Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 1299-1309.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01299
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Next Articles
KE Xiaoxiao1, QI Huizi1, LIANG Jiahui1, JIN Xinyuan1, GAO Jie1, ZHANG Mingxia2, WANG Yamin1()
Received:
2020-07-08
Published:
2021-12-25
Online:
2021-10-26
Contact:
WANG Yamin
E-mail:wangym_cn@hotmail.com
KE Xiaoxiao, QI Huizi, LIANG Jiahui, JIN Xinyuan, GAO Jie, ZHANG Mingxia, WANG Yamin. (2021). Situational assessment method of the Chinese people’s holistic thinking characteristics and their application. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(12), 1299-1309.
Scale | Dimensions | Main content |
---|---|---|
AHS scale | Causality | Emphasis on the relationship between the goal and the environment, pay attention to the interaction |
Contradiction | Seek compromise in the face of conflict | |
Change | Phenomena are non-static and constantly changing | |
Attention | Focus on the relationship between goal and goal/goal and environment | |
Chinese Thinking Style Scale | Relation | The world is interconnected |
Change | The world is changing | |
Contradiction | The world is a unity full of contradictions |
Table 1 Dimensions for AHS scale and Chinese thinking style scale
Scale | Dimensions | Main content |
---|---|---|
AHS scale | Causality | Emphasis on the relationship between the goal and the environment, pay attention to the interaction |
Contradiction | Seek compromise in the face of conflict | |
Change | Phenomena are non-static and constantly changing | |
Attention | Focus on the relationship between goal and goal/goal and environment | |
Chinese Thinking Style Scale | Relation | The world is interconnected |
Change | The world is changing | |
Contradiction | The world is a unity full of contradictions |
Figure 2. Examples of creative expressions in virtual reality. Above is “a winding path leading to peace”, below is “be like a frog at the bottom of a well”
Classification | Operational Definition |
---|---|
Reasonable Idiom | Conforms to the environmental information or the psychological and behavioral characteristics of the participants. |
Integral Idiom | Embody the content of the whole environment and the participants’ overall mood experience. |
Specific Idiom | Embody the details of clues, the specific actions of the participants and their immediate experience. |
Superficial Idiom | Simply describe the appearance of things and have no deep meaning; Have deep meaning, but only superficial and concrete meaning is expressed in this scenario. |
Connotative Idiom | Express the atmosphere; In addition to the surface meaning, the participants can experience a deeper extended meaning in the environment. |
Subjective Idiom | Embody the behavior, emotion, feeling and evaluation of the subject |
Objective Idiom | Only embody the environmental information and do not involve the participants’ subjective experience |
Table 2 Standards for classification of idioms coding
Classification | Operational Definition |
---|---|
Reasonable Idiom | Conforms to the environmental information or the psychological and behavioral characteristics of the participants. |
Integral Idiom | Embody the content of the whole environment and the participants’ overall mood experience. |
Specific Idiom | Embody the details of clues, the specific actions of the participants and their immediate experience. |
Superficial Idiom | Simply describe the appearance of things and have no deep meaning; Have deep meaning, but only superficial and concrete meaning is expressed in this scenario. |
Connotative Idiom | Express the atmosphere; In addition to the surface meaning, the participants can experience a deeper extended meaning in the environment. |
Subjective Idiom | Embody the behavior, emotion, feeling and evaluation of the subject |
Objective Idiom | Only embody the environmental information and do not involve the participants’ subjective experience |
Idiom | Integral | Specific | Superficial | Connotative | Objective | Subjective |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full of life | √ | √ | √ | |||
Paint a snake with feet | √ | √ | √ | |||
Draw a circle on the ground to serve as a prison | √ | √ | √ | |||
Have nothing but the bare walls in one's house | √ | √ | √ | |||
Green hills and clear water | √ | √ | √ |
Table 3 Examples of idiom encoding
Idiom | Integral | Specific | Superficial | Connotative | Objective | Subjective |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full of life | √ | √ | √ | |||
Paint a snake with feet | √ | √ | √ | |||
Draw a circle on the ground to serve as a prison | √ | √ | √ | |||
Have nothing but the bare walls in one's house | √ | √ | √ | |||
Green hills and clear water | √ | √ | √ |
Number Of Items | Mean | SD | Range | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Idioms | ||||
Number of Reports | 31.50 | 21.28 | 4~125 | |
Number of Reasonable Idioms | 19.50 | 8.32 | 4~47 | |
Reasonable Proportion | 0.70 | 0.18 | 0.21~1.00 | |
Integral Proportion | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.00~1.00 | |
Connotative Proportion | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.00~0.65 | |
Subjective Proportion | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00~0.40 | |
IPQ | ||||
Spatial Presence | 5 | 4.59 | 1.35 | 1.80~6.60 |
Involvement | 4 | 3.46 | 1.08 | 1.25~6.00 |
Realism | 4 | 3.28 | 0.84 | 1.25~5.25 |
General Presence | 1 | 3.03 | 1.94 | 0.00~6.00 |
Table 4 Descriptive statistics of Idiom Report and IPQ scores (N = 90)
Number Of Items | Mean | SD | Range | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Idioms | ||||
Number of Reports | 31.50 | 21.28 | 4~125 | |
Number of Reasonable Idioms | 19.50 | 8.32 | 4~47 | |
Reasonable Proportion | 0.70 | 0.18 | 0.21~1.00 | |
Integral Proportion | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.00~1.00 | |
Connotative Proportion | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.00~0.65 | |
Subjective Proportion | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00~0.40 | |
IPQ | ||||
Spatial Presence | 5 | 4.59 | 1.35 | 1.80~6.60 |
Involvement | 4 | 3.46 | 1.08 | 1.25~6.00 |
Realism | 4 | 3.28 | 0.84 | 1.25~5.25 |
General Presence | 1 | 3.03 | 1.94 | 0.00~6.00 |
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | ||||
2. Reasonable proportion | -0.65** | |||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | ||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | |
5. Subjective Proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** |
Table 5 Correlations among holistic thinking characteristics
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | ||||
2. Reasonable proportion | -0.65** | |||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | ||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | |
5. Subjective Proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** |
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | |||||||||
2. Reasonable Proportion | -0.65** | ||||||||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | |||||||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | ||||||
5. Subjective proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** | |||||
6. Neuroticism | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.09 | 0.06 | -0.22* | ||||
7. Conscientiousness | 0.12 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.09 | -0.03 | -0.14 | |||
8. Agreeableness | 0.06 | -0.03 | 0.02 | -0.26* | -0.01 | -0.35** | 0.15 | ||
9. Openness | 0.08 | 0.09 | -0.23* | -0.08 | -0.05 | -0.23* | 0.10 | 0.22* | |
10. Extroversion | 0.18 | -0.17 | 0.04 | -0.04 | 0.13 | -0.32** | 0.02 | 0.32** | 0.51** |
Table 6 Correlations between the holistic thinking characteristics and personality characteristics
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | |||||||||
2. Reasonable Proportion | -0.65** | ||||||||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | |||||||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | ||||||
5. Subjective proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** | |||||
6. Neuroticism | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.09 | 0.06 | -0.22* | ||||
7. Conscientiousness | 0.12 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.09 | -0.03 | -0.14 | |||
8. Agreeableness | 0.06 | -0.03 | 0.02 | -0.26* | -0.01 | -0.35** | 0.15 | ||
9. Openness | 0.08 | 0.09 | -0.23* | -0.08 | -0.05 | -0.23* | 0.10 | 0.22* | |
10. Extroversion | 0.18 | -0.17 | 0.04 | -0.04 | 0.13 | -0.32** | 0.02 | 0.32** | 0.51** |
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | ||||||||
2. Reasonable Proportion | -0.65** | |||||||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | ||||||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | |||||
5. Subjective Proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** | ||||
6. Risky | -0.16 | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.09 | -0.01 | |||
7. Curiosity | -0.23* | 0.36** | -0.28** | -0.06 | -0.17 | 0.48** | ||
8. Imagination | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.16 | 0.05 | -0.04 | 0.49** | 0.46** | |
9. Challenge | -0.05 | 0.08 | -0.06 | -0.05 | -0.01 | 0.43** | 0.54** | 0.52** |
Table 7 Correlations between the holistic thinking characteristics and creativity tendency
Items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Number of Reports | ||||||||
2. Reasonable Proportion | -0.65** | |||||||
3. Integral Proportion | 0.08 | -0.39** | ||||||
4. Connotative Proportion | 0.14 | -0.27** | 0.26* | |||||
5. Subjective Proportion | 0.05 | -0.34** | 0.62** | 0.53** | ||||
6. Risky | -0.16 | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.09 | -0.01 | |||
7. Curiosity | -0.23* | 0.36** | -0.28** | -0.06 | -0.17 | 0.48** | ||
8. Imagination | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.16 | 0.05 | -0.04 | 0.49** | 0.46** | |
9. Challenge | -0.05 | 0.08 | -0.06 | -0.05 | -0.01 | 0.43** | 0.54** | 0.52** |
Items | Cluster | M ± SD | t | Cohen's d |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Reports | 1 | 21.15 ± 6.16 | -5.04** | 1.02 |
2 | 39.78 ± 25.20 | |||
Reasonable Proportion | 1 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 11.41** | 2.50 |
2 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | |||
Integral Proportion | 1 | 0.19 ± 0.13 | -6.80** | 1.47 |
2 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | |||
Connotative Proportion | 1 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | -2.49** | 0.52 |
2 | 0.40 ± 0.12 | |||
Subjective Proportion | 1 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | -5.03** | 1.04 |
2 | 0.13 ± 0.09 |
Table 8 Results of t-tests between two clusters
Items | Cluster | M ± SD | t | Cohen's d |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Reports | 1 | 21.15 ± 6.16 | -5.04** | 1.02 |
2 | 39.78 ± 25.20 | |||
Reasonable Proportion | 1 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 11.41** | 2.50 |
2 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | |||
Integral Proportion | 1 | 0.19 ± 0.13 | -6.80** | 1.47 |
2 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | |||
Connotative Proportion | 1 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | -2.49** | 0.52 |
2 | 0.40 ± 0.12 | |||
Subjective Proportion | 1 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | -5.03** | 1.04 |
2 | 0.13 ± 0.09 |
[1] |
Arlin, P. K. (1976). Toward a metatheoretical model of cognitive development. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 7(3), 247-253.
doi: 10.2190/2UNG-NGJN-HR24-YTEU URL |
[2] |
Arlin, P. K., & Levitt, L. (1998). A developmental perspective on giftedness. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4),347-355.
doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1104_8 URL |
[3] | Benack, S., Basseches, M., & Swan, T. (1989). Dialectical thinking and adult creativity. In: Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp.199-208). Springer. |
[4] | Chiu, C. Y. (2000). Assessment of zhong-yong (dialectic) thinking: Preliminary findings from a cross-regional study. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 18, 33-55. |
[5] |
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691-705.
doi: 10.1177/0146167206298568 URL |
[6] | Duan, J. Y., & Ling, B. (2011). A Chinese indigenous study of the construct of employee voice behavior and the influence of Zhongyon on it. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(10), 1185-1197. |
[7] |
Düzel, E., Bunzeck, N., Guitart-Masip, M., & Düzel, S. (2010). Novelty-related motivation of anticipation and exploration by dopamine (NOMAD): Implications for healthy aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 660-669.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.08.006 URL |
[8] | Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Kung, T. M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. Progress in Asian Social Psychology, 1, 135-146 |
[9] | Hou, Y. B., Peng, K. P., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Chinese thinking styles: Their concept and structure. Chinese Social Psychological Review, (2), 45-72. |
[10] | Hou, Y. B., & Zhu, Y. (2002). The effect of culture on thinking style of Chinese people. Journal of Chinese Psychology Acta Psychologica Sinica, 34(1), 106-111. |
[11] |
Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943-955.
pmid: 10821200 |
[12] | Li, S. X., & Li, T. (2000). A study on the relationship between cognitive style, interpersonal communication and creativity of college students. Journal of Psychological Science, 23(1), 119-120. |
[13] |
Li, T. R., & Yu, G. L. (2015). Why are humans curious? Concept, functions and theories of interpersonal curiosity. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(1), 132-141.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00132 URL |
[14] | Lin, X. T., & Wang, M. R. (1999). Williams creativity test. Taipei, China: Psychological Publishing |
[15] | Liu, X. L., Liu, L., Qiu, Y. X., Jin, Y., & Zhou, J. (2016). Reliability and validity of Williams Creativity Assessment Packet. Journal of Schooling Studies, 13(3). 51-58. |
[16] |
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 URL |
[17] | Lu, T. P. (2008). The cultural characteristics of Chinese idioms. Overseas Chinese Education, (4), 16-23. |
[18] | Lu, Z. Y., & Zhang, Y. J. (2007). The effects of phonological loop of the working memory in Chinese reading comprehension. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(5), 768-776.] |
[19] | Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. P. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 947-971. |
[20] |
Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 788-799.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/062) URL |
[21] | Nisbett, R. E. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently…and why. New York: Free Press. |
[22] |
Paletz, S. B. F., & Peng, K. P. (2009). Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naive dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 139-151.
doi: 10.1080/10400410902858683 URL |
[23] | Peng, K. P., Liu, Y., Cao, C. H., & Zhang, W. (2011). Virtual social psychology: Exploration and implication. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(7), 933-943. |
[24] |
Peng, K. P., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741 URL |
[25] |
Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2-3), 207-231.
doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj0902&3_8 URL |
[26] |
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266-281.
doi: 10.1162/105474601300343603 URL |
[27] |
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K. P., Wang, L., & Hou, Y. (2004). Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1416-1432.
pmid: 15448306 |
[28] |
Su, D. Q., Zhong, Y., Zeng, H., & Ye, H. S. (2013). Embodied semantic processing of Chinese action idioms: Evidence from fMRI study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(11), 1187-1199.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01187 URL |
[29] | Tan, H. Y., & Liu, M. (2009). The effects of imagery on the memory of Chinese idioms. Journal of Psychological Science, 32(1), 21-24. |
[30] | Wang, M. C., Dai, X. Y., & Yao, S. Q. (2011). Development of the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory (CBF-PI) Ⅲ: Psychometric properties of CBF-PI brief version. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(4), 454-457. |
[31] | Wu, X., & Zhang, H. C. (1997). New development of creativity research. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science), 139(1), 13-18. |
[32] | Yang, W. J., Zhang, H. Y., Li, R. J., & Zhou, Y. J. (2013). The effects of clues on meta-cognition monitor of anagram solving. Psychological Exploration, 33(1), 28-33. |
[33] | Ye, H. S. (2011). Embodied cognition: A consideration from theoretical psychology. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(5), 589-598. |
[34] |
Yuan, X. J., Cui, X. X., Cao, Z. C., Kan, H., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. M. (2018). Attentional bias towards threatening visual stimuli in a virtual reality-based visual search task. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(6), 622-636.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00622 URL |
[35] |
Zhu, X. C., Li, R. J., & Zhou, Y. J. (2009). The role of clues in Chinese idiom riddle solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(5), 397-405.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00397 URL |
[1] | WANG Dan, WANG Dianhui, CHEN Wenfeng. The relationship between adolescents’ resilience and their malevolent creative behaviors [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(2): 154-167. |
[2] | CHENG Rui, LU Kelong, HAO Ning. The effect of anger on malevolent creativity and strategies for its emotion regulation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(8): 847-860. |
[3] | SUN Lin, DUAN Tao, LIU Wei, CHEN Ning. The influence of dispositional mindfulness on the academic affective forecasting biases of middle school students [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(11): 1203-1214. |
[4] | ZHANG Jinghuan, FU Mengmeng, XIN Yuwen, CHEN Peipei, SHA Sha. The development of creativity in senior primary school students: Gender differences and the role of school support [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(9): 1057-1070. |
[5] | HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668. |
[6] | ZHU Jinqiang, XU Shiyong, ZHOU Jinyi, ZHANG Bainan, XU Fangfang, ZONG Boqiang. The cross-level double-edged-sword effect of boundary-spanning behavior on creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(11): 1340-1351. |
[7] | TONG DanDan, LI WenFu, LU Peng, YANG WenJing, YANG Dong, ZHANG QingLin, QIU Jiang. The neural basis of scientific innovation problem finding [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(11): 1253-1265. |
[8] | LUAN Mo, WU Shuang, LI Hong. The relationship between anticipated communication and creativity: The moderating role of construal level [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(10): 1178-1188. |
[9] | LUO Ping,SHI Junqi,ZHU Yanni,FANG Yanran. The influence of idiosyncratic deals on employee proactive career behavior and creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 81-92. |
[10] | WEI Lihua, LIU Zhiqiang, LIAO Shudi, LONG Lirong, LIAO Jianqiao. Collective psychological ownership, status conferral criteria and team creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 677-687. |
[11] | GUO Jichengsi,HUANG Jianping,WAN Xiaoang. The influence of target knowledge on path integration [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 188-195. |
[12] | SHEN Yimo,MA Chenlu,BAI Xinwen,ZHU Yanhan,LU Yunlin,ZHANG Qinglin,LIU Jun. Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity: The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 238-247. |
[13] | ZHANG Weiwei,HUANG Jianping,WAN Xiaoang. Influence of expectations on human path integration [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1219-1228. |
[14] | Xiaojun YUAN, Xiaoxia CUI, Zhengcao CAO, Hong KAN, Xiao WANG, Yamin WANG. Attentional bias towards threatening visual stimuli in a virtual reality-based visual search task [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 622-636. |
[15] | Weiguo LIU, Yanran FANG, Junqi SHI, Shenjiang MO. The impact of supervisor’s creativity expectation on team creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 667-677. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||