解释现象学分析在中国的运用：系统评价及指南

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01826

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为一种质性研究方法, 解释现象学分析在心理学及社会科学的其他领域中逐渐兴起。目前在中国, 运用解释现象学分析的研究质量参差不齐, 对这些研究进行系统评价, 可以为将来的研究提供指导。通过对中英文数据库的检索及筛选, 最终纳入49篇期刊文章。根据Smith (2011)为解释现象学分析提出的4个标准对这些文章进行评价, 结果显示, 26篇研究明确提及了解释现象学的理论原则, 33篇文章的资料收集及分析过程清晰透明, 大部分研究(n = 40)条理清晰、言之成理, 但只有约1/4的研究(n = 13)提供了足够强的证据来支持其提取出来的主题。只有4篇全部达到质量标准, 11篇基本达到标准, 大部分文章没有达到标准。最后, 本研究尝试提出一份解释现象学分析的使用指南, 供将来的研究参考。

关键词: 解释现象学分析, 系统评价, 质性研究

Abstract:

As a qualitative method, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) has been increasingly employed in psychology and other social sciences disciplines. In China, the quality of research using IPA was doubtful, and thus a systematic review of the current studies was warranted. Through a comprehensive search in Chinese and English database and screening, 49 articles were included. According to Smith’s criterion, 26 studies explicitly referred to IPA theoretical principles; 33 studies had clear and transparent data collection and analysis process. Most of the studies (n = 40) were coherent and plausible, however, only a small proportion of the studies (n = 13) provided strong evidence to support the themes. In the forty-nine included studies, only 4 articles were rated as “good”, 11 articles were “acceptable”, and the remaining 34 articles were “unacceptable”. Based on previous research and recommendations, this study attempted to present a guideline to conduct and write a good IPA study.

Key words: interpretative phenomenological analysis, systematic review, qualitative research

中图分类号:

B841

侯力琪, 唐信峰, 何丽, 贾晓明. (2019). 解释现象学分析在中国的运用：系统评价及指南. 心理科学进展 , 27(11), 1826-1841.

HOU Liqi, TANG Xinfeng, HE Li, JIA Xiaoming. (2019). Interpretative phenomenological analysis in China: A systematic review and guideline. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(11), 1826-1841.

图/表 7

参考文献 114

1	房蕊 . ( 2013). 青少年自主健身行为概念模型的质性研究. 北京体育大学学报*, 36( 7), 41-46.
2	何丽, 唐信峰, 王建平 . (2017a).生死相连: 失独父母持续性联结的质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志*, 25( 4), 697-703.
3	何丽, 王建平 . (2017b).失独者宗教应对的质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志*, 25( 5), 970-975.
4	解海霞, 王艳波 . ( 2015). 脊髓损伤后患者成长历程的质性研究. 中国康复理论与实践*, 21( 12), 1451-1456.
5	李梅, 李洁, 时勘 . ( 2017). 中国丧亲个体社会支持体验的质性研究. 心理科学*, 40( 4), 961-966.
6	李秀, 杜文东 . ( 2017). 丧失子女个体哀伤调适历程的质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志*, 25( 5), 976-981.
7	刘冬, 唐魁玉 . ( 2014). 在婚同妻的婚姻生活经历: 一项解释现象学分析. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)*, ( 6), 32-38.
8	刘冬, 唐魁玉 . ( 2016). 网络互动对抗逆力的影响——以同妻的虚拟日常生活实践为中心. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)*, 18( 1), 16-21.
9	刘盈君, 蔡育伦, 蒋欣欣 . ( 2017). 生命中可承受之重-探究临终照护护理人员的伦理自我. 护理杂志*, 64( 2), 34-43.
10	刘盈君, 蒋欣欣 . ( 2014). 临终照护中的实践智慧. 护理杂志*, 61( 5), 33-42.
11	彭艳琼, 唐玮, 甘秀妮 . ( 2016). 终末期肾病患者信息实践动机的质性研究. 解放军护理杂志*, 33( 16), 23-26.
12	钱玉芬 . ( 2011). 从同性恋到前同性恋—基督徒前同性恋者生命改变历程的解释现象学分析. 生命教育研究*, 3( 1), 111-154.
13	田国素 . ( 2013). 晚期肝脏恶性肿瘤患者家庭照顾者负担体验的质性研究. 临床合理用药杂志*, 6( 35), 128-129.
14	汪昌华 ,Geng G. (2017a).基于IPA的师生冲突比较研究——以流动儿童与城市儿童为例. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社科版)*, 45( 6), 785-791.
15	汪昌华, 晋玉 ,Gretchen, G. (2017b).高校师生关系现状与教师非言语亲切性研究. 国家教育行政学院学报*, ( 2), 63-70.
16	王冰, 石岩 . ( 2016). 中学生体育竞赛愤怒的个案研究:基于解释现象学分析. 体育与科学*, 37( 4), 88-96.
17	王俊秀 . ( 2014). 社会心态: 转型社会的社会心理研究. 社会学研究, ( 1), 104-124.
18	王艳波, 范素云, 贾彦彦, 柴丽 . (2017a).甲状腺癌患者对诊断及术后放射性碘治疗心理体验的质性研究. 中国实用护理杂志*, 33( 2), 126-130.
19	王艳波, 汪际, 戴敏辉, 刘晓虹 . ( 2011). 工伤致脊髓损伤患者的创伤后成长体验. 中华护理杂志*, 46( 6), 608-610.
20	王艳波, 张萌萌, 赵旭东 . (2017b).某综合性大学医学生转专业决策历程的质性研究. 中华医学教育探索杂志*, 16( 5), 531-536.
21	许洪梅, 丁炜光, 穆纯, 包頔, 张月华, 邢秋玲 . ( 2016). 2型糖尿病患者低血糖恐惧行为的质性研究. 中国实用护理杂志*, 32( 31), 2429-2432.
22	尹秋馨, 梁珍红, 刘晓虹 . ( 2015). 特大事故重伤者亲属早期照护体验的诠释现象学分析. 中华护理杂志*, 50( 11), 1303-1307.
23	张媛媛, 孙国珍, 王正梅, 王爱凤 . ( 2013). 中重型颅脑损伤患者延续性护理需求的质性研究. 中华现代护理杂志*, 19( 31), 3837-3840.
24	郑显亮, 谢园梅 . ( 2014). 我国心理学质性研究现状的文献计量学分析. 赣南师范大学学报, ( 4), 93-96.
25	Adele D., Christina K., & Paul F . ( 2008). 'That was my old life; it's almost like a past-life now': Identity crisis, loss and adjustment amongst people living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Psychology & Health, 23( 4), 459-476.
26	Ayres, L. . ( 2008). Semi-structured interview. In L. M. Given (Ed.),The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods(pp. 811-813). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27	Becker,H. S . ( 1970). Field work evidence. In H. Becker, Sociological work: Method and substance(pp. 39-62). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
28	Biggerstaff, D., &Thompson,A. R . ( 2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5( 3), 214-224.
29	Bramley, N., &Eatough V. 2005). The experience of living with Parkinson's disease: An interpretative phenomenological analysis case study. Psychology & Health, 20( 2), 223-235.
30	Braun, V., &Clarke V. 2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3( 2), 77-101.
31	Brocki,J. M., &Wearden,A. J . ( 2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and health, 21( 1), 87-108.
32	Case A. D., Todd N. R., & Kral M. J . ( 2014). Ethnography in community psychology: Promises and tensions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54( 1-2), 60-71. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9648-0
33	Charlick S., Pincombe J., McKellar L., & Fielder A . ( 2016). Making sense of participant experiences: Interpretative phenomenological analysis in midwifery research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 205-216.
34	Charmaz, K. . ( 2014). Constructing grounded theory (2 ^nd ed) . London, UK:Sage.
35	Charmaz, K., &Henwood K. 2017). Grounded theory methods for qualitative psychology. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.),The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology(pp. 238-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36	*Cheng,F. K. (2017). Resilience of Buddhist sexual minorities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 3( 4), 368-383.
37	*Cheng,F. K. ( 2018). Dilemmas of Chinese lesbian youths in contemporary mainland China. Sexuality & Culture, 22( 1), 190-208.
38	Cheng J. O. Y, Lo R. S. K., Chan F. M. Y., Kwan B. H. F., & Woo J. ( 2010). An exploration of anticipatory grief in advanced cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 19( 7), 693-700.
39	Chou Y-C, Fu L-y., & Chang H-H. ( 2013). Making work fit care: Reconciliation strategies used by working mothers of adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26( 2), 133-145.
40	*Chou, Y-C., &Kröger, T. . ( 2014). Reconciliation of work and care among lone mothers of adults with intellectual disabilities: The role and limits of care capital. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22( 4), 439-448.
41	Clare, L. . ( 2003). Managing threats to self: Awareness in early stage Alzheimer's disease. Social Science and Medicine, 57( 6), 1017-1029.
42	Cooper R., Fleisher A., & Cotton F. A . ( 2012). Building connections: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of qualitative research students’ learning experiences. The Qualitative Report, 17( 17), 1-16.
43	Creswell,J. W., &Miller,D. L . ( 2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39( 3), 124-130.
44	Creswell,J. W., & Plano Clark,V. L . ( 2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3 ^rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Publications
45	*Fan, S.-Y., &Eiser, C. . ( 2012). Illness experience in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: An interpretative phenomenological analysis study. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 24( 2), 203-208.
46	Fu F, Chen L., Sha W., Chan C. L., Chow A. Y., & Lou V. W. ( 2018). Mothers’ grief experiences of losing their only child in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake: A qualitative longitudinal study. OMEGA-Journal of death and dying.
47	*Fung, A. . (2016). Alternative pathways to musical mastery: Exploring the lived experiences of two conductors’ lifelong learning and factors that enabled their success. International Journal of Learner Diversity and Identity, 24( 1), 1-16.
48	*Fung,A. S. K. (2018a).Exploring relational ethics and care: A longitudinal study of a Hong Kong cellist's marriage disintegration and identity change. The Qualitative Report, 23( 1), 12-28.
49	*Fung,A. S. K . (2018b).Motivation and Resilience: A mother-daughter dyad’s pursuit of tertiary music education, a longitudinal study. The International Journal of Adult, Community, and Professional Learning, 24(3), 1-44.
50	Fung Y, Chan Z. C., & Chien W. ( 2016). We are different: The voices of psychiatric advanced practice nurses on the performance of their roles. Contemporary Nurse, 52( 1), 13-29.
51	Geerlings L. R. C., Thompson C. L., Kraaij V., &Keijsers, G. P. J. . (2018). Culturally competent practice: A mixed methods study among students, academics and alumni of clinical psychology master’s programs in the Netherlands. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14( 1), 88-106.
52	Ghaffari, K., &Lagzian M. 2018). Exploring users’ experiences of using personal cloud storage services: A phenomenological study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37( 3), 295-309.
53	Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54	Giorgi, A. . (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. Oxford, England: Harper & Row.
55	Giorgi, A. (2009).The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology:A modified Huessrlian approach. Pittsburgh,PA: Duquesne University Press.
56	Glaser,B. G . (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology press.
57	Glaser B. G. ,& Strauss, A. L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory; Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
58	Golafshani, N. . (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8( 4), 597-606.
59	Grech A., Depares J., & Scerri J . (2018). Being on the frontline: Nurses' experiences providing end-of-life care to adults with hematologic malignancies. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 20(3), 237-244.
60	Guest G., Bunce A., & Johnson L . ( 2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18( 1), 59-82.
61	Hammersley, M. . ( 1992). Reconstructing the qualitative- quantitative divide. In M. Hammersley, What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations( pp. 159-173). London: Routledge.
62	Hannes, K. . ( 2011). Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In J. Noyes, A. Booth, K. Hannes, A. Harden, J. Harris, S. Lewin, & C. Lockwood (Eds.),Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1 (updated August 2011). Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group.
63	Ho H. S, Yi H., Griffiths S., Chan D. F., & Murray S. ( 2014). ‘Do It Yourself’ in the parent-professional partnership for the assessment and diagnosis of children with autism spectrum conditions in Hong Kong: A qualitative study. Autism, 18( 7), 832-844. doi: 10.1177/1362361313508230
64	Hou Y, Huang Q., Prakash R., & Chaudhury S. ( 2013). Infrequent near death experiences in severe brain injury survivors-A quantitative and qualitative study. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 16( 1), 75-81. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.107715
65	Husserl, E. (1970).The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology:An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.) . Evanston, Illinois:Northwestern University Press.
66	Johnson,R. B., &Onwuegbuzie,A. J . ( 2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33( 7), 14-26.
67	Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., & Turner L. A . ( 2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
68	Johnson,R. B., &Turner,L. A . ( 2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. B. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research(pp. 297-319).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69	Jaccard, J., &Dittus P. 1990). Idiographic and nomothetic perspectives on research methods and data analysis. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology(pp. 312-351). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
70	Ko C-J, Smith P., Liao H-Y., & Chiang H-H. ( 2013). Searching for reintegration: Life experiences of people with schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23( 3-4), 394-401.
71	*Komorowski, L., &Chen, B. . ( 2006). Female urinary incontinence in China: Experiences and perspectives. Health Care for Women International, 27( 2), 169-181.
72	*Li, S., &Southcott, J. . ( 2015). The meaning of learning piano keyboard in the lives of older Chinese people. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34( 3), 316-333.
73	Lincoln,Y. S., &Guba,E. G . ( 1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
74	Liu J, McMahon M., & Watson M . (2015a).Parental influence on child career development in mainland China: A qualitative study. The Career Development Quarterly, 63( 1), 74-87.
75	Liu J, McMahon M., & Watson M . (2015b).Parental influence on mainland Chinese children’s career aspirations: Child and parental perspectives. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 15( 2), 131-143.
76	*Liu, Y.-C., &Chiang, H.-H. . ( 2017). From vulnerability to passion in the end-of-life care: The lived experience of nurses. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 31, 30-36.
77	Lopez,K. A., &Willis,D. G . ( 2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14( 5), 726-735.
78	Lub, V. . ( 2015). Validity in qualitative evaluation: Linking purposes, paradigms, and perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2015 1-8.
79	Luo S.-X, Liu J.-E., Cheng A. S., Xiao S.-Q., Su Y.-L., & Feuerstein M. ( 2018). Breast cancer survivors report similar concerns related to return to work in developed and developing nations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 29( 1), 42-51.
80	Malterud, K. . ( 2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358( 9280), 483-488.
81	Maxwell,J. A . ( 1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62( 3), 279-301.
82	Maxwell,J. A . (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16( 6), 475-482.
83	Miles,M. B., &Huberman,A. M . (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
84	Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., & Altman D. G . (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6( 7), e1000097.
85	Murray,C. D., &Rhodes K. 2011). 'Nobody likes damaged goods': The experience of adult visible acne. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10( 2), 183-202.
86	*Ng,H. C.,&Graydon, C. ( 2016). In search of empathy in Playback Theatre: A preliminary study. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 15( 2), 126-141.
87	O’brien B. C., Harris I. B., Beckman T. J., Reed D. A., & Cook D. A . ( 2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89( 9), 1245-1251.
88	Osborn, M., &Smith,J. A . (1998). The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3( 1), 65-83.
89	Sale J. E., Lohfeld L. H., & Brazil K . (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed- methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36( 1), 43-53.
90	Senior V., Smith J. A., Michie S., & Marteau T. M . ( 2002). Making sense of risk: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of vulnerability to heart disease. Journal of Health Psychology, 7( 2), 157-168.
91	Smith,J. A . ( 1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11( 2), 261-271.
92	Smith,J. A . ( 2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1( 1), 39-54.
93	Smith,J. A . ( 2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5( 1), 9-27. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
94	Smith,J. A . ( 2018). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16( 2), 166-181.
95	Smith J. A., Flowers P., & Larkin M . ( 2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.
96	Smith J. A., Flowers P., & Osborn M . ( 1997). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In L. Yardley (Ed.),Material discourses of health and illness(pp. 68-91). Florence: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
97	Smith,J. A., &Osborn M. 2004). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.),Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods(pp. 229-254). London: Sage.
98	Smith,J. A., &Osborn M. 2007). Pain as an assault on the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of chronic benign low back pain. Psychology and Health, 22( 5), 517-534.
99	Smith,J. A., &Rhodes,J. E . ( 2015). Being depleted and being shaken: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experiential features of a first episode of depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice,88( 2), 197-209.
100	*Southcott, J., &Li, S. . ( 2018). “Something to live for”: Weekly singing classes at a Chinese university for retirees. International Journal of Music Education, 36( 2), 283-296.
101	Strauss, A., &Corbin J. 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
102	Tandoc,E. C Jr., . &Takahashi B. 2016). Journalists are humans, too: A Phenomenology of covering the strongest storm on earth. Journalism, 19( 7), 917-933.
103	*To, S.-M., &Chu, F. . ( 2009). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived experiences of young Chinese females in the course of unintended pregnancy. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 21( 4), 531-544.
104	Tuffour, I. . ( 2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2( 4), 52.
105	van Maanen J. 1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24( 4), 520-526.
106	Vignoles V. L., Chryssochoou X., & Breakwell G. M . ( 2004). Combining individuality and relatedness: Representations of the person among the Anglican clergy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43( 1), 113-132.
107	Wang Q, Li H., & Pang W. ( 2016). From PBL tutoring to PBL coaching in undergraduate medical education: An interpretative phenomenological analysis study. Medical Education Online, 21( 1), 31973.
108	Wang Y, Wang H., Wang Z., Xie H., Shi J., & Zhao X. ( 2015). The process of posttraumatic growth in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury in Mainland China: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 22( 5), 637-649.
109	Wang Y, Wang J., & Liu X. ( 2012). Posttraumatic growth of injured patients after motor vehicle accidents: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 17( 2), 297-308. doi: 10.1177/1359105311410511
110	Willig, C., &Rogers,W. S . ( 2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
111	Wu S., Wyant D. C., & Fraser M. W . ( 2016). Author guidelines for manuscripts reporting on qualitative research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 7( 2), 405-425.
112	Yardley, L. . ( 2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health, 15( 2), 215-228.
113	Zamariola G., Frost N., van Oost A., Corneille O., & Luminet O . ( 2019). Relationship between interoception and emotion regulation: New evidence from mixed methods. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 480-485.
114	Zhang H, Stapleton C. M., Hsueh Y., & Sun, F.(2018). “Get encouraged through failures. Failures are not fearful. We can always start over again”: Chinese children’s lived experiences of zi zun. Qualitative Research in Psychology.DOI:10.1080/14780887.2018.1475534.

研究	年份	语言	地区	样本量	研究领域	条件1IPA 理论原则	条件2清晰透明	条件3言之成理	条件4证据强度	效度
Cheng et al. (2010)	2010	英文	中国香港	7	丧亲	1	1	1	0	1
Cheng (2017)	2017	英文	中国香港	7	LGBT	0	0	1	0	1
Cheng (2018)	2018	英文	中国香港	4	LGBT	0	0	1	1	1
Chou et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国台湾	15	身体疾病	0	0	1	0	1
Chou et al. (2014)	2014	英文	中国台湾	11	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fan et al. (2012)	2012	英文	中国台湾	33	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fu et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	6	丧亲	1	1	1	0	0
Fung et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	13	精神疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fung (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	2	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	0
Fung (2018a)	2018	英文	中国香港	1	其他	1	1	1	1	1
Fung (2018b)	2018	英文	中国香港	2	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Ho et al. (2014)	2014	英文	中国香港	10	精神疾病	1	0	1	1	1
Hou et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国大陆	86	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
Ko et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国台湾	15	精神疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Komorowski et al. (2006)	2006	英文	中国大陆	15	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	1
Li et al. (2015)	2015	英文	中国大陆	16	学习过程及师生关系	0	1	1	0	0
Liu et al. (2015a)	2015	英文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	1
Liu et al. (2015b)	2015	英文	中国大陆	8	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	1
Liu et al. (2017)	2017	英文	中国台湾	13	临终护理	1	1	1	0	1
Luo et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	16	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Ng et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	8	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Southcott et al. (2018)	2017	英文	中国大陆	15	学习过程及师生关系	0	0	1	0	1
To et al. (2009)	2009	英文	中国香港	10	其他	1	1	1	1	1
Wang et al. (2012)	2012	英文	中国大陆	6	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
Wang et al. (2015)	2015	英文	中国大陆	12	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	1
Wang et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国大陆	25	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Zhang et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	16	其他	1	1	0	0	0
房蕊(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	43	其他	1	0	0	0	0
何丽等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	11	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
何丽等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	5	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
解海霞等(2015)	2015	中文	中国大陆	12	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	0
李梅等(2017)	2017	中文	中国大陆	28	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
李秀等(2017)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	丧亲	0	0	1	0	0
刘冬等(2014)	2014	中文	中国大陆	8	LGBT	1	1	1	1	0
刘冬等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	40	LGBT	0	0	0	0	0
刘盈君等(2014)	2014	中文	中国台湾	7	临终护理	1	0	1	0	1
刘盈君等(2017)	2017	中文	中国台湾	13	临终护理	1	0	1	0	1
彭艳琼等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	8	身体疾病	0	0	0	1	1
钱玉芬(2011)	2011	中文	中国台湾	6	LGBT	1	1	1	1	0
田国素(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	10	身体疾病	0	0	0	0	0
汪昌华等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	0	0	0	0
汪昌华等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	0	0	1	0
王冰等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	5	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
王艳波等(2011)	2011	中文	中国大陆	3	身体疾病	0	0	0	1	0
王艳波等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	38	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	0
王艳波等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	0	1	0	1	0
许洪梅等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	33	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
尹秋馨等(2015)	2015	中文	中国大陆	5	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
张媛媛等(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	15	身体疾病	0	0	1	0	0

研究	年份	语言	地区	样本量	研究领域	条件1IPA 理论原则	条件2清晰透明	条件3言之成理	条件4证据强度	效度
Cheng et al. (2010)	2010	英文	中国香港	7	丧亲	1	1	1	0	1
Cheng (2017)	2017	英文	中国香港	7	LGBT	0	0	1	0	1
Cheng (2018)	2018	英文	中国香港	4	LGBT	0	0	1	1	1
Chou et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国台湾	15	身体疾病	0	0	1	0	1
Chou et al. (2014)	2014	英文	中国台湾	11	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fan et al. (2012)	2012	英文	中国台湾	33	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fu et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	6	丧亲	1	1	1	0	0
Fung et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	13	精神疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Fung (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	2	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	0
Fung (2018a)	2018	英文	中国香港	1	其他	1	1	1	1	1
Fung (2018b)	2018	英文	中国香港	2	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Ho et al. (2014)	2014	英文	中国香港	10	精神疾病	1	0	1	1	1
Hou et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国大陆	86	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
Ko et al. (2013)	2013	英文	中国台湾	15	精神疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Komorowski et al. (2006)	2006	英文	中国大陆	15	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	1
Li et al. (2015)	2015	英文	中国大陆	16	学习过程及师生关系	0	1	1	0	0
Liu et al. (2015a)	2015	英文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	1
Liu et al. (2015b)	2015	英文	中国大陆	8	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	1	1
Liu et al. (2017)	2017	英文	中国台湾	13	临终护理	1	1	1	0	1
Luo et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	16	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
Ng et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国香港	8	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Southcott et al. (2018)	2017	英文	中国大陆	15	学习过程及师生关系	0	0	1	0	1
To et al. (2009)	2009	英文	中国香港	10	其他	1	1	1	1	1
Wang et al. (2012)	2012	英文	中国大陆	6	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
Wang et al. (2015)	2015	英文	中国大陆	12	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	1
Wang et al. (2016)	2016	英文	中国大陆	25	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
Zhang et al. (2018)	2018	英文	中国大陆	16	其他	1	1	0	0	0
房蕊(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	43	其他	1	0	0	0	0
何丽等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	11	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
何丽等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	5	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
解海霞等(2015)	2015	中文	中国大陆	12	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	0
李梅等(2017)	2017	中文	中国大陆	28	丧亲	0	1	1	0	0
李秀等(2017)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	丧亲	0	0	1	0	0
刘冬等(2014)	2014	中文	中国大陆	8	LGBT	1	1	1	1	0
刘冬等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	40	LGBT	0	0	0	0	0
刘盈君等(2014)	2014	中文	中国台湾	7	临终护理	1	0	1	0	1
刘盈君等(2017)	2017	中文	中国台湾	13	临终护理	1	0	1	0	1
彭艳琼等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	8	身体疾病	0	0	0	1	1
钱玉芬(2011)	2011	中文	中国台湾	6	LGBT	1	1	1	1	0
田国素(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	10	身体疾病	0	0	0	0	0
汪昌华等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	0	0	0	0
汪昌华等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	1	0	0	1	0
王冰等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	5	学习过程及师生关系	1	1	1	0	1
王艳波等(2011)	2011	中文	中国大陆	3	身体疾病	0	0	0	1	0
王艳波等(2017a)	2017	中文	中国大陆	38	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	0
王艳波等(2017b)	2017	中文	中国大陆	6	学习过程及师生关系	0	1	0	1	0
许洪梅等(2016)	2016	中文	中国大陆	33	身体疾病	0	1	1	0	1
尹秋馨等(2015)	2015	中文	中国大陆	5	身体疾病	1	1	1	0	0
张媛媛等(2013)	2013	中文	中国大陆	15	身体疾病	0	0	1	0	0