Review of Contextual Performance

›› 2004, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06): 924-924~931.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Review of Contextual Performance

Shen Zhengrong,Wang Erping

Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100015

Received:2004-03-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-11-15 Published:2004-11-15
Contact: Shen Zhengrong

Abstract

Abstract: Borman and Motowidlo introduced contextual performance based on organizational citizenship behavior in 1993. Contrasting with task performance, contextual performance is composite of three dimensions: behaviors benefiting others, behaviors benefiting organizations and behaviors benefiting jobs. Personality and job characteristics are main factors that influence contextual performance. Contextual performance can contribute to organizational performance, personnel selection, personnel train and performance evaluation. At last, the authors point out some inspirations from the review.

Key words: contextual performance, organizational citizenship behavior, personality

CLC Number:

B849：C93

Shen Zhengrong,Wang Erping. Review of Contextual Performance[J]. , 2004, 12(06): 924-924~931.

[1]	LUO Ziwei, WU Yuting. The influence of perception of luck on consumers' behavior and its theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 464-474.
[2]	ZHANG Wen, HU Na, DING Xuechen, LI Junyi. The relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1179-1194.
[3]	ZHANG Liangting, WANG Bin, FU Jingtao. Exploring the trajectories of organizational citizenship behavior and its mechanism from the organizational socialization perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2105-2118.
[4]	LIU Doudou, XU Yan, LI Chaoping. Paternalistic leadership and employee performance: A meta-analysis of Chinese samples [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(10): 1829-1846.
[5]	YIN Kui, ZHAO Jing, ZHOU Jing, NIE Qi. The big-five personality profiles: A person-centered approach [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(10): 1866-1877.
[6]	CAI Yuqing, DONG Shuyang, YUAN Shuai, HU Chuan-Peng. Network analysis and its applications in psychology [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 178-190.
[7]	ZHAO Jun, YAN Miao, XIAO Sufang, ZHANG Yongjun. The mutual relationship of organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: An integrated process of emotion and cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 871-883.
[8]	WU Ting, ZHENG Yong. The validity of cues in personality judgment [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 533-543.
[9]	FU Xurong, WEI Xindong, WANG Yuling, WANG Fengyan. The relationship between wisdom and well-being: A perspective based on multiple orientations to well-being [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 544-556.
[10]	Yuping LIU, Hui ZHAO, Shanshan LI, Zhuo ZHANG, Bo YANG. The neurobiological evidence of antisocial personality disorder and its judicial implications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1726-1742.
[11]	CAO Ben, XIA Mian, REN Zhihong, LIN Xiubin, XU Sheng, LAI Lizu, WANG Qi, JIANG Guangrong. Technology of text analysis in the big data era: Application of the topic model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 770-780.
[12]	LIU Xiaoguang, WANG Zhihao. Influence mechanism of managerial pro-social rule breaking on employee behavior from the perspective of opposition between favor and reason: A cross-levels and longitudinal study [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 191-203.
[13]	Kai ZhiZhong. Face Shapes on Chinese Traditional Physiognomy and Relevant Personality [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 40-40.
[14]	ZHANG Ying, YANG Fu. Proactive personality: Mechanisms and future directions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1544-1551.
[15]	ZHAO Hongdan; JIANG Wei. Citizenship pressure in the workplace [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 312-318.

Review of Contextual Performance

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments