ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1980-1989.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01980

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

得不偿失: 序贯决策中的短视风险漠视

陈志琴1, 马家涛1, 张雪婷2   

  1. 1浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 杭州 310058;
    2莱顿大学心理学系, 莱顿 2333AK, 荷兰
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-21 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-09-24
  • 通讯作者: 陈志琴, E-mail: zhiqin.chen@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    * 国家自然科学基金青年项目(72201239)资助

The loss outweighs the gain: Myopic risk ignorance in sequential decision making

CHEN Zhiqin1, MA Jiatao1, ZHANG Xueting2   

  1. 1 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2 Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden 2333AK, The Netherlands
  • Received:2023-12-21 Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-09-24

摘要: 在日常生活和企业经营中, 人们常常因忽视潜在的“高概率、大损失”风险而导致无法挽回的后果。为探究这一现象背后的科学问题, 本研究构想首次提出了“短视风险漠视”这一新概念。具体而言, 该概念指的是决策者在进行多轮相同或相似决策时, 由于短视评估和认知局限, 难以准确意识到或评估各决策间的关联性, 从而在单轮决策中追求当前增益目标而牺牲全局最优目标, 并逐渐忽视长期风险的现象。因此, 短视风险漠视态度可以视为序贯决策中的一种特定短视风险态度。序贯决策是指个体、群体或组织为实现最优总目标, 按时序进行多次决策, 且每次决策相关联的动态决策过程。尽管现实中的决策多为序贯决策, 但当前行为决策研究主要集中于单次决策, 很少探讨个体在序贯决策中的真实行为模式, 这限制了过往研究对短视风险漠视现象的关注与探索。针对这一局限, 本研究构想旨在基于序贯决策视角, 揭示短视风险漠视现象, 明确其表现规律与主要特点。此外, 本研究构想还将开发一个特定的研究范式来测量短视风险漠视态度, 并从决策过程和决策目标两个维度探究其形成机制。研究成果有望补充和拓展行为决策研究, 并为未来序贯决策支持系统的开发提供理论基础。

关键词: 短视风险漠视, 序贯决策, 决策过程, 决策目标

Abstract:

In real life, decision-makers often intentionally ignore “high probability, large loss” risks, leading to irreparable consequences. For example, in business, companies may prioritize short-term profits over long-term goals, disregarding accumulated risks. Similarly, in personal life, individuals often deliberately ignore and sacrifice long-term health for immediate pleasures, such as prolonged sitting, inactivity, or late-night gaming, despite knowing the risks.

To explore the underlying scientific issues of this phenomenon, this project introduces the novel concept of “myopic risk ignorance.” Specifically, this concept refers to the difficulty decision-makers encounter in accurately perceiving or assessing the interdependencies among repeated similar decisions due to myopic evaluations and cognitive limitations. As a result, driven by the pursuit of immediate gains in individual decisions, decision-makers often sacrifice globally optimal goals and gradually ignore long-term risks. The phenomenon of myopic risk ignorance involves two consecutive choices in each round: first, whether to “execute” or “not execute” a certain risky behavior, and second, if they choose to execute, they need to decide the degree of execution. For the risky behavior, the decision to “execute” contains obvious “immediate small gains,” but it is also accompanied by “dynamic losses” that are often deliberately ignored. The objective probability and extent of these losses gradually increase with the degree of execution and the number of execution rounds. Choosing “not to execute” requires resisting immediate gratification, accurately assessing potential losses, and pursuing sustainable long-term goals.

Myopic risk ignorance is a specific attitude within the context of sequential decision making, where individuals or organizations make a series of decisions over time to achieve optimal overall goals. Despite its prevalence, existing research primarily focuses on one-shot decisions, neglecting genuine behavioral patterns in sequential decision making. This limitation has impeded exploration of myopic risk ignorance. To address this gap, the project aims to uncover patterns and key characteristics of myopic risk ignorance within the framework of sequential decision making. It also seeks to develop a research paradigm to measure attitudes and explore the underlying mechanisms within decision processes and goals. This project is divided into three main studies: phenomenon revelation (Study 1), attitude measurement (Study 2), and mechanism exploration (Study 3).

Study 1 aims to construct a scenario questionnaire to measure individuals’ myopic risk ignorance in daily decision making, verifying the phenomenon’s universality and robustness. Study 2, based on the characteristics of myopic risk ignorance - where individuals continuously choose to execute risky behavior or deepen the degree of execution, gaining “small gains,” but at the same time, they are accompanied by “dynamic losses with gradually increasing probability and magnitude” - will design a card-turning task as an abstract simulation of real-life decision making. Additionally, this study will use both the scenario questionnaire and the task paradigm to assess myopic risk ignorance attitudes, testing the consistency of these measurements. Study 3 intends to explore the underlying mechanisms by examining the relevance of decision processes and the multiplicity of decision goals in sequential decision making, laying the groundwork for future behavioral interventions.

In summary, this project offers several contributions. It scientifically defines myopic risk ignorance, opening new theoretical perspectives for related research and expanding the fields of risky and intertemporal decision making. By analyzing decision characteristics over rounds, it provides a foundation for future research and new insights into behavioral decision theories. Moreover, exploring the mechanisms of myopic risk ignorance from both process and goal perspectives establishes a basis for prediction and intervention systems in related social phenomena. The research findings have practical applications, supporting the development of intervention strategies and sequential decision-making support systems that help individuals and organizations identify, assess, and mitigate long-term risks, ultimately enhancing long-term welfare.

Key words: myopic risk ignorance, sequential decision making, decision process, decision goal

中图分类号: