ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 1630-1646.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.1 cstr: 32111.14.2025.1630

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    

内隐社会认知的干预方法

郭小丽, 常骏垚, 沙吗阿杰, 杨紫嫣()   

  1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 认知科学与心理健康全国重点实验室, 北京 100101
    中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-16 出版日期:2025-09-15 发布日期:2025-06-26
  • 通讯作者: 杨紫嫣, E-mail: yangzy@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32371130)

Interventions for implicit social cognition

GUO Xiaoli, CHANG Junyao, SHA Maajie, YANG Ziyan()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-03-16 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-06-26

摘要: 自1995年内隐社会认知概念提出以来, 该领域吸引了大量研究, 涵盖内隐态度、内隐刻板印象和内隐自尊等多个方面。早期研究主要集中于内隐社会认知的测量及其影响。研究表明负面的内隐社会认知(如内隐偏见、内隐刻板印象、低内隐自尊)对人们的心理和行为具有一系列消极影响。近年来, 研究焦点逐步转向如何有效干预负面的内隐社会认知, 以期减少其不良后果。目前常用的有效干预方法包括评价性条件反射、接近−回避训练、群际接触、接触反刻板印象案例、内隐偏见培训、实施意图、靶向记忆再激活、诱导情绪和正念冥想9种策略。本文对上述干预方法及其效果进行了系统介绍, 并对每种方法的效应量进行了元分析。结果表明, 这些方法表现出小到中等程度的效应量, 其中接近−回避训练、内隐偏见培训和情绪诱导干预较为有效。上述干预方法在短期内表现出一定的有效性, 但缺乏长久的时效性。后续研究可以采用多方法结合提高干预效果及时效性。此外, 未来的内隐社会认知干预可以在人工智能技术的支持下更加高效和便捷。

关键词: 内隐社会认知, 内隐联系测验, 内隐偏见, 内隐刻板印象, 干预策略

Abstract:

Since the introduction of the implicit social cognition in 1995, this field has attracted a great deal of research attention. Implicit social cognition encompasses multiple dimensions, including implicit attitudes, implicit stereotypes, implicit self-esteem and so on. Early research primarily focused on the measurement of implicit social cognition as well as its impacts on individuals’ psychological and behavioral outcomes. A large number of empirical studies have demonstrated that negative implicit social cognition (e.g., implicit biases, implicit stereotypes, and low implicit self-esteem) exerts various detrimental effects on personal mental health, decision-making, and even social consequences such as social inequality. Implicit social cognition exhibits stability but is also influenced by situational factors, menifesting a certain degree of malleability. In recent years, research has focused on the intervention approaches aimed at mitigating negative implicit social cognition and its adverse consequences. However, existing systematic reviews have predominantly concentrated on singular interventions (e.g., interventions merely for implicit racial bias), and show a lack of assessment on the effectiveness of the interventions.

To address these gaps, we systematically reviewed relevant literature on the interventions for implicit social cognition, incorporating broader aspects of implicit social cognition, involving diverse implicit biases, implicit stereotypes, and implicit self-esteem. Based on existing research, we reviewed nine intervention methods for implicit social cognition, including evaluative conditioning, approach-avoidance training, intergroup contact, exposure to counter-stereotypical exemplars, unconscious bias training, implementation intentions, targeted memory reactivation, emotion inducing, and mindfulness meditation. We also summarized the intervention object, theory, effectiveness, and merit and demerit of these intervention methods. These nine intervention methods can be categorized into the following four approaches based on their definitions and theory: (1) Cognitive restructuring approaches, including evaluative conditioning, approach-avoidance training, exposure to counter-stereotypical exemplars, unconscious bias training, and implementation intentions. (2) Social interaction approaches, such as intergroup contact. (3) Memory reinforcement approaches, such as targeted memory reactivation. (4) Emotion regulation approaches, including emotion inducing and mindfulness meditation. We next collected the effect sizes (Cohen’s d) of all these intervention methods and conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis on the effect size of these intervention methods. Results indicated small-to-medium effect sizes across interventions (range: 0.32 to 0.58), with approach-avoidance training, implicit bias training, and emotion induction exhibiting medium effect sizes. To be noted, most intervention methods manifest only short-term effects, with limited sustainability of intervention effectiveness. We proposed three primary factors which could account for this limitation. First, existing studies mainly rely on laboratory experiments that neglect real-world contextual complexities, thereby lacking ecological validity; Second, most interventions are only based on single intervention with insufficient reinforcement, which could not contributed to sustain cognitive changes; Third, most studies merely focus on the change of implicit social cognition itself while overlooking the role of socio-cultural factors in shaping implicit cognition. To improve the long-term effects of these interventions, we proposed several future research directions. First, future research could develop context-sensitive intervention methods to enhance ecological validity in naturalistic settings. Second, future intervention could combine multiple interventions methods with repeated interventions to reinforce long-term effect. Third, future research could investigate social and cultural factors that account for the change of implicit social cognition and integrating these factors in interventions. Additionally, future research could use artificial intelligence technologies such as virtual reality and natural language processing, which enable more efficient and convenient interventions for implicit social cognition.

Overall, the current review provides a comprehensive and systematic introduction of existing intervention methods for implicit social cognition. Through the integration of these intervention methods, we hope this review could provide a broad framework for future intervention for implicit social cognition and enhancing intervention effectiveness, as well as promote the practice in implicit social cognition interventions

Key words: implicit social cognition, implicit association test, implicit bias, implicit stereotypes, psychological intervention

中图分类号: