ZHENG Siqi, MENG Yingfang, HUANG Fajie. (2022). Target decision or action? The role of action in the attentional boost effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(11), 1325-1339.
Figure 1.Encoding phase under different conditions in Experiments 1-3 (a) and Experiment 4(b).
Figure 1. Encoding phase under different conditions in Experiments 1-3 (a) and Experiment 4(b).
Figure 2.Results of Experiment 1. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 2. Results of Experiment 1. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 3.Results of Experiment 2. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 3. Results of Experiment 2. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 4.Results of Experiment 3. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 4. Results of Experiment 3. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 5.Results of Experiment 4. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor vs. Baseline) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 5. Results of Experiment 4. Mean-corrected hit rates (± SE) as a function of attention type (Target vs. Distractor vs. Baseline) × detection type (Go-target vs. NoGo-target); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001