How to teach resourcefully? The mechanism of teacher dialectical feedback on team creativity of college students

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01301

Abstract

Key words: teacher dialectical feedback, team creativity, team information elaboration, mastery climate, performance climate

Cite this article

ZHANG Jianwei, ZHOU Yufan, LI Linying, LI Haihong, HUA Weijun. (2023). How to teach resourcefully? The mechanism of teacher dialectical feedback on team creativity of college students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(8), 1301-1316.

share this article

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01301

https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/Y2023/V55/I8/1301

Figures/Tables 6

Figure 1. Theoretical model.

Figure 1. Theoretical model.

Table 1 Means, Standard Deviations, and correlations among studied variables

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1 Team’s University background	2.45	0.78
2 Team’s Gender Composition	1.11	0.17	−0.07
3 Team Size	3.92	0.75	−0.31^**	−0.05
4 Teacher Contact Frequency	3.69	0.74	−0.11	0.02	−0.08
5 Teacher Feedback Frequency	3.56	0.81	−0.06	0.03	−0.17	0.83^**
6 Teacher Dialectical Feedback	4.09	0.67	−0.22	−0.05	−0.18	0.64^**	0.66^**
7 Mastery Climate	3.10	0.68	0.01	−0.15	0.05	0.15	0.24^*	0.11
8 Performance Climate	3.90	0.49	−0.22	−0.21	−0.05	0.20	0.29^**	0.41^**	0.28^*
9 Team Information Elaboration	4.23	0.61	−0.15	−0.14	−0.13	0.36^**	0.39^**	0.63^**	0.04	0.30^**
10 Team Creativity	4.17	0.46	−0.16	−0.21	−0.15	0.34^**	0.46^**	0.69^**	0.19	0.45^**	0.82^**

Table 1 Means, Standard Deviations, and correlations among studied variables

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1 Team’s University background	2.45	0.78
2 Team’s Gender Composition	1.11	0.17	−0.07
3 Team Size	3.92	0.75	−0.31^**	−0.05
4 Teacher Contact Frequency	3.69	0.74	−0.11	0.02	−0.08
5 Teacher Feedback Frequency	3.56	0.81	−0.06	0.03	−0.17	0.83^**
6 Teacher Dialectical Feedback	4.09	0.67	−0.22	−0.05	−0.18	0.64^**	0.66^**
7 Mastery Climate	3.10	0.68	0.01	−0.15	0.05	0.15	0.24^*	0.11
8 Performance Climate	3.90	0.49	−0.22	−0.21	−0.05	0.20	0.29^**	0.41^**	0.28^*
9 Team Information Elaboration	4.23	0.61	−0.15	−0.14	−0.13	0.36^**	0.39^**	0.63^**	0.04	0.30^**
10 Team Creativity	4.17	0.46	−0.16	−0.21	−0.15	0.34^**	0.46^**	0.69^**	0.19	0.45^**	0.82^**

Table 2 Hierarchical regression analysis

Variable	Team Creativity			Team Information Elaboration
Variable	Modle1	Modle2		Modle3	Modle4	Modle5
Team’s University background	−0.14	−0.08		−0.09	−0.06	−0.06
Team’s Gender Composition	−0.18	−0.11		−0.11	−0.16	−0.07
Team Size	−0.04	−0.02		−0.04	−0.06	0.01
Teacher Contact Frequency	−0.30^*		−0.27^*	−0.05	−0.28	0.02
Teacher Feedback Frequency	0.30^*	0.29^*		0.03	0.31	−0.02
Teacher Dialectical Feedback	0.64^***	0.27^**		0.61^***	0.74^***	0.55^***
Mastery Climate					−0.15
Teacher Dialectical Feedback × Mastery Climate					0.42^***
Performance Climate						0.09
Teacher Dialectical Feedback × Performance Climate						−0.27^**
Team Information Elaboration		0.61^***
R²	0.55	0.77		0.42	0.55	0.48
ΔR²		0.22			0.13	0.06

Table 2 Hierarchical regression analysis

Variable	Team Creativity			Team Information Elaboration
Variable	Modle1	Modle2		Modle3	Modle4	Modle5
Team’s University background	−0.14	−0.08		−0.09	−0.06	−0.06
Team’s Gender Composition	−0.18	−0.11		−0.11	−0.16	−0.07
Team Size	−0.04	−0.02		−0.04	−0.06	0.01
Teacher Contact Frequency	−0.30^*		−0.27^*	−0.05	−0.28	0.02
Teacher Feedback Frequency	0.30^*	0.29^*		0.03	0.31	−0.02
Teacher Dialectical Feedback	0.64^***	0.27^**		0.61^***	0.74^***	0.55^***
Mastery Climate					−0.15
Teacher Dialectical Feedback × Mastery Climate					0.42^***
Performance Climate						0.09
Teacher Dialectical Feedback × Performance Climate						−0.27^**
Team Information Elaboration		0.61^***
R²	0.55	0.77		0.42	0.55	0.48
ΔR²		0.22			0.13	0.06

Figure 2. The moderating effect of mastery climate on team information elaboration.

Figure 2. The moderating effect of mastery climate on team information elaboration.

Figure 3. The moderating effect of performance climate on team information elaboration.

Figure 3. The moderating effect of performance climate on team information elaboration.

Table 3 Conditional indirect effect

Condition	Indirect Effect	95% CI (High)	95% CI (Low)
Study1
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (low level)	0.26	0.07	0.53
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (high level)	−0.11	−0.12	0.28
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (low level)	0.93	0.55	1.35
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (high level)	0.56	0.35	0.85
Study2
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (low level)	−0.02	−0.34	0.20
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (high level)	−0.19	−0.66	0.01
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (low level)	0.36	0.06	0.83
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (high level)	0.18	0.01	0.57

Table 3 Conditional indirect effect

Condition	Indirect Effect	95% CI (High)	95% CI (Low)
Study1
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (low level)	0.26	0.07	0.53
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (high level)	−0.11	−0.12	0.28
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (low level)	0.93	0.55	1.35
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (high level)	0.56	0.35	0.85
Study2
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (low level)	−0.02	−0.34	0.20
mastery climate (low level), performance climate (high level)	−0.19	−0.66	0.01
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (low level)	0.36	0.06	0.83
mastery climate (high level), performance climate (high level)	0.18	0.01	0.57

References

Related Articles 9

[1]	WEI Lihua, LIU Zhiqiang, LIAO Shudi, LONG Lirong, LIAO Jianqiao. Collective psychological ownership, status conferral criteria and team creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 677-687.
[2]	NI Xudong,JI Baile. Eliminating the negative impact of subgroups by exchanging members in the subgroups [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 259-268.
[3]	Weiguo LIU, Yanran FANG, Junqi SHI, Shenjiang MO. The impact of supervisor’s creativity expectation on team creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 667-677.
[4]	Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168.
[5]	NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[6]	LV Jie; ZHANG Gang. The Mechanisms of Knowledge Heterogeneity on Creativity of Knowledge Teams: An Interactive Cognition Perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 533-544.
[7]	LIN Xiaomin; BAI Xinwen; LIN Lin. Effects of Similarity and Accuracy Indices of Shared Mental Models on Team Creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1734-1747.
[8]	CAI Yahua;JIA Liangding;YOU Shuyang;ZHANG Yi;CHEN Yanlu. The Influence of Differentiated Transformational Leadership on Knowledge Sharing and Team Creativity: A Social Network Explanation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 585-598.
[9]	Zhang Gang,Ni Xudong . The Impact of Knowledge Difference and Knowledge Conflict on the Creativity of Team [J]. , 2007, 39(05): 926-933.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP