ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1590-1605.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1590 cstr: 32111.14.2026.1590

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式人工智能个性化推荐对旅游信息决策的影响

宋潇潇1, 凌小蝶2, 谷慧敏1,3, 马双2   

  1. 1北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院, 北京 100024;
    2对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院, 北京 100029;
    3新疆大学旅游学院, 乌鲁木齐 830046
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-24 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-07-20
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72502012, 72572033, 72332010, 72072006); 国家社科基金项目(21AGL016); 北京第二外国语学院科研项目(KYZX25A012); 北京市属高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(XJQN25A006)

The impact of generative AI personalized recommendations on tourists’ travel decision-making

SONG Xiaoxiao1, LING Xiaodie2, GU Huimin1,3, MA Shuang2   

  1. 1School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China;
    2School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
    3College of Tourism, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
  • Received:2025-12-24 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-07-20

摘要: 生成式人工智能个性化推荐(Generative Artificial Intelligence-Driven Personalized Recommendations, 简称GAI个性化推荐)如何重塑游客信息搜索行为及决策模式亟待研究。本文基于5A模型, 将“旅行前”游客行为细分为旅游需求识别、行程规划和预订决策三个阶段, 探究不同阶段GAI个性化推荐类型对信息搜索行为及决策的影响。首先, 基于信息处理理论和启发式-系统式模型, 探讨旅游需求识别阶段主动式与响应式GAI个性化推荐对游客GAI持续使用意愿影响的机制及边界条件。其次, 基于信任视角, 探究旅游行程规划阶段基于高适应性算法与低适应性算法的GAI个性化推荐对游客满意度影响的机制及边界条件。最后, 基于人机协同视角和线索过滤理论, 研究GAI提供与人-GAI协同提供的个性化推荐在旅游预订决策阶段对游客GAI推荐接受度影响的机制及边界条件。研究结果为GAI驱动的旅游信息决策与个性化推荐系统的优化提供切实可行的理论依据和实践启示。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 个性化推荐类型, 旅游信息决策, 信息处理理论, 5A模型

Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence personalized recommendations play a critical role in tourism information search. How to leverage GAI personalized recommendations to reshape the information search experience and enhance decision-making efficiency has become an urgent issue for the tourism industry. Grounded in information search-related theories and the 5A model, this study systematically investigates the effects of different types of GAI personalized recommendations namely proactive versus reactive recommendations, recommendation with high versus low adaptive algorithms and recommendations provided by GAI alone versus human-GAI collaboration on tourists’ information search behaviors and decision-making across three pre-travel stages: travel need recognition, itinerary planning, and booking decision-making.
The theoretical contributions of this study are structured as follows. First, based on the core characteristics of users’ information search behaviors across different pre-travel stages, this study proposes a stage-based classification of GAI-driven personalized recommendations. Most existing studies treat the pre-travel stage as a single holistic phase, overlooking heterogeneity in users’ needs, motivations, and decision tasks across stages. This study therefore adopts the 5A model and refines the pre-travel stage into three sequential phases: travel need recognition, itinerary planning, and booking decision-making. These stages exhibit a progressive relationship, in which need recognition provides foundational information for itinerary planning, and itinerary planning, in turn, enables booking decisions. Accordingly, this study proposes stage-specific types of GAI personalized recommendations and emphasizes the matching relationship between recommendation types and stage-specific search tasks and informational needs, thereby extending the application of the 5A model in tourism information search research.
Second, this study develops a theoretical framework explaining how different types of GAI personalized recommendations influence tourism information search behaviors and decision-making across the three pre-travel stages, thereby enriching and advancing the theoretical system of tourism information search research. The dynamic interaction mechanisms of GAI, heterogeneous user characteristics, and diverse tourism contexts introduce uncertainty into the effects and pathways through which personalized recommendations influence decision behaviors. By systematically examining how different recommendation types operate across pre-travel stages, this study fills a gap in the literature on GAI-enabled tourism information search and highlights the importance of understanding GAI personalization from an information search theory perspective.
Third, this study reveals the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions through which different types of GAI personalized recommendations influence users’ psychological processes and decision-making behaviors across pre-travel stages, thereby advancing research on the integration of personalized tourism marketing and AI technologies. Existing studies primarily focus on the overall effectiveness or single-dimensional attributes of personalized recommendations, with limited attention to the heterogeneous mechanisms of different recommendation types. By incorporating stage-specific task characteristics, such as cognitive load, perceived risk, emotional engagement, and information needs, this study explains how different GAI-driven recommendation types affect decision-making through psychological mechanisms including creativity, trust, and perceived information comprehensiveness. This contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the integration between GAI and personalized marketing and addresses gaps in the classification and mechanism analysis of GAI recommendation types.
This study also offers significant practical implications. Although GAI is increasingly integrated into tourism information search and personalized recommendation systems, tourism enterprises still face challenges such as overly uniform recommendation strategies, inaccurate user need identification, and poor alignment between recommendation content and search tasks. By classifying GAI recommendations according to pre-travel stages and emphasizing the matching between recommendation types and task characteristics, this study provides actionable insights for optimizing information search experiences and improving recommendation efficiency.
Specifically, during the travel need recognition stage, users are more sensitive to the attractiveness and inspirational value of information. Enterprises should therefore adopt more creative and exploratory recommendation strategies to stimulate travel interest and demand. During the itinerary planning stage, users focus more on information integration, comparative evaluation, and comprehensibility; thus, recommendations should emphasize interpretability and comparability of travel plans. During the booking decision stage, users prioritize trustworthiness, transparency, and risk controllability. At this point, high-reliability human-GAI collaborative recommendations can enhance decision confidence and improve conversion outcomes. However, for standardized, low-risk products such as attraction tickets, autonomous GAI recommendations may provide superior user experiences due to faster response and smoother interaction.
Finally, this study provides practical guidance for the design of GAI-based tourism recommendation systems. The findings demonstrate that different recommendation types influence user psychology and decision-making through mechanisms. Therefore, system developers should enhance the capability of identifying users’ information search stages and dynamically adjust recommendation logic and information presentation accordingly. In addition, recommendation systems should strengthen process transparency and interpretability by presenting recommendation rationales, reference information, generative logic, and key constraints. This can improve users’ understanding of recommendations and reduce concerns regarding AI hallucinations and algorithmic “black-box” effects. Furthermore, incorporating human-GAI collaborative recommendation and process visualization can enhance user trust and further improve the effectiveness of GAI personalized recommendation systems in tourism contexts.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence, personalized recommendation types, tourism information decision- making, Information Processing Theory, 5A model

中图分类号: