Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 515-530.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00515
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles
WANG Lili, ZHANG Xuan(), CHEN Hanyu
Published:
2024-04-25
Online:
2024-01-18
Contact:
ZHANG Xuan
E-mail:xuan_zhang@zju.edu.cn
WANG Lili, ZHANG Xuan, CHEN Hanyu. (2024). Remembering the past makes consumers easier to forgive: The influence of nostalgia on forgiveness and its internal mechanism in service failure. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(4), 515-530.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00515
Experiment | Condition | Forgiveness | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Experiment 1a (N = 149) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 5.54, SD = 0.86 Mcontrol = 5.10, SD = 1.20 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(147) = 2.57, p = 0.011, 95% CI [0.10, 0.78], d = 0.40 |
Experiment 1b (N = 210) | Individual nostalgia Collective nostalgia Control | Mindividual nostalgia = 4.60, SD = 1.00 Mcollective nostalgia = 4.41, SD = 1.15 Mcontrol = 3.99, SD = 1.17 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(2, 207) = 5.68, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.05 Individual nostalgia vs. control condition: t(207) = 3.29, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.99], d = 0.46 Collective nostalgia vs. control condition: t(207) = 2.28, p = 0.024, 95% CI [0.06, 0.80], d = 0.32 Individual nostalgia vs. collective nostalgia: t(207) = 1.01, p = 0.312 |
Experiment 2a (N = 130) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 2.53, SD = 1.15 Mcontrol = 2.16, SD = 0.77 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(128) = 2.15, p = 0.034, 95% CI [0.03, 0.70], d = 0.38 Mediation effect: Empathy: b = 0.12, SE = 0.07, 95% CI [0.01, 0.29] Focalism: b = 0.01, SE = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.08] Relaxation: b = 0.01, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.07] Self-esteem: b = 0.002, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.05] Positive affect: b = −0.04, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.13, 0.04] |
Experiment 2b (N = 130) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 2.91, SD = 1.21 Mcontrol = 2.46, SD = 1.02 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(128) = 2.28, p = 0.025, 95% CI [0.06, 0.83], d = 0.40 Mediation effect: Empathy: b = 0.22, SE = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32] Perceived service failure severity: b = 0.05, SE = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.16, 0.28] |
Experiment 3 (N = 300) | Nostalgia, Warm brand Control, Warm brand Nostalgia, Competence brand Control, Competence brand | In the warm brand condition: Mnostalgia = 2.77, SD = 1.30 Mcontrol = 2.15, SD = 0.96 In the competence brand condition: Mnostalgia = 2.66, SD = 1.22 Mcontrol = 2.60, SD = 1.06 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(1, 296) = 6.69, p = 0.010, η2p = 0.02 Main effect of brand image type: F(1, 296) = 1.66, p = 0.198 Interaction of nostalgia and brand image type: F(1, 296) = 4.64, p = 0.032, η2p = 0.02 In the warm brand condition: t(296) = 3.60, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.99], d = 0.55 In the competence brand condition: t(296) = 0.30, p = 0.766 |
Experiment 4 (N = 240) | Nostalgia, Minor service failure Control, Minor service failure Nostalgia, Major service failure Control, Major service failure | In the minor service failure condition: Mnostalgia = 5.74, SD = 1.29 Mcontrol = 4.78, SD = 1.56 In the major service failure condition: Mnostalgia = 3.60, SD = 1.53 Mcontrol = 3.52, SD = 1.41 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(1, 236) = 7.65, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.03 Main effect of service failure severity: F(1, 236) = 81.42, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.26 Interaction of nostalgia and service failure severity: F(1, 236) = 5.50, p = 0.020, η2p = 0.02 In the minor service failure condition: t(236) = 3.60, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.44, 1.48], d = 0.65 In the major service failure condition: t(236) = 0.30, p = 0.766 |
Table 1 The effect of nostalgia on forgiveness
Experiment | Condition | Forgiveness | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Experiment 1a (N = 149) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 5.54, SD = 0.86 Mcontrol = 5.10, SD = 1.20 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(147) = 2.57, p = 0.011, 95% CI [0.10, 0.78], d = 0.40 |
Experiment 1b (N = 210) | Individual nostalgia Collective nostalgia Control | Mindividual nostalgia = 4.60, SD = 1.00 Mcollective nostalgia = 4.41, SD = 1.15 Mcontrol = 3.99, SD = 1.17 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(2, 207) = 5.68, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.05 Individual nostalgia vs. control condition: t(207) = 3.29, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.99], d = 0.46 Collective nostalgia vs. control condition: t(207) = 2.28, p = 0.024, 95% CI [0.06, 0.80], d = 0.32 Individual nostalgia vs. collective nostalgia: t(207) = 1.01, p = 0.312 |
Experiment 2a (N = 130) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 2.53, SD = 1.15 Mcontrol = 2.16, SD = 0.77 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(128) = 2.15, p = 0.034, 95% CI [0.03, 0.70], d = 0.38 Mediation effect: Empathy: b = 0.12, SE = 0.07, 95% CI [0.01, 0.29] Focalism: b = 0.01, SE = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.08] Relaxation: b = 0.01, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.07] Self-esteem: b = 0.002, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.05] Positive affect: b = −0.04, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.13, 0.04] |
Experiment 2b (N = 130) | Nostalgia Control | Mnostalgia = 2.91, SD = 1.21 Mcontrol = 2.46, SD = 1.02 | Main effect of nostalgia: t(128) = 2.28, p = 0.025, 95% CI [0.06, 0.83], d = 0.40 Mediation effect: Empathy: b = 0.22, SE = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32] Perceived service failure severity: b = 0.05, SE = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.16, 0.28] |
Experiment 3 (N = 300) | Nostalgia, Warm brand Control, Warm brand Nostalgia, Competence brand Control, Competence brand | In the warm brand condition: Mnostalgia = 2.77, SD = 1.30 Mcontrol = 2.15, SD = 0.96 In the competence brand condition: Mnostalgia = 2.66, SD = 1.22 Mcontrol = 2.60, SD = 1.06 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(1, 296) = 6.69, p = 0.010, η2p = 0.02 Main effect of brand image type: F(1, 296) = 1.66, p = 0.198 Interaction of nostalgia and brand image type: F(1, 296) = 4.64, p = 0.032, η2p = 0.02 In the warm brand condition: t(296) = 3.60, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.99], d = 0.55 In the competence brand condition: t(296) = 0.30, p = 0.766 |
Experiment 4 (N = 240) | Nostalgia, Minor service failure Control, Minor service failure Nostalgia, Major service failure Control, Major service failure | In the minor service failure condition: Mnostalgia = 5.74, SD = 1.29 Mcontrol = 4.78, SD = 1.56 In the major service failure condition: Mnostalgia = 3.60, SD = 1.53 Mcontrol = 3.52, SD = 1.41 | Main effect of nostalgia: F(1, 236) = 7.65, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.03 Main effect of service failure severity: F(1, 236) = 81.42, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.26 Interaction of nostalgia and service failure severity: F(1, 236) = 5.50, p = 0.020, η2p = 0.02 In the minor service failure condition: t(236) = 3.60, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.44, 1.48], d = 0.65 In the major service failure condition: t(236) = 0.30, p = 0.766 |
Figure 2. Multiple mediation analysis of empathy and perceived service failure severity (Experiment 2b). Note. +p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||