心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 790-799.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00790
收稿日期:
2023-09-07
出版日期:
2024-05-15
发布日期:
2024-03-05
通讯作者:
张林
E-mail:zhanglin1@nbu.edu.cn
WANG Yuling, LU Xiaowei, WU Zongjie, LI Guogen, ZHANG Lin()
Received:
2023-09-07
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-03-05
Contact:
ZHANG Lin
E-mail:zhanglin1@nbu.edu.cn
摘要:
以往关于面孔吸引力判断的研究多关注视觉信息, 忽视了非视觉信息在其中的作用, 而现有研究已证实面孔吸引力判断中存在不同感官信息的相互作用, 是跨通道整合的。为此, 在以往研究的基础上, 综合面孔空间模型和贝叶斯因果推理模型, 推测在面孔吸引力判断的跨通道整合过程中, 当个体根据感官刺激和已有的标准面孔推断不同感官信息是来自同一张目标面孔时, 便自然将各种感官信息在大脑中进行整合, 形成统一的目标面孔, 进行吸引力的判断。未来可将面孔嵌入更广泛的环境中, 考察多种感官信息的跨通道整合, 并进一步探究跨通道整合的边界条件, 以及社会互动中的跨通道整合, 以构建更系统的面孔吸引力跨通道整合模型。
中图分类号:
王羽凌, 陆晓伟, 武宗杰, 李国根, 张林. (2024). 面孔吸引力判断中的跨通道整合过程. 心理科学进展 , 32(5), 790-799.
WANG Yuling, LU Xiaowei, WU Zongjie, LI Guogen, ZHANG Lin. (2024). The cross-modal integration process in facial attractiveness judgments. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(5), 790-799.
[1] | 周雯, 冯果. (2012). 嗅知觉及其与情绪系统的交互. 心理科学进展 20(1), 2-9. |
[2] |
Aglieri, V., Watson, R., Pernet, C., Latinus, M., Garrido, L., & Belin, P. (2017). The glasgow voice memory test: Assessing the ability to memorize and recognize unfamiliar voices. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 97-110.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0689-6 pmid: 26822668 |
[3] |
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 267-278.
doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1 pmid: 10859571 |
[4] |
Alsius, A., Navarra, J., Campbell, R., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005). Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology, 15(9), 839-843.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.046 pmid: 15886102 |
[5] |
Badde, S., Navarro, K. T., & Landy, M. S. (2020). Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch. Cognition, 197, 104170.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104170 URL |
[6] |
Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Lafaille, P., Ahad, P., & Pike, B. (2000). Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature, 403, 309-312.
doi: 10.1038/35002078 URL |
[7] |
Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., & Mühl, C. (2021). Individual differences in voice adaptability are specifically linked to voice perception skill. Cognition, 210, 104582.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104582 URL |
[8] |
Bowdring, M. A., Sayette, M. A., Girard, J. M., & Woods, W. C. (2021). In the eye of the beholder: A comprehensive analysis of stimulus type, perceiver, and target in physical attractiveness perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 45(2), 241-259.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-020-00350-2 |
[9] |
Broadbent, H., Osborne, T., Mareschal, D., & Kirkham, N. (2020). Are two cues always better than one? The role of multiple intra-sensory cues compared to multi-cross- sensory cues in children’s incidental category learning. Cognition, 199, 104202.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104202 URL |
[10] |
Calvert, G. A., Brammer, M. J., & Iversen, S. D. (1998). Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 247-253.
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01189-9 pmid: 21244923 |
[11] |
Campanella, S., & Belin, P. (2007). Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 535-543.
pmid: 17997124 |
[12] |
Cao, Y., Summerfield, C., Park, H., Giordano, B. L., & Kayser, C. (2019). Causal inference in the multisensory brain. Neuron, 102(5), 1076-1087.
doi: S0896-6273(19)30332-0 pmid: 31047778 |
[13] | Chen, K., Zhou, B., Chen, S., He, S., & Zhou, W. (2013). Olfaction spontaneously highlights visual saliency map. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1768), 20131729. |
[14] | Chen, Y. C., & Spence, C. (2017). Assessing the role of the ‘unity assumption’ on multisensory integration: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 445. |
[15] |
Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65(5), 997-1004.
doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2123 URL |
[16] |
Cook, S., Kokmotou, K., Soto, V., Fallon, N., Tyson-Carr, J., Thomas, A., ... Stancak, A. (2017). Pleasant and unpleasant odour-face combinations influence face and odour perception: An event-related potential study. Behavioural Brain Research, 333, 304-313.
doi: S0166-4328(17)30608-3 pmid: 28716674 |
[17] |
Cook, S., Kokmotou, K., Soto, V., Wright, H., Fallon, N., Thomas, A., ... Stancak, A. (2018). Simultaneous odour-face presentation strengthens hedonic evaluations and event-related potential responses influenced by unpleasant odour. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 22-27.
doi: S0304-3940(18)30114-9 pmid: 29466719 |
[18] |
Damjanovic, L., Wilkinson, H., & Lloyd, J. (2018). Sweet emotion: The role of odor-induced context in the search advantage for happy facial expressions. Chemical Senses, 43(3), 139-150.
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx081 pmid: 29293901 |
[19] | Debats, N. B., Heuer, H., & Kayser, C. (2021). Visuo- proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 21640. |
[20] |
Drimalla, H., Landwehr, N., Hess, U., & Dziobek, I. (2019). From face to face: The contribution of facial mimicry to cognitive and emotional empathy. Cognition and Emotion, 33(8), 1672-1686.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1596068 URL |
[21] |
Fairhall, S. L., & Macaluso, E. (2009). Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29(6), 1247-1257.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06688.x pmid: 19302160 |
[22] | Feng, G., & Lei, J. (2022). The effect of odor valence on facial attractiveness judgment: A preliminary experiment. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 665. |
[23] |
Fraccaro, P. J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2010). Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 447-461.
pmid: 22947812 |
[24] |
French, R. L., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2020). Multisensory neural processing: From cue integration to causal inference. Current Opinion in Physiology, 16, 8-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.04.004 pmid: 32968701 |
[25] |
Groyecka, A., Pisanski, K., Sorokowska, A., Havlíček, J., Karwowski, M., Puts, D., ... Sorokowski, P. (2017). Attractiveness is multimodal: Beauty is also in the nose and ear of the beholder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 778.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00778 pmid: 28572777 |
[26] |
Han, S., Liu, S., Gan, Y., Xu, Q., Xu, P., Luo, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Repeated exposure makes attractive faces more attractive: Neural responses in facial attractiveness judgement. Neuropsychologia, 139, 107365.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107365 URL |
[27] |
Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36(10), 1523-1533.
doi: 10.1068/p5851 URL |
[28] |
Hermann, C., Ziegler, S., Birbaumer, N., & Flor, H. (2000). Pavlovian aversive and appetitive odor conditioning in humans: Subjective, peripheral, and electrocortical changes. Experimental Brain Research, 132(2), 203-215.
doi: 10.1007/s002210000343 pmid: 10853945 |
[29] |
Hughes, S. M., & Miller, N. E. (2016). What sounds beautiful looks beautiful stereotype: The matching of attractiveness of voices and faces. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(7), 984-996.
doi: 10.1177/0265407515612445 URL |
[30] |
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33, 569-576.
pmid: 15250662 |
[31] |
Jones, E. G., & Powell, T. P. S. (1970). An anatomical study of converging sensory pathways within the cerebral cortex of the monkey. Brain, 93(4), 793-820.
pmid: 4992433 |
[32] | Kahnt, T., Heinzle, J., Park, S. Q., & Haynes, J. D. (2010). The neural code of reward anticipation in human orbitofrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(13), 6010-6015. |
[33] | Kayser, C., & Shams, L. (2015). Multisensory causal inference in the brain. Plos Biology, 13(2),e1002075. |
[34] |
Kirsch, W., & Kunde, W. (2023). On the role of interoception in body and object perception: A multisensory-integration account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 321-339.
doi: 10.1177/17456916221096138 URL |
[35] |
Klümper, L., Wühr, P., Hassebrauck, M., & Schwarz, S. (2020). Automaticity of facial attractiveness perception and sex-specific mating strategies. Cognition, 204, 104379.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104379 URL |
[36] |
Knowles, K. K., & Little, A. C. (2016). Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1657-1675.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091484 URL |
[37] | Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. Plos One, 2(9), e943. |
[38] |
Kowal, M., Sorokowski, P., Pisanski, K., Valentova, J. V., Varella, M. A., Frederick, D. A., ... Espinosa, M. Z. (2022). Predictors of enhancing human physical attractiveness: Data from 93 countries. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(6), 455-474.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.08.003 URL |
[39] | Lavan, N., Mileva, M., Burton, A. M., Young, A. W., & McGettigan, C. (2021). Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within-and between-person variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(9), 1854. |
[40] |
Li, J., & Deng, S. W. (2023). Facilitation and interference effects of the multisensory context on learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Research, 87(5), 1334-1352.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01733-4 |
[41] |
Li, W., Moallem, I., Paller, K. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2007). Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1044-1049.
pmid: 18031410 |
[42] |
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638-1659.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 URL |
[43] | Liu, M., Sommer, W., Yue, S., & Li, W. (2023). Dominance of face over voice in human attractiveness judgments: ERP evidence. Psychophysiology, 60(11), e14358. |
[44] |
Macaluso, E., George, N., Dolan, R., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2004). Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: PET study. Neuroimage, 21(2), 725-732.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.049 pmid: 14980575 |
[45] | Maddox, R. K., Atilgan, H., Bizley, J. K., & Lee, A. K. (2015). Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners. Elife, 4, e04995. |
[46] |
Marchant, J. L., Ruff, C. C., & Driver, J. (2012). Audiovisual synchrony enhances BOLD responses in a brain network including multisensory STS while also enhancing target‐detection performance for both modalities. Human Brain Mapping, 33(5), 1212-1224.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.v33.5 URL |
[47] | Marin, M. M., Schober, R., Gingras, B., & Leder, H. (2017). Misattribution of musical arousal increases sexual attraction towards opposite-sex faces in females. Plos One, 12(9), e0183531. |
[48] |
McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746-748.
doi: 10.1038/264746a0 |
[49] | Mei, M., Grillot, R. L., Abbey, C. K., Emery Thompson, M., & Roney, J. R. (2022). Does scent attractiveness reveal women's ovulatory timing? Evidence from signal detection analyses and endocrine predictors of odour attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 289(1970), 20220026. |
[50] |
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 247-279.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-x pmid: 7083803 |
[51] | Moller, A. P., & Pomiankowski, A. (1993). Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32(3), 167-176. |
[52] |
Mühl, C., Sheil, O., Jarutyte, L., & Bestelmeyer, P. E. G. (2018). The bangor voice matching test: A standardized test for the assessment of voice perception ability. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2184-2192.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0985-4 pmid: 29124718 |
[53] |
Noesselt, T., Bergmann, D., Heinze, H. J., Münte, T., & Spence, C. (2012). Coding of multisensory temporal patterns in human superior temporal sulcus. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 64.
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00064 pmid: 22973202 |
[54] | O’Connor, J. J. M., Fraccaro, P. J., Pisanski, K., Tigue, C. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Men’s preferences for women’s femininity in dynamic cross-modal stimuli. Plos One, 8(7), e69531. |
[55] |
Olofsson, J. K., & Gottfried, J. A. (2015). The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 314-321.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.007 pmid: 25979848 |
[56] |
Pan, Y., Jin, J., Wan, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, F., Xu, S., ... Rao, H. (2022). Beauty affects fairness: Facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 16(6), 2497-2505.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00705-x |
[57] |
Panagiotopoulou, E., Crucianelli, L., Lemma, A., & Fotopoulou, A. (2022). Identifying with the beautiful: Facial attractiveness effects on unisensory and multisensory self-other distinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(7), 1314-1329.
doi: 10.1177/17470218211050318 URL |
[58] |
Pisanski, K., Fraccaro, P. J., Tigue, C. C., O'Connor, J. J., & Feinberg, D. R. (2014). Return to Oz: Voice pitch facilitates assessments of men’s body size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1316-1331.
doi: 10.1037/a0036956 URL |
[59] |
Porada, D. K., Regenbogen, C., Seubert, J., Freiherr, J., & Lundström, J. N. (2019). Multisensory enhancement of odor object processing in primary olfactory cortex. Neuroscience, 418, 254-265.
doi: S0306-4522(19)30615-3 pmid: 31473279 |
[60] |
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
pmid: 16318594 |
[61] |
Rinaldi, L., Maggioni, E., Olivero, N., Maravita, A., & Girelli, L. (2018). Smelling the space around us: Odor pleasantness shifts visuospatial attention in humans. Emotion, 18(7), 971-979.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000335 pmid: 28872341 |
[62] |
Roberts, S. C., Kralevich, A., Ferdenzi, C., Saxton, T. K., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., … Havlicek, J. (2011). Body odor quality predicts behavioral attractiveness in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1111-1117.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9803-8 pmid: 21879430 |
[63] |
Rokni, D., Hemmelder, V., Kapoor, V., & Murthy, V. N. (2014). An olfactory cocktail party: Figure-ground segregation of odorants in rodents. Nature Neuroscience, 17(9), 1225-1232.
doi: 10.1038/nn.3775 pmid: 25086608 |
[64] | Romanski, L. M. (2012). Convergence of auditory, visual, and somatosensory information in ventral prefrontal cortex. In M. M.Murray, M. T.Wallace (Eds.), The neural bases of multisensory processes (pp. 667-682). Boca Raton, FL: Frontiers in Neuroscience. |
[65] |
Rubenstein, A. J. (2005). Variation in perceived attractiveness: Differences between dynamic and static faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 759-762.
pmid: 16181436 |
[66] |
Scheller, M., & Sui, J. (2022). Social relevance modulates multisensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(9), 1022-1038.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0001013 pmid: 35446086 |
[67] | Seubert, J., Gregory, K. M., Chamberland, J., Dessirier, J. M., & Lundström, J. N. (2014). Odor valence linearly modulates attractiveness, but not age assessment, of invariant facial features in a memory-based rating task. Plos One, 9(5), e98347. |
[68] |
Shams, L., & Beierholm, U. (2022). Bayesian causal inference: A unifying neuroscience theory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 137, 104619.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104619 URL |
[69] |
Sorokowska, A. (2013). Assessing personality using body odor: Differences between children and adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 153-163.
pmid: 23894217 |
[70] |
Sorokowski, P., Kościński, K., & Sorokowska, A. (2013). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder but ugliness culturally universal? Facial preferences of Polish and Yali (Papua) people. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 907-925.
doi: 10.1177/147470491301100414 URL |
[71] |
Spence, C. (2021). The scent of attraction and the smell of success: Crossmodal influences on person perception. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1-33.
doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00267-w |
[72] |
Steinberg, C., Dobel, C., Schupp, H. T., Kissler, J., Elling, L., Pantev, C., & Junghofer, M. (2012). Rapid and highly resolving: Affective evaluation of olfactorily conditioned faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 17-27.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00067 pmid: 21671742 |
[73] | Syrjänen, E., Fischer, H., Liuzza, M. T., Lindholm, T., & Olofsson, J. K. (2021). A review of the effects of valenced odors on face perception and evaluation. I-Perception, 12(2), 1-19. |
[74] |
Syrjänen, E., Liuzza, M. T., Fischer, H., & Olofsson, J. K. (2017). Do valenced odors and trait body odor disgust affect evaluation of emotion in dynamic faces?. Perception, 46(12), 1412-1426.
doi: 10.1177/0301006617720831 pmid: 28708027 |
[75] |
Syrjänen, E., Wiens, S., Fischer, H., Zakrzewska, M., Wartel, A., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2018). Background odors modulate N170 ERP component and perception of emotional facial stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1000.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01000 pmid: 29997539 |
[76] | Tybur, J. M., Cinar, C., Karinen, A. K., & Perone, P. (2018). Why do people vary in disgust? Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 373(1751), 1-10. |
[77] |
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(2), 161-204.
doi: 10.1080/14640749108400966 URL |
[78] |
Van Atteveldt, N. M., Formisano, E., Blomert, L., & Goebel, R. (2007). The effect of temporal asynchrony on the multisensory integration of letters and speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 962-974.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl007 pmid: 16751298 |
[79] |
Van der Burg, E., Rhodes, G., & Alais, D. (2019). Positive sequential dependency for face attractiveness perception. Journal of Vision, 19(12), 6-6.
doi: 10.1167/19.12.6 pmid: 31621804 |
[80] |
Wen, F., Gao, J., Ke, W., Zuo, B., Dai, Y., Ju, Y., & Long, J. (2023). The Effect of face-voice gender consistency on impression evaluation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(3), 1123-1139.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02524-z |
[81] |
White, D., & Burton, A. M. (2022). Individual differences and the multidimensional nature of face perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 287-300.
doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00041-3 |
[82] |
Wuttke, S. J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2019). The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces. Biological Psychology, 140, 86-95.
doi: S0301-0511(18)30583-0 pmid: 30529289 |
[83] |
Yu, R. (2023). Unconscious integration: Current evidence for integrative processing under subliminal conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 430-456.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.v114.2 URL |
[84] | Zäske, R., Skuk, V. G., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2020). Attractiveness and distinctiveness between speakers’ voices in naturalistic speech and their faces are uncorrelated. Royal Society Open Science, 7(12), 201244. |
[1] | 付春野, 李艾馨, 吕小康, 王崇颖. 孤独症谱系障碍者的视觉感知:基于贝叶斯和预测编码视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1164-1178. |
[2] | 刘一鸣, 罗浩诚, 傅世敏. 视觉意识是离散还是连续模式?基于注意瞬脱的整合性视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 264-275. |
[3] | 郑远霞, 刘国雄, 辛聪, 程黎. 以貌取人:儿童基于面孔的信任判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(2): 300-317. |
[4] | 孙猛, 刘泽军, 贾茜, 尚晨阳, 张钦. 情绪T2对抗注意瞬脱:理解情绪优先加工的窗口[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(1): 58-74. |
[5] | 孔志明, 陈辰, 贾建荣. 瞳孔对主观视觉规律性的自发反应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 14-14. |
[6] | 段苏娜, 杨雨晨, 赵冰蕾. 有意和无意想象促进视觉感知能力的提升[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 32-32. |
[7] | 张燕, 张俊俊. 经颅磁刺激对视觉感知效应的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 33-33. |
[8] | 陈子龙, 季琭妍. 多面孔情绪变异性的自动化加工:来自视觉失匹配负波的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 34-34. |
[9] | Yongyi Chen, Yu Zou, Xiaoyan Li, Ying Zhang, Guomei Zhou. “反差美”是否存在[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 39-39. |
[10] | 陈雅兰, 李天添, 周攀, 刘小燕, 王玲. 城市隧道出口驾驶过程中的视觉适应机制研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 49-49. |
[11] | 卞瑞晨, 郑晨豪, 周梁. 利用包含事件偏移的拍子同步范式比较视觉运动刺激与听觉刺激对动作的诱导作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 58-58. |
[12] | 姜一馨, 耿晓丽, 王悦, 周梁. 探究听力障碍者视觉运动拍子同步能力的表现和发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 62-62. |
[13] | 徐宏格, 潘静. 知觉引导的精细动作控制:探索抓取并移动盛有液体容器时使用的视觉信息[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 68-68. |
[14] | 梁晨曦, 陈中廷, 陈静. 一种基于持续运动追踪快速评估人眼色觉的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 69-69. |
[15] | 魏宁, 宋锦涛, 周天罡. 空间位置信息对视觉工作记忆重复优势效应的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 72-72. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||