ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 1041-1047.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01041

• 生理心理学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

强迫症诊断研究的新变化

孙凌;王建平   

  1. (北京师范大学心理学院, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京100875)
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-14 出版日期:2013-06-15 发布日期:2013-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 王建平
  • 基金资助:

    北京市教育委员会共建项目(SYS100270661)资助。

The New Development of Diagnostic Research of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

SUN Ling;WANG Jianping   

  1. (School of psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875, China)
  • Received:2013-01-14 Online:2013-06-15 Published:2013-06-15
  • Contact: WANG Jianping

摘要: 临床实践与相关研究表明, 强迫症的诊断标准已不能满足复杂的临床工作需要。首先, 有关患者的自知力以及主观痛苦程度等诊断指标需要进一步修订。其次, 就强迫症的核心症状而产生的争议, 研究者提出应重新考虑强迫症、焦虑障碍、强迫谱系障碍和囤积障碍这四个概念之间的从属关系和诊断标准。未来研究应考虑从认知神经科学的视角探索强迫症的核心症状和病理机制, 为强迫症的诊断标准提供新的依据。

关键词: 强迫症, 焦虑障碍, 强迫谱系障碍, 囤积障碍

Abstract: Whereas evdence from clinical practice and research suggests that current diagnostic criteria of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have not met the need of therapists’ work, more clirifications are needed to be discussed about the patients’ insight and clinical significance criterion. Considering the debate about the core symptom of OCD, researchers proposed that it’s necessary to reconsiderate the relationship among the OCD, anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder and hoarding disorder. Furture research should identify the core symptoms of OCD in the perspective of cognitive neuroscience and provide a basis for the OCD diagnostic standard.

Key words: obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder, hoarding disorder