ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

社会流动信念的变迁:一项基于2014~2024年中国样本的横断历史元分析

张晟轩, 江蕴怡, 丁毅, 郭永玉   

  1. 南京师范大学心理学院,
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-19 修回日期:2026-08-06 接受日期:2026-08-21

Have social mobility beliefs changed in China? A cross-temporal meta-analysis from 2014 to 2024

Zhang Shengxuan, Jiang Yunyi, Ding Yi, Guo Yongyu   

  1. , ,
  • Received:2026-05-19 Revised:2026-08-06 Accepted:2026-08-21

摘要: 社会流动信念是指个体对社会成员在不同社会经济地位间流动可能性(通常指向上流动)的感知与预期,对理解社会公平与维持社会稳定具有重要意义。近年来,关于社会固化、“内卷”与“躺平”等公共讨论,使得这一信念的时代变迁成为值得关注的议题。本研究采用横断历史元分析方法,对2014—2024年间采用社会流动信念量表的50篇文献(共57个独立样本,N = 28089;其中中学生9462名、大学生11091名、非学生成人7536名)进行分析,考察这一阶段中国被试样本社会流动信念的时代变迁趋势。结果发现:过去十年间,中国被试的社会流动信念未呈现显著的随时间下降趋势,即随时间保持稳定。按测量维度(个人层面、社会层面)和样本群体(中学生、大学生、成人)进行的亚组分析也均未发现显著的下降趋势,表明这种稳定性在不同测量维度和群体中具有一致性。一些反映社会发展的指标(人均GDP、教育经费投入、城镇化率等)和反映社会治理的指标(现行有效法律数、反腐立案数)与社会流动信念呈现显著正向关联,可能是支撑社会流动信念保持稳定的重要宏观基础。本研究结果对社会变迁与人类发展理论在中国情境下的应用提供了新的证据,并进一步细化了该理论框架对社会心理变迁的解释。

关键词: 社会流动信念, 社会变迁与人类发展理论, 横断历史元分析, 社会变迁

Abstract: Social mobility beliefs refer to individuals' perceptions and expectations of the possibility of mobility across social classes for themselves or for others, and play an important role in promoting upward mobility, social fairness, and social stability. Notably, social mobility beliefs are not remain permanent within a society, but may shift along with changes in macro-social conditions. Over the past decade, China has experienced rapid and multifaceted social changes. The economy has continued to grow, higher education has further expanded, the Internet has been widely adopted, and the legal and anti-corruption systems have undergone substantial development. At the same time, economic inequality has remained at a relatively high level, and competition in education and the labor market has intensified. However, whether Chinese people's social mobility beliefs have shifted along with these societal changes remains unclear. The present research meta-analyzed 50 studies conducted between 2014 and 2024, with 57 independent samples and 28,089 participants, and further examined the macro-social correlates of these beliefs. We conducted cross-temporal meta-analysis with the year of data collection as the predictor, while controlling for sample type, measurement dimension, and scale type. We also examined associations between social mobility beliefs and a set of macro-social indicators—including modernization indicators (e.g., GDP per capita, gross enrollment rate in higher education, urbanization rate, and Internet penetration rate), governance indicators (e.g., the number of effective laws, the number of corruption-related cases filed, and national education expenditure), and economic risk indicators (e.g., the Gini coefficient and economic slowdown)—measured at multiple time lags. Results showed that, contrary to predictions of decline derived from modernization-based perspectives, Chinese people's social mobility beliefs remained stable from 2014 to 2024, showing no significant temporal trend. Subgroup analyses across measurement dimensions (individual-level vs. society-level beliefs) and sample groups (middle school students, college students, and adults) yielded the same pattern. Analyses of macro-social correlates further revealed that modernization and governance indicators were positively associated with social mobility beliefs, whereas economic risk indicators showed no significant associations. These results suggest that sustained economic and educational development, together with the improvement in governance effectiveness, may constitute the macro-level foundations supporting the stability of social mobility beliefs. In summary, Chinese people's social mobility beliefs have remained stable over the past decade despite rapid and multifaceted social changes, and this stability appears to be supported by ongoing developmental and governance progress. The current research extends the theory of social change and human development to the Chinese context and provides two refinements to the framework. Specifically, the influence of macro-social changes on core social attitudes should be examined according to specific dimensions of social change, and developmental and governance factors may serve as important macro-level foundations supporting social mobility beliefs. The findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of social attitudes during periods of rapid social transformation.

Key words: social mobility belief, theory of social change and human development, cross-temporal meta-analysis, social change