ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1669-1683.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01669

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

小标签, 大作用: 营销领域中的食品标签效应

杨巧英, 柳武妹(), 张东   

  1. 兰州大学管理学院, 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-03 发布日期:2021-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 柳武妹 E-mail:wumeijiayou@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972092);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(人文社科类)(2020jbkytd003)

Food labeling effects in marketing

YANG Qiaoying, LIU Wumei(), ZHANG Dong   

  1. School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2021-02-03 Published:2021-07-22
  • Contact: LIU Wumei E-mail:wumeijiayou@163.com

摘要:

食品标签作为一种食品相关信息的来源, 会对消费者的认知、情感偏好以及行为反应产生重要影响。基于信息涵盖层面的不同, 可以将食品标签划分为产品层面标签、成分层面标签两类, 且不同类型的食品标签在影响结果、作用机制以及边界方面有所差异。调节定向理论有助于解释两类食品标签所带来的不同影响。产品层面标签更多地会启动消费者的预防定向, 而成分层面标签则会启动消费者的促进定向。同时, 两类食品标签效应会受到晕轮效应、信息加工、概念隐喻、社会认同、属性推断等机制的驱动以及社会人口因素、个体差异、产品特征的调节。最后基于整合的研究框架提出了一些可行的研究方向。

关键词: 食品标签, 产品层面标签, 成分层面标签, 调节定向

Abstract:

As a tool to convey food-related information to consumers, food labels can effectively solve the problem of information asymmetry in food consumption. With the popularization of food labels in practice, more and more scholars have begun to pay attention to the impact of different food labels on consumer behavior. However, most of the existing studies focus on a single food label type and its effects, lacking of comparison and discussion on the effects of different food labels and their inherent mechanisms and boundary conditions. Based on this, this paper reviews the research on food labels in the field of marketing, which focuses on how different types of food labels affect individuals' cognition, emotion and behavior. Meanwhile, this paper introduces the regulatory orientation theory to explain the different effects of different food labels, and on this basis, a more integrated food label effect framework is constructed in this paper.

Through combing the existing literature, the existing research on food labeling has roughly underwent three stages. The first stage began in the early 1980s. The demand for the nutritional value of food led to the attention and research on the nutrition label. The second stage started around 2000. Scholars mainly focus on labels that can convey information about food safety and quality. In the third stage, in the last decade, eco-environmental labels attracted more attention from consumers and scholars. Based on the different levels of information coverage, food labels can be divided into two types: product-level labels and ingredient-level labels. The product-level label refers to the label which is used to explain the overall characteristics and quality information of the food (including date label, health warning label, organic label, natural label, brand information, genetically modified organism label, eco label, and fair trade label). However, the ingredient-level label refers to the label that is used to display the specific nutritional information of the food (including nutrition facts panel, GDA label, low-fat label, health claim, traffic light label, health star rating, calorie menu label, shelf label).

Further analysis and comparison showed that different types of food labels differ in influencing results, mechanism of action, and boundaries. Specifically, the product-level labels can arouse consumers' perceptions of safety, risk, and morality, and can effectively increase consumers' trust in products. At the same time, after purchasing products with such labels, consumers will show more food waste and repeated purchases. Ingredient-level labels, on the other hand, mainly affects consumers' perceptions of product health, as well as subsequent food choices and food intake. The theory of regulatory orientation helps to explain the different effects of the two types of food labels. The product-level labels more often initiate consumer preventive orientation, while the ingredient-level labels activate consumer promotion orientation. In addition, the two types of food labeling effects are driven by the halo effect, information processing, conceptual metaphor, social identity, attribute inference and other mechanisms. Besides, these effects are moderated by social demographic factors, individual differences, and product characteristics.

On the one hand, combing and commenting on the effects of different food labels can provide reference for food manufacturers to carry out food marketing practices. On the other hand, through the construction of food label research framework in the field of marketing, it can point out the context and direction for marketing scholars to carry out empirical research on food label. Based on the overall framework of food labeling effects constructed in this paper, we propose that further research on the topic of food label can be carried out from following aspects in the future: (1) Expanding the behavioral results of ingredient-level labels; (2) Expanding the behavioral results of product-level labels; (3) Exploring the impact of different food label presentation forms on consumers; (4) Expanding the outer packaging labels and related research; and (5) Exploring the reversal mechanism of the negative effects of food labels.

Key words: food label, product-level labels, ingredient-level labels, regulatory orientation

中图分类号: