Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 244-258.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00244
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yuping1, LI Shanshan2, HE Yun2, WANG Doudou2, YANG Bo2()
Received:
2020-06-09
Published:
2021-03-25
Online:
2021-01-27
Contact:
YANG Bo
E-mail:zsdybo@sina.com
Supported by:
LIU Yuping, LI Shanshan, HE Yun, WANG Doudou, YANG Bo. (2021). Eliminating threat or venting rage? The relationship between narcissism and aggression in violent offenders. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(3), 244-258.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00244
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Vulnerable narcissism | 27.40 | 5.83 | — | |||||
2. Grandiose narcissism | 3.18 | 2.40 | 0.24** | — | ||||
3. Trait anger | 20.13 | 5.35 | 0.39** | 0.30** | — | |||
4 Psychological entitlement | 30.62 | 9.54 | 0.24** | 0.24** | 0.31** | — | ||
5. Impulsive aggression | 15.91 | 4.87 | 0.38** | 0.19** | 0.62** | 0.27** | — | |
6. Premeditated aggression | 22.09 | 7.71 | 0.42** | 0.31** | 0.60** | 0.35** | 0.72** | — |
Table 1 Descriptive statistics and correlation matrices (N = 498)
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Vulnerable narcissism | 27.40 | 5.83 | — | |||||
2. Grandiose narcissism | 3.18 | 2.40 | 0.24** | — | ||||
3. Trait anger | 20.13 | 5.35 | 0.39** | 0.30** | — | |||
4 Psychological entitlement | 30.62 | 9.54 | 0.24** | 0.24** | 0.31** | — | ||
5. Impulsive aggression | 15.91 | 4.87 | 0.38** | 0.19** | 0.62** | 0.27** | — | |
6. Premeditated aggression | 22.09 | 7.71 | 0.42** | 0.31** | 0.60** | 0.35** | 0.72** | — |
Model | c2 | df | c2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | GFI | IFI | NFI | TLI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 223.24 | 105 | 2.13 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
M2 | 226.64 | 107 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
Table 2 Fit Index of multi-medium model
Model | c2 | df | c2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | GFI | IFI | NFI | TLI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 223.24 | 105 | 2.13 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
M2 | 226.64 | 107 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
Figure 2. Structural equation model of multiple mediations between narcissism and aggression. Note. In order to keep it simple, only the structural model is kept and the measurement model is omitted. The path coefficients from latent variable to manifest variable are between 0.52 and 0.97. The coefficients in the figure are all standardized coefficients.
Number | Path | Standardized effect | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mediating Effect 1 | Vulnerable narcissism → trait anger → impulsive aggression | 0.30 | 0.05 | [0.195, 0.400] |
Mediating Effect 2 | Vulnerable narcissism → trait anger → premeditated aggression | 0.24 | 0.05 | [0.151, 0.335] |
Mediating Effect 3 | Vulnerable narcissism → psychological entitlement → impulsive aggression | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.013, 0.052] |
Mediating Effect 4 | Vulnerable narcissism → psychological entitlement → premeditated aggression | 0.04 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.075] |
Mediating Effect 5 | Grandiose narcissism → trait anger → impulsive aggression | 0.18 | 0.06 | [0.077, 0.302] |
Mediating Effect 6 | Grandiose narcissism → trait anger → premeditated aggression | 0.15 | 0.04 | [0.065, 0.232] |
Mediating Effect 7 | Grandiose narcissism → psychological entitlement → impulsive aggression | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.010, 0.048] |
Mediating Effect 8 | Grandiose narcissism → psychological entitlement → premeditated aggression | 0.03 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.062] |
Direct Effect 1 | Vulnerable narcissism → impulsive aggression | 0.18 | 0.08 | [0.035, 0.327] |
Direct Effect 2 | Vulnerable narcissism → premeditated aggression | 0.22 | 0.07 | [0.091, 0.349] |
Direct Effect 3 | Grandiose narcissism → impulsive aggression | -0.08 | 0.07 | [-0.227, 0.063] |
Direct Effect 4 | Grandiose narcissism → premeditated aggression | 0.06 | 0.07 | [-0.070, 0.196] |
Table 3 Bootstrap test for significance of main effects
Number | Path | Standardized effect | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mediating Effect 1 | Vulnerable narcissism → trait anger → impulsive aggression | 0.30 | 0.05 | [0.195, 0.400] |
Mediating Effect 2 | Vulnerable narcissism → trait anger → premeditated aggression | 0.24 | 0.05 | [0.151, 0.335] |
Mediating Effect 3 | Vulnerable narcissism → psychological entitlement → impulsive aggression | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.013, 0.052] |
Mediating Effect 4 | Vulnerable narcissism → psychological entitlement → premeditated aggression | 0.04 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.075] |
Mediating Effect 5 | Grandiose narcissism → trait anger → impulsive aggression | 0.18 | 0.06 | [0.077, 0.302] |
Mediating Effect 6 | Grandiose narcissism → trait anger → premeditated aggression | 0.15 | 0.04 | [0.065, 0.232] |
Mediating Effect 7 | Grandiose narcissism → psychological entitlement → impulsive aggression | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.010, 0.048] |
Mediating Effect 8 | Grandiose narcissism → psychological entitlement → premeditated aggression | 0.03 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.062] |
Direct Effect 1 | Vulnerable narcissism → impulsive aggression | 0.18 | 0.08 | [0.035, 0.327] |
Direct Effect 2 | Vulnerable narcissism → premeditated aggression | 0.22 | 0.07 | [0.091, 0.349] |
Direct Effect 3 | Grandiose narcissism → impulsive aggression | -0.08 | 0.07 | [-0.227, 0.063] |
Direct Effect 4 | Grandiose narcissism → premeditated aggression | 0.06 | 0.07 | [-0.070, 0.196] |
Total effect | Include path | Standardized effect | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Vulnerable narcissism predicts impulsive aggression | Mediating Effect 1 + Mediating Effect 3 + Direct Effect 1 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.344, 0.630] |
2. Vulnerable narcissism predicts premeditated aggression | Mediating Effect 2 + Mediating Effect 4 + Direct Effect 2 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.352, 0.618] |
3. Grandiose narcissism predicts impulsive aggression | Mediating Effect 5 + Mediating Effect 7 + Direct Effect 3 | 0.12 | 0.08 | [-0.035, 0.265] |
4. Grandiose narcissism predicts premeditated aggression | Mediating Effect 6 + Mediating Effect 8 + Direct Effect 4 | 0.23 | 0.07 | [0.092, 0.378] |
Table 4 Significance of total effect and differences
Total effect | Include path | Standardized effect | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Vulnerable narcissism predicts impulsive aggression | Mediating Effect 1 + Mediating Effect 3 + Direct Effect 1 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.344, 0.630] |
2. Vulnerable narcissism predicts premeditated aggression | Mediating Effect 2 + Mediating Effect 4 + Direct Effect 2 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.352, 0.618] |
3. Grandiose narcissism predicts impulsive aggression | Mediating Effect 5 + Mediating Effect 7 + Direct Effect 3 | 0.12 | 0.08 | [-0.035, 0.265] |
4. Grandiose narcissism predicts premeditated aggression | Mediating Effect 6 + Mediating Effect 8 + Direct Effect 4 | 0.23 | 0.07 | [0.092, 0.378] |
Variable | Provocative Group M ± SD | Control Group M ± SD | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 36.02 ± 5.57 | 35.59 ± 6.18 | 0.35 | 0.729 |
Educational level | 1.83 ± 0.80 | 1.91 ± 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.604 |
Original sentence (years) | 19.17 ± 7.65 | 19.02 ± 8.14 | 0.09 | 0.929 |
Time served (years) | 5.84 ± 3.36 | 5.39 ± 3.92 | 0.57 | 0.567 |
Grandiose narcissism | 1.93 ± 1.71 | 1.84 ± 1.71 | 0.26 | 0.795 |
Vulnerable narcissism | 26.89 ± 5.31 | 25.45 ± 6.59 | 1.14 | 0.259 |
Table 5 Basic Information and narcissism score in provocative group and control group
Variable | Provocative Group M ± SD | Control Group M ± SD | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 36.02 ± 5.57 | 35.59 ± 6.18 | 0.35 | 0.729 |
Educational level | 1.83 ± 0.80 | 1.91 ± 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.604 |
Original sentence (years) | 19.17 ± 7.65 | 19.02 ± 8.14 | 0.09 | 0.929 |
Time served (years) | 5.84 ± 3.36 | 5.39 ± 3.92 | 0.57 | 0.567 |
Grandiose narcissism | 1.93 ± 1.71 | 1.84 ± 1.71 | 0.26 | 0.795 |
Vulnerable narcissism | 26.89 ± 5.31 | 25.45 ± 6.59 | 1.14 | 0.259 |
Variable | Provocation Group M ± SD | Control Group M ± SD | t | p | Cohen’ d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hostile Perceptions | 14.93 ± 4.89 | 12.45 ± 4.48 | 2.50 | 0.014 | 0.53 |
Negative affect | 19.00 ± 6.39 | 16.14 ± 4.81 | 2.39 | 0.019 | 0.51 |
Perceived threat | 10.41 ± 4.45 | 8.30 ± 3.37 | 2.54 | 0.013 | 0.53 |
Aggressive behavior | 0.12 ± 2.01 | -0.71 ± 1.25 | 2.33 | 0.022 | 0.50 |
Table 6 Descriptive statistics and manipulation tests
Variable | Provocation Group M ± SD | Control Group M ± SD | t | p | Cohen’ d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hostile Perceptions | 14.93 ± 4.89 | 12.45 ± 4.48 | 2.50 | 0.014 | 0.53 |
Negative affect | 19.00 ± 6.39 | 16.14 ± 4.81 | 2.39 | 0.019 | 0.51 |
Perceived threat | 10.41 ± 4.45 | 8.30 ± 3.37 | 2.54 | 0.013 | 0.53 |
Aggressive behavior | 0.12 ± 2.01 | -0.71 ± 1.25 | 2.33 | 0.022 | 0.50 |
[1] | American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. |
[2] | Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, (1), 27-51. |
[3] | Bai, Y., & Wang, J. N. (2018). Reliability and validity of psychological entitlement scale in Chinese college students. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 6, (12), 752-759 |
[4] |
Barry, T. D., Thompson, A., Barry, C. T., Lochman, J. E., & Hill, K. (2007). The importance of narcissism in predicting proactive and reactive aggression in moderately to highly aggressive children. Aggressive Behavior, 33, (3), 185-197.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20198 URL pmid: 17444525 |
[5] | Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: A study with adults. Personality & Individual Differences, 52, (5), 571-575. |
[6] |
Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24, (11), 2201-2209.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749 URL pmid: 24022650 |
[7] | Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, (1), 219-229. |
[8] |
Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Thomaes, S., Ryu, E., & West, S. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77, (2), 427-446.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00553.x URL pmid: 19192074 |
[9] | Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, (1), 29-45. |
[10] | Chabrol, H., van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality & Individual Differences, 47, (7), 734-739. |
[11] | Chen, G. M. (2015). Losing face on social media: Threats to positive face lead to an indirect effect on retaliatory aggression through negative affect. Communication Research, 42, (6), 819-838. |
[12] | Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2019). Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor aggression paradigm. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, (5), 620-631. |
[13] |
Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Eisenberg, N., & Maffei, C. (2010). Relations of proactive and reactive dimensions of aggression to overt and covert narcissism in nonclinical adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 36, (1), 21-27.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20332 URL pmid: 19918915 |
[14] |
Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.015 URL |
[15] |
Gentile, B., Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 25, (4), 1120-1136.
doi: 10.1037/a0033192 URL |
[16] |
Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2014). Down-regulating narcissistic tendencies: Communal focus reduces state narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, (4), 488-500.
doi: 10.1177/0146167213516635 URL |
[17] |
Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Burton, K. A., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissism and self-presentation: Profiling grandiose and vulnerable narcissists' self-presentation tactic use. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 48-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.062 URL |
[18] |
Hart, W., Adams, J. M., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissistic responses to provocation: An examination of the rage and threatened-egotism accounts. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 152-156.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.049 URL |
[19] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, New York, USA: Guilford Press. |
[20] |
Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31 (4), 588-599.
doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204 URL |
[21] |
Hou, L. L., Jiang, Q., Wang, H. Z., & Li, C. R. (2017). The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: Based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49, (12), 1548-1558.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01548 URL |
[22] | Huang, L., Yang, T. Z., & Ji, Z. M. (2003). Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17, (1), 56-58. |
[23] |
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, (1), 12-18.
doi: 10.1177/1948550609347591 URL |
[24] |
Krizan, Z., & Johar, O. (2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, (5), 784-801.
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000013 URL pmid: 25545840 |
[25] |
Lambe, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Garner, E., & Walker, J. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, (2), 209-230.
doi: 10.1177/1524838016650190 URL pmid: 27222500 |
[26] |
Li, J. -B., Nie, Y. -G., Boardley, I. D., Dou, K., & Situ, Q. M. (2015). When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 41, (6), 544-555.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21594 URL pmid: 26075351 |
[27] |
Li, C., Sun, Y., Ho, M. Y., You, J., Shaver, P. R., & Wang, Z. (2016). State narcissism and aggression: The mediating roles of anger and hostile attributional bias. Aggressive Behavior, 42, (4), 333-345.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21629 URL pmid: 27283271 |
[28] |
Liu, Y. P., Zhao, H., Li, S. S., Zhang, Z., & Yang, B. (2019). The neurobiological evidence of antisocial personality disorder and its judicial implications. Advances in Psychological Science, 27, (10), 1726-1742.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01726 URL |
[29] | Luo, Y. L., & Zhang, D. J. (2011). Experimental study of attentional bias to negative emotion facial expressions in high trait anger individuals. Journal of Psychological Science, 34, (2), 322-327. |
[30] | Maples, J. L., Lamkin, J., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The Dirty Dozen and Short Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 26, (1), 326-331. |
[31] |
Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, (5), 1013-1042.
URL pmid: 21204843 |
[32] | Miller, J. D., & Maples, J. (2012). Trait personality models of narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism, and vulnerable narcissism. The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[33] | Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, (6), 556-563. |
[34] | Qiao, Y., Xie, B., & Zhang, M. D. (2009). The Chinese version of impulsive-premeditated aggression scale in adolescents with aggression: Its reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical and Brain Science, 18, (04), 366-368. |
[35] | Qin, F., & Xu, F. (2013). Review on the studies of the dark triad. Advances in Psychological Science, 21, (7), 1248-1261. |
[36] | Rasmussen, K. (2016). Entitled vengeance: A meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42, (4), 362-379. |
[37] | Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The dark triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, (4), 487-496. |
[38] | Reidy, D. E., Foster, J. D., & Zeichner, A. (2010). Narcissism and unprovoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 36, (6), 414-422. |
[39] | Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., Foster, J. D., & Martinez, M. A. (2008). Effects of narcissistic entitlement and exploitativeness on human physical aggression. Personality & Individual Differences, 44, (4), 865-875. |
[40] | Schoenleber, M., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Parallel syndromes: Two dimensions of narcissism and the facets of psychopathic personality in criminally involved individuals. Personality Disorders, 2, (2), 113-127. |
[41] | Spielberger, C. D. (1988). State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI) (Research edition). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. |
[42] | Stanford, M. S., Houston, R. J., Mathias, C. W., Villemarette-Pittman, N. R., Helfritz, L. E., & Conklin, S. M. (2003). Characterizing aggressive behavior. Assessment, 10, (2), 183-190. |
[43] | van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Claassen, L., & van, Dijk, W. W. (2007). Inmate emotion coping and psychological and physical well-being: The use of crying over spilled milk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, (5), 697-708. |
[44] | Wang, X. Y. (2008). A Study on the Influence of College Students' Narcissistic Personality on Self-esteem and Subjective Well-being. (Unpublished master's thesis). Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China. |
[45] |
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, (6), 1063-1070.
URL pmid: 3397865 |
[46] | Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, (4), 590-597. |
[47] | Wu, Y., & Wen, Z. L.(2011). Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, (12):1859-1867. |
[48] | Yang, C. C., Li, C. N., Wang, Z. H., & Bian, Y. F. (2016). The mediational roles of perceived threat, anger, and hostile attribution bias between state narcissism and aggression. Psychological Development and Education, 32 (2), 236-245. |
[49] | Yu, Z. K., Liu, Y. Z., Luo, Y., & Cai, H. J. (2019). Adaptive narcissism and maladaptive narcissism: Diverse evidences for the distinction. Advances in Psychological Science, 27, (1), 96-105. |
[50] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12, (6), 942-950. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||