基层干部何以担当作为?测量、动机与前因机制

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00924

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基层政府职能转变和担当离不开广大基层干部的担当作为。但是, 什么是基层干部的担当作为, 如何测量?基层干部担当作为是出于怎样的动机?受到哪些因素的影响?如何促进?这些问题尚未得到系统研究。因此, 基于行为公共管理学视角, 首先以实证的方式研究基层干部担当作为的内涵结构和具体测量; 第二, 突破传统动机研究对利他的依赖和内外动机二分的束缚, 以自我决定理论为基础, 从自主动机(内在调节、整合调节、认同调节)和受控动机(内摄调节、外在调节)精细化研究担当作为动机; 第三, 关注从动机到行为的整合框架, 提出担当角色认同的中介变量, 关注个体因素和组织因素的交互以及中介过程中的调节作用, 解释担当作为动机将如何产生担当作为行为, 并有何种权变因素。通过实证研究, 最终回应基层干部担当作为的测量、管理和激励问题。

关键词: 公共组织行为, 担当作为, 担当角色认同, 行为动机, 基层干部

Abstract:

That street-level cadres take charge and live up to their responsibility is essential to the function transition and performance of public duties of grass-root government. Against this backdrop, however, some critical questions are pending in the literature. For instance, what are taking charge behaviors and how should we measure them? What are the motivations underlying those behaviors? Are there any contingencies for those behaviors and how to effectively promote them? The present project aims to answer these questions. First, in view of the behavioral public administration perspective, we will clarify the dimensions of taking charge behaviors and develop an assessment tool. Second, we draw on the self-determination theory and investigate a controlled-autonomous motivation spectrum underlying the taking charge behaviors. This approach departs from the previously established altruism perspective and the dichotomy of internal and external motivation. Additionally, this project will extend the literature by delving into taking charge role identity as a key mechanism linking autonomous/controlled motivations to taking charge behaviors and by exploring personal/situational contingencies for the process. In other words, the present project elucidates how and when autonomous/controlled motivations translate into taking charge behaviors. This empirical project has significant implications for assessing, managing and promoting taking charge behaviors of street-level cadres.

Key words: public organizational behavior, taking charge, taking charge role identity, behavioral motivation, street-level cadres

中图分类号:

B849:C939

郭晟豪. (2020). 基层干部何以担当作为?测量、动机与前因机制. 心理科学进展 , 28(6), 924-934.

GUO Shenghao. (2020). How to drive street-level cadres to take charge? A study on measurements, motivations, and antecedents. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(6), 924-934.

图/表 1

参考文献 58

[1]	白凌 . (2018). 为敢于担当的干部撑腰鼓劲. 人民论坛, 27(25), 44-45.
[2]	陈斌 . (2019). 让干部敢担当善作为. 人民论坛, 28(1), 60-61.
[3]	陈家喜 . (2018). 地方官员政绩激励的制度分析. 政治学研究, 34(3), 74-82+130.
[4]	陈希 . (2018). 新时代要有新担当新作为. 社会主义论坛, 33(8), 4-6.
[5]	高晓兵 . (2012). 领导干部要敢于担当. 理论学刊, 29(3), 4-8+127.
[6]	胡威, 蓝志勇, 杨永平 . (2013). 西部地区基层公务员学习意愿及其影响因素研究. 公共管理学报, 11(4), 68-77.
[7]	李庆霞 . (2016). 领导干部敢担当、善作为的“三个统一”. 理论探讨, 33(4), 123-126.
[8]	林志友 . (2017). 论习近平的中国共产党人担当思想. 社会主义研究, 40(5), 10-17.
[9]	刘昕 . (2018). 身心俱疲的干部与仍不满意的群众——问题的症结及其破解之道. 人民论坛, 27(30), 44-47.
[10]	梅赐琪, 翟晓祯 . (2018). “政绩出官”可持续吗?——挑战晋升锦标赛理论的一个新视角. 公共行政评论, 11(3), 7-27+209.
[11]	倪星, 王锐 . (2018). 权责分立与基层避责: 一种理论解释. 中国社会科学, 39(5), 116-135+206-207.
[12]	唐任伍 . (2018). “五个敢于”是新时代干部担当精神的具体体现. 人民论坛, 27(8), 12-14.
[13]	陶文昭 . (2014). 中华民族伟大复兴的历史担当——学习习近平同志关于担当精神的重要论述. 中共中央党校学报, 18(6), 35-39.
[14]	万庄 . (2018). 关于完善干部激励约束和容错纠错机制的几点探讨. 中国行政管理, 34(10), 86-89.
[15]	王长江 . (2018). 构建敢于担当型干部评价体系势在必行. 人民论坛, 27(8), 24-26.
[16]	王亚华, 舒全峰 . (2018). 脱贫攻坚中的基层干部职业倦怠: 现象、成因与对策. 国家行政学院学报, 22(3), 130-136+157-158.
[17]	吴德贵 . (2018). 评价党员干部是否敢于担当的三个维度. 人民论坛, 27(8), 16-18.
[18]	萧鸣政, 王晨舟, 吴万鹏, 白增涛 . (2015). “敢于担当”型领导考评标准的实证研究: 结构探索与量表编制. 中国人力资源开发, 29(5), 42-49.
[19]	杨小军 . (2018). 以激励机制促干部作为以容错机制保干部担当. 人民论坛, 27(26), 40-41.
[20]	叶先宝, 李纾 . (2008). 公共服务动机: 内涵、检验途径与展望. 公共管理学报, 5(1), 56-60+122-123.
[21]	于海波 . (2018). 敢于担当型干部评价体系构建的内容与方法. 人民论坛, 27(8), 30-31.
[22]	张树旺, 卢倩婷, Jeff, Wang, 黄晶 . (2017). 论组织支持感对基层公务员敢于担当行为的影响——基于珠三角地区的调查数据. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 19(4), 88-99.
[23]	张书维, 李纾 . (2018). 行为公共管理学探新: 内容、方法与趋势. 公共行政评论, 11(1), 7-36+219.
[24]	张占辉 . (2018). 新时代党员干部如何担当责任. 人民论坛, 27(35), 46-47.
[25]	周黎安 . (2017). 转型中的地方政府: 官员激励与治理(第二版). 上海: 格致出版社, 上海三联书店, 上海人民出版社.
[26]	竺乾威 . (2015). 政治生态变化中官员的公民身份认知回归. 探索与争鸣, 31(6), 68-71.
[27]	Assadi, A., & Lundin, M . (2018). Street-level bureaucrats, rule-following and tenure: How assessment tools are used at the front line of the public sector. Public Administration, 96(1), 154-170.
[28]	Bozeman, B., & Su, X . (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700-710.
[29]	Brodkin, E. Z . (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940-949.
[30]	Chen, C. A., & Bozeman, B . (2013). Understanding public and nonprofit managers’ motivation through the lens of self-determination theory. Public Management Review, 15(4), 584-607.
[31]	Chen, C. A., Chen, D. Y., & Xu, C . (2018). Applying self- determination theory to understand public employee’s motivation for a public service career: An East Asian case (Taiwan). Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 365-389.
[32]	Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M . (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
[33]	Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M . (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
[34]	Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T . (2015). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction in the U.S. federal bureaucracy: A self-determination theory perspective. American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 375-401.
[35]	Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R . (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589-611.
[36]	Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., & Naticchioni, P . (2010). Moonlighting politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9-10), 688-699.
[37]	Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L . (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.
[38]	Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M . (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
[39]	Houston, D. J . (2000). Public-Service Motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713-728.
[40]	Jacobsen, C. B., Hvitved, J., & Andersen, L. B . (2014). Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 790-806.
[41]	Kuvaas, B . (2009). A test of hypotheses derived from self-determination theory among public sector employees. Employee Relations, 31(1), 39-56.
[42]	Mattozzi, A., & Merlo, A . (2008). Political careers or career politicians?. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3-4), 597-608.
[43]	Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G . (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554 URL
[44]	Pedersen, M. J . (2015). Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 734-746.
[45]	Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R . (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
[46]	Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 10(2), 471-488.
[47]	Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R . (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681-690.
[48]	Petkus, E . (1996). The creative identity: Creative behavior from the symbolic interactionist perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 188-196.
[49]	Prebble, M . (2016). Has the study of public service motivation addressed the issues that motivated the study? The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 267-291.
[50]	Rainey, H. G . (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.
[51]	Riley, A., & Burke, P. J . (1995). Identities and self- verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 61-73.
[52]	Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L . (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 URL
[53]	Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J . (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
[54]	Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M . (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
[55]	Turban, D. B., Tan, H. H., Brown, K. G., & Sheldon, K. M . (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of perceived locus of causality: An application of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2376-2404.
[56]	Vandenabeele, W., Brewer, G. A., & Ritz, A . (2014). Past, present, and future of public service motivation research. Public Administration, 92(4), 779-789.
[57]	Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L . (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
[58]	Weske, U., & Schott, C . (2016). What motivates different groups of public employees working for dutch municipalities? Combining autonomous and controlled types of motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 415-430.