DOES PRIORITY OF PERCEPTION WITHIN INHIBITION OF RETURN EXIST UNDER DIFFERENT ATTENTIONAL ORIENTING

Abstract

Abstract: Priority of Pereephon (POP) within inhibihon of return (IOR) means that astimulus in the cued position will be perceived earlier than that in the uncued positionin contrast to the RT data. The aim of this study was to find if POP existed underdifferent attentional orienting. Two experiments were carried out by method oftemporal order judgements (TOJs) within IOR paradigm. College students were servedas subects. Experiment 1 showed that POP existed at locations being cued successi-vely; experiment 2 showed that POP also existed when attention was distributed bydouble cueing. It was concluded that POP could exist at different conditions of visualorienting within IOR, not only under focused attention. These results implied that POPwas a relatively general phenomenon in nature and could be considered as strongsupport for the response-related view on IOK

Key words: attentional orienting, inhibition of return, priority of perception, temporal order judgements, response-related view

Li Xiaoxuan, Wang Su(Departwent of Psychology, Beijing University, Beijing, 100871). (1999). DOES PRIORITY OF PERCEPTION WITHIN INHIBITION OF RETURN EXIST UNDER DIFFERENT ATTENTIONAL ORIENTING. , 31(03), 241-248.

[1]	ZHANG Ming, WANG Tingting, WU Xiaogang, ZHANG Yue’e, WANG Aijun. Effects of integration of facial expression and emotional voice on inhibition of return [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(4): 331-342.
[2]	WANG Hui-Yuan, CHEN Ai-Rui, ZHANG Ming. Meaningful contingent attentional orienting effects: Spatial location-based inhibition and capture [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(2): 113-127.
[3]	Xiaoyu TANG, Jiaying SUN, Xing PENG. The effect of bimodal divided attention on inhibition of return with audiovisual targets [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 257-268.
[4]	PENG Xing, CHANG Ruosong, LI Qi, WANG Aijun, TANG Xiaoyu. Visually induced inhibition of return affects the audiovisual integration under different SOA conditions [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 759-771.
[5]	ZHANG Yan, CAO Huimin, ZHENG Yuanjie, REN Yanju. Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to and disengagement from rewarded distractors [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 377-389.
[6]	WANG Aijun, LIU Xiaole, TANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Ming. Inhibition of return at different eccentricities in visual field under three-dimensional (3D) world [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 723-732.
[7]	XU Ju, HU Yuanyan, WANG Shuang, LI Aisu, ZHANG Ming, ZHANG Yang. Cognitive neural mechanism of training effect on inhibition of return: Evidence from an ERP study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 658-670.
[8]	XU Ju, MA Fangyuan, ZHANG Ming, ZHANG Yang. Dissociation of Inhibitory Tagging from Inhibition of Return by Long-term Training [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 981-991.
[9]	WANG Aijun, LI Biqin, ZHANG Ming. Location-based Inhibition of Return along Depth Plane in Three-dimensional Space [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 859-868.
[10]	FAN Hainan; XU Baihua. The Role of Color and Identity of an Object in Inhibition of Return in a Dynamic Display [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1628-1638.
[11]	ZHANG Yu;ZHENG Xifu;HUANG Shanshan;LI Yue;DU Xiaofen;ZHOU Wei. Inhibition of Return in Trait Anxieties Under Different Cues [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 446-452.
[12]	XU Danni;ZHANG Jiayue;LI Xianchun. Sex Differences in Inhibition of Return in Face-gender Discrimination [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 161-168.
[13]	WANG Jingxin;JIA Liping;BAI Xuejun;LUO Yuejia. Emotional Faces Processing Takes Precedence of Inhibition of Return: ERPs Study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(1): 1-10.
[14]	LIU Pan,XIE Ning,WU Yan-Hong. The Modulation of Intentional Control on Automatic Inhibition in Cognitive Aging [J]. , 2010, 42(10): 981-987.
[15]	DENG Xiao-Hong,ZHANG De-Xuan,HUANG Shi-Xue,YUAN Wen,ZHOU Xiao-Lin. Effects of Supra- and Sub-liminal Emotional Cues on Inhibition of Return [J]. , 2010, 42(03): 325-333.

DOES PRIORITY OF PERCEPTION WITHIN INHIBITION OF RETURN EXIST UNDER DIFFERENT ATTENTIONAL ORIENTING

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments