Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (5): 549-557    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00549
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 彩民命运控制与问题购彩的关系: 基于意义维持模型的视角
胡月1;王斌1;马红宇2;李 改1
 (1华中师范大学体育学院; 2华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079)
 Fate control and problem lottery playing: The perspective of meaning maintenance
 HU Yue1; WANG Bin1; MA Hongyu2; LI Gai1
 (1 School of physical Education & Sport, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
全文: PDF(431 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  中国彩民在购彩过程中表现出更多的命运控制信念, 但是命运控制对我国彩民问题购彩的影响及其作用机制少有研究涉及。在意义维持模型的视角下, 本研究构建了一个多重中介模型, 考察命运控制对问题购彩的影响以及逃避动机、控制幻觉和预期在其中的作用机制。本研究采用问卷法对2241名体育彩民进行调查, 结果发现:(1)命运控制、逃避动机、控制幻觉、预期和问题购彩呈显著正相关; (2)命运控制不仅可以直接预测问题购彩, 还可以通过5条路径的间接作用影响彩民的问题购彩:逃避动机的中介作用, 控制幻觉的中介作用, 预期的中介作用, 逃避动机和控制幻觉的序列中介作用, 逃避动机和预期的序列中介作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
胡月
王斌
马红宇
李改
关键词  问题购彩命运控制 逃避动机 控制幻觉 预期    
Abstract: Problem lottery playing has received increasing attention nowadays. Previous studies reveal that lottery-specific beliefs, such as lottery attitudes, risk perception, and irrational belief, play significant roles in the development and maintenance of problem lottery playing which are mostly based on social-cognitive theory or theory of planned behavior. Few studies have investigated the relationship between general belief and problem lottery playing. Fate control, as an important general belief, provides an account of our experiences and is also a form of meaning. Studies have shown that fate control is correlate with various psychological indicators (e.g., negative affect, study intention, and problem gambling), and it is particularly strong in Asian cultures. However, little is known about the effect of fate control on problem lottery playing and its mediators explaining this relationship. In the perspective of meaning maintenance model, this study aimed to examine the effect of fate control on problem lottery playing, and the mediating roles of avoidance motivation, illusion of control, and expectation deviation. A sample of 2241 sport lottery players (1592 male, 649 female) were recruited for the study. They were required to complete a battery of self-report questionnaires. Fate control was measured by the subscales of Social Axioms Survey. Avoidance motivation was measured by subscales of lottery playing motivation adapted from five-factor gambling motivation scale. Illusion of control and expectancy were measured by subscales of lottery related cognitions adapted from Gambling Related Cognitions Scale. Problem Gambling Severity Index was adapted to access problem lottery playing. Data was analyzed by using SPSS 17.0 and MPLUS 7.0 which was specifically developed for assessing the complex models with the bias-corrected percentile Bootstrap method. The results of the study showed that fate control, avoidance motivation, illusion of control, expectancy were positively related to problem lottery playing; fate control was positively related to avoidance motivation, illusion of control, expectancy; avoidance motivation was positively related to illusion of control and expectancy. Structure equation modeling revealed significant prediction of fate control on avoidance motivation, illusion of control, expectancy and problem lottery playing. Avoidance motivation, illusion of control and expectancy mediated the relationship between fate control and problem lottery playing. Moreover, avoidance motivation could mediate the relationship among fate control, illusion of control and expectancy. The mediating effect contained five paths: the mediating effect of avoidance motivation, of illusion of control, and of expectancy, the serial mediating effect of avoidance motivation and the serial mediating effect of illusion of control, avoidance motivation and expectancy. The present study offers the following major contributions. First, we investigated the effects of fate control on avoidance motivation, illusion of control, expectancy and problem lottery playing, which support the negative side of fate control. Second, the present study explored the meaning maintenance mechanism of fate control on problem lottery playing by identifying the central role of avoidance motivation based on meaning maintenance model, which broadens the research perspectives of problem lottery playing. Third, this study revealed that general fate control belief could indirectly facilitate problem lottery playing through lottery- specific beliefs.
Key wordsproblem lottery playing    fate control    avoidance motivation    illusion of control    expectancy
收稿日期: 2017-09-08      出版日期: 2018-03-31
ZTFLH:     
  B849: F713.55  
基金资助: 国家社会科学基金项目(14BTY007)、教育部人文社会科学研究项目(14YJC890014)、华中师范大学基本科研业务费重大培育项目(CCNU14Z02013)资助。
通讯作者: 王斌, E-mail: bwang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn     E-mail: E-mail: bwang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
胡月, 王斌, 马红宇, 李改.  彩民命运控制与问题购彩的关系: 基于意义维持模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
HU Yue, WANG Bin, MA Hongyu, LI Gai.  Fate control and problem lottery playing: The perspective of meaning maintenance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00549      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I5/549
[1] 王健, 袁立伟, 张芷, 王诗忠.  视觉预期和注意指向对姿势和动作肌肉 预期和补偿姿势调节的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 920-927.
[2] 孙雨生;张智君;吴彬星. 上下文预期在快速场景识别中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 577-589.
[3] 程垦, 林英晖.  组织支持一致性与新生代员工离职意愿: 员工幸福感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1570-1580.
[4] 崔楠;徐岚;谢雯婷. 做会后悔还是不做会后悔?——自我调节模式对不作为惯性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 423-434.
[5] 李董平;周月月;赵力燕;王艳辉;孙文强. 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1519-1537.
[6] 纪丽燕;陈宁轩;丁锦红;魏萍. 奖赏预期调节局部注意干扰效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 721-733.
[7] 金艳;郑希付. 女性生理周期对条件性恐惧习得和消退的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1465-1471.
[8] 谢琳;王健;张芷;袁立伟;王楚婕. 姿势干扰强度的心理预期效应[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 951-959.
[9] 魏萍;康冠兰;丁锦红;郭春彦. 奖赏预期对面孔情绪加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 437-449.
[10] 吕超;莫雷;伍丽梅;陈琳;罗雪莹. 现实预期与意愿预期在文本阅读中的保持[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 27-35.
[11] 张芷;王健. 神经肌肉下意识前馈与反馈控制的知觉线索效应[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 50-57.
[12] 苏凇;陈荣;黄劲松. 不作为惰性的调节:基于“向前看”的多参照点视角[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(12): 1393-1409.
[13] 何先友;李惠娟;陈广耀;汪小伟. 情境模型中时间和空间维度更新的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(1): 23-34.
[14] 汪祚军,李纾. 对整合模型和占优启发式模型的检验:基于信息加工过程的眼动研究证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(2): 179-198.
[15] 陈晶,索涛,袁文萍,冯廷勇. 青少年结果预期与评价的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(02): 152-163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn