ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 429-435.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

学习判断的练习伴随低估效应

贾宁;白学军   

  1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074
  • 收稿日期:2006-09-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-05-15 发布日期:2007-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 白学军

Underconfidence-with-Pratice Effect for Judgments of Learning

Jia Ning;Bai Xuejun   

  1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China
  • Received:2006-09-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-05-15 Published:2007-05-15
  • Contact: Bai Xuejun

摘要: 学习判断是元认知判断的一种重要形式,是个体对随后的记忆成绩的预测。当个体在多次学习-测验任务中学习词对时,学习判断出现了练习伴随低估效应。研究者对此进行了大量的实验并提出了多种理论,如线索应用模型,提取流畅性假说和基点-校正假说。但是,Koriat等人通过分析发现练习伴随低估效应可能不是单一因素作用的结果,而是多种效应共同影响作用的表现,并由此提出了记忆去偏差假说。文章指出了目前研究中还存在的问题以及未来研究的方向

关键词: 学习判断, 练习伴随低估效应, 产生机制

Abstract: As an important metacognitive judgment, judgment of learning (JOL) is the prediction about future performance of learned materials. JOLs made during multiple study-test trials underestimate increases in recall performance across those trials, an effect that has been dubbed the underconfidence-with-practice (UWP) effect. Based on lots of experiment results, several theoretical explanations for UWP effect have been proposed, such as cue-utilization model, retrieval-fluency hypothesis, and anchoring-and-adjustment account. But, Koriat et al (2006) found these results did not point to a single mechanism that could account for the occurrence of the UWP effect, which suggesting that this effect might be multiply determined. Thus, they proposed a mnemonic debiasing account. The limitations of the precious studies and the suggestions for future research are put forward

Key words: judgment of learning, UWP effect, mechanism

中图分类号: