稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响：基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00833

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

稀缺是由资源的真实缺乏或感知缺乏所引起的个体欲望和需求得不到满足的一种状态。稀缺作为一种普遍存在的现象对个体的情感、认知、以及行为方式产生了重要的影响, 但是不同类型的稀缺(以食物、产品、资金为代表的有形资源稀缺vs.以时间为代表的无形资源稀缺)对个体心理和行为的影响是否存在共性与差异?梳理文献发现, 有形资源稀缺会使个体产生珍惜性行为、补偿性行为和趋近性行为, 而无形资源稀缺只会使个体产生珍惜性和补偿性行为。未来研究应关注稀缺影响个体行为的边界条件, 以及时间稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响。

关键词: 稀缺, 有形资源稀缺, 无形资源稀缺, 心理感知, 行为方式

Abstract:

Scarcity is a state due to dissatisfaction of individual desire and demand, which is resulted from real scarcity of resource or perceived scarcity of resource. As a universal phenomenon, scarcity plays an important role in individual emotion, perception and behavior. Tangible resource scarcity is represented by scarcity in food, product and capital, whereas intangible resource scarcity is represented by scarcity in time. Are there any similarities and differences in different kinds of scarcity? This question has not been addressed by past scarcity research. After combing theses, this paper found that tangible resource scarcity led to individual’s cherishing behavior, compensation behavior, and approaching behavior, whereas intangible resource scarcity only led to cherishing behavior and compensation behavior. Future research should focus on the boundary conditions under which scarcity would not affect individuals’ behavior, and the impact of time scarcity on individual psychology and behavior.

Key words: scarcity, tangible resource scarcity, intangible resource scarcity, perception, behavior

中图分类号:

B849: C91

雷亮, 王菁煜, 柳武妹. (2020). 稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响：基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释. 心理科学进展 , 28(5), 833-843.

LEI Liang, WANG Jingyu, LIU Wumei. (2020). The effect of scarcity on individuals’ psychology and behavior: An explanation from a more integrated perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(5), 833-843.

图/表 3

参考文献 63

1	樊亚凤, 蒋晶 . ( 2017). 财务约束感对消费者多样化寻求行为的影响及心理机制. 营销科学学报, 13( 2), 56-70.
2	利振华, 窦凯, 聂衍刚 . ( 2018). 远离“诱惑”:预先承诺对跨期决策的调控机制及其神经基础. 心理科学进展, 26( 10), 1869-1877.
3	刘建新, 李东进 . ( 2017). 产品稀缺诉求影响消费者购买意愿的并列多重中介机制. 南开管理评论, 20( 4), 4-15.
4	郑晓莹, 彭泗清 . ( 2014). 补偿性消费行为: 概念、类型与心理机制. 心理科学进展, 22( 9), 1513-1520.
5	Aarøe L. &Petersen M. B . ( 2013). Hunger games: Fluctuations in blood glucose levels influence support for social welfare. Psychological Science, 24( 12), 2550-2556.
6	Adler B.A . ( 1917). Study of organ inferiority and its psychical compensation: A contribution to clinical medicine. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 12( 5), 348-351.
7	Arkes H. R., &Ayton P. , ( 1999). The sunk cost and concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?. Psychological Bulletin, 125( 5), 591-600.
8	Belk R.W . ( 1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12( 3), 265-280.
9	Bozzolo A. M., &Brock T. C . ( 1992). Unavailability effects on message processing: A theoretical analysis an empirical test. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 13( 1), 93-101.
10	Brock T. C. ( 1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243-275). San Diego: Academic Press.
11	Carroll C. D., Hall R. E., & Zeldes S. P . ( 1992). The buffer-stock theory of saving: Some macroeconomic evidence. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, ( 2), 61-156.
12	Devoe S. E., &Pfeffer J. , ( 2011). Time is tight: How higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96( 4), 665-676.
13	Duncker, K. ( 1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58( 5), i-113.
14	Eisenberg N., Fabes R. A., & Spinrad T. L . ( 2006). Prosocial development. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646-718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
15	Eisenberg N. ,& Strayer, J.( 1987) . Critical issues in the study of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 3-13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16	Eisend, M. ( 2008). Explaining the impact of scarcity appeals in advertising: The mediating role of perceptions of susceptibility. Journal of Advertising, 37( 3), 33-40.
17	Ellis B. J., Figueredo A. J., Brumbach B. H., & Schlomer G. L . ( 2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20( 2), 204-268.
18	Fan L. Y. S., Li X. N. S., & Jiang Y. W . ( 2018). Room for opportunity: Resource scarcity increases attractiveness of range marketing offers. Journal of Consumer Research, 46( 1), 82-98.
19	Figueredo A. J., Vasquez G., Brumbach B. H., Schneider S. M. R., Sefcek J. A., Tal I. R., .. Jacobs W. J . ( 2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26( 2), 243-275.
20	Griskevicius V., Ackerman J. M., Cantú S. M., Delton A. W., Robertson T. E., Simpson J. A., … Tybur J. M . ( 2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science, 24( 2), 197-205.
21	Griskevicius V., Delton A. W., Robertson T. E., & Tybur J. M . ( 2011). Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 100( 2), 241-254.
22	Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., Ackerman J. M., Delton A. W., Robertson T. E., & White A. E . ( 2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102( 1), 69-80.
23	Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., Delton A. W., & Robertson T. E . ( 2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100( 6), 1015-1026.
24	Hamilton R., Thompson D., Bone S., Chaplin L. N., Griskevicius V., Goldsmith K., .. Zhu M . ( 2019). The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47( 3), 532-550.
25	Haushofer J. &Fehr E. , ( 2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344( 6186), 862-867.
26	Higgins E.T . ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52( 12), 1280-1300.
27	Higgins E.T . ( 1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30( 2), 1-46.
28	Hill S. E., Rodeheffer C. D., Griskevicius V., Durante K., & White A. E . ( 2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103( 2), 275-291.
29	Holland J., Silva A. S., & Mace R . ( 2012). Lost letter measure of variation in altruistic behaviour in 20 neighbourhoods. Plos One, 7( 8), e43294.
30	Hsee C. K., Yang Y., & Ruan B . ( 2015). The mere-reaction effect: Even nonpositive and noninformative reactions can reinforce actions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42( 3), 420-434.
31	Inman J. J., Peter A. C., & Raghubir P . ( 1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24( 1), 68-79.
32	Karau S. J., &Kelly J. R . ( 1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28( 6), 542-571.
33	Karlsson N., Gärling T., Dellgran P., & Klingander B . ( 2005). Social comparison and consumer behavior: When feeling richer or poorer than others is more important than being so. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35( 6), 1206-1222.
34	Keys A., Brožek J., Henschel A., Mickelsen O. , & Taylor, H. L.( 1950) . The biology of human starvation. (2 vols). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
35	Kraus M. W., Piff P. K., Mendoza-Denton R., Rheinschmidt M. L., & Keltner D . ( 2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119( 3), 546-572.
36	Kristofferson K., McFerran B., Morales A. C., & Dahl D. W . ( 2016). The dark side of scarcity promotions: How exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. Journal of Consumer Research, 43( 5), 683-706.
37	Laran J. &Salerno A. , ( 2013). Life-history strategy, food choice, and caloric consumption. Psychological Science, 24( 2), 167-173.
38	Layous K., Kurtz J., Chancellor J., & Lyubomirsky S . ( 2018). Reframing the ordinary: Imagining time as scarce increases well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13( 3), 301-308.
39	Lynn M. ( 1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8( 1), 43-57.
40	Mani A., Mullainathan S., Shafir E., & Zhao J . ( 2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341( 6149), 976-980.
41	Mehta R. &Zhu M. , ( 2015). Creating when you have less: The impact of resource scarcity on product use creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 42( 5), 767-782.
42	Molden D. C., Lee A. Y. , & Higgins, E. T.( 2008) . Motivation for promotion and prevention. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbookof motivation science (pp. 169-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43	Monga A., May F., & Bagchi R . ( 2017). Eliciting time versus money: Time scarcity underlies asymmetric wage rates. Journal of Consumer Research, 44( 4), 833-852.
44	Morris M. W., Menon T., & Ames D. R . ( 2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5( 2), 169-182.
45	Mullainathan S. &Shafir E. , ( 2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York:Penguin Books.
46	Petersen M. B., Aarøe L., Jensen N. H., & Curry O . ( 2014). Social welfare and the psychology of food sharing: Short‐term hunger increases support for social welfare. Political Psychology, 35( 6), 757-773.
47	Pierce J. L., Kostova T., & Dirks K. T . ( 2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26( 2), 298-310.
48	Pierce J. L., Kostova T., & Dirks K. T . ( 2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7( 1), 84-107.
49	Piff P. K., Kraus M. W., Côté S., Cheng B. H., & Keltner D . ( 2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99( 5), 771-784.
50	Read D. & van Leeuwen , B. ( 1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76( 2), 189-205.
51	Reb J. &Connolly T. , ( 2007). Possession, feelings of ownership, and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2( 2), 107-114.
52	Ross L. &Nisbett R. E . ( 2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. London: Pinter & Martin Publishers.
53	Roux C., Goldsmith K., & Bonezzi A . ( 2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42( 4), 615-631.
54	Sasson C., Magid D. J., Chan P., Root E. D., McNally B. F., Kellermann A. L., & Haukoos J. S . ( 2012). Association of neighborhood characteristics with bystander-initiated CPR. New England Journal of Medicine, 367( 17), 1607-1615.
55	Shah A. K., Mullainathan S., & Shafir E . ( 2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338( 6107), 682-685.
56	Sharma E. &Alter A. L . ( 2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 3), 545-560.
57	Siddiqui R. A., May F., & Monga A . ( 2014). Reversals of task duration estimates: Thinking how rather than why shrinks duration estimates for simple tasks, but elongates estimates for complex tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50( 1), 184-189.
58	Stern, K. ( 2013). With charity for all: Why charities are failing and a better way to give. New York: Anchor Books.
59	Suls J. &Wheeler L. , ( Eds.). ( 2013). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
60	Wu W. Y., Lu H. Y., Wu Y. Y., & Fu C. S . ( 2012). The effects of product scarcity and consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36( 3), 263-274.
61	Xu A. J., Schwarz N., & Wyer R. S . ( 2015). Hunger promotes acquisition of nonfood objects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112( 9), 2688-2692.
62	Zauberman D., Levav J., Diehl K. , & Bhargave, R.( 2010). 1995 feels so close yet so far: the effect of event 'markers' on the subjective feelings of elapsed time. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 21(1), 133-139.
63	Zhu M., Bagchi R., & Hock S. J . ( 2018). The mere deadline effect: Why more time might sabotage goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 45( 5), 1068-1084.

研究阶段	研究领域	研究内容及结论	代表性研究
第一阶段： 20世纪50年代至今	食物稀缺	食物稀缺情况下食物的发放问题	Keys et al., 1950
		食物稀缺会使消费者产生不耐烦的情绪	Read & van Leeuwen, 1998
		食物稀缺导致对非食物目标的追求	Xu et al., 2015
第二阶段： 20世纪70年代前后至今	产品稀缺	商品理论：稀缺性提高产品的价值	Brock, 1968; Inman, et al., 1997
		商品理论在营销中的应用	Lynn, 1991
		产品稀缺影响购买意愿	Bozzolo & Brock, 1992
		产品稀缺影响支付意愿	Eisend, 2008
		产品稀缺影响消费者购买意愿的中介探讨	Wu et al., 2012; 刘建新 & 李东进, 2017
第三阶段： 20世纪90年代至今	资金稀缺	储蓄的缓冲库存理论	Carroll et al., 1992
		贫困问题的稀缺理论	Shah et al., 2012
		资金稀缺导致稀缺商品的追求	Sharma & Alter, 2012
		资金稀缺导致口红效应	Hill et al., 2012
		资金稀缺导致压力和消极情绪状态	Haushofer & Fehr, 2014
第四阶段： 20世纪90年代至今	时间稀缺	繁忙使得个体更加关注任务的截止时间	Karau & Kelly, 1992
		时间的价值增加了个体的时间压力	Devoe & Pfeffer, 2011
		时间稀缺对目标追求的影响	Zhu et al., 2018
		时间稀缺对个体幸福感的影响	Layous et al., 2018

研究阶段	研究领域	研究内容及结论	代表性研究
第一阶段： 20世纪50年代至今	食物稀缺	食物稀缺情况下食物的发放问题	Keys et al., 1950
		食物稀缺会使消费者产生不耐烦的情绪	Read & van Leeuwen, 1998
		食物稀缺导致对非食物目标的追求	Xu et al., 2015
第二阶段： 20世纪70年代前后至今	产品稀缺	商品理论：稀缺性提高产品的价值	Brock, 1968; Inman, et al., 1997
		商品理论在营销中的应用	Lynn, 1991
		产品稀缺影响购买意愿	Bozzolo & Brock, 1992
		产品稀缺影响支付意愿	Eisend, 2008
		产品稀缺影响消费者购买意愿的中介探讨	Wu et al., 2012; 刘建新 & 李东进, 2017
第三阶段： 20世纪90年代至今	资金稀缺	储蓄的缓冲库存理论	Carroll et al., 1992
		贫困问题的稀缺理论	Shah et al., 2012
		资金稀缺导致稀缺商品的追求	Sharma & Alter, 2012
		资金稀缺导致口红效应	Hill et al., 2012
		资金稀缺导致压力和消极情绪状态	Haushofer & Fehr, 2014
第四阶段： 20世纪90年代至今	时间稀缺	繁忙使得个体更加关注任务的截止时间	Karau & Kelly, 1992
		时间的价值增加了个体的时间压力	Devoe & Pfeffer, 2011
		时间稀缺对目标追求的影响	Zhu et al., 2018
		时间稀缺对个体幸福感的影响	Layous et al., 2018

[1]	杨超, 董之婕, 闻浩言, 周一舟, 王艳丽, 袁方舟. 积极身体意象的前因后果及其提升策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 815-826.
[2]	杨蕾, 陈维扬, 白宝玉, 钟年. 累积文化演化的内在机制：实验证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 866-886.
[3]	郭英, 田鑫, 胡东, 白书琳, 周蜀溪. 羞愧对亲社会行为影响的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 371-385.
[4]	程婕婷, 史梦薇. “凭感觉”的热情与能力：社会认知内容的生理线索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 443-454.
[5]	张昊天, 喻丰, 许丽颖, 玄哲理. 道德之一元论与多元论：缘起、内涵与论争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 301-314.
[6]	张静, 孙庆洲, 吴宝. 医患风险沟通：角色与信息匹配的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 99-107.
[7]	郑银波, 李馨, 黄华东, 李斌, 李爱梅. 死亡提醒对员工绩效的双刃效应：压力交互理论的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 116-126.
[8]	寇东晓, 王晓玉. 权力对人际敏感性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 108-115.
[9]	杨群, 朱兵, 俞奕铭, 张敬敏, 薛孟孟. 应激环境下亲社会性的增加：来自不同类型的亲社会偏好的研究证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2809-2824.
[10]	李松, 刘峻君, 鲍秀琴, 陈旭. 人际感恩对关系维持的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2586-2594.
[11]	栾墨, 吴霜. 消费决策过程如何彰显社会地位?基于最优化决策策略的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2194-2205.
[12]	胡小勇, 杜棠艳, 李兰玉, 王甜甜. 低社会经济地位影响自我调节的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2278-2290.
[13]	李豫苏, 张锟, 毕研玲, 张宝山. 家庭第一代大学生的心理挑战及其解析——基于文化不匹配理论的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2338-2355.
[14]	唐辉, 李鑫宇, 魏一帆, 李晓彩, 陈柳燕, 张曜. 伙伴选择对合作行为的影响作用与机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2356-2371.
[15]	胡小勇, 李兰玉, 杜棠艳, 王甜甜, 杨静. “转换-坚持”对低阶层健康的保护作用及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2088-2099.