ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 932-943.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00932

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

团队建设性偏差的形成与影响过程:组织惯例演变的视角

孙建群1,2, 叶文娟1, 李锐2,3, 田晓明2,3()   

  1. 1苏州科技大学商学院, 苏州 215009
    2苏州科技大学城市发展智库, 苏州 215009
    3苏州科技大学教育学院, 苏州 215009
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-20 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 田晓明 E-mail:tianxm@usts.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72102162);国家自然科学基金项目(71974140);国家自然科学基金项目(72171053);江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划重点课题(c-b/2021/01/21)

The antecedents and consequences of team constructive deviation: A routine-evolution perspective

SUN Jianqun1,2, YE Wenjuan1, LI Rui2,3, TIAN Xiaoming2,3()   

  1. 1School of Business, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
    2USTS Think Tank for Urban Development, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
    3School of Education, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
  • Received:2022-03-20 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-03-07
  • Contact: TIAN Xiaoming E-mail:tianxm@usts.edu.cn

摘要:

组织惯例能为企业发展提供稳定性和效率, 但有时也会因为无法适应环境而变得无价值, 甚至老化过时。建设性偏差正是一种来自员工的、自下而上的组织惯例创新与变革的推动力量, 但规范挑战的本质使得建设性偏差很难在个体层面展开或是发挥作用。有鉴于此, 本项目聚焦于团队建设性偏差, 在编制相关行为量表与事件清单的基础上, 结合事件系统理论与团队认知−情感的双重过程视角深入探讨团队建设性偏差的形成与影响过程, 包括:分析组织惯例僵化背景下团队建设性偏差的形成过程; 探索团队建设性偏差与组织惯例更新的倒U形关系及其作用机制。相关研究成果不仅是对以往建设性偏差研究的推进, 而且还能为探究组织惯例演化的黑箱过程提供新思路。

关键词: 团队建设性偏差, 组织惯例更新, 团队学习, 团队认知-情绪过程, 事件系统理论

Abstract:

Organizational routines can provide stability and efficiency for enterprise development, but sometimes they become worthless or even become outdated longer because they cannot adapt to the environment. Constructive deviance is a bottom-up driving force for organizational routine innovation and change from employees, but the existing research is still very lacking on this topic. At the same time, the essential nature of the normative challenge makes it difficult for constructive deviance to unfold at the individual level. In view of this, this project focuses on the team constructive deviance. Based on developing the relevant behavior scale and event list, the project integrates event system theory and group cognitive-affective dual-process, using the research methods of interview, time-lagged design and experiment to explore the antecedents and outcomes of team constructive deviance in the context of organizational rigidity.
Specifically, the study includes: (1) developing a team constructive deviance scale and an event inventory to lay the foundation for subsequent research; (2) examining how the events of rigidity in organizational routines contributes to team constructive deviance by inducing team normative conflict and team psychological discomfort, as well as the moderating role of environmental uncertainty and team cohesion in the above process; (3) exploring the inverted U-shaped relationship between team constructive deviance and organizational routine updating to inquire into the "degree" of constructive team deviance and the mediating role of bystander team reflexivity and bystander team activating moods in the above process and the moderating role of inter-team differences perception.
The research results not only advance the previous research on constructive deviance, but also provide inspiration for exploring the black box process of organizational routine evolution. The specific theoretical contributions are as follows: First, the proposal of team constructive deviance. Team constructive deviance contains interactive elements that are not present in individual-level constructive deviance, which originate from the mutual imprinting of team members in terms of identity or identification, and mutual infection and influence in terms of emotion and cognition. These processes and mechanisms lead to the existence of shared strong or weak constructive deviance in teams. Further, exploring and developing structural models and measurement tools of team constructive deviance in local companies can provide us with a more comprehensive understanding of constructive deviance and is expected to provide new breakthroughs in theoretical and empirical research on constructive deviance. Second, team constructive deviance is used to gain insight into the process of organizational routine evolution. Using team constructive deviance as a key element in dissecting the process of organizational routine evolution helps to identify and shape the bottom-up routine change driving force of routine evolution, which effectively complements the previous top-down routine evolution driving approach and innovatively constructs a docking study between micro-level and macro-level. Third, event system theory and team cognitive-affective dual-path model. The forming and influencing process of team constructive deviance in the process of organizational routine evolution relies on the role of situational events and follows the process of “situational events - team cognition-emotion dual-path - team behavior decision”. The event perspective and the process model of team cognition-emotion dual-path proposed in this study are effective extensions of previous studies that focused on traits such as individual stability characteristics, leadership styles, and group characteristics. In addition, this study also considers situational and entity characteristics based on the process model, which provides useful insights for subsequent research on the mixture of traits and processes.

Key words: team constructive deviance, organizational routine updating, team learning, team cognitive-affective dual-path, event system theory

中图分类号: