自主安全动机与安全绩效的多水平模型

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01141

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

自主安全动机对安全绩效的积极作用已引起研究者的关注, 但自主动机与安全绩效多水平的作用机制还未得到深入研究。结合自我决定理论与多水平动机过程, 个体与团队自主安全动机通过安全目标, 进而影响安全绩效; 在安全工作情境中通过对自主支持、工作重塑的干预促进自主安全动机。研究拟结合认知测量和问卷测量, 通过纵向研究、实验、准实验研究等方法探讨上述问题。研究结果一方面可拓展自我决定理论与安全绩效的研究; 另一方面为安全管理实践, 尤其是安全培训提供理论依据, 对高风险企业安全绩效的改善有积极的现实意义。

关键词: 自主动机, 安全绩效, 基于行为的安全, 高风险组织, 动机过程模型

Abstract:

The positive effect of autonomous safety motivation on safety performance has received considerable attention; however, the mediating mechanism between motivation and safety performance has not been explored. The present proposal integrates self-determination theory and a multilevel motivational process to explore the effect of individual and team autonomous safety motivation on safety performance through safety goals, and the intervention effects of autonomy-supportive factors and job crafting on promoting autonomous safety motivation in the workplace. A longitudinal design, experiment as well as quasi-experiment including cognitive tests and questionnaires is proposed to test the model. The results can contribute to self-determination theory and safety research by deepening the understanding of the multilevel mechanism, and has practical implications for safety training and safety performance in high-risk organizations.

Key words: autonomous motivation, safety performance, behavior-based safety, high-risk organizations, motivational process model

中图分类号:

B849:C93

蒋丽, 张意如, 李锋. (2019). 自主安全动机与安全绩效的多水平模型. 心理科学进展 , 27(7), 1141-1152.

JIANG Li, ZHANG Yiru, LI Feng. (2019). A multilevel model of autonomous safety motivation and safety performance. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1141-1152.

图/表 1

参考文献 74

[1]	李琼, 刘力 . (2010). 偏见的自我调节研究述评. 心理科学进展, 18(2), 365-373.
[2]	苗青 . (2007). 管理学研究方法的新思路: 基于准实验设计的现场研究. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 37(6), 73-80.
[3]	晏碧华, 姬鸣, 赵小军, 屠金路, 游旭群 . (2015). 根植于航空安全文化的内隐安全态度的预测效应. 心理学报, 47(1), 119-128.
[4]	Baumeister R. F . (2016). Chapter 1-Limited resources for self-regulation: A current overview of the strength model. In E. Hirt, J. Clarkson, & L. Jia (Eds.), Self-regulation and ego control(pp. 1-15). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
[5]	Bray S. R . (2004). Collective efficacy, group goals, and group performance of a muscular endurance task. Small Group Research, 35(2), 230-238. doi: 10.1177/1046496403260531 URL
[6]	Burns C., Mearns K., & McGeorge P . (2006). Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture. Risk Analysis, 26(5), 1139-1150. doi: 10.1111/risk.2006.26.issue-5 URL
[7]	Chan D .(1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234 URL
[8]	Chen G., & Kanfer R. , (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223-267. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27006-0 URL
[9]	Chen G., Kanfer R., DeShon R. P., Mathieu J. E & Kozlowski S. W. J ., (2009). The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer’s (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.006 URL
[10]	Christian M. S., Bradley J. C., Wallace J. C., & Burke M. J . (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127. doi: 10.1037/a0016172 URL
[11]	Clarke S . (2013). Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49. doi: 10.1111/joop.2013.86.issue-1 URL
[12]	Clarke S . (2012). The effect of challenge and hindrance stressors on safety behavior and safety outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 387-397. doi: 10.1037/a0029817 URL
[13]	Conchie S. M . (2013). Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: A moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 198-210.
[14]	Deci E. L., Olafsen A. H., & Ryan R. M . (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 URL
[15]	Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M . (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology(pp. 416-433). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[16]	Evans J. S. B. T., & Stanovich K. E . (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685 URL
[17]	Fernet C., Gagné M., & Austin S . 2010. When does quality of relationships with coworkers predict burnout over time? The moderating role of work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1163-80. doi: 10.1002/job.v31:8 URL
[18]	Foss N. J., Minbaeva D. B., Pedersen T., & Reinholt M . 2009. Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 871-93. doi: 10.1002/hrm.v48:6 URL
[19]	Gagné M . (2014). Self-determination theory in the work domain: This is just the beginning. In M. N. Gagné (Ed.), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 414-431). New York: Oxford University Press.
[20]	Gagné M., & Deci E. L . (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
[21]	Gagné M., Forest J., Vansteenkiste M., Crevier-Braud L., van den Broeck A., Aspeli A. K., .. Westbye CA . (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892 URL
[22]	Gillet N., Fouquereau E., Lafrenière M.-A. K., & Huyghebaert T . (2016). Examining the roles of work autonomous and controlled motivations on satisfaction and anxiety as a function of role ambiguity. The Journal of Psychology, 150(5), 644-665. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1154811 URL
[23]	Grant A. M., & Wall T. D . (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 653-686. doi: 10.1177/1094428108320737 URL
[24]	Grenier S., Chiocchio F., Gagné M., & Sarrazin L.-P . (2013). Individual and team motivational process: Multilevel implications of social interactions on self-determined motivation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Montreal.
[25]	Griffin M. A., & Curcuruto M. ,(2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191-212. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414 URL
[26]	Griffin M. A., & Neal A. , (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347 URL
[27]	Grolnick W. S., & Ryan R. M . (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890-898. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890 URL
[28]	Hardré P. L., & Reeve J. , (2009). Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(3):165-84. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.2009.13.issue-3 URL
[29]	Heldal F. & Antonsen S. , (2014). Team leadership in a high-risk organization: The role of contextual factors. Small Group Research, 45(4), 376-399. doi: 10.1177/1046496414533617 URL
[30]	Helmreich R. L., Merritt A. C., & Wilhelm J. A . (1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2 URL
[31]	Hofmann D. A., Burke M. J., & Zohar D . (2017). 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 375-388. doi: 10.1037/apl0000114 URL
[32]	Hu J., & Liden R. C . (2015). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102-1127. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.1142 URL
[33]	Jiang L., & Tetrick L. E . (2016). Mapping the nomological network of employee self-determined safety motivation: A preliminary measure in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 94, 1-7.
[34]	Jiang L., Yu G., Li Y., & Li F . (2010). Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior and safety performance: Safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1468-1476.
[35]	Johnson R. E., Lanaj K., & Barnes C. M . (2014). The good and bad of being fair: Effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 635-650. doi: 10.1037/a0035647 URL
[36]	Kallgren C. A., Reno R. R., & Cialdini R. B . (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002-1012. doi: 10.1177/01461672002610009 URL
[37]	Kanfer R., Frese M., & Johnson R. E . (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338-355. doi: 10.1037/apl0000133 URL
[38]	Katz-Navon T., Naveh E., & Stern Z . (2005). Safety climate in healthcare organizations: A multidimensional approach, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1075-1089.
[39]	Koestner R., & Hope N. ,(2014) . A Self-Determination theory approach to goals. In M. Gagné (Ed.), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self- determination theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
[40]	Koestner R., Otis N., Powers T. A., Pelletier L., & Gagnon H . (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1201-1230. doi: 10.1111/jopy.2008.76.issue-5 URL
[41]	Lavergne K. J., & Pelletier L. G . (2015). Predicting individual differences in the choice of strategy to compensate for attitude-behaviour inconsistencies in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.001 URL
[42]	Legault L., Green-Demers I., & Eadie A. L . (2009). When internalization leads to automatization: The role of self-determination in automatic stereotype suppression and implicit prejudice regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33(1), 10-24. doi: 10.1007/s11031-008-9110-4 URL
[43]	Legault L., Green-Demers I., Grant P., & Chung J . (2007). On the self-regulation of implicit and explicit prejudice: A self-determination theory perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 732-749. doi: 10.1177/0146167206298564 URL
[44]	Legault L., & Inzlicht M. , (2013). Self-determination, self-regulation, and the brain: Autonomy improves performance by enhancing neuroaffective responsiveness to self-regulation failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 123-138. doi: 10.1037/a0030426 URL
[45]	LePine J. A., Piccolo R. F., Jackson C. L., Mathieu J. E., & Saul J. R . (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x URL
[46]	Leung M.-Y., Chan I. Y. S., & Yu J . (2012). Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48, 156-166.
[47]	Levesque C., Copeland K. J., & Sutcliffe R. A . (2008). Conscious and nonconscious processes: Implications for self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 218-224. doi: 10.1037/a0012756 URL
[48]	March J. G. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. New York, US: Cornell University Press.
[49]	Marquardt N., Gades R., & Robelski S . (2012). Implicit social cognition and safety culture. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 22(3), 213-234.
[50]	Mathieu J. E., Gilson L. L., & Ruddy T. M . (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97-108 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97 URL
[51]	Molesworth B. R., & Chang B. , (2009). Predicting pilots’ risk-taking behavior through an implicit association test. Human Factors, 51(6), 845-857. doi: 10.1177/0018720809357756 URL
[52]	Morgeson F. P., & Hofmann D. A . (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of management Review, 24(2), 249-265. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1893935 URL
[53]	Oga-Baldwin W. L. Q., Nakata Y., Parker P., & Ryan R. M . (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.010 URL
[54]	Park G., Spitzmuller M., & DeShon R. P . (2013). Advancing our understanding of team motivation: Integrating conceptual approaches and content areas. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1339-1379.
[55]	Preenen P. T. Y., Oeij P. R. A., Dhondt S., Kraan K. O., & Jansen E . (2016). Why job autonomy matters for young companies' performance: Company maturity as a moderator between job autonomy and company performance. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 74-100. doi: 10.1504/WREMSD.2016.073425 URL
[56]	Probst T. M., & Brubaker T. L . (2001). The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: Cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(2), 139-159. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.6.2.139 URL
[57]	Reason J . (1995). A systems approach to organizational error. Ergonomics, 38(8), 1708-1721. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925221 URL
[58]	Rigby C. S., & Ryan R. M . (2018). Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133-147.
[59]	Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L . (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 702-717. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x URL
[60]	Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. ,(2017) . Basic psychological needs theory: satisfaction and frustration of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in relation to psychological wellness and full functioning In R M Ryan & E L Deci (Eds), Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness (pp 239-271). New York: The Guilford Press.
[61]	Sackett E., & Cummings J. N . (2018). When team members perceive task interdependence differently: Exploring centrality asymmetry and team success. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22(1), 16-31. doi: 10.1037/gdn0000079 URL
[62]	Schreurs B., van Emmerik I., van den Broeck A., & Guenter H . (2014). Work values and engagement within teams: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 267-281. doi: 10.1037/gdn0000009 URL
[63]	Scott N., Fleming M. & Kelloway E. K. , (2014) . Understanding why employees behave safely from a self-determination theory perspective. In M. Gagne & P. E. Nathan (Eds.), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 276-294). New York: Oxford University Press.
[64]	Slemp G. R., Kern M. L., Patrick K. J., & Ryan R. M . (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706-724.
[65]	Turner N., & Parker S. K . (2004). The effect of teamwork on safety processes and outcomes. In J. Barling & M. R. Frone (Eds.), The psychology of workplace safety(pp. 35-62). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
[66]	Wang X. H., Kim T. Y., & Lee D. R . (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231-3239. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.026 URL
[67]	Weinstein N., Przybylski A. K., & Ryan R. M . (2013). The integrative process: New research and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 69-74. doi: 10.1177/0963721412468001 URL
[68]	Weinstein N., Ryan W. S., DeHaan C. R., Przybylski A. K., Legate N., & Ryan R. M . (2012). Parental autonomy support and discrepancies between implicit and explicit sexual identities: Dynamics of self-acceptance and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 815-832. doi: 10.1037/a0026854 URL
[69]	Wrzesniewski A., & Dutton J. E . (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378011 URL
[70]	Xu Y., Li Y., Ding W., & Lu F . (2014). Controlled versus automatic processes: Which is dominant to safety? The moderating effect of inhibitory control. Plos One, 9(2), e87881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087881 URL
[71]	Zohar D . (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587-596. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587 URL
[72]	Zohar D . (2002). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 75-92. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379 URL
[73]	Zohar D., Huang Y.-h., Lee J., & Robertson M. M . (2015). Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate-safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 30, 84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.014 URL
[74]	Zohar D., & Luria G. , (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616-628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616 URL