Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 895-908.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00895
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yinling1, YU Zhen2, MAI Xiaoqin1()
Received:
2019-06-01
Published:
2020-07-25
Online:
2020-05-25
Contact:
MAI Xiaoqin
E-mail:maixq@ruc.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZHANG Yinling, YU Zhen, MAI Xiaoqin. (2020). The influence of social value orientation on self-other risk decision-making and its mechanisms. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(7), 895-908.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00895
Figure 2. Heatmap of gambling frequency for different potential loss (L)/gain (G) under two beneficiary conditions. White means gambling frequency is 1, Black means gambling frequency is 0.
Figure 3. The frequency of gambling (A), loss aversion (B), sensitivity to potential loss (C) of proselfs and prosocials, and the mediation of sensitivity to potential loss of others on the SVO effect (D). Self-G and Self-L respectively represent the potential gain and potential loss when making decisions for self, Other-G and Others-L respectively represent the potential gain and potential loss when making decisions for others. a is the SVO effect of sensitivity to potential loss of others, b is the effect of sensitivity to potential loss of others on the degree of risk-taking in decision-making for others, a×b is the indirect effect, c is the total effect, c' is the direct effect of mediation model, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, same as below.
Figure 4. The relationship between social value orientation and empathy (A) and other-self risk-taking difference (B). The Interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) reflects the ability of empathy, while the frequency difference of gambling refers to the difference in risk-taking for others and for oneself when EV < 0.
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 SVO (proself, prosocial) | 1 | |||
2 The partial regression coefficient of L when making decision for others | -0.273* | 1 | ||
3 EV < 0, the gambling frequency of making decision for others | -0.515*** | 0.524*** | 1 | |
4 EV < 0, the gambling frequency difference of other-self decision-making | -0.510*** | 0.472*** | 0.873*** | 1 |
Table 1 Correlation coefficient of each variable
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 SVO (proself, prosocial) | 1 | |||
2 The partial regression coefficient of L when making decision for others | -0.273* | 1 | ||
3 EV < 0, the gambling frequency of making decision for others | -0.515*** | 0.524*** | 1 | |
4 EV < 0, the gambling frequency difference of other-self decision-making | -0.510*** | 0.472*** | 0.873*** | 1 |
1 |
Albrecht K., Volz K. G., Sutter M., Laibson D. I., & von Cramon, D. Y.(2011). What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 218-225.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq046 URL pmid: 20529885 |
2 | Andersson O., Holm H. J., Tyran J. R., & Erik W . ( 2013). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. SSRN Electronic Journal, 62(1), 29-36. from: |
3 |
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S .(2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34 2, 163-175.
doi: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 URL pmid: 15162935 |
4 |
Beisswanger A. H., Stone E. R., Hupp J. M., & Allgaier L . ( 2003). Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25 2, 121-135.
doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_3 URL |
5 | Bromiley, P., Curley, S. P . ( 1992). Individual differences in risk taking. Risk-taking behavior, 16 6, 482-497. |
6 |
Canessa N., Crespi C., Motterlini M., Baud-Bovy G., Chierchia G., Pantaleo G., … Caooa S . ( 2013). The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33 36, 14307-14317.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013 URL pmid: 24005284 |
7 | Chakravarty S., Harrison G. W., Haruvy E. E., & Rutstrom E. E . ( 2011). Are you risk averse over other people’s money?. Southern Economic Journal, 77 4, 901-913. |
8 |
Davis, M. H . (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 1, 113-126.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 URL |
9 |
Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S. ( 2008). Social value orientation: Related to empathy and the ability to read the mind in the eyes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148 6, 711-726.
doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.6.711-726 URL pmid: 19058659 |
10 |
de Cremer, D., & van Lange,P. A. M . ( 2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15 S1, S5-S18.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984 URL |
11 |
de Martino B., Camerer C. F., & Adolphs R . ( 2010). Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 8, 3788-3792.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910230107 URL |
12 |
Emonds G., Declerck C. H., Boone C., Vandervliet E. J. M., & Parizel P. M . (2011). Comparing the neural basis of decision making in social dilemmas of people with different social value orientations, a fMRI study. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, Economics, 4(1, 11-24.
doi: 10.1037/a0020151 URL |
13 |
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaloy, O. ( 2010). Myopic investment management. Review of Finance, 14 3, 521-542.
doi: 10.1093/rof/rfp019 URL |
14 |
Evans, J. S. B. T . (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7( 10), 454-459.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012 URL pmid: 14550493 |
15 |
Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. G . (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39 2, 175-191.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 URL |
16 |
Fermin A. S. R., Sakagami M., Kiyonari T., Li Y., Matsumoto Y., & Yamagishi T . (2016). Representation of economic preferences in the structure and function of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 20982.
doi: 10.1038/srep20982 URL |
17 | Fu X. L. (2016), Emotional psychology. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press. |
18 |
Genauck A., Quester S., Wüstenberg T., Mörsen C., Heinz A., & Romanczuk-Seiferth N . (2017). Reduced loss aversion in pathological gambling and alcohol dependence is associated with differential alterations in amygdala and prefrontal functioning. Scientific Reports, 7( 1, 16306.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16433-y URL pmid: 29176580 |
19 |
Haruno, M., & Frith, C.D . (2010). Activity in the amygdala elicited by unfair divisions predicts social value orientation. Nature Neuroscience, 13 2, 160-161.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2468 URL pmid: 20023652 |
20 |
Haruno M., Kimura M., & Frith C. D . ( 2014). Activity in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala underlies individual differences in prosocial and individualistic economic choices. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 8, 1861-1870.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00589 URL |
21 | Hastie R.,& Dawes, R. M. (2013). Rational choice in an uncertain world——the psychology of judgment and decision making. Beijing: People's Posts and Telecommunications Press. |
22 |
Hayes, A.(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51 3, 335-337.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2014.51.issue-3 URL |
23 |
Hu X., Xu Z., & Mai X . (2017). Social value orientation modulates the processing of outcome evaluation involving others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12 11, 1730-1739.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx102 URL pmid: 28981906 |
24 |
Judd C. M., Kenny D. A., & Mcclelland G. H . (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6(2, 115-134.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.115 URL pmid: 11411437 |
25 |
Jung D., Sul S., & Kim H . ( 2013). Dissociable neural processes underlying risky decisions for self versus other. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 15.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00015 URL pmid: 23519016 |
26 |
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 2, 263-292.
doi: 10.2307/1914185 URL |
27 |
Kanagaretnam K., Mestelman S., Nainar K., & Shehata M . (2009). The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 3, 368-380.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.12.003 URL |
28 |
Kermer D. A., Driver-Linn E., Wilson T. D., & Gilbert D. T . ( 2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17 8, 649-653.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x URL pmid: 16913944 |
29 | Li, S .(2016). Decision-making psychology: Equate-to- differentiate. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press. |
30 |
Li Y. J., Kenrick D. T., Griskevicius V., & Neuberg S. L . (2012). Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 3, 550-561.
doi: 10.1037/a0025844 URL |
31 |
Liu S., Gonzalez G., & Warneken F . (2018). Worth the wait: children trade off delay and reward in self- and other-benefiting decisions. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12702.
doi: 10.1111/desc.12702 URL pmid: 29978941 |
32 |
Liu Y. F., Wang P., Zhuang J. Y., Zhong J., Sun Q. Z., & Liu Y . ( 2014). Self-other differences in decision-making: questions, studies and reflection. Advances in Psychological Science, 22 4, 580-587.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00580 URL |
33 |
Liu Y., Li S., Lin W., Li W., Yan X., Wang X., … Ma Y . ( 2019). Oxytocin modulates social value representations in the amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 22 4, 633-641.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0351-1 URL pmid: 30911182 |
34 | Loewenstein, G. F., & O’Donoghue, T .( 2004). Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=539843 |
35 |
Loewenstein G. F., Weber E. U., Hsee C. K., & Welch N . (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127 2, 267-286.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 URL pmid: 11316014 |
36 |
Lu, J. Y.,& Shang, X. S . (2018). Making decisions for others: Multi-dimensional psychological mechanisms and decision feelings. Advances in Psychological Science, 26 9, 1545-1552.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.0545 URL |
37 | McClintock, C. G . (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12 1, 121-137. |
38 |
Mengarelli F., Moretti L., Faralla V., Vindras P., & Sirigu A . (2014). Economic decisions for others: an exception to loss aversion law. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85042.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085042 URL pmid: 24454788 |
39 |
Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A . (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18 1, 13-41.
doi: 10.1177/1088868313501745 URL |
40 | Murphy R. O., Ackermann K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 771-781. |
41 |
Ogawa A., Ueshima A., Inukai K., & Kameda T . ( 2018). Deciding for others as a neutral party recruits risk-neutral perspective-taking: Model-based behavioral and fMRI experiments. Scientific Reports, 8( 1), 12857.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31308-6 URL pmid: 30150657 |
42 |
Pahlke J., Strasser S., & Vieider F. M . ( 2012). Risk-taking for others under accountability. Economics Letters, 114 1, 102-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.09.037 URL |
43 |
Park S. Q., Kahnt T., Dogan A., Strang S., Fehr E., & Tobler P. N . ( 2017). A neural link between generosity and happiness. Nature Communications, 8, 15964.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15964 URL pmid: 28696410 |
44 |
Phelps E. A., Lempert K. M., & Sokol-Hessner P . ( 2014). Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37 1, 263-287.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119 URL |
45 |
Pletzer J. L., Balliet D., Joireman J., Kuhlman D. M., Voelpel S. C., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32 1, 62-83.
doi: 10.1002/per.2139 URL |
46 |
Polman, E.(2012). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119 2, 141-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.005 URL |
47 | Qi Y., Wu H., & Liu X . (2018). Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: an erp study. Neuropsychologia, 122, 135-144. |
48 | Qi Y. Y., Wu H. Y., & Liu X . ( 2017). The influences of social value orientation on prosocial behaviors: The evidences from behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Chinese Science Bulletin, 62 11, 1136-1144. |
49 |
Rand D. G., Peysakhovich A., Kraft-Todd G. T., Newman G. E., Wurzbacher O., Nowak M. A., & Greene J. D . ( 2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms4677 URL pmid: 24751464 |
50 | Rong X., Sun B. H., Huang X. Z., Cai M. Y., & Li W. J . ( 2010). Reliabilities and validities of Chinese version of interpersonal reactivity index. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18 2, 158-160. |
51 | Shu H.,& Zhang, Y. X.( 2008). Research methods in psychology: Experimental design and data analysis Beijing: People’s Education Press Experimental design and data analysis. Beijing: People’s Education Press. |
52 |
Sokol-Hessner P., Camerer C. F., Phelps E. A . ( 2013). Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases amygdala responses to losses. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8( 3), 341-350.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss002 URL pmid: 22275168 |
53 | Sokol-Hessner P., Hsu M., Curley N. G., Delgado M. R., Camerer C. F., & Phelps E. A . ( 2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion. Proceedings of the Natitonal Academy of Sciences, 106 13, 5035-5040. |
54 |
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F . ( 2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 5, 645-665.
doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003435 URL pmid: 11301544 |
55 |
Stone E. R., Yates A. J., & Caruthers A. S . ( 2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 9, 1797-1824.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-9 URL |
56 |
Sul S., Tobler P. N., Hein G., Leiberg S., Jung D., Fehr E., & Kim H . ( 2015). Spatial gradient in value representation along the medial prefrontal cortex reflects individual differences in prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 25, 7851-7856.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423895112 URL |
57 |
Sun Q., Liu Y., Zhang H., & Lu J . ( 2016). Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157 4, 502-512.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471 URL pmid: 27685243 |
58 |
Tom S. M., Fox C. R., Trepel C., & Poldrack R. A . (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315 5811, 515-518.
doi: 10.1126/science.1134239 URL pmid: 17255512 |
59 |
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D .(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
doi: 10.1007/BF00122574 URL |
60 |
van Lange, P. A. M . ( 1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 2, 337-349.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337 URL |
61 |
van Lange, P. A. M . (2000). Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. European Review of Social Psychology, 11 1, 297-331.
doi: 10.1080/14792772043000068 URL |
62 |
van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers R., Schuyt T. N. M., & Vugt M. V . (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29 4, 375-384.
doi: 10.1080/01973530701665223 URL |
63 |
van Lange, P. A. M., Otten W., de Bruin E. M., & Joireman J. A . (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 4, 733-746.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.733 URL pmid: 9325591 |
64 |
van Lange, P. A. M., Schippers M., & Balliet D . (2011). Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 3, 279-284.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.038 URL |
65 |
van Prooijen J. W., Ståhl T., Eek D., & van Lange, P. A. M.(2012). Injustice for all or just for me? Social value orientation predicts responses to own versus other’s procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 10, 1247-1258.
doi: 10.1177/0146167212448826 URL |
66 |
Wei Z., Zhao Z., & Zheng Y . (2016). Moderating effects of social value orientation on the effect of social influence in prosocial decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 952.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00952 URL pmid: 27445917 |
67 |
Wen, Z. L.,& Ye, B. J . (2014). Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22 5, 731-745.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731 URL |
68 |
Zhang Y., Chen S., Hu X., & Mai X . ( 2019). Increasing the difference in decision making for oneself and for others by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 185.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00185 URL pmid: 30787900 |
69 |
Zhang X., Liu Y., Chen X., Shang X., & Liu Y . (2017). Decisions for others are less risk-averse in the gain frame and less risk-seeking in the loss frame than decisions for the self. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1601.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01601 URL pmid: 28966604 |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||