Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 400-412.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00400
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-02-10
Published:
2021-04-25
Online:
2021-02-22
Contact:
ZHANG Lihua
E-mail:lihuaz@ruc.edu.cn
Supported by:
JIANG Ping, ZHANG Lihua. (2021). Does conformity lead to gains? The effect of workplace ostracism on performance evaluation from a self-presentational view. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(4), 400-412.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00400
Variable | Facades of conformity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
Constant | 1.39 | 0.33 | 4.17*** | 1.24 | 0.33 | 3.78*** |
Ostracism manipulation | 0.32 | 0.08 | 3.94*** | 0.33 | 0.08 | 4.21*** |
Collectivism | 0.20 | 0.07 | 2.83** | 0.23 | 0.07 | 3.22** |
Ostracism manipulation × collectivism | 0.23 | 0.07 | 3.12** | |||
ΔR2 | 0.06** | |||||
Overall R2 | 0.17 | 0.23 |
Table 1 Study 1: Hierarchical regression analysis predicts facades of conformity
Variable | Facades of conformity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
Constant | 1.39 | 0.33 | 4.17*** | 1.24 | 0.33 | 3.78*** |
Ostracism manipulation | 0.32 | 0.08 | 3.94*** | 0.33 | 0.08 | 4.21*** |
Collectivism | 0.20 | 0.07 | 2.83** | 0.23 | 0.07 | 3.22** |
Ostracism manipulation × collectivism | 0.23 | 0.07 | 3.12** | |||
ΔR2 | 0.06** | |||||
Overall R2 | 0.17 | 0.23 |
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1.56 | 0.50 | — | |||||||||
2. Age | 31.44 | 4.54 | -0.14** | — | ||||||||
3. Tenure | 6.73 | 2.83 | -0.02 | 0.52** | — | |||||||
4. Self-esteem | 4.09 | 0.65 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.01 | — | ||||||
5. Self-leadership | 2.73 | 0.56 | -0.03 | 0.24** | 0.02 | 0.01 | — | |||||
6. Impression management | 3.19 | 0.62 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.21** | 0.04 | -0.27** | — | ||||
7. Workplace ostracism | 2.08 | 0.44 | -0.06 | 0.06 | -0.19** | -0.18** | 0.43** | -0.16** | — | |||
8. Employee collectivism | 3.14 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.16* | -0.06 | — | ||
9. Facades of conformity | 2.37 | 0.49 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.07 | -0.09 | 0.20** | -0.03 | 0.25** | 0.14* | — | |
10. Leader collectivism | 3.48 | 0.57 | -0.03 | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.14** | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | — |
11. Performance evaluation | 3.45 | 0.63 | 0.08 | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.14** | 0.06 | -0.13* | -0.25** | -0.10 | -0.04 | -0.08 |
Table 2 Study 2: mean, standard deviation, reliability and correlation coefficient between variables
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1.56 | 0.50 | — | |||||||||
2. Age | 31.44 | 4.54 | -0.14** | — | ||||||||
3. Tenure | 6.73 | 2.83 | -0.02 | 0.52** | — | |||||||
4. Self-esteem | 4.09 | 0.65 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.01 | — | ||||||
5. Self-leadership | 2.73 | 0.56 | -0.03 | 0.24** | 0.02 | 0.01 | — | |||||
6. Impression management | 3.19 | 0.62 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.21** | 0.04 | -0.27** | — | ||||
7. Workplace ostracism | 2.08 | 0.44 | -0.06 | 0.06 | -0.19** | -0.18** | 0.43** | -0.16** | — | |||
8. Employee collectivism | 3.14 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.16* | -0.06 | — | ||
9. Facades of conformity | 2.37 | 0.49 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.07 | -0.09 | 0.20** | -0.03 | 0.25** | 0.14* | — | |
10. Leader collectivism | 3.48 | 0.57 | -0.03 | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.14** | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | — |
11. Performance evaluation | 3.45 | 0.63 | 0.08 | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.14** | 0.06 | -0.13* | -0.25** | -0.10 | -0.04 | -0.08 |
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five-factor model A | 729.10 | 424 | 1.72 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Four-factor model B | 1226.67 | 428 | 2.87 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
Four-factor model C | 1376.82 | 428 | 3.22 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
Four-factor model D | 1553.71 | 428 | 3.63 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
Three-factor model E | 2093.61 | 431 | 4.86 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
Two-factor model F | 2570.93 | 433 | 5.94 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
Single-factor model G | 3264.59 | 434 | 7.52 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
Table 3 Study 2: confirmatory factor analysis results
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five-factor model A | 729.10 | 424 | 1.72 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Four-factor model B | 1226.67 | 428 | 2.87 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
Four-factor model C | 1376.82 | 428 | 3.22 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
Four-factor model D | 1553.71 | 428 | 3.63 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
Three-factor model E | 2093.61 | 431 | 4.86 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
Two-factor model F | 2570.93 | 433 | 5.94 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
Single-factor model G | 3264.59 | 434 | 7.52 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
Variables | First stage (dependent variable = facades of conformity) | Second stage (dependent variable = performance evaluation) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
Constant | 1.71 | 0.43 | 4.00*** | 3.78 | 0.59 | 6.43*** |
Gender | -0.11 | 0.06 | -1.76 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 1.04 |
Age | -0.01 | 0.01 | -1.06 | -0.00 | 0.01 | -0.13 |
Tenure | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.64 | -0.02 | 0.02 | -0.97 |
Evaluation unit | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
Self-esteem | -0.04 | 0.05 | -0.78 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 1.73 |
Self-leadership | 0.14 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.40 |
Impression management | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.28 | -0.09 | 0.06 | -1.33 |
Workplace ostracism | 0.15 | 0.08 | 1.64 | -0.51 | 0.10 | -4.98*** |
Employee collectivism | 0.14 | 0.06 | 2.38* | |||
Workplace ostracism × employee collectivism | 0.28 | 0.11 | 2.68** | |||
Facades of conformity | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.49 | |||
Leader collectivism | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.03 | |||
Facades of conformity × leader collectivism | 0.34 | 0.12 | 2.99** | |||
R2 | 0.15 | 0.19 | ||||
ΔR2 for interaction | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Table 4 Study 2: Coefficient estimates for the conditional indirect effects model
Variables | First stage (dependent variable = facades of conformity) | Second stage (dependent variable = performance evaluation) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
Constant | 1.71 | 0.43 | 4.00*** | 3.78 | 0.59 | 6.43*** |
Gender | -0.11 | 0.06 | -1.76 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 1.04 |
Age | -0.01 | 0.01 | -1.06 | -0.00 | 0.01 | -0.13 |
Tenure | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.64 | -0.02 | 0.02 | -0.97 |
Evaluation unit | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
Self-esteem | -0.04 | 0.05 | -0.78 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 1.73 |
Self-leadership | 0.14 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.40 |
Impression management | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.28 | -0.09 | 0.06 | -1.33 |
Workplace ostracism | 0.15 | 0.08 | 1.64 | -0.51 | 0.10 | -4.98*** |
Employee collectivism | 0.14 | 0.06 | 2.38* | |||
Workplace ostracism × employee collectivism | 0.28 | 0.11 | 2.68** | |||
Facades of conformity | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.49 | |||
Leader collectivism | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.03 | |||
Facades of conformity × leader collectivism | 0.34 | 0.12 | 2.99** | |||
R2 | 0.15 | 0.19 | ||||
ΔR2 for interaction | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Conditions | Indirect effect | SE | Boot LL 95% CI | Boot UL 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low employee collectivism, low leader collectivism | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.05 |
Low employee collectivism, high leader collectivism | 0.01 | 0.04 | -0.09 | 0.07 |
High employee collectivism, low leader collectivism | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.11 | 0.02 |
High employee collectivism, high leader collectivism | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
Table 5 Study 2: 95% Confidence Interval (CI) results for the conditional indirect effects
Conditions | Indirect effect | SE | Boot LL 95% CI | Boot UL 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low employee collectivism, low leader collectivism | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.05 |
Low employee collectivism, high leader collectivism | 0.01 | 0.04 | -0.09 | 0.07 |
High employee collectivism, low leader collectivism | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.11 | 0.02 |
High employee collectivism, high leader collectivism | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
[1] | Balliet, D., & Ferris, D. L. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 298-308. |
[2] | Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3-26. |
[3] | Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 145-174. |
[4] |
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
URL pmid: 7777651 |
[5] | Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229-283. |
[6] | Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. |
[7] | Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 400-417. |
[8] | Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187-206. |
[9] | Cable, D. M., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2013). Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-presentation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 1-36. |
[10] | Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Meindl, J. R. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 285-304. |
[11] | Chen, C., Yang, F., & Li, Y. Q. (2017). Workplace ostracism: A review on mechanisms and localization development. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(8), 1387-1400. |
[12] | Cheng, W., Huang, J. X., & Ma, J. H. (2019). Facades of conformity in organization: Concept, measurement, antecedents and consequences. Human Resources Development of China, 36(12), 53-68. |
[13] | Cullen, K. L., Gerbasi, A., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2018). Thriving in central network positions: The role of political skill. Journal of Management, 44(2), 682-706. |
[14] | Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3(1), 127-150. |
[15] |
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
URL pmid: 17402809 |
[16] |
English, T., & John, O. P. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: The mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13(2), 314-329.
doi: 10.1037/a0029847 URL pmid: 23046456 |
[17] | Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348-1366. |
[18] |
Ferris, D. L., Fatimah, S., Yan, M., Liang, L. H., Lian, H., & Brown, D. J. (2019). Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152, 138-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.001 URL |
[19] |
Ferris, D. L., Lian, H., Brown, D. J., & Morrison, R. (2015). Ostracism, self-esteem, and job performance: When do we self-verify and when do we self-enhance?. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 279-297.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0347 URL |
[20] |
Fiset, J., Al Hajj, R., & Vongas, J. G. (2017). Workplace ostracism seen through the lens of power. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1528-1546.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01528 URL pmid: 28928702 |
[21] | Gao, T. R., & He, A. Z. (2019). The influence mechanism between workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding: A moderated chain mediation model. Nankai Business Review, 22(3), 15-27. |
[22] | Gelfand, M. J., Aycan, Z., Erez, M., & Leung, K. (2017). Cross-cultural industrial organizational psychology and organizational behavior: A hundred-year journey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 514-529. |
[23] | Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday. |
[24] | Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 96-109. |
[25] | Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633-642. |
[26] | Hewlin, P. F. (2009). Wearing the cloak: Antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 727-741. |
[27] | Hewlin, P. F., Dumas, T. L., & Burnett, M. F. (2017). To thine own self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 178-199. |
[28] | Hewlin, P. F., Kim, S. S., & Song, Y. H. (2016). Creating facades of conformity in the face of job insecurity: A study of consequences and conditions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(3), 539-567. |
[29] | Hornstein, H. A. (1996). Brutal bosses and their prey. New York: Riverhead Books. |
[30] | Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216-232. |
[31] | Howard, M. C., Cogswell, J. E., & Smith, M. B. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 577-596. |
[32] | Huang, G. H., Zhao, H. H., Niu, X. Y., Ashford, S. J., & Lee, C. (2013). Reducing job insecurity and increasing performance ratings: Does impression management matter?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 852-862. |
[33] | Jackson, C. L., Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 884-899. |
[34] | Khan, A. K., Moss, S., Quratulain, S., & Hameed, I. (2018). When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2801-2826. |
[35] | Kim, S. H., Vincent, L. C., & Goncalo, J. A. (2013). Outside advantage: Can social ostracism fuel creative thought?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 605-611. |
[36] |
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245-1267.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.6.1245 URL pmid: 9177018 |
[37] | Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. |
[38] |
Leary, M. R., & Allen, A. B. (2011). Personality and persona: Personality processes in self-presentation. Journal of Personality, 79(6):1191-1218.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00704.x URL pmid: 21204836 |
[39] | Li, J., Liu, J., Liu, C., & Fan, W. (2016). The buffering effects of workplace ostracism: An empirical exploration based on needs theory. Chinese Journal of Management, 13(2), 221-228. |
[40] | Liang, L. H., Lian, H. W., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Hanig, S., & Keeping, L. M. (2016). Why are abusive supervisors abusive? A dual-system self-control model. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1385-1406. |
[41] | Liu, X. Y., Liu, J., Xu, J., & Wu, R. R. (2015). The effect of workplace ostracism on proactive behavior: The self-verification theory perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 826-836. |
[42] | Liu, Y. X., Zhang, J. W., Wang, C. Q., & Peng, K. P. (2013). An experimental study on the psychological mechanism of workplace ostracism’s effects on counterproductive work behavior. China Soft Science, 10, 157-167. |
[43] | MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 70-80. |
[44] | Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social ostracism motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55. |
[45] | Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. |
[46] | Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism‐collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127-142. |
[47] |
Pfundmair, M., Graupmann, V., Frey, D., & Aydin, N. (2015). The different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 363-378.
doi: 10.1177/0146167214566186 URL pmid: 25575872 |
[48] | Robinson, S. L., O’Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, 39(1), 203-231. |
[49] | Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
[50] | Samnani, A.-K., & Singh, P. (2016). Workplace bullying: Considering the interaction between individual and work environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 537-549. |
[51] | Schilpzand, P., de Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1), S57-S88. |
[52] | Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 361-388. |
[53] | Schneider, B., González-Romá, V., Ostroff, C., & West, M. A. (2017). Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 468-482. |
[54] | Shi, Q. M., & Zhao, H. (2002). A survey on the theory of self-presentation. Advances in Psychological Science, 10(4), 425-432. |
[55] | Sommer, K. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Self-evaluation, persistence, and performance following implicit ostracism: The role of trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 926-938. |
[56] |
Steinbauer, R., Renn, R. W., Chen, H. S., & Rhew, N. (2018). Workplace ostracism, self-regulation, and job performance: Moderating role of intrinsic work motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(6), 767-783.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1424110 URL pmid: 29308995 |
[57] | Tice, D. M. (1998). Effects of self-presentation depend on the audience. In J. Cooper & J. M. Darley (Eds.), The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 409-421). Washington, DC: APA. |
[58] | Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 41-133). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. |
[59] | Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. |
[60] |
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323 URL |
[61] | Vogel, R. M., &Mitchell, M. S. (2017). The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2218-2251. |
[62] | Wang, H. B., Yan, M., Wu, H. B. Li, J. R., & Wang, X. H. (2019). Hostile retaliation or identity motivation? The mechanisms of how newcomers’ role organizational socialization affects their workplace ostracism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(1), 128-140. |
[63] | Wang, Z., Sun, J. M., & Zhang, R. J. (2012). Effect of leader core self-evaluation on follower organizational citizenship behavior: The role of ethical leadership and collectivistic orientation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(9), 1231-1243. |
[64] | Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need‐threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314. |
[65] |
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748 URL pmid: 11079239 |
[66] | Wu, C. H., Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., & Lee, C. (2016). Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 362-378. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||