(-) | R (-0.049) | |
1981 | 40 | 绘图vs阅读 | 想象的非洲部落 | / | R*(1.08) T*(1.097) |
184 | 绘图vs复制提供的图vs写作 | 能量守恒定律 | / | R (-) C*(-) | |
58 | 绘图vs总结vs阅读 | 板块构造论 | / | R*(0.738)T*(0.714) | |
92 | 绘图vs提供图画vs阅读 | 手动气泵的工作 | / | C*(0.464) | |
60 | 绘图vs想象vs阅读 | 人类心血管系统 | CL (-) | C*(0.461) | |
339 | 阅读vs列关键词vs绘图vs (列关键词+绘图) | 人体骨骼肌系统 | / | R*(0.066) | |
71 | 绘图vs总结vs提供图画vs提供总结 | 水分子及其化学键 | / | C*(0.245) T(0.053) | |
2012 | 90 | 绘图vs观点选择vs (绘图+观点选择)vs阅读 | 水分子 | / | C*(0.61) T*(0.808) |
2012 | 71 | 绘图vs总结vs (绘图+总结)vs阅读 | 水分子 | / | C (0.277) T*(0.817) |
Exp. 1 | 24 | 绘图vs阅读 | 散文 | / | R&(-0.98) |
Exp. 2 | 72 | 绘图(提供支持)vs阅读 | 同上 | / | R*(0.129) |
& Levin, 1977 | 32 | 绘图vs阅读 | 故事 | / | R*(#) |
111 | 绘图vs想象vs (绘图+想象)vs阅读 | 水分子的双极特性 | CL*(0.72) | C&(-0.37) | |
199 | 绘图vs复制图画vs观看 | 五球摆动的动画 | / | R*(0.418) | |
2017 | 52 | 绘图vs想象 | 四冲程引擎动画 | / | R&(-0.164) |
74 | 绘图vs解释 | 介绍化学导论的 说明文 | / | R (0.414) T(0.211) | |
2017 | 73 | 绘图vs阅读 | 关于极光的天文 现象 | CL (-0.35) JOL*(-) | R (0.063) |
2017 | 69 | 绘图vs阅读 | 同上 | CL (-0.066) JOL*(-) | R (-0.143) |
Exp. 1 | 48 | 绘图vs阅读 | 流感的生物知识 | ME*(0.766), PD (-0.124) | C*(0.85) |
Exp. 2 | 168 | 绘图vs提供图画vs (绘图+提供图画)vs阅读 | 同上 | ME (-0.584), PD (-0.779) | C*(0.5) |
2011 | 102 | 绘图vs提供图画vs (绘图+提供图画)vs阅读 | 肥皂和水的化学反应 | ME*(0.333) | R&(-0.169) T&(0) |
2010 | 196 | 绘图vs (绘图+选择)vs(绘图+组织/整合)vs(绘图+选择+组织/整合)vs阅读 | 肥皂和水的化学反应 | / | R*(0.87) T*(0.91) |
Schmidgall et al., in press, Exp. 1 | 121 | 绘图vs总结vs提供图画vs阅读 | 人类游泳行为的生物力学研究 | / | R (0.002) T*(0.174) |
研究 | 样本量 | 实验操纵 | 实验材料 | 内在感知 | 学习效果d值 |
Schmidgall et al., in press, Exp. 2 | 223 | 绘图vs想象vs观看 | 同上 | PD*(0.643) | R& (-0.458) T (-0.081) |
Cunningham, 1975 | 63 | 绘图vs问题vs (问题+绘图)vs阅读 | 描述一个虚构的部落 | / | R (-) |
41 | 绘图vs总结 | 植物物种 | L* | R (0.009) | |
1990 | 53 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术词问题 | / | R (-0.047) T(-0.439) |
1990 | 50 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术词问题 | / | R*(0.774) T*(0.67) |
135 | 绘图vs提供图画vs提供问题vs阅读 | 关于鸟的翅膀的文章 | / | R (0.043) T*(0.234) | |
100 | 绘图vs提供图画vs提供问题vs阅读 | 中枢神经 | S-M*(-) | R*(0.337) | |
2016 | 55 | 绘图(仔细)vs写作(重复) | 单词 | / | R*(1.23) |
2016 | 49 | 绘图(重复)vs写作(仔细) | 同上 | / | R*(1.3) |
2016 | 47 | 绘图vs关键词vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.86) |
2016 | 28 | 绘图vs想象vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.87) |
2016 | 37 | 绘图vs提供图画vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.67) |
2016 | 28 | 绘图vs写作(更长的学习列表, 更短的编码时间) | 同上 | / | R*(2.27) |
2016 | 47 | 纯绘图vs纯写作 | 同上 | / | R*(1.63) |
2013 | 110 | 绘图vs简单选择 | 化学反应 | S-M*(-) | R (-0.139) T*(0.668) |
2013 | 172 | 绘图vs复杂选择 | 化学反应 | S-M (-) | R (-0.107) T(-0.256) |
133 | 绘图vs观看 | 电池汽车氢气燃烧的过程 | / | T*(0.516) | |
73 | 绘图vs评论 | 氢气燃烧过程中分子的相互作用 | / | T(-) |
研究 | 样本量 | 实验操纵 | 实验材料 | 内在感知 | 学习效果d值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
383 | 绘图vs释义 | 电池中电化学的概念 | / | U*=0.279 | |
762 | 绘图vs阅读 | 人体组织结构 | / | R*(#) | |
222 | 绘图vs提供图画vs阅读 | 数学单词问题 | / | R*(#) | |
244 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术 | B*(-) | R (-0.049) | |
1981 | 40 | 绘图vs阅读 | 想象的非洲部落 | / | R*(1.08) T*(1.097) |
184 | 绘图vs复制提供的图vs写作 | 能量守恒定律 | / | R (-) C*(-) | |
58 | 绘图vs总结vs阅读 | 板块构造论 | / | R*(0.738)T*(0.714) | |
92 | 绘图vs提供图画vs阅读 | 手动气泵的工作 | / | C*(0.464) | |
60 | 绘图vs想象vs阅读 | 人类心血管系统 | CL (-) | C*(0.461) | |
339 | 阅读vs列关键词vs绘图vs (列关键词+绘图) | 人体骨骼肌系统 | / | R*(0.066) | |
71 | 绘图vs总结vs提供图画vs提供总结 | 水分子及其化学键 | / | C*(0.245) T(0.053) | |
2012 | 90 | 绘图vs观点选择vs (绘图+观点选择)vs阅读 | 水分子 | / | C*(0.61) T*(0.808) |
2012 | 71 | 绘图vs总结vs (绘图+总结)vs阅读 | 水分子 | / | C (0.277) T*(0.817) |
Exp. 1 | 24 | 绘图vs阅读 | 散文 | / | R&(-0.98) |
Exp. 2 | 72 | 绘图(提供支持)vs阅读 | 同上 | / | R*(0.129) |
& Levin, 1977 | 32 | 绘图vs阅读 | 故事 | / | R*(#) |
111 | 绘图vs想象vs (绘图+想象)vs阅读 | 水分子的双极特性 | CL*(0.72) | C&(-0.37) | |
199 | 绘图vs复制图画vs观看 | 五球摆动的动画 | / | R*(0.418) | |
2017 | 52 | 绘图vs想象 | 四冲程引擎动画 | / | R&(-0.164) |
74 | 绘图vs解释 | 介绍化学导论的 说明文 | / | R (0.414) T(0.211) | |
2017 | 73 | 绘图vs阅读 | 关于极光的天文 现象 | CL (-0.35) JOL*(-) | R (0.063) |
2017 | 69 | 绘图vs阅读 | 同上 | CL (-0.066) JOL*(-) | R (-0.143) |
Exp. 1 | 48 | 绘图vs阅读 | 流感的生物知识 | ME*(0.766), PD (-0.124) | C*(0.85) |
Exp. 2 | 168 | 绘图vs提供图画vs (绘图+提供图画)vs阅读 | 同上 | ME (-0.584), PD (-0.779) | C*(0.5) |
2011 | 102 | 绘图vs提供图画vs (绘图+提供图画)vs阅读 | 肥皂和水的化学反应 | ME*(0.333) | R&(-0.169) T&(0) |
2010 | 196 | 绘图vs (绘图+选择)vs(绘图+组织/整合)vs(绘图+选择+组织/整合)vs阅读 | 肥皂和水的化学反应 | / | R*(0.87) T*(0.91) |
Schmidgall et al., in press, Exp. 1 | 121 | 绘图vs总结vs提供图画vs阅读 | 人类游泳行为的生物力学研究 | / | R (0.002) T*(0.174) |
研究 | 样本量 | 实验操纵 | 实验材料 | 内在感知 | 学习效果d值 |
Schmidgall et al., in press, Exp. 2 | 223 | 绘图vs想象vs观看 | 同上 | PD*(0.643) | R& (-0.458) T (-0.081) |
Cunningham, 1975 | 63 | 绘图vs问题vs (问题+绘图)vs阅读 | 描述一个虚构的部落 | / | R (-) |
41 | 绘图vs总结 | 植物物种 | L* | R (0.009) | |
1990 | 53 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术词问题 | / | R (-0.047) T(-0.439) |
1990 | 50 | 绘图vs阅读 | 算术词问题 | / | R*(0.774) T*(0.67) |
135 | 绘图vs提供图画vs提供问题vs阅读 | 关于鸟的翅膀的文章 | / | R (0.043) T*(0.234) | |
100 | 绘图vs提供图画vs提供问题vs阅读 | 中枢神经 | S-M*(-) | R*(0.337) | |
2016 | 55 | 绘图(仔细)vs写作(重复) | 单词 | / | R*(1.23) |
2016 | 49 | 绘图(重复)vs写作(仔细) | 同上 | / | R*(1.3) |
2016 | 47 | 绘图vs关键词vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.86) |
2016 | 28 | 绘图vs想象vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.87) |
2016 | 37 | 绘图vs提供图画vs写作 | 同上 | / | R*(0.67) |
2016 | 28 | 绘图vs写作(更长的学习列表, 更短的编码时间) | 同上 | / | R*(2.27) |
2016 | 47 | 纯绘图vs纯写作 | 同上 | / | R*(1.63) |
2013 | 110 | 绘图vs简单选择 | 化学反应 | S-M*(-) | R (-0.139) T*(0.668) |
2013 | 172 | 绘图vs复杂选择 | 化学反应 | S-M (-) | R (-0.107) T(-0.256) |
133 | 绘图vs观看 | 电池汽车氢气燃烧的过程 | / | T*(0.516) | |
73 | 绘图vs评论 | 氢气燃烧过程中分子的相互作用 | / | T(-) |
[1] |
钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎 . ( 2016). 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响. 心理发展与教育, 32, (2), 191-197.
doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.02.08 URL |
[2] |
谢和平, 王福兴, 王玉鑫, 安婧 . ( 2016). 越难读意味着学得越好? 学习过程中的不流畅效应. 心理科学进展, 24 (7), 1077-1090.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01077 URL |
[3] |
王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎 . ( 2013). 线索在多媒体学习中的作用. 心理科学进展, 21, (8), 1430-1440.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01430 URL |
[4] |
王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎, 陈珺 . ( 2015). 邻近效应对多媒体学习中图文整合的影响: 线索的作用. 心理学报, 47 (2), 224-233.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00224 URL |
[5] |
王福兴, 谢和平, 李卉 . ( 2016). 视觉单通道还是视听双通道?——通道效应的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24, (3), 335-350.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00335 URL |
[6] |
Ainsworth S., Prain V., & Tytler R . ( 2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science Education, 333, (6046), 1096-1097.
doi: 10.1126/science.1204153 URL |
[7] |
Alesandrini K.L . ( 1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytic- holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, (3), 358-368.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.73.3.358 URL |
[8] |
Balemans M. C. M., Kooloos J. G. M., Donders A. R. T., & van der Zee C. E. E. M .( 2016). Actual drawing of histological images improves knowledge retention. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, (1), 60-70.
doi: 10.1002/ase.1545 URL pmid: 26033842 |
[9] |
Bjork R. A., Dunlosky J., & Kornell N . ( 2013). Self- regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 URL pmid: 23020639 |
[10] |
Bock D. D., Verschaffel L., & Janssens D . ( 1998). The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students' solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, (1), 65-83.
doi: 10.1023/A:1003151011999 URL |
[11] | Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., & Cocking R. R . ( 2000). How people learn (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC:National Academy. |
[12] |
Brucker B., Ehlis A. C., Häußinger F. B., Fallgatter A. J., & Gerjets P . ( 2015). Watching corresponding gestures facilitates learning with animations by activating human mirror-neurons: An fNIRS study. Learning and Instruction, 36, 27-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.003 URL |
[13] | Carney R.N., &Levin J.R . ( 2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, (1), 5-26. |
[14] |
Csíkos C., Szitányi J., & Kelemen R . ( 2011). The effects of using drawings in developing young children’s mathematical word problem solving: A design experiment with third- grade Hungarian students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, (1), 47-65.
doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9360-z URL |
[15] |
Dean R.S., &Kulhavey R.W . ( 1981). Influence of spatial organization in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, (1), 57-64.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.57 URL |
[16] |
Edens K.M., &Potter E. ( 2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103, (3), 135-144.
doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x URL |
[17] | Gan Y .( 2008). Drawing out ideas: Student-generated drawings' roles in supporting understanding of "light" (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Toronto. |
[18] | Gobert J.D., &Clement J.J . ( 1999). Effects of student- generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causaland dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, (1), 39-53. |
[19] |
Greene T.R . ( 1989). Children's understanding of class inclusion hierarchies: The relationship between external representation and task performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, (1), 62-89.
doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90041-6 URL pmid: 2754389 |
[20] |
Hall V. C., Bailey J., & Tillman C . ( 1997). Can student- generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, (4), 677-681.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.677 |
[21] |
Imhof B., Scheiter K., Edelmann J., & Gerjets P . ( 2012). How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns. Learning and Instruction, 22, (3), 193-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.006 URL |
[22] | Lee D.L . ( 2017). Effectiveness of learner-gennerated drawing in biology comprehension. ( Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Pennsylvania State University. |
[23] |
Lehtinen A., & Viiri J. ( 2014). Using tablets as tools for learner-generated drawings in the context of teaching the kinetic theory of gases. Physics Education, 49, (3), 344-348.
doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/49/3/344 URL |
[24] |
Leopold C., &Leutner D. ( 2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22, (1), 16-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005 URL |
[25] |
Leopold C., Sumfleth E., & Leutner D . ( 2013). Learning with summaries: Effects of representation mode and type of learning activity on comprehension and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 27, 40-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.003 URL |
[26] |
Lesgold A. M., De Good H., & Levin J. R . ( 1977). Pictures and young children's prose learning: A supplementary report. Journal of Reading Behavior. 9 (4), 353-360.
doi: 10.1080/10862967709547240 URL |
[27] |
Lesgold A. M., Levin G. R., Shimron J., & Guttman J . ( 1975). Pictures and young children's learning from oral prose. Journal of Educational Psychology. 67 (5), 636-642.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.67.5.636 URL |
[28] |
Leutner D., Leopold C., & Sumfleth E . ( 2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, (2), 284-289.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.010 URL |
[29] | Leutner D., &Schmeck A. ( 2014). The generative drawing principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 433- 463). New York: Cambridge University. |
[30] | Liao C. C. Y., Lee Y. C., & Chan T. W . ( 2013). Buliding a self-generated drawing enviornment to improve children's performance in writing and storyleaning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 8, (3), 449-464. |
[31] |
Lin L. J., Lee C. H., Kalyuga S., Wang Y., Guan S. C., & Wu H . ( 2017). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85, (1), 142-154.
doi: 10.1080/00220973.2016.1143796 URL |
[32] |
Mason L., Lowe R., & Tornatora M. C . ( 2013). Self- generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, (3), 211-224.
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.04.001 URL |
[33] | Mayer R.E . ( 1993). Illustrations that instruct. Advances in instructional psychology, 4, 253-284. |
[34] | Mayer R. E. ( 2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[35] |
Mayer R.E . ( 2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, (2), 167-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.012 URL |
[36] |
Ploetzner R., &Fillisch B. ( 2017). Not the silver bullet: Learner-generated drawings make it difficult to understand broader spatiotemporal structures in complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 47, 13-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.002 URL |
[37] |
Quillin K., &Thomas S. ( 2015). Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE- Life Sciences Education, 14, (1), 1-16.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128 URL pmid: 4353088 |
[38] |
Rellensmann J., Schukajlow S., & Leopold C . ( 2016). Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students’ mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, (1), 53-78.
doi: 10.1007/s10649-016-9736-1 URL |
[39] |
Scheiter K., Schleinschok k., & Ainsworth S . ( 2017). Why sketching may aid learning from science texts: Contrasting sketching with written explanations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, (4), 866-882.
doi: 10.1111/tops.12261 URL |
[40] |
Schleinschok K., Eitel A., & Scheiter K . ( 2017). Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text? Learning and Instruction, 51, 10-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.002 URL |
[41] |
Schmeck A., Mayer R. E., Opfermann M., Pfeiffer V., & Leutner D . ( 2014). Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: Testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, (4), 275-286.
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.07.003 URL |
[42] |
Schmidgall S. P., Eitel A., & Scheiter K. (in press). Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner- generated drawing.Learning and Instruction.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.006 URL |
[43] |
Schwamborn A., Mayer R. E., Thillmann H., Leopold C., & Leutner D . ( 2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, (4), 872-879.
doi: 10.1037/a0019640 URL |
[44] |
Schwamborn A., Thillmann H., Opfermann M., & Leutner D . ( 2011). Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, (1), 89-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.028 URL |
[45] |
Slominski T. N., Momsen J. L., & Montplaisir L. M . ( 2017). Drawing on student knowledge of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 41, (2), 212-221.
doi: 10.1152/advan.00129.2016 URL pmid: 28377435 |
[46] |
Snowman J., &Cunningham D,J. ( 1975). A comparison of pictorial and written adjunct aids in learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, (2), 307-311.
doi: 10.1037/h0076934 URL |
[47] |
Stagg B.C., &Verde M.F . ( 2018 ). A comparison of descriptive writing and drawing of plants for the development of adult novices’ botanical knowledge. Journal of Biological Education, 52, 1-16.
doi: 10.1080/00219266.2017.1420683 URL |
[48] |
Stull A.T., &Mayer R.E . ( 2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, (4), 808-820.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808 URL |
[49] | Sweller J., Ayres P., & Kalyuga S . ( 2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. |
[50] | Sweller J., van Merriënboer J. J. G., & Paas F. G. W. C .( 1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, (3), 251-296. |
[51] |
van Essen G., &Hamaker C. ( 1990). Using self-generated drawings to solve arithmetic word problem. The Journal of Educational Reasearch, 83, (6), 301-312.
doi: 10.1080/00220671.1990.10885976 URL |
[52] |
van Gog T., &Scheiter K. ( 2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, (2), 95-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009 |
[53] |
van Meter P. ( 2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, (1), 129-140.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.129 URL |
[54] | van Meter P., & Firetto C. M .( 2013). Cognitive model of drawing construction. Learning through the construction of drawings. In G. J. Schraw, M. T. McCrudden, & D. R. Robinson (Eds.). Learning through visual displays (pp. 247-380) . Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing. |
[55] |
van Meter P., Aleksic M., Schwartz A., & Garner J . ( 2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, (2), 142-166.
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001 URL |
[56] |
van Meter P., &Garner J. ( 2005). The Promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, (4), 285-325.
doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3 URL |
[57] | Wammes J. D., Meade M. E., & Fernandes M. A . ( 2016). The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, (9), 1752-1776. |
[58] |
Wang L. C., Yang H. M., Tasi H. J., & Chan S. Y . ( 2013). Learner-generated drawing for phonological and orthographic dyslexic readers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, (1), 228-233.
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.006 URL pmid: 22982467 |
[59] |
Wilson K. E., Martinez M., Mills C., D'Mello S., Smilek D., & Risko E. F . ( 2018). Instructor presence effect: Liking does not always lead to learning. Computers & Education, 122, 205-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.011 URL |
[60] |
Xie H. P., Wang F. X., Hao Y. B., Chen J. X., An J., Wang Y., & Liu H. S . ( 2017). The more cognitive load is reduced by cues, the better retention and transfer of multimedia learning: A meta-analysis and two meta- regression analyses. PLoS ONE, 12, (8), e0183884.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183884 URL pmid: 5576760 |
[61] | Zhang H.Z . ( 2010, June). Exploring drawing and critique to enhance learning from visualizations. Presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, Illinois. |
[62] |
Zhang H.Z., &Linn M.C . ( 2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, (10), 1177-1198.
doi: 10.1002/tea.20443 URL |
[63] |
Zhang H.Z., &Linn M.C . ( 2013). Learning from chemical visualizations: Comparing generation and selection. International Journal of Science Education, 35, (13), 2174-2197.
doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.792971 URL |
[1] | WANG Yanqing, GONG Shaoying, JIANG Tiantian, Wu Yanan. Can affective pedagogical agent facilitate multimedia learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1524-1535. |
[2] | KUANG Ziyi, CHENG Meixia, LI Wenjing, WANG Fuxing, HU Xiangen. Can Instructors' eye gaze promote video learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2291-2302. |
[3] | KUANG Ziyi, ZHANG Yang, WANG Fuxing, YANG Xiaomeng, HU Xiangen. Can the presence of human teacher promote video learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2184-2194. |
[4] | CHE Jingshang, SUN Hailong, XIAO Chenjie, LI Aimei. Why information overload damages decisions? An explanation based on limited cognitive resources [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1758-1768. |
[5] | CHEN Jiaxue, XIE Heping, WANG Fuxing, ZHOU Li, LI Wenjing. Do induced positive emotions facilitate multimedia learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1818-1830. |
[6] | WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; XIE Heping; LIU Huashan. Is pedagogical agent in multimedia learning good for learning? A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 12-28. |
[7] | XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; WANG Yuxin; An Jing. Does Harder-to-Read mean Better-to-Learn? Effects of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1077-1090. |
[8] | WANG Fuxing; XIE Heping; LI Hui. Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 335-350. |
[9] | LI Songqing; ZHAO Qingbai; ZHOU Zhijin; ZHANG Yi. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Text and Picture Processing in Multimedia Learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1361-1370. |
[10] | WANG Fuxing;DUAN Zhaohui;ZHOU Zongkui. Attention Guidance in Multimedia Learning: The Role of Cueing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1430-1440. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||