ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 291-304.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0291

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

神经振荡:窥探句法解析的时间进程

戚睿盈, 封叶, 司富珍   

  1. 北京语言大学语言学系/生物语言学与脑科学实验室, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-31 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2024-12-06
  • 通讯作者: 封叶, E-mail: echofy@blcu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    * 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“汉语婴幼儿声调感知的大脑偏侧化模式及其对语言发展的影响” (23YJC740011)、北京语言大学校级科研项目“音乐节奏对汉语发展性语言障碍儿童语法加工的潜在影响及其神经机制研究”(24QN07)、北京语言大学院级科研项目“汉语儿童关系从句的加工模式探究” (23YJ120001)资助

Neural oscillations: Exploring the temporal dynamics of syntactic parsing

QI Ruiying, FENG Ye, SI Fuzhen   

  1. Department of Linguistics/ Lab of Biolinguistics and Brain Sciences, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2024-05-31 Online:2025-02-15 Published:2024-12-06

摘要: 在语言表型与神经机制之间寻找对应关系, 即所谓的映射问题(the mapping problem), 是当前研究的一大热点。其中, 句法解析的神经机制尤具挑战性, 这涉及到如何在神经活动中识别出对应于句法结构构建的过程, 是人类语言能力之谜破题的关键。近期神经振荡活动的相关研究不仅为句法解析过程中句法加工的心理现实性提供了有力证据, 也展示了利用神经振荡来阐释句法解析过程的神经编码活动的可行性。而理论语言学最简方案有关句法计算的理论模型可以与神经科学中有关神经振荡的实验研究相互印证, 通过此类研究可以窥探句法构建的时间进程。未来研究可集中于四方面:神经振荡与句法加工的更细粒度对齐; 神经振荡的发生机制及其生物学意义; 儿童语言发展过程中神经振荡的变化模式; 语言障碍神经生理基础及其康复应用。

关键词: 神经振荡, 语言理解, 句法解析, 最简方案, 增量转换

Abstract: The mapping problem, which seeks to establish correspondences between linguistic phenomena and their underlying neural mechanisms, has emerged as a significant research focus. Syntactic parsing, defined as the process by which linear speech sequences are incrementally converted into abstract hierarchical syntactic structures, is considered a fundamental aspect of human language processing. Understanding the neural basis of syntactic parsing is crucial for advancing research on the mapping problem in language and neuroscience. Recent studies have increasingly demonstrated the feasibility of using low-frequency neural oscillation as index for constructing syntactic hierarchies, positioning these oscillations as strong candidates for explaining the neural mechanisms involved in syntactic processing. By dissociating syntactic knowledge from prosodic information, semantic statistical information, and lexical properties, these studies have found a significant correlation between low-frequency neural oscillatory activity and the processes involved in constructing linguistic hierarchies, which indicated that the prior grammatical knowledge is the prerequisite for robust linguistic hierarchy construction, further providing evidence supporting the psychological reality of syntactic processing.
Furthermore, increasing attention has been directed toward the potential relationship between phase coherence in neural oscillations and different levels of linguistic structure. Research suggests that neural clusters may represent syntactic hierarchies through phase synchronization or desynchronization within the same frequency band or across different frequency bands. As the processing of linguistic input unfolds over time, different neural clusters are progressively activated or inhibited, generating oscillatory signals with distinct phase properties. These oscillatory dynamics contribute to the storage, maintenance, and retrieval of sensory information across different temporal scales, thereby facilitating the dynamic encoding of hierarchical linguistic structures. This capacity for dynamic encoding through temporally coordinated neural oscillations is thought to be critical for constructing linguistic hierarchies, as it enables the brain to process complex syntactic information in real time.
Several theoretical models, including ROSE, CNAL, SMMM, DORA, VS-BIND have been proposed to explain how neural oscillations relate to syntactic parsing. Within the framework of David Marr’s theory, these models have given a comprehensive description of syntactic parsing and its neural mechanism from the perspective of implementational level, algorithmic level, and computational level, which indicates the non-isomorphic relationship between the temporal structure of neural oscillations and the construction of syntactic hierarchies. The temporal distribution of phase properties in neural oscillations provides a plausible framework for understanding how neural activity encodes syntactic parsing processes. These insights offer a potential solution to the mapping problem by elucidating how different neural oscillatory dynamics might underlie the incremental construction of syntactic structures. This line of research, therefore, holds considerable promise for advancing our understanding of the neural basis of language processing.
Future research on the relationship between neural oscillations and syntactic parsing can focus on several promising directions. First, achieving finer-grained alignment and causal inference between neural oscillatory activity and the specific stages of syntactic processing will be essential for clarifying how neural signals correspond to different aspects of syntactic hierarchy construction. Second, investigating the mechanisms underlying the generation of neural oscillations and exploring their broader biological significance could provide important insights into how oscillatory activity supports language processing. Third, understanding how neural oscillations change during the course of language development in children will be critical for uncovering the developmental trajectories of neural circuits involved in syntactic parsing. Lastly, examining the neurophysiological foundations of language disorders and identifying how disruptions in neural oscillatory patterns contribute to these conditions could inform new approaches to diagnosis and rehabilitation.

Key words: neural oscillation, language comprehension, syntactic parsing, the minimalist program, incremental conversion