ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 719-730.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00719

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

 “过犹不及”效应及其作用机制

 邢 璐1;孙健敏1;尹 奎2;王 震3   

  1.  (1中国人民大学劳动人事学院, 北京 100872) (2北京科技大学东凌经济管理学院, 北京 100083) (3中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100081)
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-13 出版日期:2018-04-15 发布日期:2018-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 尹奎, E-mail: bluesky7198@163.com E-mail: E-mail: bluesky7198@163.com
  • 基金资助:
     中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果(18XNH049); 国家自然科学基金项目(71772193)。

 The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing effect and its mechanisms

 XING Lu1; SUN Jianmin1; YIN Kui2; WANG Zhen3   

  1.  (1 School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China) (2 Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China) (3 Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Received:2017-01-13 Online:2018-04-15 Published:2018-02-28
  • Contact: YIN Kui, E-mail: bluesky7198@163.com E-mail: E-mail: bluesky7198@163.com
  • Supported by:
     

摘要:  以往管理学研究过度简化了概念间的关系, 认为某一因素或实践所带来的收益能够“多多益善”。近年来, 随着研究的不断深入, “过犹不及”效应(即倒U型关系)逐渐引起研究者关注。通过分析近5年(2013~2017)组织行为学领域中的44篇文献, 本文首先将“过犹不及”研究主题归纳为相对稳定的个体特征、积极的工作感受与体验、工作情境和任务特征及群体构成特征四个主要类型。其次, 将“过犹不及”的产生原因总结为“收益与损失的叠加效应”与“动机与能力(或机会)的交互效应”, 并在此基础上提出基于“单一机制变化”和“机制联动变化”两类调节变量作用机制。最后, 对未来研究提出以下建议:(1)拓展研究主题、丰富研究层次, (2)理清“过犹不及”效应的背后机制, (3)结合情境因素探讨临界点位置, (4)明确“过犹不及”调节作用的理论基础, (5)完善抽样与研究设计。

关键词:  “过犹不及”效应, 倒U型关系, 作用机制, 调节效应

Abstract:  Most previous studies have oversimplified the relationships among constructs. Researchers usually propose and test linear relations based on the assumption that “more is better”. Recently, along with the deepening of research, the perspective of too-much-of-a-good-thing effect (TMGT effect), i.e. the inverse U relation, has aroused more attention. By reviewing 44 research in organizational behavior field in recent five years, we identify four types of research topics, including positive feelings and thoughts at work, stable individual characteristics, characteristics of work and task, and group composition. We then identify two types of explanation mechanisms, which are summarized as “additive benefit and cost” and “interactive motivation and ability/opportunity”. In addition, we put forward that the moderation effect can be based on the change of single or dual mechanisms. We then discuss several suggestions for future research: (1) Diversify research topics and expand research levels; (2) Clarify the influencing mechanism behind TMGT effect; (3) Explore the threshold points based on the contextual factors; (4) Explicate the theoretical underpinnings of TMGT effect; (5) Improve sampling process and research design.

Key words: Too-much-of-a-good-thing effect, inverted U-shaped relationship, mechanisms, moderation effect

中图分类号: