The associations between parent−child value conflict in filial piety and adolescent depressive symptoms

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0058

Abstract

Cite this article

GUO Xiaolin, ZHANG Yifan, GUAN Yuelin, LUO Liang. (2025). The associations between parent−child value conflict in filial piety and adolescent depressive symptoms. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(1), 58-70.

share this article

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0058

https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/Y2025/V57/I1/58

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1 Polynomial regression and response surface analysis coefficients for parent-child discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and children’s depressive symptoms

Dependent variables	Sons’ depressive symptoms		Daughters’ depressive symptoms
Dependent variables	Father−son dyads	Mother−son dyads	Father−daughter dyads	Mother−daughter dyads
Polynomial Regression Coefficients
Constant (b₀)	17.50	17.61	18.12	17.68
Parents’ RFP (b₁)	0.30	0.25	0.82	0.85
Children’s RFP (b₂)	−1.54^*	−1.53^*	−2.12^*	−1.89^*
Parents’ RFP squared (b₃)	0.27	0.24	0.02	0.28
Parents’ RFP × Children’s RFP (b₄)	−0.53	−0.50	−0.53	−0.92
Children’s RFP squared (b₅)	−0.04	−0.05	0.30	0.39
Response Surface Analysis Coefficients
Slope for congruence line (a₁)	−1.23	−1.28	−1.30	−1.05
Curvature for congruence line (a₂)	−0.29	−0.30	−0.21	−0.25
Slope for incongruence line (a₃)	1.84^*	1.78	2.95^**	2.74^*
Curvature for incongruence line (a₄)	0.74	0.69	0.85	1.59^*

Table 1 Polynomial regression and response surface analysis coefficients for parent-child discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and children’s depressive symptoms

Dependent variables	Sons’ depressive symptoms		Daughters’ depressive symptoms
Dependent variables	Father−son dyads	Mother−son dyads	Father−daughter dyads	Mother−daughter dyads
Polynomial Regression Coefficients
Constant (b₀)	17.50	17.61	18.12	17.68
Parents’ RFP (b₁)	0.30	0.25	0.82	0.85
Children’s RFP (b₂)	−1.54^*	−1.53^*	−2.12^*	−1.89^*
Parents’ RFP squared (b₃)	0.27	0.24	0.02	0.28
Parents’ RFP × Children’s RFP (b₄)	−0.53	−0.50	−0.53	−0.92
Children’s RFP squared (b₅)	−0.04	−0.05	0.30	0.39
Response Surface Analysis Coefficients
Slope for congruence line (a₁)	−1.23	−1.28	−1.30	−1.05
Curvature for congruence line (a₂)	−0.29	−0.30	−0.21	−0.25
Slope for incongruence line (a₃)	1.84^*	1.78	2.95^**	2.74^*
Curvature for incongruence line (a₄)	0.74	0.69	0.85	1.59^*

Figure 1. Response surface for father−son discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and sons’ depressive symptoms

Figure 1. Response surface for father−son discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and sons’ depressive symptoms

Figure 2. Response surface for father−daughter discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 2. Response surface for father−daughter discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 3. Response surface for mother−daughter discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 3. Response surface for mother−daughter discrepancies in reciprocal filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Table 2 Polynomial regression and response surface analysis coefficients for parent-child discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and children’s depressive symptoms

Dependent variables	Sons’ depressive symptoms		Daughters’ depressive symptoms
Dependent variables	Father−son dyads	Mother−son dyads	Father−daughter dyads	Mother−daughter dyads
Polynomial Regression Coefficients
Constant (b₀)	14.18	14.04	14.78	14.64
Parents’ AFP (b₁)	0.33	−0.06	0.57	0.50
Children’s AFP (b₂)	−0.65	−0.46	−1.52^**	−1.48^**
Parents’ AFP squared (b₃)	0.21	0.27	0.07	0.29
Parents’ AFP × Children’s AFP (b₄)	−0.28	−0.00	−0.51	−0.38
Children’s AFP squared (b₅)	0.32	0.24	0.89^***	0.86^***
Response Surface Analysis Coefficients
Slope for congruence line (a₁)	−0.32	−0.53	−0.95	−0.99
Curvature for congruence line (a₂)	0.25	0.51	0.45	0.77
Slope for incongruence line (a₃)	0.98	0.40	2.09^**	1.98^**
Curvature for incongruence line (a₄)	0.80^*	0.52	1.46^***	1.52^**

Table 2 Polynomial regression and response surface analysis coefficients for parent-child discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and children’s depressive symptoms

Dependent variables	Sons’ depressive symptoms		Daughters’ depressive symptoms
Dependent variables	Father−son dyads	Mother−son dyads	Father−daughter dyads	Mother−daughter dyads
Polynomial Regression Coefficients
Constant (b₀)	14.18	14.04	14.78	14.64
Parents’ AFP (b₁)	0.33	−0.06	0.57	0.50
Children’s AFP (b₂)	−0.65	−0.46	−1.52^**	−1.48^**
Parents’ AFP squared (b₃)	0.21	0.27	0.07	0.29
Parents’ AFP × Children’s AFP (b₄)	−0.28	−0.00	−0.51	−0.38
Children’s AFP squared (b₅)	0.32	0.24	0.89^***	0.86^***
Response Surface Analysis Coefficients
Slope for congruence line (a₁)	−0.32	−0.53	−0.95	−0.99
Curvature for congruence line (a₂)	0.25	0.51	0.45	0.77
Slope for incongruence line (a₃)	0.98	0.40	2.09^**	1.98^**
Curvature for incongruence line (a₄)	0.80^*	0.52	1.46^***	1.52^**

Figure 4. Response surface for father−son discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and sons’ depressive symptoms

Figure 4. Response surface for father−son discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and sons’ depressive symptoms

Figure 5. Response surface for father−daughter discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 5. Response surface for father−daughter discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 6. Response surface for mother-daughter discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

Figure 6. Response surface for mother-daughter discrepancies in authoritarian filial piety and daughters’ depressive symptoms

References

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP