Is older adult happier with more filial Piety children? The role of filial responsibility expectation of older adult

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.013

Abstract

Key words: filial responsibility expectation, filial support behavior, quadratic polynomial regression with response surface analysis, loneliness, life satisfaction

Cite this article

LI Xiying, JIN Yitong, LIU Jing, ZHANG Xingyu, PI Zhongling. (2022). Is older adult happier with more filial Piety children? The role of filial responsibility expectation of older adult. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(11), 1381-1390.

share this article

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.013

https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/Y2022/V54/I11/1381

Figures/Tables 5

The relationship between filial discrepancy and life satisfaction

Variables	Polynomial regression						A quadratic polynomial regression with response surface analysis
Variables	β	t	p	ΔR²	F	p		β	t	p
Emotional expectation	1.19	3.05	0.003	0.07	5.36	0.001	a₁	3.23	4.51	< 0.001
Emotional support	2.04	3.71	< 0.001				a₂	−0.86	−3.27	0.001
Emotional expectation²	−0.11	−0.07	0.945				a₃	−0.86	−1.36	0.176
Emotional expectation × Emotional support	−0.13	−0.58	0.564				a₄	−0.61	−1.70	0.090
Emotional support²	−0.72	−3.70	0.000
Contact expectation	0.10	0.23	0.822	0.04	2.84	0.039	a₁	1.74	2.62	0.010
Contact support	1.64	3.49	0.001				a₂	−0.14	−0.58	0.565
Contact expectation²	−0.01	−0.04	0.971				a₃	−1.54	−2.39	0.018
Contact expectation × Contact support	0.34	1.73	0.086				a₄	−0.82	−2.24	0.026
Contact support²	−0.47	−2.68	0.008
Information expectation	0.84	1.90	0.060	0.06	4.51	0.004	a₁	2.73	4.65	< 0.001
Information support	1.89	4.24	< 0.001				a₂	−0.51	−2.28	0.024
Information expectation ²	0.21	1.39	0.168				a₃	−1.05	−1.59	0.117
Information expectation × Information support	−0.17	−0.88	0.378				a₄	−0.17	−0.49	0.627
Information support²	−0.55	−3.00	0.003

The relationship between filial discrepancy and life satisfaction

Variables	Polynomial regression						A quadratic polynomial regression with response surface analysis
Variables	β	t	p	ΔR²	F	p		β	t	p
Emotional expectation	1.19	3.05	0.003	0.07	5.36	0.001	a₁	3.23	4.51	< 0.001
Emotional support	2.04	3.71	< 0.001				a₂	−0.86	−3.27	0.001
Emotional expectation²	−0.11	−0.07	0.945				a₃	−0.86	−1.36	0.176
Emotional expectation × Emotional support	−0.13	−0.58	0.564				a₄	−0.61	−1.70	0.090
Emotional support²	−0.72	−3.70	0.000
Contact expectation	0.10	0.23	0.822	0.04	2.84	0.039	a₁	1.74	2.62	0.010
Contact support	1.64	3.49	0.001				a₂	−0.14	−0.58	0.565
Contact expectation²	−0.01	−0.04	0.971				a₃	−1.54	−2.39	0.018
Contact expectation × Contact support	0.34	1.73	0.086				a₄	−0.82	−2.24	0.026
Contact support²	−0.47	−2.68	0.008
Information expectation	0.84	1.90	0.060	0.06	4.51	0.004	a₁	2.73	4.65	< 0.001
Information support	1.89	4.24	< 0.001				a₂	−0.51	−2.28	0.024
Information expectation ²	0.21	1.39	0.168				a₃	−1.05	−1.59	0.117
Information expectation × Information support	−0.17	−0.88	0.378				a₄	−0.17	−0.49	0.627
Information support²	−0.55	−3.00	0.003

Figure 1. The relationship between filial discrepancy in emotional expectation and support and life satisfaction.

Figure 1. The relationship between filial discrepancy in emotional expectation and support and life satisfaction.

Figure 2. The relationship between filial discrepancy in contact expectation and support and life satisfaction.

Figure 2. The relationship between filial discrepancy in contact expectation and support and life satisfaction.

Table 2 The relationship between filial discrepancy and loneliness

Variables	Polynomial regression						A quadratic polynomial regression with response surface analysis
Variables	β	t	p	ΔR²	F	p		β	t	p
Emotional expectation	−0.74	−1.14	0.256	0.04	2.78	0.042	a₁	−3.37	−2.81	0.006
Emotional support	−2.63	−2.85	0.005				a₂	0.99	2.25	0.025
Emotional expectation²	−0.27	−0.99	0.323				a₃	1.88	1.79	0.076
Emotional expectation × Emotional support	0.45	1.25	0.214				a₄	0.09	0.15	0.884
Emotional support²	0.81	2.47	0.015
Instrumental expectation	−0.47	−0.59	0.559	0.02	1.27	0.285	—
Instrumental support	−0.94	−1.42	0.157
Instrumental expectation²	0.11	0.36	0.722
Instrumental expectation × Instrumental support	0.58	1.61	0.108
Instrumental support²	−0.27	−1.00	0.319
Contact expectation	0.52	0.67	0.504	0.01	1.36	0.780	—
Contact support	−1.88	−2.35	0.020
Contact expectation²	−0.07	−0.25	0.804
Contact expectation × Contact support	−0.04	−0.11	0.910
Contact support²	0.31	1.02	0.309
Information expectation	−0.32	−0.43	0.670	0.02	1.58	0.193	—
Information support	−1.53	−2.02	0.045
Information expectation ²	−0.29	−1.13	0.258
Information expectation × Information support	−0.04	−0.14	0.892
Information support²	0.60	1.94	0.054

Table 2 The relationship between filial discrepancy and loneliness

Variables	Polynomial regression						A quadratic polynomial regression with response surface analysis
Variables	β	t	p	ΔR²	F	p		β	t	p
Emotional expectation	−0.74	−1.14	0.256	0.04	2.78	0.042	a₁	−3.37	−2.81	0.006
Emotional support	−2.63	−2.85	0.005				a₂	0.99	2.25	0.025
Emotional expectation²	−0.27	−0.99	0.323				a₃	1.88	1.79	0.076
Emotional expectation × Emotional support	0.45	1.25	0.214				a₄	0.09	0.15	0.884
Emotional support²	0.81	2.47	0.015
Instrumental expectation	−0.47	−0.59	0.559	0.02	1.27	0.285	—
Instrumental support	−0.94	−1.42	0.157
Instrumental expectation²	0.11	0.36	0.722
Instrumental expectation × Instrumental support	0.58	1.61	0.108
Instrumental support²	−0.27	−1.00	0.319
Contact expectation	0.52	0.67	0.504	0.01	1.36	0.780	—
Contact support	−1.88	−2.35	0.020
Contact expectation²	−0.07	−0.25	0.804
Contact expectation × Contact support	−0.04	−0.11	0.910
Contact support²	0.31	1.02	0.309
Information expectation	−0.32	−0.43	0.670	0.02	1.58	0.193	—
Information support	−1.53	−2.02	0.045
Information expectation ²	−0.29	−1.13	0.258
Information expectation × Information support	−0.04	−0.14	0.892
Information support²	0.60	1.94	0.054

Figure 3. The relationship between filial discrepancy in emotional expectation and support and loneliness.

Figure 3. The relationship between filial discrepancy in emotional expectation and support and loneliness.

References

Related Articles 15

[1]	Guoting WU, Minqiang ZHANG, Yuhan NI, Yawei YANG, Chengming QI, Jianxing WU. Changes in loneliness among elderly people and its effect factors: A latent transition analysis [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1061-1070.
[2]	Qili XIE,Chongjing LI,Xiaoshan QUAN,Guangrong JIANG, . Couples when young and companions when aged: The relationship between marital attachment and loneliness of left behind elderly [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 771-781.
[3]	Ruosong YAO,Mengshi GUO,Haosheng YE. The mediating effects of hope and loneliness on the relationship between social support and social well-being in the elderly [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1151-1158.
[4]	WANG Tao; FENG Wenting; WEI Hua; ZHOU Nan. Loneliness makes me fall in love with you: The influence of product display on lonely individual’s product preference [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 398-409.
[5]	CHEN Rui; ZHENG Yuhuang. The Impact of Loneliness on Consumer Preference of Uncertain Consumption: New Products, Product Packaging and Probabilistic Promotions [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1067-1076.
[6]	TIAN Lumei;ZHANG Wenxin;CHEN Guanghui. Effects of Parental Support, Friendship Quality on Loneliness and Depression: To Test An Indirect Effect Model [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 238-251.
[7]	LIU Junsheng;ZHOU Ying;LI Dan. Developmental Trajectories of Loneliness During Middle and Late Childhood: A Latent Growth Curve Analysis [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 179-192.
[8]	LI Caina;DANG Jianning;HE Shanshan;LI Hongmei. Shyness and Loneliness: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Self-efficacy [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1251-1260.
[9]	TIAN Lu-Mei,CHEN Guang-Hui,WANG Shu-Qiong,LIU Hai-Jiao,ZHANG Wen-Xin. Effects of Parental Support and Friendship Support on Loneliness and Depression During Early and Middle Adolescence [J]. , 2012, 44(7): 944-956.
[10]	ZHANG Mian,LI Hai,WEI Jun,YANG Bai-Yin . Cross-over Effects or Direct Effects? The Mechanism Linking Work-family Conflict with Outcomes [J]. , 2011, 43(05): 573-588.
[11]	Zhou-Zongkui,Zhao-Dongmei,Sun-Xiaojun,Ding-Xianfeng. Children’s Experiences with Peers and Loneliness: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study [J]. , 2006, 38(05): 743-750.
[12]	Zhou-Zongkui，Sun-Xiaojun,Zhao-Dongmei,Hsueh-Yeh. The Test of the Mediator Variable between Peer Relationship and Loneliness in Middle Childhood [J]. , 2005, 37(06): 776-783.
[13]	Xin Ziqiang,Chi Liping. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAMILY FUNCTIONING AND CHILDREN'S LONELINESS: THE ROLE OF MEDIATOR [J]. , 2003, 35(02): 216-221.
[14]	Zang Liwei (Beijing University of Physical Education,Beijing 10084) Leung Jinpang ( Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong). ATHLETES' LIFE SATISFACTION: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SELF-ESTEEM AND COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM [J]. , 2002, 34(02): 51-58.
[15]	Yu Guoliang, Xin Ziqiang, Luo Xiaolu(Institute of Developmental Psychology,Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875). THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LONELINESS, PEER ACCEPTANCE AND THEIR RELATION TO FAMILY FUNCTIONING [J]. , 2000, 32(01): 59-64.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP