ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

员工主体视角下道德权威的概念、形成、跨层演进与多层影响

陈亚硕, 陈奥博, 许嘉琦, 杨春江   

  1. 兰州大学管理学院, 甘肃 730000 中国
    唐山学院电子商务学院, 河北 063000 中国
    西北大学经济管理学院, 陕西 710127 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-02 修回日期:2026-01-01 接受日期:2026-01-15
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72502097); 国家自然科学基金项目(72572128); 国家自然科学基金项目(72172137); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(23YJC630016)

The concept, formation, cross-level evolution, and multilevel influence of employee-centric moral authority

  1. , 730000, China
    , 063000, China
    , 710127, China
  • Received:2025-11-02 Revised:2026-01-01 Accepted:2026-01-15

摘要: 组织扁平化与去中心化等变革趋势正挑战传统组织伦理理论与实践,并催生出以员工为主体的道德权威这一组织管理新议题。作为一种非正式权威,道德权威突破了正式权威在层级、方向与范围上的局限,实现了跨层级、全方向和无边界的伦理重塑效应。然而,道德权威尚未获得管理学的充分重视。对此,本研究基于“建构概念−形成机理−跨层演化−多层影响”研究框架,建构和检验道德权威理论。首先,界定“道德权威”和“道德权威团队泛化”概念,并开发相应的测量工具;其次,检验道德权威的形成机制,并揭示其如何通过“社会判断−社会认同−社会影响”路径影响团队集体,从而实现团队层面的泛化;最后,实证道德权威团队泛化对个体心理、团队效率和组织系统的多层影响、作用机理与边界条件。本研究在理论上拓展了组织伦理研究的新领域,在实践上为企业提供了以微见著、撬动全局的新型伦理治理思路。

关键词: 道德权威, 道德权威团队泛化, 员工主体, 跨层演进, 多层影响

Abstract: Trends of organizational flattening and decentralization are challenging traditional theories and practices of organizational ethics and have given rise to employee-based moral authority as a new topic in organizational management. As an informal form of authority, moral authority transcends the limitations of formal authority in terms of hierarchy, direction, and scope, achieving an ethical reshaping effect that spans across hierarchies, directions, and boundaries. However, moral authority has not yet received sufficient attention in management studies. In response, this project constructs and tests a theory of moral authority based on the research framework of “concept construction-formation mechanisms-cross-level evolution-multi-level impacts.” First, it defines the concepts of “moral authority” and “moral authority team norming,” and develops corresponding measurement tools. Second, it examines the formation mechanisms of moral authority and reveals how it influences team collectives through the path of “social judgment—social identity—social influence,” thus realizing team-level norming (i.e., the cross-level evolution of moral authority). Finally, the project empirically investigates the multi-level impacts of moral authority team norming on individual psychology, team efficiency, and organizational systems, as well as its underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. This project theoretically expands the field of organizational ethics research and, in practice, provides businesses with a new approach to ethical governance that can drive large-scale change through small, localized interventions.

Key words: moral authority, moral authority team norming, employee-centric, cross-level evolution, multilevel influence